Skip to main content
  • ASM Journals
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Research and News from ASM Journals
    • mSphere of Influence: Commentaries from Early Career Microbiologists
    • Archive
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Getting Started
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mSphere
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • ASM Journals
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
mSphere
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Research and News from ASM Journals
    • mSphere of Influence: Commentaries from Early Career Microbiologists
    • Archive
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Getting Started
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mSphere
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
Editor's Pick Research Article | Applied and Environmental Science

Environmental Consortium Containing Pseudomonas and Bacillus Species Synergistically Degrades Polyethylene Terephthalate Plastic

Cameron Roberts, Sabrina Edwards, Morgan Vague, Rosa León-Zayas, Henry Scheffer, Gayle Chan, Natasja A. Swartz, Jay L. Mellies
Katherine McMahon, Editor
Cameron Roberts
aBiology Department, Reed College, Portland, Oregon, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sabrina Edwards
aBiology Department, Reed College, Portland, Oregon, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Sabrina Edwards
Morgan Vague
aBiology Department, Reed College, Portland, Oregon, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rosa León-Zayas
bBiology Department, Willamette University, Salem, Oregon, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Henry Scheffer
aBiology Department, Reed College, Portland, Oregon, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gayle Chan
cChemistry Department, Reed College, Portland, Oregon, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Natasja A. Swartz
cChemistry Department, Reed College, Portland, Oregon, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Natasja A. Swartz
Jay L. Mellies
aBiology Department, Reed College, Portland, Oregon, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jay L. Mellies
Katherine McMahon
University of Wisconsin-Madison
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/mSphere.01151-20
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Supplemental Material
  • FIG 1
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 1

    Rhodamine B agar screen for lipase activity. Master plates of mixed colonies were generated by soaking soil samples in water and collecting the supernatant to spread on LB plates. Individual plates with growth (A and C) were stamped onto rhodamine B plates (4.0% wt/vol) (B and D) to screen for lipase activity. The presence of orange or yellow halos under 365-nm UV exposure indicates lipase positive colonies (indicated with arrows). After, individual colonies in lipase-positive areas were spotted onto new rhodamine plates to isolate the lipase producers, and positive spots were restreaked onto LB agar for purification.

  • FIG 2
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 2

    Lipase production by strains plated on rhodamine B agar containing olive oil demonstrating lipolytic activity. Lipase negative E coli strain MC4100 (1) was a negative control. Strains 9.1 (2), 9.2 (3), 10 (4), 13.1 (5), and 13.2 (6) were inoculated on LB and olive oil-rhodamine B plates grown for 48 h at 26°C without UV exposure (A and B) and with UV light at 365 nm (C and D). (C) LB plates show natural fluorescence. (D) The rhodamine B plate shows lipolytic activity indicated by white halos for strains 9.2, 10, and 13.2.

  • FIG 3
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 3

    The full consortium grows faster, with higher yields on PET and BHET, than individual consortia or strains. Strains were grown on UV-treated postconsumer 2.0% wt/vol PET (A), 2.0% wt/vol UV-treated granular PET pellets (B), or 0.25% wt/vol BHET (C) as sole carbon sources. All strains were grown overnight in LCFBM supplemented with yeast extract and normalized by OD600 to ensure equal amounts of bacteria were added to all samples. Cultures containing PET were incubated statically, while those with BHET were shaken at 225 rpm at 30°C. Growth was measured every 24 h by an OD600 with a noninoculated sample as a blank. All experiments were performed in triplicate. Error bars indicate standard error.

  • FIG 4
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 4

    Differential growth of isolates on the surface of PET in LCFBM. All isolates were grown in LCFBM supplemented with granular (A) or postconsumer (B) PET for 6 weeks. By standard plate count, the total CFU/g of bacteria in the media were compared by Student's t test to CFU on the surface of substrate (P values < 0.05 were considered significant: *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; and ****, P < 0.0001). Data are representative of three biological replicates, and means are reported above each bar with standard deviation.

  • FIG 5
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 5

    SEM images show surface modification of amorphous PET plastic. LCFBM containing amorphous PET and the full consortium were grown at 30°C for 40 days. Samples were treated with a mild detergent, saponin (A to C), to remove biofilms or with proteinase K (D to F) to remove remaining, tightly adherent bacteria prior to SEM. (A and D) Samples were uninoculated. Note, Pseudomonas (B) and Bacillus (C) indicated by arrows, and the cavities (E) and groove underlying lysed Bacillus bacteria (F) also indicated by arrows. Bars, 20 μm (A to C) and 5 μM (D to F).

