Skip to main content
  • ASM Journals
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Research and News from ASM Journals
    • mSphere of Influence: Commentaries from Early Career Microbiologists
    • Archive
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Getting Started
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mSphere
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • ASM Journals
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
mSphere
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Research and News from ASM Journals
    • mSphere of Influence: Commentaries from Early Career Microbiologists
    • Archive
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Getting Started
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mSphere
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
Research Article | Molecular Biology and Physiology

Functional Characterization of Core Regulatory Genes Involved in Sporulation of the Nematophagous Fungus Purpureocillium lavendulum

Mi Chen, He-Yu Yang, Yan-Ru Cao, Quan-Quan Hui, Hai-Feng Fan, Chen-Chen Zhang, Jing-Jing Han, Zhi-Yi Guo, Jianping Xu, Ke-Qin Zhang, Lian-Ming Liang
Aaron P. Mitchell, Editor
Mi Chen
aState Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Bio-Resources in Yunnan, Yunnan University, Kunming, China
bThe Key Laboratory for Southwest Microbial Diversity of the Ministry of Education, Yunnan University, Kunming, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
He-Yu Yang
aState Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Bio-Resources in Yunnan, Yunnan University, Kunming, China
bThe Key Laboratory for Southwest Microbial Diversity of the Ministry of Education, Yunnan University, Kunming, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yan-Ru Cao
cKey Laboratory of Special Biological Resource Development and Utilization of Universities in Yunnan Province, Department of Life Science and Technology, Kunming University, Kunming, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Quan-Quan Hui
aState Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Bio-Resources in Yunnan, Yunnan University, Kunming, China
bThe Key Laboratory for Southwest Microbial Diversity of the Ministry of Education, Yunnan University, Kunming, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hai-Feng Fan
aState Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Bio-Resources in Yunnan, Yunnan University, Kunming, China
bThe Key Laboratory for Southwest Microbial Diversity of the Ministry of Education, Yunnan University, Kunming, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chen-Chen Zhang
aState Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Bio-Resources in Yunnan, Yunnan University, Kunming, China
bThe Key Laboratory for Southwest Microbial Diversity of the Ministry of Education, Yunnan University, Kunming, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jing-Jing Han
aState Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Bio-Resources in Yunnan, Yunnan University, Kunming, China
bThe Key Laboratory for Southwest Microbial Diversity of the Ministry of Education, Yunnan University, Kunming, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zhi-Yi Guo
aState Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Bio-Resources in Yunnan, Yunnan University, Kunming, China
bThe Key Laboratory for Southwest Microbial Diversity of the Ministry of Education, Yunnan University, Kunming, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jianping Xu
dDepartment of Biology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jianping Xu
Ke-Qin Zhang
aState Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Bio-Resources in Yunnan, Yunnan University, Kunming, China
bThe Key Laboratory for Southwest Microbial Diversity of the Ministry of Education, Yunnan University, Kunming, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lian-Ming Liang
aState Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Bio-Resources in Yunnan, Yunnan University, Kunming, China
bThe Key Laboratory for Southwest Microbial Diversity of the Ministry of Education, Yunnan University, Kunming, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Lian-Ming Liang
Aaron P. Mitchell
University of Georgia
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/mSphere.00932-20
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

The nematophagous fungus Purpureocillium lavendulum is a natural enemy of plant-parasitic nematodes, which cause severe economic losses in agriculture worldwide. The production of asexual spores (conidia) in P. lavendulum is crucial for its biocontrol activity against nematodes. In this study, we characterized the core regulatory genes involved in conidiation of P. lavendulum at the molecular level. The central regulatory pathway is composed of three genes, P. lavendulum brlA (PlbrlA), PlabaA, and PlwetA, which regulate the early, middle, and late stages of asexual development, respectively. The deletion of PlbrlA completely inhibited conidiation, with only conidiophore stalks produced. PlAbaA determines the differentiation of conidia from phialides. The deletion of PlwetA affected many phenotypes related to conidial maturation, including abscission of conidia from conidium strings, thickening of the cell wall layers, vacuole generation inside the cytoplasm, production of trehalose, tolerance to heat shock, etc. Comparative analyses showed that the upstream regulators of the core regulatory pathway of conidiation, especially the “fluffy” genes, were different from those in Aspergillus. Besides their roles in conidiation, the central regulators also influence the production of secondary metabolites, such as the leucinostatins, in P. lavendulum. Our study revealed a set of essential genes controlling conidiation in P. lavendulum and provided a framework for further molecular genetic studies on fungus-nematode interactions and for the biocontrol of plant-parasitic nematodes.

