Skip to main content
  • ASM Journals
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Research and News from ASM Journals
    • mSphere of Influence: Commentaries from Early Career Microbiologists
    • Archive
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Getting Started
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mSphere
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • ASM Journals
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
mSphere
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Research and News from ASM Journals
    • mSphere of Influence: Commentaries from Early Career Microbiologists
    • Archive
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Getting Started
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mSphere
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
Research Article

Additional Feeding Reveals Differences in Immune Recognition and Growth of Plasmodium Parasites in the Mosquito Host

Hyeogsun Kwon, Maria L. Simões, Rebekah A. Reynolds, George Dimopoulos, Ryan C. Smith
Lars Hviid, Editor
Hyeogsun Kwon
aDepartment of Entomology, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maria L. Simões
bDepartment of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rebekah A. Reynolds
aDepartment of Entomology, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
George Dimopoulos
bDepartment of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for George Dimopoulos
Ryan C. Smith
aDepartment of Entomology, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ryan C. Smith
Lars Hviid
University of Copenhagen
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/mSphere.00136-21
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Supplemental Material
  • FIG 1
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 1

    Additional feeding differentially impacts rodent and human malaria parasite survival. Experimental overview of additional feeding experiments in A. gambiae (A). Following an initial infection (day 0) with Plasmodium berghei or Plasmodium falciparum (dark red circle), blood fed mosquitoes were maintained on sugar or were challenged with an additional blood (pink circle) or protein (blue circle) meal at either 4 or 8 days postinfection. The effects of each experimental condition on oocyst numbers were then evaluated at 8 or 10 days postinfection, respectively. The influence of an additional feeding on P. berghei oocyst numbers was examined on day 8 for mosquitoes receiving an additional blood (B) or protein meal (C) 4 days postinfection. Similar experiments were also performed with P. falciparum, where oocyst numbers were evaluated on day 8 in mosquitoes that received an additional blood or protein meal 4 days postinfection (D). Potential temporal effects of the timing of feeding on oocyst survival were also examined, where mosquitoes infected with P. berghei or P. falciparum were maintained on sugar or received an additional uninfected blood meal 8 days postinfection (E and F). Oocyst numbers were evaluated at 10 days postinfection for P. berghei (E) and P. falciparum (F). For all experiments, each dot represents the number of parasites on an individual midgut, with the median value denoted by a horizontal red line. Mosquito infection data were pooled from three or more independent experiments (B to D) or from two independent experiments (E and F). Statistical analysis was performed using nonparametric tests for individual comparisons (Mann-Whitney U) or multiple comparisons (Kruskal-Wallis with a Dunn’s multiple-comparison test) using GraphPad Prism 7 software. Asterisks denote significance (**, P < 0.01; ****, P < 0.0001). n, number of mosquitoes examined per group; ns, not significant.

  • FIG 2
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 2

    Additional protein or blood feeding similarly influence mosquito physiology. To examine the physiological impacts of additional feeding, P. berghei-infected mosquitoes (dark red circle) were challenged 4 days postinfection with an additional protein (blue circle) or blood meal (pink circle). Approximately 24 h after an additional feeding, samples were collected to examine the effects on the microbiome using bacterial 16S rRNA expression (A), vitellogenesis using vitellogenin (Vg) expression (B), and TEP1 expression as a proxy for the immune system (C). Gene expression was examined by reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (qRT-PCR) using either dissected midgut samples (A) or whole-mosquito samples (B and C) using three or more independent biological replicates. Statistical analysis was performed using Mann-Whitney analysis with GraphPad Prism 7 software. Asterisks denote significance (*, P < 0.05). ns, not significant.

  • FIG 3
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 3

    Mosquito feeding promotes the degradation of the midgut basal lamina. Using a fluorescein-labeled collagen hybridizing peptide (CHP) to detect degraded collagen, midgut basal lamina integrity was examined temporally at 3, 6, 18, 24, and 48 h following blood or protein feeding (A). Heat-treated midguts (70°C for 10 min in 1× phosphate-buffered saline [PBS]) were used as a positive (+) control sample. The CHP fluorescence signal was quantified with ImageJ for each sample, and used to determine the relative fluorescence at each time point following blood feeding (B) or protein feeding (C). CHP binding analysis was performed in three independent experiments under blood-fed conditions and in two independent experiments with protein feeding. For each time point, three or more midgut samples were examined by fluorescence microscopy with images analyzed using ImageJ. Relative fluorescence was calculated using the 0-h time point as the baseline measurement, then examined across multiple time points using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with a Holm-Sidak multiple-comparison test using GraphPad Prism 7 software. Asterisks denote significance (***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001).

