Skip to main content
  • ASM Journals
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Research and News from ASM Journals
    • mSphere of Influence: Commentaries from Early Career Microbiologists
    • Archive
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Getting Started
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mSphere
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • ASM Journals
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
mSphere
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Research and News from ASM Journals
    • mSphere of Influence: Commentaries from Early Career Microbiologists
    • Archive
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Getting Started
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mSphere
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
Research Article | Host-Microbe Biology

Acquisition of Host Cytosolic Protein by Toxoplasma gondii Bradyzoites

Geetha Kannan, Pariyamon Thaprawat, Tracey L. Schultz, Vern B. Carruthers
William J. Sullivan, Editor
Geetha Kannan
aDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pariyamon Thaprawat
aDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
bMedical Scientist Training Program, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tracey L. Schultz
aDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vern B. Carruthers
aDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Vern B. Carruthers
William J. Sullivan
Indiana University School of Medicine
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/mSphere.00934-20
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • FIG 1
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 1

    Ingestion of host cytosolic material by tachyzoites under bradyzoite-inducing conditions and doxycycline treatment. (A) Representative images of tachyzoites with ingested host cytosolic mCherry under bradyzoite-inducing conditions. Bar, 1 μm. (B) Ingestion of host cytosolic mCherry by T. gondii tachyzoites (Tz) under bradyzoite-inducing conditions. Three independent experiments were performed for each strain. The following parasites were enumerated for each experiment: ME49 for 4 h (280, 265, and 256 parasites), MΔcpl (304, 271, and 303), ME49 overnight (O/N) (199, 228, and 220), and MΔcpl overnight (236, 195, and 287). An unpaired t test was performed to compare genotypes within each time point. * denotes a P value of <0.05, and ** denotes a P value of <0.005. (C) Ingestion of host cytosolic mCherry by T. gondii tachyzoites under CHO cell culture conditions. Three or five independent experiments were performed. The following parasites were enumerated for each experiment: ME49 for 4 h (281, 227, 259, 244, and 262 parasites), MΔcpl (163, 228, 263, 283, and 272), ME49 overnight (194, 180, 220, 340, 293, and 529), and MΔcpl overnight (218, 295, 231, 328, 238, and 322). A Mann-Whitney U test was performed to compare genotypes within each time point. * denotes a P value of <0.05, and ** denotes a P value of <0.005. (D) Ingestion of host cytosolic mCherry by T. gondii tachyzoites after doxycycline treatment. Four independent experiments were performed. The following parasites were enumerated for each experiment: ME49 −DOX (318, 271, 258, and 210 parasites), MΔcpl −DOX (214, 277, 230, and 292), ME49 +DOX (226, 338, 248, and 206), and MΔcpl +DOX (324, 235, 222, and 266). An unpaired t test was performed to compare strains within each treatment. ** denotes a P value of <0.005, and *** denotes a P value of <0.0005.

  • FIG 2
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 2

    Bradyzoites can ingest host-derived mCherry. (A) Representative fields of view of bradyzoites with ingested host cytosolic mCherry. Bar, 10 μm. White arrowheads point to bradyzoites containing host-derived mCherry. (B) Bradyzoites (Bz) from mouse brain cysts can ingest host cytosolic mCherry. Three to six independent experiments were performed. The following parasites were enumerated for each experiment: ME49 with DMSO for 4 h (236, 210, and 277 parasites), ME49 with LHVS for 4 h (10 μM) (255, 299, and 245), ME49 with DMSO overnight (O/N) (282, 229, 217, 245, 228, and 245), and ME49 with LHVS (3 μM) overnight (266, 394, 234, 245, 202, and 217). An unpaired t test was performed to compare treatments within each time point. ** denotes a P value of <0.005, and **** denotes a P value of <0.0001. (C) Ingestion of host cytosolic mCherry by in vitro bradyzoites. Three to five independent experiments were performed. The following GFP+ parasites were enumerated for each experiment: Pru with DMSO for 4 h (365, 231, and 214 parasites), Pru with LHVS for 4 h (1 μM) (213, 238, and 175), Pru with DMSO overnight (231, 189, 154, 212, and 231), and Pru with LHVS (1 μM) overnight (318, 245, 213, 200, and 242). An unpaired t test was performed to compare treatments within each time point. ** denotes a P value of <0.005, and *** denotes a P value of <0.0005.