IMPORTANCE Plant-parasitic nematodes cause serious damage to crops throughout the world. Purpureocillium lavendulum is a nematophagous fungus which is a natural enemy of nematodes and a potential biocontrol agent against plant-parasitic nematodes. The conidia play an important role during infection of nematodes. In this study, we identified and characterized genes involved in regulating asexual development of P. lavendulum. We found that these genes not only regulate conidiation but also influence secondary-metabolite production. This work provides a basis for future studies of fungus-nematode interactions and nematode biocontrol.

INTRODUCTION

Plant-parasitic nematodes cause serious damage to more than 3,000 known species of plants, including most agricultural crops, resulting in economic losses amounting to US $157 billion annually worldwide (1). Nematophagous fungi are a diverse group of fungal species capable of capturing or infecting nematodes. These fungi represent an important source of potential biocontrol agents against plant-parasitic nematodes. Purpureocillium lavendulum is a new fungal species discovered recently and a close relative of the nematophagous fungus Purpureocillium lilacinum, which has been the most widely used species for controlling nematodes (2–4). An obvious difference between the two species is that P. lavendulum cannot grow at above 35°C and is thus not considered an infectious threat to humans, while P. lilacinum can grow well at above 35°C (4). The lack of growth at above 35°C makes P. lavendulum a safer candidate as a biocontrol agent than P. lilacinum.

Because fungal infection of nematodes starts with conidia, the number of asexual spores (conidia) produced by fungal strains can directly affect the infectivity of a nematophagous fungus. Furthermore, the production of a large number of conidia is essential for the successful application of the biocontrol agent in agricultural fields. Therefore, understanding the regulatory mechanism of sporulation of P. lavendulum could help us enhance spore production and its utilization efficiency. At present, almost nothing is known about the molecular mechanism of sporulation in P. lavendulum. In this study, we investigated the function of several genes in sporulation of P. lavendulum. Orthologs of these genes are known to be involved in sporulation in the model filamentous fungus Aspergillus nidulans (5–7).

RESULTS

Characterization of the regulatory genes involved in sporulation of P. lavendulum.BLASTp searches were carried out to identify the putative genes involved in regulating sporulation in P. lavendulum. The queried genes included 11 genes total, including the 3 central regulators P. lavendulum brlA (PlbrlA), abaA, and wetA, the 6 “fluffy” genes fluG and flbA to -E, and fadA and pkaA (two inhibitors of conidiation in A. nidulans) as revealed in previous studies. We identified the orthologs of nine genes in the genome of P. lavendulum, including PlbrlA, PlabaA, PlwetA, PlfadA, and PlpkaA and the fluffy genes PlfluG, PlflbA, PlflbC, and PlflbD. However, the orthologous genes of flbB and flbE were not found in the P. lavendulum genome. The genes PlbrlA, PlabaA, PlwetA, PlfadA, and PlpkaA encode proteins of 367, 915, 614, 353, and 545 amino acids (aa), respectively. They showed 36%, 42%, 70%, 94%, and 80% amino acid sequence identity to their orthologs in A. nidulans. The four fluffy genes PlfluG, PlflbA, PlflbC, PlflbD encode proteins of 450, 705, 357, and 448 aa, respectively. They showed 31%, 59%, 47%, and 51% amino acid sequence identities to their orthologs in A. nidulans.