  • FIG 4
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 4

    Additional feeding enables the recognition and killing of P. berghei oocysts by mosquito complement. Immunofluorescence assays were performed to examine TEP1 localization on developing oocysts when maintained on sugar or following an additional blood meal. P. berghei oocysts were identified by circumsporozoite protein (CSP) staining and residual signal from the mCherry-parasite background, enabling determination of the percentage of TEP1+ oocysts from both experimental conditions (A). Similar experiments were performed following P. falciparum infection (B). Additional feeding experiments were performed on either wild-type (WT) or mutant TEP1 (ΔTEP1) lines to confirm the involvement of mosquito complement in P. berghei oocyst recognition and killing (C). Oocyst numbers were evaluated 8 days postinfection. (D) Model for the role of mosquito complement via TEP1 recognition and killing of P. berghei oocysts. The percentage of TEP1+ oocysts for P. berghei and P. falciparum studies are displayed as the mean (+ standard error of the mean [SEM]) and analyzed by Mann-Whitney U test for direct comparison (**, P < 0.01; ****, P < 0.0001). Bar, 10 μm. n, number of mosquitoes examined; ns, not significant. For each figure, the feeding status is designated by a dark red circle demonstrating an initial P. berghei or P. falciparum parasite infection. Additional blood (pink circle) or protein (blue circle) meals at either 4 days postinfection are designated by their respective colors.

  • FIG 5
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 5

    Human malaria parasites utilize host resources provided by an additional feeding to enhance their growth. P. falciparum (A) or P. berghei (B) oocysts were examined at 8 days postinfection. The size of individual oocysts from mosquitoes maintained on sugar or that received an additional blood or protein meal were measured using ImageJ and compared by relative size across conditions. Representative images are shown on the right. Based on growth differences and supporting literature, we propose a model in which human malaria parasites are able to utilize host resources to increase growth and increase the chances of transmission (C). Oocyst measurements were performed in ImageJ using infected midgut micrographs with oocyst measurements in sugar-fed samples from two independent experiments serving as the baseline for relative comparisons using Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn’s multiple-comparison tests in GraphPad Prism 7 software. Asterisks denote significance (****, P < 0.0001). n, number of oocysts examined; ns, not significant. For each figure, the feeding status is designated by a dark red circle demonstrating an initial P. berghei or P. falciparum parasite infection. Additional blood (pink circle) or protein (blue circle) meals at either 4 days postinfection are designated by their respective colors.

Supplemental Material

  • Figures
  • FIG S1

    Experimental overview of additional feeding studies. Experimental overview of feeding experiments where Anopheles gambiae mosquitoes were initially challenged with Plasmodium berghei (A) or Plasmodium falciparum (B). They were then either maintained on sugar or received an additional uninfected blood or protein meal 4 days postinfection. For both panels A and B, oocyst numbers were examined at 8 days postinfection. Similar experiments were performed for both P. berghei or P. falciparum mosquitoes (C) in which an additional blood meal was provided at 8 days postinfection. Oocyst numbers were evaluated at 10 days postinfection. Download FIG S1, TIF file, 2.9 MB.

    Copyright © 2021 Kwon et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • TABLE S1

    Raw data for additional blood- and protein-feeding experiments. Download Table S1, XLSX file, 0.02 MB.

    Copyright © 2021 Kwon et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • FIG S2

    Low-melt agarose causes mortality in P. berghei-infected mosquitoes. P. berghei-infected mosquitoes were challenged with an additional meal of low-melt agarose at various concentrations (0.05, 0.1, and 0.2%) 4 days postinfection. After feeding, mosquitoes were maintained at 19°C, the standard temperature for P. berghei infection. Mosquito mortality was assessed at 24 h for each concentration of low-melt agarose. Each condition resulted in complete mortality of all of the mosquitoes that fed on the low-melt agarose. n, number of mosquitoes examined per treatment. Download FIG S2, TIF file, 0.08 MB.

    Copyright © 2021 Kwon et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • TABLE S2

    Raw data for P. berghei infection experiments with wild-type (WT) and TEP1 mutant lines. Download Table S2, XLSX file, 0.01 MB.

    Copyright © 2021 Kwon et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • TABLE S3

    Primers used for reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis. Download Table S3, DOCX file, 0.01 MB.

    Copyright © 2021 Kwon et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Additional Feeding Reveals Differences in Immune Recognition and Growth of Plasmodium Parasites in the Mosquito Host
Hyeogsun Kwon, Maria L. Simões, Rebekah A. Reynolds, George Dimopoulos, Ryan C. Smith
mSphere Mar 2021, 6 (2) e00136-21; DOI: 10.1128/mSphere.00136-21

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print
Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this mSphere article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Additional Feeding Reveals Differences in Immune Recognition and Growth of Plasmodium Parasites in the Mosquito Host
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from mSphere
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in mSphere.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Additional Feeding Reveals Differences in Immune Recognition and Growth of Plasmodium Parasites in the Mosquito Host
Hyeogsun Kwon, Maria L. Simões, Rebekah A. Reynolds, George Dimopoulos, Ryan C. Smith
mSphere Mar 2021, 6 (2) e00136-21; DOI: 10.1128/mSphere.00136-21
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

blood feeding
host-pathogen interactions
immune evasion
innate immunity
malaria
mosquito

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About mSphere
  • Board of Editors
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • Embargo Policy
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Warranty
  • Types of Articles
  • Getting Started
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #mSphereJ

@ASMicrobiology

       

 

Website feedback

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Online ISSN: 2379-5042