Skip to main content
  • ASM Journals
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Research and News from ASM Journals
    • mSphere of Influence: Commentaries from Early Career Microbiologists
    • Archive
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Getting Started
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mSphere
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • ASM Journals
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
mSphere
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Research and News from ASM Journals
    • mSphere of Influence: Commentaries from Early Career Microbiologists
    • Archive
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Getting Started
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mSphere
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
Research Article | Clinical Science and Epidemiology

Clinical and Molecular Epidemiology of an Emerging Panton-Valentine Leukocidin-Positive ST5 Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Clone in Northern Australia

Sarah L. McGuinness, Deborah C. Holt, Tegan M. Harris, Connor Wright, Rob Baird, Phillip M. Giffard, Asha C. Bowen, Steven Y. C. Tong
Paul D. Fey, Editor
Sarah L. McGuinness
aDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Royal Darwin Hospital, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia
bDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
cDepartment of Infectious Diseases, The Alfred Hospital and Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Sarah L. McGuinness
Deborah C. Holt
dGlobal and Tropical Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia
fCollege of Health and Human Sciences, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tegan M. Harris
dGlobal and Tropical Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Tegan M. Harris
Connor Wright
aDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Royal Darwin Hospital, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rob Baird
eMicrobiology, Territory Pathology, Royal Darwin Hospital, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Phillip M. Giffard
dGlobal and Tropical Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia
fCollege of Health and Human Sciences, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Asha C. Bowen
dGlobal and Tropical Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia
gPerth Children’s Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
hWesfarmers Centre for Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kids Institute, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
iSchool of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Steven Y. C. Tong
dGlobal and Tropical Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia
jVictorian Infectious Disease Service, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
kDoherty Department, University of Melbourne, at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Victoria, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Steven Y. C. Tong
Paul D. Fey
University of Nebraska Medical Center
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/mSphere.00651-20
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Recently, we identified a Staphylococcus aureus sequence type 5 (ST5) clone in northern Australia with discrepant trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SXT) susceptibility results. We aimed to identify isolates of this clone using Vitek 2 SXT resistance as a proxy and to compare its epidemiology with those of other circulating S. aureus strains. We collated Vitek 2 susceptibility data for S. aureus isolates collected through our laboratory and conducted a prospective, case-control study comparing clinical, microbiological, epidemiological, and genomic data for subsets of isolates reported as SXT resistant (cases) and SXT susceptible (controls) by Vitek 2. While overall SXT resistance rates remained relatively stable from 2011 to 2018 among 27,721 S. aureus isolates, non-multidrug-resistant methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) strains almost completely replaced multidrug-resistant MRSA strains as the predominant SXT-resistant MRSA phenotype. Demographic and clinical features of 51 case-control pairs were similar, but genotyping revealed stark differences: clonal complex 5 (CC5) MRSA predominated among SXT-resistant cases (34/51 [67%]), while CC93 MRSA predominated among susceptible controls (26/51 [51%]). All CC5 isolates were an ST5 clonal lineage that possessed the trimethoprim resistance gene dfrG within SCCmec IVo; all were SXT susceptible by Etest. The replacement of Vitek 2 reported SXT-resistant multidrug-resistant MRSA by non-multidrug-resistant MRSA appears related to the emergence of an ST5-MRSA-SCCmec IVo clone that is SXT susceptible by Etest and causes clinical disease similar to that caused by ST93-MRSA-SCCmec IVa. Reliance on Vitek 2 SXT reporting may lead to unnecessary restriction of effective oral treatment options for S. aureus infections. Whether the presence of dfrG within SCCmec IVo provides a selective advantage at the population level is currently unclear.

IMPORTANCE Staphylococcus aureus is an important human pathogen that causes a wide range of clinical infections. In the past 2 decades, an epidemic of community-associated skin and soft tissue infections has been driven by S. aureus strains with specific virulence factors and resistance to beta-lactam antibiotics. Recently, an S. aureus strain with discrepant antimicrobial susceptibility testing results has emerged in northern Australia. This ST5-MRSA-SCCmec IVo clone is reported as resistant to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole by Vitek 2 but susceptible by phenotypic methods. ST5-MRSA-SCCmec IVo is now the second most common community-associated MRSA clone in parts of Australia and causes a spectrum of clinical disease similar to that caused by the virulent ST93-MRSA lineage. Whole-genome sequence analysis demonstrates that ST5-MRSA-SCCmecIVo is causing a clonal outbreak across a large geographical region. Although phenotypic testing suggests in vitro susceptibility to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, it is unclear at this stage whether the presence of dfrG within SCCmec IVo provides a selective advantage at the population level.

INTRODUCTION

Staphylococcus aureus is a leading cause of skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs), osteoarticular infections, bacteremia, infective endocarditis, and device-related infections worldwide. These infections are associated with considerable morbidity and mortality (1, 2). In the Western Pacific region (which includes Australia), there is a strikingly disproportionate burden of S. aureus disease in Indigenous communities (2, 3).

S. aureus is well recognized for its ability to develop antibiotic resistance: methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) rapidly appeared in hospitals after the introduction of methicillin and has emerged as a widespread cause of community infections (4, 5). Over the past 2 decades, an epidemic of SSTIs has arisen in community settings, principally driven by MRSA clones with specific virulence factors (2–4, 6). In North America, USA300 is overwhelmingly dominant, whereas the virulent sequence type 93 (ST93) MRSA clone (Queensland clone) has emerged as the leader in Australia (2, 7, 8). These community MRSA clones typically have a non-multidrug-resistant MRSA (nmMRSA) antimicrobial susceptibility profile, and non-beta-lactam agents are used to treat these infections (5).

Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SXT) is a broad-spectrum, combination sulfonamide antibiotic available in oral and intravenous formulations (9). SXT has activity against many community MRSA clones and is increasingly being recommended for the treatment of SSTIs in adults and children (10, 11). Following a recent randomized controlled trial (RCT) in which short-course SXT was demonstrated to be noninferior to intramuscular benzathine penicillin G in the treatment of impetigo (12), SXT has been recommended for (13) and adopted into (11, 14, 15) treatment guidelines. The emergence of SXT resistance in S. aureus would therefore have significant implications for prescribing guidelines and practice.

A recent 20-year (1993 to 2012) study of community S. aureus isolates in the Northern Territory (NT) of Australia demonstrated an increase in SXT resistance from 2010 to 2012, albeit at low rates (<2%) (3). In investigating presumed SXT-resistant strains recovered during the impetigo treatment RCT (12), a surprising discrepancy was found in antimicrobial susceptibility testing results for SXT as determined by different methodologies among 19 isolates from 8 of 508 children in the trial (16). The discrepant isolates tested resistant to SXT by Vitek 2 but susceptible by Etest (with further confirmation of SXT susceptibility with broth microdilution for 2 isolates). These isolates were a clonal Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL)-positive ST5-MRSA lineage (16). Notably, the emergence of a trimethoprim-resistant PVL-positive ST5-MRSA clone (WA121 MRSA) in the neighboring state of Western Australia (WA) has also been observed (17).

We therefore aimed to identify further isolates of this clone among infections in individuals presenting to a tertiary care center, using SXT resistance by Vitek 2 as a proxy for the clone. We had a particular focus on providing a more detailed clinical and molecular description of the lineage in comparison to other circulating S. aureus strains.

RESULTS

Changes in S. aureus resistance over time.Of 27,721 S. aureus isolates collected from 2011 to 2018, 2251 (8.1%) were reported as SXT resistant by Vitek 2. Reported SXT resistance rates fluctuated over time but did not substantially change between 2011 and 2018 (7% in 2011 versus 8% in 2018 [P = 0.12 for trend over time]) (Fig. 1A). However, SXT resistance due to mMRSA substantially decreased over time, with mMRSA isolates making up 81% of SXT-resistant isolates in 2011 versus 11% in 2018 (P < 0.001 for trend over time). In contrast, SXT resistance due to nmMRSA substantially increased over time (3% of isolates in 2011 versus 67% in 2018 [P < 0.001]), with nmMRSA replacing mMRSA as the dominant phenotype among SXT-resistant isolates. Among all 27,721 isolates, the proportion of S. aureus isolates that were MRSA (including nmMRSA) increased over time, making up 33% of isolates in 2011 versus 35% of isolates in 2018 (P = 0.001). Again, this increase was attributable to an increase in the frequency of nmMRSA isolates, which made up 25% of all isolates in 2011 but increased to account for 33% of S. aureus isolates by 2018 (P < 0.001 for trend over time) (Fig. 1B).

FIG 1
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1

Proportion of 27,721 S. aureus isolates reported as SXT resistant by Vitek 2 by year (2011 to 2018), stratified by type (A) and proportion of 27,721 S. aureus isolates reported as MSSA, nmMRSA, and mMRSA by year (2011 to 2018) (B). SXT, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole; nmMRSA, non-multidrug-resistant MRSA; mMRSA, multidrug-resistant MRSA; MSSA, methicillin-susceptible S. aureus.

Case-control study.We collected 51 case-control isolate pairs over a 6-month period in 2015. Demographic and clinical features of cases and controls were similar; most infections (88/102 [86%]) were SSTIs, and hospital admission (76/102 [75%]) and operative surgical drainage (45/102 [44%]) were common (Table 1). Of the 102 isolates collected, 76 were nmMRSA (74.5%) and 76 harbored the lukSF-PV genes encoding PVL (74.5%). Genotyping revealed clear differences among the nmMRSA isolates in the case and control groups (Fig. 2). Within the case isolates, 89% of the nmMRSA (34/38) belonged to a subset of clonal complex 5 (CC5) that includes ST5 (CC5/ST5), while CC93 predominated among nmMRSA in the control group (26/38 [68%]). All of the 34 CC5/ST5 case isolates were positive for mecA, and all but 1 were positive for PVL. All CC93 control isolates were positive for mecA and PVL. Genotyping results for all isolates are available in Data Set S1 in the supplemental material.

FIG 2
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 2

Genotyping results for S. aureus isolates among cases and controls. CC, clonal complex; ST, sequence type. Full genotyping results are available in Data Set S1.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
TABLE 1

Demographics and clinical features of infections caused by SXT-resistant (case) and SXT-susceptible (control) isolatesa

DATA SET S1

Clinical and genotyping information for case and control isolates. Download Data Set S1, XLSX file, 0.02 MB.
Copyright © 2021 McGuinness et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

We compared the epidemiological and clinical features of CC5 (n = 34) and CC93 (n = 26) isolates (Table 2). Most CC5 infections were community onset (30/34 [88%]), as were CC93 infections (22/26 [85%] [P = 0.72]). Most CC5 and CC93 isolates were recovered from patients living in remote communities (20/24 [59%] and 11/26 [46%], respectively [P = 0.30]) and from Indigenous patients (25/34 [74%] and 15/26 [58%], respectively [P = 0.27]). Clinical features were similar, with SSTIs predominating (88% in both groups). Abscess was the most common SSTI presentation, seen in 16/34 (47%) of those with CC5 isolates and 15/26 (58%) of those with CC93 isolates (P = 0.45). The majority of surgical procedures were for incision and drainage of abscesses and/or debridement of wounds. Patients with CC93 isolates were more likely to require surgical management in an operating theater (17/26 [65%]) than patients with CC5 isolates (12/34 [35%] [P = 0.02]). Patients with CC93 isolates were also more likely to be admitted to the hospital (24/26 [96%]) than those with CC5 isolates (22/34 [65%], P = 0.02), but hospital lengths of stay were similar in the two groups. Three patients with CC93 isolates (12%) were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), compared to no patients (0%) with CC5 isolates (P = 0.08), but two of the three admissions were for unrelated reasons (both cases of head trauma with either subarachnoid or subdural hemorrhage). Two patients with CC5 isolates had received treatment courses of SXT within the 6 months prior to S. aureus isolation, compared to one patient with a CC93 isolate. Readmission rates were low, and only one patient died within 90 days of S. aureus isolation; this was a 62-year-old man who was admitted following head trauma and died within 7 days of admission because of a subarachnoid hemorrhage. S. aureus was isolated from sputum and considered a colonizing organism.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
TABLE 2

Demographics and clinical features of infections caused by CC5 (including ST5) versus CC93 isolates

The geographical distribution of ST5 and CC93 MRSA isolates was mapped according to residential location at time of admission (Fig. 3).