Real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) was carried out to evaluate the expression profiles of the above-mentioned genes during conidiation in the fungus. Conidia of the ku80 knockout (KO) strain were first inoculated in submerged liquid minimal medium (MM) (300 ml of medium in 500-ml flasks) and incubated stationarily at 28°C for 48 h. The mycelia were then collected by filtration and spread on top of solid MM to induce conidium production. Samples were taken at 0, 6, 12, 24, and 36 h after the start of incubation for RT-qPCR analysis. As shown in Fig. 1, PlbrlA showed a high expression level after 48 h of submerged cultivation and then dropped down during growth on solid media. This result is consistent with the feature of this fungus which can produce simple conidiophores from both aerial and submerged mycelia (4). The genes PlabaA, PlwetA, PlfluG, PlflbA, PlfadA, and PlpkaA showed regularly elevated expression during growth on solid media. PlflbC and PlflbD showed elevated expression during the first 12 h and then dropped down in the subsequent 24 h of cultivation.

FIG 1
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1

RT-qPCR data showing mRNA expression levels of nine conidiation-related genes in the ku80 KO strain after various periods of conidiation induction.

Roles of identified homologs in the regulation of conidiogenesis in P. lavendulum.To elucidate the functions of the putative homologs identified as described above, we constructed deletion mutants for each of the genes in P. lavendulum, via homologous recombination. Here, the open reading frame (ORF) of each gene was replaced with the chlorimuron resistance gene (sur) and the replacements were confirmed by PCR and Southern blotting (Fig. S1 to S8). We constructed the complementing PlwetA plasmid using the In-Fusion methodology with a benomyl resistance gene (bml) as the selection marker; the details of the complementation of ΔPlwetA are described in Fig. S2.

FIG S1

Knockout of the PlabaA gene in P. lavendulum. (A) The disruption plasmid of PlabaA and the relative position of PlabaA in the ku80 KO strain. The relative positions of primers used for the construction of knockout plasmids and the verification of transformants are indicated. The relative position of restriction endonuclease sites and the probe used in Southern blotting are also shown. “Sur” represents the chlorimuron resistance gene. (B) Confirmation of the disruption of PlabaA by PCR in the mutants with chlorimuron resistance was achieved with primer pair sur5/sur3. −, the wild-type strain; +, the knockout plasmid; M, DNA marker. (C) Confirmation of the disruption of PlabaA by PCR in the mutants with chlorimuron resistance was achieved with primer pair abaA-PlKu80-F/abaA-PlKu80-R. +, the wild-type strain; −, the knockout plasmid; M, DNA marker. (D) The transformants were confirmed to have no additional copy of the knockout cassette randomly inserted into the genome, by PCR with primers GFP-f/GFP-r. −, the wild-type strain; +, the knockout plasmid. (E) Southern blot analysis of ku80 KO and mutant strains. The probe was PCR amplified with the genomic DNA of the ku80 KO strain; the primers used are shown in Table S1. Download FIG S1, TIF file, 1.0 MB.
Copyright © 2020 Chen et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S2

Knockout of the PlwetA gene in P. lavendulum. (A) The disruption plasmid of PlwetA and the relative position of PlwetA in the ku80 KO strain. The relative positions of primers used for the construction of knockout plasmids and the verification of transformants are indicated. The relative position of restriction endonuclease sites and the probe used in Southern blotting are also shown. Sur, the chlorimuron resistance gene. (B) Confirmation of the disruption of PlwetA by PCR in the mutants with chlorimuron resistance was achieved with primer pair wetA-5f/wetA-3f. −, the wild-type strain; +, the knockout plasmid; M, DNA marker. (C) The transformants were confirmed to have no additional copy of the knockout cassette randomly inserted into the genome, by PCR with primers GFP-f/GFP-r. −, the wild-type strain; +, the knockout plasmid. (D) Southern blot analysis of the ku80 KO strain, PlwetA mutant, and complementary strain. The probe was PCR amplified with the genomic DNA of the ku80 KO strain; the primers used are shown in Table S1. Download FIG S2, TIF file, 0.5 MB.
Copyright © 2020 Chen et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