  • FIG 6
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 6

    Secreted enzymes from the Bacillus species efficiently convert BHET to TPA. (A) PET degradation pathway. (B) Enzymes secreted by strains 9.1, 9.2, 10, 13.1, 13.2, and consortium 9, consortium 13, and the full consortium (FC) were added to 0.25% wt/vol BHET. Significant differences between TPA and BHET signals are represented as <0.05 (*), <0.01 (**), and <0.001 (***). The quantity of TPA from BHET cleavage was normalized by the presence of the BHET signal. For the full consortium, BHET was below detectable limits, suggesting there was near-complete conversion to TPA, unlike that observed for the other consortia and strains.

  • FIG 7
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 7

    Infrared spectra of postconsumer PET plastics incubated with lipase positive consortia 9 and 13, strain 10, and E. coli. (A) Averaged ATR-FTIR spectrum acquired of the method blank (Buv) compared with consortium 13 (13uv) to illustrate representative peaks. (B) Comparison of PET difference spectra with UV (dashed line) and without UV (solid line) pretreatment prior to inoculation. Difference spectra (D) are vertically offset for clarity and were produced by spectral subtraction of the method blank (Buv) from the inoculated PET (9uv, 10uv, 13uv, or Euv). Direction of arrows indicates the growth or loss of a peak after incubation, signifying a relative increase or decrease in abundance of that bond, respectively. All spectra were averaged (n = 9) and normalized by peak area to the asymmetric bending mode (δ) at 1,408 cm−1 prior to spectral math.

  • FIG 8
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 8

    Acetaldehyde, methyl, glycol, and carboxylic acid by-products detected from granular PET treated with consortia. Representative 1H NMR spectra from leached granular PET treated with nobacteria (black), full consortium (red), consortium 13 (blue), and consortium 9 (green). Specific regions of interest are highlighted for unique methyl, hydroxyl, aldehyde, and carboxylic acid species. Unique signals are highlighted in red dotted boxes. 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) spectra include 1.04 (t, −CH3), 1.88 (m, −CH2-CH3), 2.12 (d, 3H, acetaldehyde), 2.28 (t, −CH2-OH) 3.26 (m, CH2-OH), 3.43 (m, CH2-OH), 4.28 (m, Ph-CH2-CH2-OH), 9.66 (q, 1H, acetaldehyde), 10.02 (s, −COOH), 10.87 (s, −COOH).

Tables

  • Figures
  • Supplemental Material
  • TABLE 1

    Consortium 9 synergistic lipase activitya

    TABLE 1
    • ↵a Strain 9.1 B. thuringiensis strain C15 and strain 9.2 Pseudomonas sp. B10 (consortium 9), strains 9.1, 9.2, or strain 10 Pseudomonas sp. SWI36 alone were swabbed from cultures with postconsumer PET as the sole carbon source and then inoculated onto rhodamine B plates with olive oil as a substrate (n = 5). The growth of each strain and the corresponding halo diameters were measured after 48 h. All diameters were quantified in ImageJ with a column average plot across each halo, and the ratio of halo to growth for each strain was compared to the two pseudomonads alone. By standard plate count, approximately equal numbers (∼200 CFU/ml) of strains 9.2 and 9.1, comprising consortium 9, were released from the PET plastic, upon gentle vortexing, after 8 weeks of incubation at room temperature. Strain 9.1 alone was unable to grow using PET as a sole source of carbon.

    • ↵b P values < 0.05 were considered significant.

  • TABLE 2

    Substrates used for screening for various hydrolytic abilities of consortia strainsa

    TABLE 2
    • ↵a Short-, medium-, and long-chained substrates were used to assess specificity and promiscuity of esterase and lipase activities among strains. Simple triglyceride tributyrin was used to screen for basic ester cleavage. Tween 20 and Tween 80 were used to screen hydrolytic activities classified between esterases and true lipases. Coconut oil is a medium-chain fatty acid and was used to detect distinctly different lipase and esterase activities than those screened with Tween. Olive oil, a long-chain fatty acid, indicated true lipase activity. Polycaprolactone, a biodegradable polyester, was used to detect polymer hydrolysis/polyurethane esterase activities.

  • TABLE 3

    Molecular index and confidence intervals calculated by relative intensities of vibrational bands from ATR-FTIR analysis of commercial PET with and without UV pretreatment incubated in carbon-free medium for 6 weeksa

    TABLE 3
    • ↵a n = 9; a = 0.05.

    • ↵b For the method blank, PET strips were incubated in carbon-free base medium without bacterial inoculate.

    • ↵c For the experimental control, PET strips were incubated in carbon-free base medium and inoculated with E. coli strain MC4100.

  • TABLE 4

    1H NMR assignments for unique acetaldehyde, methyl, glycol, and carboxylic acid by-products detected from granular PET treated with consortia

    TABLE 4
    • ↵a H NMR spectra of leached chemical species from granular PET treated with no bacteria was compared to treatment with the full consortium, consortium 13, and consortium 9. Unique chemical shifts upon bacteria treatment are reported.