FIG 3
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 3

Map of distribution of ST5 and CC93 MRSA isolates. The greater Darwin area includes Darwin City, Palmerston City, and Litchfield Council areas, Belyuen and Coomalie Community Council areas, and the Tiwi Islands.

We conducted whole-genome sequence analysis of CC5/ST5 isolates. Genomic analysis demonstrated that all 34 CC5 isolates were ST5 and possessed SCCmec Ivo (16), which is closely related to SCCmec IVc in S. aureus strain TCH60. One hundred percent of the TCH60 SCCmec IVc can be aligned with SCCmec IVo, with a nucleotide identity of >98%. SCCmec IVo differs from the TCH60 SCCmec IVc by the insertion of a putative dfrG mobile genetic element upstream of IS431 (Fig. 4). This putative insertion element of 3,276 bp encompasses dfrG and two other open reading frames (ORFs) and is 100% identical to a sequence recovered from a clone in a genomic library of trimethoprim-resistant S. aureus isolate CM.S2 (GenBank accession no. AB205645.1) (18). Based on sequence identity, it was proposed that the CM-S2 dfrG may have been acquired by insertion sequence-mediated recombination from Enterococcus faecium (18). A search for potential markers of resistance to sulfamethoxazole across the genome demonstrated the absence of acquired sulfonamide resistance genes sulI, sulII, and sulIII. No nonsynonymous mutations in the chromosomal dihydropteroate synthase gene folP were observed in a comparison with an SXT-susceptible isolate (SST2096_S1A_SA1) (16). A maximum-parsimony phylogenomic tree was generated from 2,418 biallelic orthologous single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) identified by the alignment of the ST5 isolates to Mu50 (NCBI reference sequence NC_002758.2 [GenBank accession no. NC_002758]). Isolates from a previous study which reported a circulating trimethoprim-resistant ST5 clone harboring SCCmec IVo from a similar region of Australia were also included for comparison; these isolates were collected between 2011 and 2013 (16). The ST5 isolates recovered in this study clustered closely with the trimethoprim-resistant ST5 isolates from the previous study, with a maximum of 65 SNPs separating any two isolates in this clade (Fig. 5). Resampling of the tree demonstrated 100% support for the major branches, including the clade clustering the trimethoprim-resistant ST5 isolates. Consistent with the previous report, the ST5 isolates recovered in this study were SXT susceptible by Etest, despite being reported as SXT resistant by Vitek 2 (Fig. 5).

FIG 4
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 4

Structure of SCCmec IVo. SCCmec IVo is defined as SCCmec IVc harboring a putative mobile genetic element containing dfrG and two additional open reading frames (ORFU1 and ORFU2) encoding hypothetical proteins (18), inserted upstream of IS431. The direct repeats (DR) and left and right inverted repeats (IRL and IRR, respectively) of the putative dfrG mobile genetic element are indicated.

FIG 5
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 5

Phylogenomic analysis of ST5 isolates. Shown is a maximum-parsimony tree rooted on Mu50 of ST5 genome sequences based on 2,148 biallelic single nucleotide polymorphisms located in regions orthologous to all genomes (consistency index = 0.9581). Genome sequences included were those of 34 ST5 isolates from this study (indicated with the prefix “CASE_”), 24 ST5 isolates from a recent study of trimethoprim resistance in the same region (BioProject no. PRJNA312422) (16), and 5 publicly available ST5 isolates (ED98 [GenBank accession no. [NC_013450], ECT-R 2 [NC_017343], N315 [NC_002745], Mu3 [NC_009782], and Mu50 (NCBI reference sequence NC_002758.2; GenBank accession no. [NC_002758]). Synthetic short-read data (designated Mu50) generated from the Mu50 reference genome assembly (designated Mu50_R) were also included as an internal control for the alignment. The tree is available in Newick format in Text S1. Gray blocks to the right indicate the presence of mecA, lukF/S (PVL), dfrG, and SCCmec. Vitek 2 SXT MICs are reported as the sum of the trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole MICs which are present in a ratio of 1:19, with a resistance breakpoint of ≥80 mg/liter (29). Etest SXT MICs are reported as the trimethoprim MIC, with a resistance breakpoint of >4 μg/ml (38). Scale represents 50 SNPs.

TEXT S1

Maximum-parsimony tree Newick format. Download TEXT S1, TXT file, 0.01 MB.
Copyright © 2021 McGuinness et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

DISCUSSION

Between 2011 and 2018, rates of Vitek 2 reporting of SXT resistance among S. aureus isolates were relatively stable; however, nmMRSA S. aureus strains almost completely replaced mMRSA strains as the predominant MRSA phenotype among SXT-resistant isolates. This phenomenon was driven by the emergence of a single ST5-MRSA-SCCmec IVo clone which possesses the trimethoprim resistance gene dfrG but does not harbor any acquired genes or mutations that potentially confer sulfamethoxazole resistance. Whole-genome sequence analysis demonstrated that ST5-MRSA-SCCmec IVo is causing a clonal outbreak across a large geographical region. Although additional phenotypic testing suggests in vitro susceptibility to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, it is unclear at this stage whether the presence of dfrG within SCCmec IVo provides a selective advantage at the population level. This ST5-MRSA-SCCmec IVo clone is now the second most common community-associated MRSA strain in parts of Australia and causes a spectrum of clinical disease similar to that caused by the virulent ST93-MRSA lineage. Globally, dfrG is the most common trimethoprim resistance gene found in S. aureus, and it is typically located in mobile genetic elements (such as SCCmec) which can be transferred between bacteria (19, 20).