The morphological comparisons between the mutants and wild-type strain were conducted through light microscopy. The colonies of the ku80 KO strain were purple, while the colonies of the ΔPlabaA and ΔPlwetA strains were white and off-white, respectively (Fig. 2A and B). Our previous study showed that the PlbrlA mutant also had white colonies (8). Using a scanning electron microscope (SEM), it was observed that the ku80 KO strain developed normal conidiophores (Fig. 2C). The PlbrlA mutant produced no sporulation structure aside from having a stalk (Fig. 2D). The deletion of PlabaA resulted in immature phialides and extremely elongated hyphae with abnormal morphology (Fig. 2E). These results indicate that PlbrlA and PlabaA are essential for the differentiation of phialides in P. lavendulum. The PlwetA mutant had complete phialide structures, with chains of conidia longer than for the ku80 KO strain (Fig. 2F). To confirm this phenotype, we cultured these strains on sterile microscope slides (see Materials and Methods) and then counted the number of spores on each spore chain directly under a light microscope. As shown in Fig. 3A, for selection of 100 spore chains of each strain randomly, we found that the length of spore chains of the ΔPlwetA strain were shorter than those of the ku80 KO strain. Meanwhile, when the PlwetA null mutant was inoculated on solid medium, it exhibited reduced and limited conidiation when counted after the conidia were washed from the medium (Fig. 3B). This result revealed that the reduced conidium production in the ΔPlwetA strain could be due to fewer differentiated conidia from the phialides as well as the defect in conidium maturation, which could cause fewer conidia to be released from the phialides.

FIG 2
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 2

Morphological features of the strains with knockouts of PlbrlA, PlabaA, and PlwetA in P. lavendulum. (A) Colonies of the ku80 KO strain (top left) and three ΔPlabaA strains; (B) colonies of the ku80 strain (top left) and three ΔPlwetA strains; (C) SEM of the ku80 KO strain asexual conidiogenous structure; (D) SEM of a stalk-like structure of the ΔPlbrlA strain; (E) SEM of the ΔPlabaA mutant asexual conidiogenous structure; (F) SEM of the ΔPlwetA asexual conidiogenous structure.

FIG 3
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 3

Statistical comparisons of conidia produced by the ku80 and other knockout strains of P. lavendulum. (A) Comparison of conidial numbers on conidial chains between the ku80 KO and ΔPlwetA strains. (B) Comparison of conidia produced between the ku80 KO and ΔPlwetA strains and the complemented strains. (C) Conidia produced by the ku80 and other knockout strains. **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ns, not significant.

The putative fluffy genes identified through homology searches also showed significant effects on conidium production in P. lavendulum. When the fluffy gene PlfluG was knocked out, the mycelial growth rate increased slightly and the production of conidia was delayed (Fig. S8E). Interestingly, the final total count of conidia was not affected (Fig. 3C). The ΔPlflbA strain showed off-white colonies and produced a few conidia (Fig. 3C), and the whole colony of the ΔPlflbA strain began to autolysis after 20 days of cultivation, with only a small number of vegetative mycelia remaining. The growth rates of the colonies of both the ΔPlflbC and ΔPlflbD mutants were lower than that of the ku80 KO strain, but they both produced more conidia than the ku80 KO strain (Fig. 3C). When the PlfadA and PlpkaA genes were knocked out, the mutants produced more conidia than the ku80 KO strain, indicating that these genes negatively regulate conidium production (Fig. 3C).