    • ↵b For each unique chemical shift, the consortium that generated the signal is reported. C9, consortium 9; C13, consortium, C13; FC, full consortium.

    • ↵c Validated by standard in DMSO-d6.

  • TABLE 5

    Strain genomes encode hydrolytic enzymes that may be associated with PET degradation

    TABLE 5
    • ↵a Lipases, esterases, α/β-fold hydrolases, and carboxylesterases were found to be encoded in all isolates. All isolates shared the conserved protein domain EstA; specifically, Bacillus sp. 9.1 and 13.1 encoded a triacylglycerol esterase/lipase, while Pseudomonas strains 9.2, 10, and 13.2 encoded a triacylglycerol lipase-like from the SGNH hydrolases subfamily. Only the Pseudomonas strain 9.2 encoded an acetyl esterase/lipase from the Aes domain. Only Pseudomonas spp. encoded bifunctional outer membrane translocase/extracellular lipase (PlpD) and a predicted carboxylesterase, YpfH, whereas only Bacillus spp. encoded an α/β-fold hydrolase, FrsA. Like EstB in Enterobacter sp. HY1, FrsA has been shown to display esterase activity on pNP-butyrate, which is correlated with BHET cleavage.

    • ↵b Genomes/genes annotated via the IMG suite from the Joint Genome Institute (JGI).

    • ↵c SignalP was used to identify putative signal sequences, indicating secretion.

  • TABLE 6

    Enzymes associated with ethylene glycol and terephthalic acid metabolism, associated metabolites, and the strains that encode them

    TABLE 6
    • ↵a Only Pseudomonas 10 and 13.2 encode all genes associated with EG metabolism. Pseudomonas strains 9.2, 10, and 13.2 encode enzymes responsible for TPA metabolism/downstream metabolites protocatechuate (PCA) and catechol (CAT), while neither Bacillus strains encode this capability. EG, ethylene glycol; TPA, terephthalic acid.

Supplemental Material

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • TABLE S1

    Predicted secretion signals of putative hydrolytic enzymes determined using SignalP 5.0. Download Table S1, PDF file, 0.1 MB.

    Copyright © 2020 Roberts et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • TABLE S2

    Enzymes encoded in the genomes implicated in ethylene glycol and acetaldehyde metabolism. Download Table S2, PDF file, 0.1 MB.

    Copyright © 2020 Roberts et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • FIG S1

    BHET is hydrolyzed by secreted enzymes generating ethylene glycol and terephthalic acid. Consortium 9 and the full consortium were grown with BHET substrate as the only carbon source. Native secreted proteins were then collected from filtered culture supernatants. The full collection of secreted proteins were incubated with fresh BHET substrate. Resulting insoluble degradation products were analyzed by 1H NMR in DMSO-d6 for comparison to an untreated control. A glycol methylene triplet of BHET (3.73 ppm) was used as the reference peak for 4 hydrogens. BHET uninoculated (A), BHET treated with secreted proteins from consortium 9 (B), and the full consortium (C). Note peak at 13.28 ppm (1H, s, TPA carboxylic acid) absence in the uninoculated control (A), with increasing intensity when inoculated with consortium 9 (B) and then the full consortium (C). Download FIG S1, PDF file, 1.3 MB.

    Copyright © 2020 Roberts et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Environmental Consortium Containing Pseudomonas and Bacillus Species Synergistically Degrades Polyethylene Terephthalate Plastic
Cameron Roberts, Sabrina Edwards, Morgan Vague, Rosa León-Zayas, Henry Scheffer, Gayle Chan, Natasja A. Swartz, Jay L. Mellies
mSphere Dec 2020, 5 (6) e01151-20; DOI: 10.1128/mSphere.01151-20

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print
Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this mSphere article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Environmental Consortium Containing Pseudomonas and Bacillus Species Synergistically Degrades Polyethylene Terephthalate Plastic
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from mSphere
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in mSphere.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Environmental Consortium Containing Pseudomonas and Bacillus Species Synergistically Degrades Polyethylene Terephthalate Plastic
Cameron Roberts, Sabrina Edwards, Morgan Vague, Rosa León-Zayas, Henry Scheffer, Gayle Chan, Natasja A. Swartz, Jay L. Mellies
mSphere Dec 2020, 5 (6) e01151-20; DOI: 10.1128/mSphere.01151-20
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

PET plastic
pollution
bioaugmentation
Pseudomonas
Bacillus
consortia
biodegradation

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About mSphere
  • Board of Editors
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • Embargo Policy
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Warranty
  • Types of Articles
  • Getting Started
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #mSphereJ

@ASMicrobiology

       

 

Website feedback

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Online ISSN: 2379-5042