Discrepant SXT resistance reporting between Vitek 2 and Etest has recently been reported for S. aureus isolates from a previous study from our region (16). In that study, the discrepancy between Vitek 2 and Etest results was replicated in a second reference laboratory, with SXT susceptibility confirmed using Sensititre broth microdilution. The discovery of discrepant SXT susceptibility testing is concerning, as laboratories routinely reporting antimicrobial susceptibility for S. aureus using Vitek 2 results may be overcalling SXT resistance and this may translate to unnecessary restriction of effective oral treatment options for patients with S. aureus infections. Discrepancies in results by different testing methodologies are well recognized in laboratory practice. In light of the findings presented here and in a previous publication (16), the Royal Darwin Hospital (RDH) laboratory has made SXT Etest available on clinical request. Similarly, the major pathology provider for community clinics in the Northern Territory has amended protocols to include performing disc diffusion testing on all S. aureus isolates that test SXT resistant by Vitek 2. These are then reported as susceptible if found to be so on disc diffusion.

The majority of ST5 isolates investigated in our study were imported from the community into the hospital, and the infections typically occurred in Indigenous patients from remote communities. The disease caused by this clone is similar to that caused by other virulent PVL+ MRSA clones, such as ST93 (7, 21). Mapping of the location of disease onset (Fig. 3) suggests a greater relative prevalence of ST5 in the western regions of NT bordering WA than in the east of the NT. This is consistent with the reported emergence of a PVL+ ST5 clone (ST5-IV [2B]/WA 121) in northern WA, primarily among young Indigenous patients (17). The spread of ST93-MRSA from Indigenous communities in northwestern Australia to major population centers on the Australian east coast and subsequently overseas should serve as a salutary warning (8). Prospective surveillance of this ST5 lineage and appropriate community-based antimicrobial stewardship and infection control strategies will likely be important in containing its spread.

Other studies have shown that ST93 isolates are frequently methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA), whereas in this study all CC93 isolates were MRSA. This seeming inconsistency may be a consequence of the study design, in which cases and controls were matched with respect to MRSA/MSSA status, allowing MSSA CC93 to remain undetected in the very shallow sampling of the large number of diverse SXT-susceptible MSSA organisms isolated at RDH during the study period.

SXT use in northern Australia is almost certainly increasing, particularly in light of recent guidelines recommending the use of SXT for both impetigo and SSTIs (11, 14, 15). However, the role of increasing SXT prescriptions in the emergence and spread of either trimethoprim-resistant or SXT-resistant S. aureus is currently unclear. A time series analysis conducted in the United States did not demonstrate significant changes in SXT susceptibility rates despite increasing SXT prescriptions over time (9); however, these results may not be directly applicable to our setting, as the global epidemiology of S. aureus is heterogeneous and there are important geographical differences in predominant clones between the United States and Australia (5). Notably, SXT resistance is frequent in Africa, where SXT is commonly prescribed and SXT prophylaxis is used in HIV-infected individuals (22–25).

It is presently unclear whether the use of SXT will select SXT or trimethoprim resistance, and work is needed to elucidate this. In addition, further investigation into the role of increasing SXT prescriptions in SXT and trimethoprim resistance rates is required. Pilot surveillance of antimicrobial resistance rates and patterns and use of antimicrobial agents has commenced across the north of remote Australia to develop robust mechanisms for such surveillance (26). Targeted antimicrobial stewardship is a priority in the context of SSTIs dominated by nmMRSA to preserve effective oral antibiotic treatments. Although our prospective study is restricted to a hospital setting and limited by small numbers, it contributes an important understanding to the rapidly changing epidemiology of S. aureus in northern Australia, with implications for community-based treatment algorithms for SSTIs.

Our findings highlight the growing importance of genomic analysis in the investigation of emerging resistance trends. The absence of known acquired genes or mutations potentially conferring sulfamethoxazole resistance in genomic analysis of ST5 isolates prompted further phenotypic resistance testing. The discrepancy between Vitek 2 and SXT Etest results is consistent with that reported previously (16) and with the genomic analyses. The underlying reasons for the discrepancy between the Vitek 2 AST-P612 card and phenotypic Etest are not clear, and the issue was referred to bioMerieux for internal assessment. We note that when reference methods are compared there can be major variations in results between methods (27). Communications with bioMerieux indicate that although the discrepancy was confirmed when comparing the AST-P612 card with agar dilution as the reference, the discrepancy was not apparent when comparing the updated AST-P656 card with broth microdilution as the reference. As many laboratories are moving to the AST-P656 card, bioMerieux has stated that additional phenotypic testing is not required.

In conclusion, the almost complete replacement of mMRSA strains by nmMRSA strains as the predominant MRSA phenotype among Vitek 2-reported SXT-resistant isolates appears to be driven by the emergence of a trimethoprim-resistant ST5-MRSA-SCCmec IVo clone that is SXT susceptible by Etest. This clone, which has already been shown to be causing infections in the community setting (12), is now causing infections in patients presenting to hospitals and appears to cause clinical disease similar to that caused by the virulent ST93-MRSA-SCCmec IVa clone. In the context of increasing nmMRSA rates, empirical therapy for severe staphylococcal infections in our setting should clearly include non-beta-lactam agents that target MRSA. To date, SXT has been the preferred oral choice or step-down from intravenous therapy, but misleading SXT resistance reporting may deter clinicians from this option and lead to unnecessary restriction of effective oral treatment options for patients with S. aureus infections. Monitoring of clinical responses to treatment with SXT is recommended given some ongoing uncertainty regarding phenotypic SXT susceptibility testing.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Design and setting.The Royal Darwin Hospital (RDH) is a 350-bed tertiary referral center that serves a population of 170,000 over an area of approximately 500,000 km2 (28). RDH is the only tertiary referral hospital in the NT, a vast, sparsely populated territory of Australia that lies between the states of Queensland to the east and WA to the west. Indigenous Australians make up 27% of the regional population but comprise >50% of the RDH inpatient and emergency department population (28).