FIG S3

Knockout of the PlfadA gene in P. lavendulum. (A) The disruption plasmid of PlfadA and the relative position of PlfadA in the ku80 KO strain. The relative positions of primers used for the construction of knockout plasmids and the verification of transformants are indicated. The relative position of restriction endonuclease sites and the probe used in Southern blotting are also shown. (B) Confirmation of the disruption of PlfadA by PCR in the mutants with chlorimuron resistance was achieved with primer pair fadA-5f/fadA-3f. −, the wild-type strain; +, the knockout plasmid; M, DNA marker. (C) The transformants were confirmed to have no additional copy of the knockout cassette randomly inserted into the genome, by PCR with primers GFP-f/GFP-r. −, the wild-type strain; +, the knockout plasmid. (D) Southern blot analysis of the ku80 KO and mutant strains. The probe was PCR amplified with the genomic DNA of the ku80 KO strain; the primers used are shown in Table S1. Download FIG S3, TIF file, 0.6 MB.
Copyright © 2020 Chen et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S4

Knockout of PlpkaA gene in P. lavendulum. (A) The disruption plasmid of PlpkaA and the relative position of PlpkaA in the ku80 KO strain. The relative positions of primers used for the construction of knockout plasmids and the verification of transformants are indicated. The relative position of restriction endonuclease sites and the probe used in Southern blotting are also shown. (B) Confirmation of the disruption of PlpkaA by PCR in the mutants with chlorimuron resistance was achieved with primer pair sur5/sur3. −, the wild-type strain; +, the knockout plasmid; M, DNA marker. (C) Confirmation of the disruption of PlpkaA by PCR in the mutants with chlorimuron resistance was achieved with primer pair pkaA-PlKu80-F/pkaA-PlKu80-R. +, the wild-type strain; −, the knockout plasmid; M, DNA marker. (D) The transformants were confirmed to have no additional copy of the knockout cassette randomly inserted into the genome, by PCR with primers GFP-f/GFP-r. −, the wild-type strain; +, the knockout plasmid. (E) Southern blot analysis of ku80 KO and mutant strains. The probe was PCR amplified with the genomic DNA of the ku80 KO strain; the primers used are shown in Table S1. Download FIG S4, TIF file, 1.1 MB.
Copyright © 2020 Chen et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S5

Knockout of the PlflbA gene in P. lavendulum. (A) The disruption plasmid of PlflbA and the relative position of PlflbA in the ku80 KO strain. The relative positions of primers used for the construction of knockout plasmids and the verification of transformants are indicated. The relative position of restriction endonuclease sites and the probe used in Southern blotting are also shown. (B) Confirmation of the disruption of PlflbA by PCR in the mutants with chlorimuron resistance was achieved with primer pair flbA-f/flbA-r. −, the wild-type strain; +, the knockout plasmid; M, DNA marker. (C) The transformants were confirmed to have no additional copy of the knockout cassette randomly inserted into the genome, by PCR with primers GFP-f/GFP-r. −, the wild-type strain; +, the knockout plasmid. (D) Southern blot analysis of ku80 KO and mutant strains. The probe was PCR amplified with the genomic DNA of the ku80 KO strain; the primers used are shown in Table S1. Download FIG S5, TIF file, 0.5 MB.
Copyright © 2020 Chen et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S6

Knockout of the PlflbC gene in P. lavendulum. (A) The disruption plasmid of PlflbC and the relative position of PlflbC in the ku80 KO strain. The relative positions of primers used for the construction of knockout plasmids and the verification of transformants are indicated. The relative position of restriction endonuclease sites and the probe used in Southern blotting are also shown. (B) Confirmation of the disruption of PlflbC by PCR in the mutants with chlorimuron resistance was achieved with primer pair flbC-f/flbC-r. −, the wild-type strain; +, the knockout plasmid; M, DNA marker. (C) The transformants were confirmed to have no additional copy of the knockout cassette randomly inserted into the genome, by PCR with primers GFP-f/GFP-r. −, the wild-type strain; +, the knockout plasmid. (D) Southern blot analysis of ku80 KO and mutant strains. The probe was PCR amplified with the genomic DNA of the ku80 strain; the primers used are shown in Table S1. Download FIG S6, TIF file, 0.4 MB.
Copyright © 2020 Chen et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S7