  • FIG 3
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 3

    In vitro bradyzoite cysts contain host-derived mCherry. (A) Ingestion of host cytosolic mCherry by T. gondii in vitro bradyzoites (Bz) converted in iCHO cells for 12 days and treated with LHVS for 2 days. BAG1+ stained parasites were enumerated. Four to five independent experiments were performed for each strain and treatment. The following parasites were enumerated for each experiment: ME49 with DMSO (262, 342, 272, 237, and 272 parasites), ME49 with LHVS (231, 195, 328, and 231), and MΔcpl (95, 254, 282, 135, and 251). A Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare groups. * denotes a P value of <0.05, and ** denotes a P value of <0.005. NS, not significant. (B) Ingestion of host cytosolic mCherry by T. gondii in vitro bradyzoites converted in iCHO cells for 12 days and treated with LHVS for 2 days. GFP+ parasites were enumerated. Four independent experiments were performed for each strain and treatment. The following parasites were enumerated for each experiment: Pru with DMSO (85, 277, 264, and 298 parasites), Pru with LHVS (209, 215, 223, and 317), and PΔcpl (270, 432, 232, and 276). An unpaired t test was used to compare all groups. * denotes a P value of <0.05, and ** denotes a P value of <0.005. (C) Ingestion of host cytosolic mCherry by T. gondii in vitro bradyzoites converted in iCHO cells for 8 days and treated with LHVS for 2 days. GFP+ parasites were enumerated. Three independent experiments were performed for each strain and treatment. The following parasites were enumerated for each experiment: Pru with DMSO (270, 210, and 209 parasites), Pru with LHVS (357, 227, and 209), and PΔcpl (464, 198, and 224). An unpaired t test was used to compare all groups. * denotes a P value of <0.05, and ** denotes a P value of <0.005. (D) Ingestion of host cytosolic mCherry by T. gondii in vitro bradyzoites converted in HFFs for 7 days, harvested, and then converted in iCHO cells for 3 days with 1 μM LHVS for 2 days. BAG1+ ME49 and GFP+ Pru bradyzoites were enumerated. Three independent experiments were performed for each strain and treatment. The following parasites were enumerated for each experiment: ME49 with DMSO (234, 97, and 205 parasites), ME49 with LHVS (281, 112, and 220), Pru with DMSO (230, 144, and 156), and Pru with LHVS (212, 186, and 209). (E) Schematic of the experimental design for panel D. (F) Representative LHVS-treated bradyzoites from panel D. The bradyzoite marker is BAG1 for ME49 and LDH2 promoter-driven expression of GFP for Pru. Bar, 1 μm. (G) Representative images of intracellular ME49 and Pru cysts at 24 h postinfection. Bars, 5 μm. (H) Percentage of dolichos-positive vacuoles at 24 and 48 h postinfection. The total numbers of GRA7 vacuoles counted are listed in parentheses. Data are from one biological replicate.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Acquisition of Host Cytosolic Protein by Toxoplasma gondii Bradyzoites
Geetha Kannan, Pariyamon Thaprawat, Tracey L. Schultz, Vern B. Carruthers
mSphere Jan 2021, 6 (1) e00934-20; DOI: 10.1128/mSphere.00934-20

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print
Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this mSphere article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Acquisition of Host Cytosolic Protein by Toxoplasma gondii Bradyzoites
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from mSphere
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in mSphere.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Acquisition of Host Cytosolic Protein by Toxoplasma gondii Bradyzoites
Geetha Kannan, Pariyamon Thaprawat, Tracey L. Schultz, Vern B. Carruthers
mSphere Jan 2021, 6 (1) e00934-20; DOI: 10.1128/mSphere.00934-20
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

chronic infection
endocytosis
parasite
protease

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About mSphere
  • Board of Editors
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • Embargo Policy
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Warranty
  • Types of Articles
  • Getting Started
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #mSphereJ

@ASMicrobiology

       

 

Website feedback

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Online ISSN: 2379-5042