Using the RDH microbiology database, we collated antimicrobial susceptibility data for clinical S. aureus isolates from 2011 to 2018. Additionally, we conducted a prospective case-control study from March to August of 2015 that compared infections determined by Vitek 2 as SXT-resistant (case) and SXT-susceptible (control) S. aureus isolates. We identified S. aureus isolates using standard methods and performed antimicrobial susceptibility testing on the Vitek 2 platform (bioMerieux, France) using CLSI breakpoints (the CLSI SXT resistance breakpoint is ≥4/76 μg/ml) (29). Case isolates were consecutive S. aureus isolates resistant to SXT by Vitek 2. We matched case isolates 1:1 to the next eligible SXT-susceptible isolate (control) with the same oxacillin susceptibility profile (e.g., SXT-resistant MRSA matched to next SXT-susceptible MRSA). We defined isolates susceptible to oxacillin as methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA); isolates resistant to oxacillin and to <3 additional non-beta-lactam antibiotics were defined as nmMRSA (21). In our setting, the majority of isolates with a multidrug-resistant phenotype (mMRSA, those resistant to oxacillin and ≥3 additional non-beta-lactam agents) have previously been noted to be typically ST239, a hospital-adapted clone present in Australia for >20 years that is predictably resistant to SXT (30). As our interest was in emerging clones among MSSA and nmMRSA isolates, we excluded mMRSA isolates from the case-control study.

Genotyping and genomic analysis.Case and control isolates were genotyped using a previously described high-resolution melting technique (31), and PCR assays to detect the nuc, mecA, and lukSF-PV genes were performed (32). All isolates identified as belonging to clonal complex 5 (CC5), including ST5, were whole-genome sequenced on the Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform (Australian Genome Research Facility, Melbourne, Australia). Sequence quality was assessed using FastQC. Twelve additional isolates with poor or ambiguous genotyping results were also genome sequenced and subjected to in silico multilocus sequence typing (MLST). None of these isolates were determined to be ST5 isolates (Data Set S1), so no further genomic analysis was conducted. In silico MLST and identification of mecA, lukSF-PV, SCCmec IVo, and genes known to be associated with SXT resistance were performed using ARIBA v2.9.4 (33). To facilitate this, manually curated databases were created (mecA, mecR1, mecI [Mu50 genome, NCBI reference sequence NC_002758.2; GenBank accession no. NC_002758], lukSF-PV [TCH60 genome; GenBank accession no. CP002110.1], SCCmec IVo, folP [SST2096 genome; BioSample no. SAMN07460127], sulI [GenBank accession no. AF071413], sulII [GenBank accession no. EU360945], sulIII [GenBank accession no. HQ875016], dfrG [GenBank accession no. AB205645], and S. aureus PubMLST database [downloaded 7 August 2018]). Comparison of the SCCmec IVo region with the SCCmec IVc region of isolate TCH60 (GenBank accession no. CP002110.1) was performed using BLASTn. Short-read data of the 34 ST5 isolates from this study were aligned with Mu50 (NCBI reference sequence NC_002758.2; GenBank accession no. NC_002758) (34) to identify core single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and insertion/deletions (indels) using SPANDx v3.2.1 (35). Short-read data of 24 ST5 isolates from a recent study of trimethoprim resistance in the same region (BioProject accession PRJNA312422) (16) and synthetic short-read data generated using ART (36) for four additional publicly available ST5 isolates (ED98 [GenBank accession no. NC_013450], ECT-R 2 [NC_017343], N315 [NC_002745], and Mu3 [NC_009782]) were also included in this analysis. As an internal control of the alignment, synthetic short-read data (designated Mu50) generated from the Mu50 reference genome assembly (designated Mu50_R) was also included. A maximum-parsimony tree was built using PAUP v4.0a150 (37) and visualized using FigTree (http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/). Resampling of the tree with 1000 replicates was conducted.

Additional antimicrobial sensitivity testing.We determined SXT MICs using Etest (bioMerieux) for ST5 isolates. Isolates were cultured on horse blood agar (HBA; Oxoid, United Kingdom) for 18 h at 37°C with 5% CO2. Suspensions (0.5 McFarland in 0.85% physiological saline) were lawn inoculated onto Mueller-Hinton (MH) agar (Oxoid) and incubated at 35°C for 18 h. Etest SXT MICs were reported as the trimethoprim MICs in micrograms per milliliter as per manufacturer’s instructions (the EUCAST trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole resistance breakpoint is >4/76 μg/ml) (38).

Clinical data collection.We extracted demographic and epidemiological data from RDH records. Extracted data included ethnicity, residential location at time of admission, underlying conditions (diabetes mellitus, hazardous alcohol consumption, intravenous drug use, renal replacement therapy, and scabies), admission and discharge details, clinical focus of infection, antibiotic therapy, and the number and type of surgical procedures. We also extracted information on health care-associated risk factors, including the presence of a permanent indwelling catheter or percutaneous medical device (e.g., Foley catheter), hospitalization, surgery, dialysis, isolation of MRSA within the past 12 months, and residence in a long-term-care facility. The following outcomes were recorded at days 7, 30, and 90 after isolation of S. aureus: hospitalization, readmission, and death. Colonization was defined as a positive culture for S. aureus at any site in a patient with no symptoms or biochemical indicators of infection and who did not require treatment. We defined recent SXT exposure as a completed or partially completed treatment course of SXT within the last 6 months as documented in the RDH electronic prescription database, which includes inpatient and outpatient prescription records. Hazardous alcohol consumption was defined as per “harmful” drinking in Australian guidelines (39). S. aureus infection was defined as community onset if isolation occurred within the first 48 h of presentation to the hospital. Using the residential location at time of admission, we mapped the distribution of CC5 and CC93 clones across a map of the NT.