Knockout of the PlflbD gene in P. lavendulum. (A) The disruption plasmid of PlflbD and the relative position of PlflbD in the ku80 KO strain. The relative positions of primers used for the construction of knockout plasmids and the verification of transformants are indicated. The relative position of restriction endonuclease sites and the probe used in Southern blotting are also shown. (B) Confirmation of the disruption of PlflbD by PCR in the mutants with chlorimuron resistance was achieved with primer pair flbD-f/flbD-r. −, the wild-type strain; +, the knockout plasmid; M, DNA marker. (C) The transformants were confirmed to have no additional copy of the knockout cassette randomly inserted into the genome, by PCR with primers GFP-f/GFP-r. −, the wild-type strain; +, the knockout plasmid. (D) Southern blot analysis of ku80 KO and mutant strains. The probe was PCR amplified with the genomic DNA of the ku80 KO strain; the primers used are shown in Table S1. Download FIG S7, TIF file, 0.5 MB.
Copyright © 2020 Chen et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S8

Knockout of the PlfluG gene in P. lavendulum. (A) The disruption plasmid of PlfluG and the relative position of PlfluG in the ku80 KO strain. The relative positions of primers used for the construction of knockout plasmids and the verification of transformants are indicated. The relative position of restriction endonuclease sites and the probe used in Southern blotting are also shown. (B) Confirmation of the disruption of PlfluG by PCR in the mutants with chlorimuron resistance was achieved with primer pair fluG-f/fluG-r. −, the wild-type strain; +, the knockout plasmid; M, DNA marker. (C) The transformants were confirmed to have no additional copy of the knockout cassette randomly inserted into the genome, by PCR with primers GFP-f/GFP-r. −, the wild-type strain; +, the knockout plasmid. (D) Southern blot analysis of ku80 KO and mutant strains. The probe was PCR amplified with the genomic DNA of the ku80 KO strain; the primers used are shown in Table S1. (E) The colonies of ku80 KO and ΔPlfluG strains in different media and at different times. Note that on day 7, the ΔPlfluG colonies were whiter than the ku80 KO colonies, suggesting a delay of conidium production. Download FIG S8, TIF file, 1.7 MB.
Copyright © 2020 Chen et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S9

The germination of ku80 KO and ΔPlwetA strains in liquid MM. Bar = 10 μm. Download FIG S9, TIF file, 2.3 MB.
Copyright © 2020 Chen et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Deletion of PlwetA caused defective conidia.The wetA gene in A. nidulans encodes a protein required for the synthesis of conidium-specific cell wall layers in the final stages of conidium maturation (9). We wondered whether the absence of PlwetA might affect maturation of conidia in P. lavendulum.

To investigate whether PlwetA knockout would change the cell structure of conidia, we obtained transmission electron micrographs (TEM) of the cell wall structure and subcellular components of the ku80 KO strain and the ΔPlwetA mutant. Conidia from the ku80 KO strain formed an electron-dense C1 layer and a condensed electron-light C2 layer (Fig. 4A and B). However, in the ΔPlwetA strain, although both the C1 and C2 layers were formed, they both failed to condense, leading to a somewhat looser and thicker cell wall than in the wild-type strain (Fig. 4C and D). The cytoplasm of conidia from the ΔPlwetA mutant consisted mainly of vacuoles, accounting for approximately 64% of all conidia, while such vacuoles were found in less than 5% of the conidia of the ku80 KO strain (Fig. 4C and D). These observations implied that PlwetA plays an essential role in conidial cell wall integrity and conidial maturation.

FIG 4
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 4

Transmission electron micrographs of conidia of ku80 KO (A and B) and ΔPlwetA (C and D) strains of P. lavendulum. The white arrows in panel C indicate vacuoles in conidia. Black arrows indicate the C1 and C2 layers of the conidial cell wall, respectively. Bar = 1 μm.