Statistical analysis.We analyzed dichotomous variables using chi-squared or Fisher’s exact test and performed univariate conditional logistic regression to compare demographic and clinical features between case and control groups and looked for risk factors associated with Vitek 2-determined SXT resistance. We obtained a chi-square statistic for the trend of drug resistance rates over time. Two-sided P values of <0.05 were considered significant. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata 14 (StataCorp, TX).

Ethics statement.Ethics approval was granted by the Human Research Ethics Committee of the NT Department of Health and Menzies School of Health Research (HREC 2014-2176). The research was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and national and institutional standards.

Data availability.The short-read data for the genome sequenced ST5 isolates in this study have been deposited in the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) at EMBL-EBI under accession number PRJEB40712).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank the microbiology laboratory staff at the Royal Darwin Hospital for their assistance in collecting S. aureus isolates for genotyping. We also thank Judith Wilson, Kerrie Cleanthous, and Julius Franssen for technical assistance.

No specific funding was provided for this study. S.L.M. (1115196) is supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC) Postgraduate Scholarship. S.Y.C.T. (1065736) and A.C.B. (1088735) are supported by NHMRC Career Development and Early Career Fellowships, respectively.

All authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received June 29, 2020.
    • Accepted January 19, 2021.
  • Copyright © 2021 McGuinness et al.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. David MZ,
    2. Daum RS
    . 2010. Community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: epidemiology and clinical consequences of an emerging epidemic. Clin Microbiol Rev 23:616–687. doi:10.1128/CMR.00081-09.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Williamson DA,
    2. Coombs GW,
    3. Nimmo GR
    . 2014. Staphylococcus aureus ‘Down Under’: contemporary epidemiology of S. aureus in Australia, New Zealand, and the South West Pacific. Clin Microbiol Infect 20:597–604. doi:10.1111/1469-0691.12702.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Tong SY,
    2. Varrone L,
    3. Chatfield MD,
    4. Beaman M,
    5. Giffard PM
    . 2015. Progressive increase in community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Indigenous populations in northern Australia from 1993 to 2012. Epidemiol Infect 143:1519–1523. doi:10.1017/S0950268814002611.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. 4.↵
    1. Chambers HF,
    2. Deleo FR
    . 2009. Waves of resistance: Staphylococcus aureus in the antibiotic era. Nat Rev Microbiol 7:629–641. doi:10.1038/nrmicro2200.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    1. Chua K,
    2. Laurent F,
    3. Coombs G,
    4. Grayson ML,
    5. Howden BP
    . 2011. Antimicrobial resistance: not community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA)! A clinician’s guide to community MRSA—its evolving antimicrobial resistance and implications for therapy. Clin Infect Dis 52:99–114. doi:10.1093/cid/ciq067.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    1. Tong SY,
    2. Davis JS,
    3. Eichenberger E,
    4. Holland TL,
    5. Fowler VG, Jr.
    2015. Staphylococcus aureus infections: epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, and management. Clin Microbiol Rev 28:603–661. doi:10.1128/CMR.00134-14.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Chua KY,
    2. Seemann T,
    3. Harrison PF,
    4. Monagle S,
    5. Korman TM,
    6. Johnson PD,
    7. Coombs GW,
    8. Howden BO,
    9. Davies JK,
    10. Howden BP,
    11. Stinear TP
    . 2011. The dominant Australian community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clone ST93-IV [2B] is highly virulent and genetically distinct. PLoS One 6:e25887. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0025887.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. van Hal SJ,
    2. Steinig EJ,
    3. Andersson P,
    4. Holden MTG,
    5. Harris SR,
    6. Nimmo GR,
    7. Williamson DA,
    8. Heffernan H,
    9. Ritchie SR,
    10. Kearns AM,
    11. Ellington MJ,
    12. Dickson E,
    13. de Lencastre H,
    14. Coombs GW,
    15. Bentley SD,
    16. Parkhill J,
    17. Holt DC,
    18. Giffard PM,
    19. Tong SYC
    . 2018. Global scale dissemination of ST93: a divergent Staphylococcus aureus epidemic lineage that has recently emerged from remote Northern Australia. Front Microbiol 9:1453. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.01453.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. 9.↵
    1. Wood JB,
    2. Smith DB,
    3. Baker EH,
    4. Brecher SM,
    5. Gupta K
    . 2012. Has the emergence of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus increased trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole use and resistance?: a 10-year time series analysis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56:5655–5660. doi:10.1128/AAC.01011-12.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Liu C,
    2. Bayer A,
    3. Cosgrove SE,
    4. Daum RS,
    5. Fridkin SK,
    6. Gorwitz RJ,
    7. Kaplan SL,
    8. Karchmer AW,
    9. Levine DP,
    10. Murray BE,
    11. Rybak MJ,
    12. Talan DA,
    13. Chambers HF
    . 2011. Clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in adults and children: executive summary. Clin Infect Dis 52:285–292. doi:10.1093/cid/cir034.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    Antibiotic Expert Groups. 2014. Therapeutic guidelines: antibiotic, version 15. Therapeutic Guidelines Limited, Melbourne, Australia.
  12. 12.↵
    1. Bowen AC,
    2. Tong SY,
    3. Andrews RM,
    4. O’Meara IM,
    5. McDonald MI,
    6. Chatfield MD,
    7. Currie BJ,
    8. Carapetis JR