To further evaluate conidium maturation in the ΔPlwetA strain, we compared the germination ratios of conidia of the ΔPlwetA and ku80 KO strains. We first cultivated the ku80 KO and ΔPlwetA strains at different temperatures (22°C, 26°C, 30°C, and 34°C). The conidial germination rate of the ΔPlwetA strain was significantly lower at 26°C and 30°C than that of the ku80 KO strain (Fig. 5B and C). When cultured at 22°C and 34°C, the germination rates of the conidia of both strains were very low (Fig. 5A and D). Remarkably, the conidium germinations of the two strains were similar, initiated by isotropic swelling of conidia and followed by polarization and emergence of a hyphal germ tube in the mutant strain. However, in the ku80 KO strain, conidia swelled bigger than in the mutant (Fig. S9).

FIG 5
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 5

Germination rate comparison between ku80 KO and ΔPlwetA strains of P. lavendulum at different temperatures.

We then tested the effects of PlwetA on spore tolerance to various stresses and found that ΔPlwetA mutant conidia exhibited drastically reduced tolerance to osmotic and oxidative stresses and were susceptible to the cell wall-interfering agents sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), Congo red (CR), calcofluor white (CFW), and heat shock (Fig. 6). The mutant was especially sensitive to heat (heated at 42°C for 10, 20, or 30 min) (Fig. 6E). Taken together, these results suggest that PlwetA plays an essential role in the proper maturation and stress tolerance of conidia in P. lavendulum.

FIG 6
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 6

The deletion of PlwetA resulted in higher sensitivity to various stresses in P. lavendulum. (A) High osmotic stress (0.2 to 0.8 M NaCl); (B) oxidative stress (0.2 to 0.8 mM H2O2); (C) 0.1 and 0.2 mg/ml of sodium dodecyl sulfate; (D) 0.2 mg/ml of Congo red and 10 μg/ml of calcofluor white; (E) heat shock at 42°C for 10, 20, or 30 min followed by growth at 28°C. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001; ******, P < 0.000001; ns, not significant.

Deletion of PlwetA caused a defect in trehalose production.Trehalose is known to be associated with the viability of conidia and stress resistance (10, 11). We measured trehalose production in spores and hyphae of the ku80 KO, ΔPlwetA, and ΔPlwetA::PlwetA strains. We found that the ΔPlwetA, ΔPlwetA::PlwetA, and ku80 KO strains produced similar amounts of trehalose in hyphae (Fig. 7A). Yet in conidia, the ΔPlwetA strain contained a lower trehalose content than that in the ku80 KO strain and its complemented ΔPlwetA::PlwetA strain, consistent with a relationship between spore defect and trehalose content.

FIG 7
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 7

The deletion of PlwetA led to reduced trehalose production in conidia in P. lavendulum. (A) The amount of trehalose in conidia and hyphae of the ku80 KO strain, the PlWetA mutant, and the complemented strain; (B to E) RT-qPCR analysis of trehalose synthetic genes in the ku80 KO and ΔPlwetA strains. *, P < 0.05; ns, not significant.

Loss of canonical trehalose biosynthesis genes in Aspergillus significantly alters cell wall structure and integrity (12). To identify putative regulatory subunits of the trehalose complex in P. lavendulum, the orthologous proteins of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Tps1, Tps2, Tps3, and Tsl1, were identified in P. lavendulum using BLASTp searches. The amino acid sequences of PlTps1, PlTps2, and PlTps3 showed 65%, 41%, and 39% identities to their S. cerevisiae orthologs, respectively. Protein domain analyses revealed that Tps1 and Tps2 shared domains similar to those of trehalose-6-phosphate synthase and trehalose-6-phosphatase, respectively. To explore the molecular mechanisms of the deficiency of conidia underlying PlWetA regulation, expression levels of Pltps1, Pltps2, Pltps3, and Pltsl1 during conidiation were examined by RT-qPCR (Fig. 7B to E). In both the ku80 KO and ΔPlwetA strains, the expression levels of all four genes were elevated after 6 h of conidiation induction and declined after 12 h (Pltps1, Pltps2, and Pltsl1) or 24 h (Pltps3). The expression levels of these genes in the ΔPlwetA strain were lower than that in the ku80 KO strain at the 12- and 24-h time points. This expression pattern suggested that trehalose production was regulated by PlWetA.