    . 2014. Short-course oral co-trimoxazole versus intramuscular benzathine benzylpenicillin for impetigo in a highly endemic region: an open-label, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet 384:2132–2140. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60841-2.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Bowen AC,
    2. Carapetis JR,
    3. Currie BJ,
    4. Fowler V, Jr,
    5. Chambers HF,
    6. Tong SYC
    . 2017. Sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (cotrimoxazole) for skin and soft tissue infections including impetigo, cellulitis, and abscess. Open Forum Infect Dis 4:ofx232. doi:10.1093/ofid/ofx232.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  14. 14.↵
    Central Australian Rural Practitioners Association Inc. 2014. CARPA standard treatment manual, 6th ed. Centre for Remote Health, Alice Springs, Australia.
  15. 15.↵
    The Australian Healthy Skin Consortium. 2018. National healthy skin guideline for the prevention, treatment and public health control of impetigo, scabies, crusted scabies and tinea for indigenous populations and communities in Australia. Telethon Kids Institute, Perth, Australia.
  16. 16.↵
    1. Harris TM,
    2. Bowen AC,
    3. Holt DC,
    4. Sarovich DS,
    5. Stevens K,
    6. Currie BJ,
    7. Howden BP,
    8. Carapetis JR,
    9. Giffard PM,
    10. Tong SYC
    . 2018. Investigation of trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole resistance in an emerging sequence type 5 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clone reveals discrepant resistance reporting. Clin Microbiol Infect 24:1027–1029. doi:10.1016/j.cmi.2018.04.020.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  17. 17.↵
    1. Coombs G,
    2. Pearson J,
    3. Robinson O
    . 2015. Western Australian methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) epidemiology and typing report July 1 2013 to June 30 2014. Government of Western Australia Department of Health. http://ww2.health.wa.gov.au/Articles/J_M/Methicillin-resistant-Staphylococcus-aureus-MRSA-infection. Accessed 6 June 2016.
  18. 18.↵
    1. Sekiguchi J,
    2. Tharavichitkul P,
    3. Miyoshi-Akiyama T,
    4. Chupia V,
    5. Fujino T,
    6. Araake M,
    7. Irie A,
    8. Morita K,
    9. Kuratsuji T,
    10. Kirikae T
    . 2005. Cloning and characterization of a novel trimethoprim-resistant dihydrofolate reductase from a nosocomial isolate of Staphylococcus aureus CM.S2 (IMCJ1454). Antimicrob Agents Chemother 49:3948–3951. doi:10.1128/AAC.49.9.3948-3951.2005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Nurjadi D,
    2. Schafer J,
    3. Friedrich-Janicke B,
    4. Mueller A,
    5. Neumayr A,
    6. Calvo-Cano A,
    7. Goorhuis A,
    8. Molhoek N,
    9. Lagler H,
    10. Kantele A,
    11. Van Genderen PJ,
    12. Gascon J,
    13. Grobusch MP,
    14. Caumes E,
    15. Hatz C,
    16. Fleck R,
    17. Mockenhaupt FP,
    18. Zanger P
    . 2015. Predominance of dfrG as determinant of trimethoprim resistance in imported Staphylococcus aureus. Clin Microbiol Infect 21:1095.e5–1095.e9. doi:10.1016/j.cmi.2015.08.021.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  20. 20.↵
    1. Steinig EJ,
    2. Andersson P,
    3. Harris SR,
    4. Sarovich DS,
    5. Manoharan A,
    6. Coupland P,
    7. Holden MT,
    8. Parkhill J,
    9. Bentley SD,
    10. Robinson DA,
    11. Tong SY
    . 2015. Single-molecule sequencing reveals the molecular basis of multidrug-resistance in ST772 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. BMC Genomics 16:388. doi:10.1186/s12864-015-1599-9.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  21. 21.↵
    1. Tong SY,
    2. Lilliebridge RA,
    3. Bishop EJ,
    4. Cheng AC,
    5. Holt DC,
    6. McDonald MI,
    7. Giffard PM,
    8. Currie BJ,
    9. Boutlis CS
    . 2010. Clinical correlates of Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL), PVL isoforms, and clonal complex in the Staphylococcus aureus population of Northern Australia. J Infect Dis 202:760–769. doi:10.1086/655396.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Groome MJ,
    2. Albrich WC,
    3. Wadula J,
    4. Khoosal M,
    5. Madhi SA
    . 2012. Community-onset Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia in hospitalised African children: high incidence in HIV-infected children and high prevalence of multidrug resistance. Paediatr Int Child Health 32:140–146. doi:10.1179/1465328111Y.0000000044.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. 23.↵
    1. Olalekan AO,
    2. Schaumburg F,
    3. Nurjadi D,
    4. Dike AE,
    5. Ojurongbe O,
    6. Kolawole DO,
    7. Kun JF,
    8. Zanger P
    . 2012. Clonal expansion accounts for an excess of antimicrobial resistance in Staphylococcus aureus colonising HIV-positive individuals in Lagos, Nigeria. Int J Antimicrob Agents 40:268–272. doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2012.05.016.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. O’Malley SM,
    2. Emele FE,
    3. Nwaokorie FO,
    4. Idika N,
    5. Umeizudike AK,
    6. Emeka-Nwabunnia I,
    7. Hanson BM,
    8. Nair R,
    9. Wardyn SE,
    10. Smith TC
    . 2015. Molecular typing of antibiotic-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Nigeria. J Infect Public Health 8:187–193. doi:10.1016/j.jiph.2014.08.001.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  25. 25.↵
    1. Schaumburg F,
    2. Alabi AS,
    3. Peters G,
    4. Becker K
    . 2014. New epidemiology of Staphylococcus aureus infection in Africa. Clin Microbiol Infect 20:589–596. doi:10.1111/1469-0691.12690.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Cuningham W,
    2. Anderson L,
    3. Bowen A,
    4. Buising K,
    5. Connors C,
    6. Daveson K,
    7. Martin JM,
    8. McNamara S,
    9. Patel B,
    10. James R,
    11. Shanks J,
    12. Wright K,
    13. Yarwood T,
    14. Tong S,
    15. McVernon J
    . 2020. Antimicrobial stewardship in remote primary healthcare across northern Australia. PeerJ 8:e9409. doi:10.7717/peerj.9409.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  27. 27.↵
    1. Griffith R,
    2. Creely D,
    3. Revell P,
    4. Dunne WM,
    5. Shortridge D
    . 2009. Comparison of three reference methods for testing susceptibility of staphylococci to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. J Clin Microbiol 47:3726–3728. doi:10.1128/JCM.00451-09.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    Health Gains Planning Branch HPD, Department of Health, Northern Territory Government. 2014. Health district population data for the Northern Territory. Health Gains Planning Branch HPD, Department of Health, Northern Territory Government, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia.
  29. 29.↵
    Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2020. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing, 30th ed. Document M100-30. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA.
  30. 30.↵
    1. Brennan L,
    2. Lilliebridge RA,
    3. Cheng AC,
    4. Giffard PM,
    5. Currie BJ,
    6. Tong SY
    . 2013. Community-associated meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carriage in hospitalized patients in tropical northern Australia. J Hosp Infect 83:205–211. doi:10.1016/j.jhin.2012.10.014.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Lilliebridge RA,
    2. Tong SY,
    3. Giffard PM,
    4. Holt DC
    . 2011. The utility of high-resolution melting analysis of SNP nucleated PCR amplicons—an MLST based Staphylococcus aureus typing scheme. PLoS One 6:e19749. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0019749.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Huygens F,
    2. Inman-Bamber J,
    3. Nimmo GR,
    4. Munckhof W,
    5. Schooneveldt J,
    6. Harrison B,
    7. McMahon JA,
    8. Giffard PM
    . 2006. Staphylococcus aureus genotyping using novel real-time PCR formats. J Clin Microbiol 44:3712–3719. doi:10.1128/JCM.00843-06.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. 33.↵
    1. Hunt M,
    2. Mather AE,
    3. Sanchez-Buso L,
    4. Page AJ,
    5. Parkhill J,
    6. Keane JA,
    7. Harris SR
    . 2017. ARIBA: rapid antimicrobial resistance genotyping directly from sequencing reads. Microb Genom 3:e000131. doi:10.1099/mgen.0.000131.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Kuroda M,
    2. Ohta T,
    3. Uchiyama I,
    4. Baba T,
    5. Yuzawa H,
    6. Kobayashi I,
    7. Cui L,
    8. Oguchi A,
    9. Aoki K,
    10. Nagai Y,
    11. Lian J,
    12. Ito T,
    13. Kanamori M,
    14. Matsumaru H,
    15. Maruyama A,
    16. Murakami H,
    17. Hosoyama A,
    18. Mizutani-Ui Y,
    19. Takahashi NK,
    20. Sawano T,
    21. Inoue R,
    22. Kaito C,
    23. Sekimizu K,
    24. Hirakawa H,
    25. Kuhara S,
    26. Goto S,
    27. Yabuzaki J,
    28. Kanehisa M,
    29. Yamashita A,
    30. Oshima K,
    31. Furuya K,
    32. Yoshino C,
    33. Shiba T,
    34. Hattori M,
    35. Ogasawara N,
    36. Hayashi H,
    37. Hiramatsu K
    . 2001. Whole genome sequencing of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Lancet 357:1225–1240. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)04403-2.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  35. 35.↵
    1. Sarovich DS,
    2. Price EP
    . 2014. SPANDx: a genomics pipeline for comparative analysis of large haploid whole genome re-sequencing datasets. BMC Res Notes 7:618. doi:10.1186/1756-0500-7-618.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. Huang W,
    2. Li L,
    3. Myers JR,
    4. Marth GT
    . 2012. ART: a next-generation sequencing read simulator. Bioinformatics 28:593–594. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btr708.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  37. 37.↵
    1. Swofford DL
    . 1998. PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and other methods), version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
  38. 38.↵
    The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST). 2016. Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and zone diameters, version 6.0. https://www.eucast.org/fileadmin/src/media/PDFs/EUCAST_files/Breakpoint_tables/v_6.0_Breakpoint_table.xls.
  39. 39.↵
    National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC). 2009. Australian guidelines to reduce health risks from drinking alcohol. Australian Government NHMRC, Canberra, Australia.
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Clinical and Molecular Epidemiology of an Emerging Panton-Valentine Leukocidin-Positive ST5 Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Clone in Northern Australia
Sarah L. McGuinness, Deborah C. Holt, Tegan M. Harris, Connor Wright, Rob Baird, Phillip M. Giffard, Asha C. Bowen, Steven Y. C. Tong
mSphere Feb 2021, 6 (1) e00651-20; DOI: 10.1128/mSphere.00651-20

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print
Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this mSphere article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Clinical and Molecular Epidemiology of an Emerging Panton-Valentine Leukocidin-Positive ST5 Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Clone in Northern Australia
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from mSphere
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in mSphere.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Clinical and Molecular Epidemiology of an Emerging Panton-Valentine Leukocidin-Positive ST5 Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Clone in Northern Australia
Sarah L. McGuinness, Deborah C. Holt, Tegan M. Harris, Connor Wright, Rob Baird, Phillip M. Giffard, Asha C. Bowen, Steven Y. C. Tong
mSphere Feb 2021, 6 (1) e00651-20; DOI: 10.1128/mSphere.00651-20
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Staphylococcus aureus
epidemiology
genomics
methicillin resistance
susceptibility testing
trimethoprim

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About mSphere
  • Board of Editors
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • Embargo Policy
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Warranty
  • Types of Articles
  • Getting Started
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #mSphereJ

@ASMicrobiology

       

 

Website feedback

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Online ISSN: 2379-5042