PlBrlA and PlAbaA, but not PlWetA, are dispensable for the secondary metabolites leucinostatins A and B in P. lavendulum.The fungal conidiation process is accompanied by many changes, including that of secondary-metabolite production. A previous report indicated that leucinostatins A and B produced in P. lilacinum could cause strong mortality and inhibited nematode reproduction (13). The leucinostatin biosynthesis gene cluster has been identified. In this study, we investigated whether PlBrlA, PlAbaA, or PlwetA was involved in the production of leucinostatins. We examined leucinostatin A and B production in the ku80 KO, ΔPlbrlA, ΔPlabaA, and ΔPlwetA strains using mycelia from a 10-day-old shaker culture by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) (Fig. 7A). The results showed that both the ku80 KO and the ΔPlwetA strains accumulated leucinostatins, while the ΔPlbrlA and ΔPlabaA strains did not produce detectable leucinostatins, in liquid culture. Interestingly, many other unknown secondary metabolites were also decreased dramatically in the last two strains. Our data showed that the expressions of both PlbrlA and PlabaA are necessary for leucinostatin biosynthesis. Besides the RT-qPCR performed above, we examined whether conidia were produced in the liquid cultures to confirm the expression of conidiation-related genes. The spores in the liquid medium were observed and counted after 48 h of inoculation, followed by every 24 h, until the 10th day. As shown in Fig. 8B and C, the ku80 KO and ΔPlwetA strains both produced conidia in submerged cultures, with the ku80 KO strain producing more conidia than the ΔPlwetA strain.

FIG 8
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 8

(A) HPLC detection of leucinostatins A and B in the ku80 KO, ΔPlbrlA, ΔPlabaA, and ΔPlwetA strains. Black arrows indicate the leucinostatin A and B peak. (B) Observation of conidium production in liquid media in the ku80 KO and ΔPlwetA strains. Bar = 10 μm. (C) Comparison of conidium numbers between the ku80 KO and ΔPlwetA strains cultivated in liquid medium for 10 days.

The conidiation-related genes are not directly involved in fungal pathogenesis against root-knot nematode eggs.To further evaluate the potential effects of these genes in fungal pathogenesis against nematodes, bioassays against the eggs of the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita were carried out in the ku80 KO and other derived mutant strains (Fig. 9). About 30% and 50% eggs had hatched within 5 and 10 days in the control set (without fungal infection), while in the infection sets, less than 10% were hatched (Fig. 9C). However, no significant differences were found between the ku80 KO strain and other mutants. As we used the same amounts of spores in the assays, the result revealed that although these conidium regulation genes were not directly involved in fungal pathogenesis against root-knot nematode eggs, they do play a role in fungal pathogenesis by regulating the quality and quantity of conidium production.

FIG 9
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 9

Bioassay against root-knot nematode eggs. (A) An intact nematode egg; (B) a nematode egg infected by P. lavendulum; (C) the hatching rates after fungal infection for various times. Bar = 50 μm.

DISCUSSION

In this study, we identified the regulatory genes in the conidiation of the nematophagous fungus P. lavendulum and investigated their biological effects through systematic gene deletion analyses. Our focus was on dissecting the developmental process of conidiogenesis. Several key development regulators were identified which could help enhance the biocontrol efficacy of this fungus against nematodes.

The orthologs of PlBrlA, PlAbaA, and PlWetA make up the central regulation module of conidiation in A. nidulans. They control the initiation and the middle and late stages of conidiogenesis. From our previous study, knocking out the PlbrlA gene in P. lavendulum totally blocked the formation of conidiophores (8). In the ΔPlbrlA mutant, the hyphae were extremely elongated, and the colony was loose and white. Disruption of the PlabaA gene also resulted in aborted conidiation. The ultrastructural study showed that PlabaA mutants produced immature phialides with a long tube-like structure but had no differentiated conidia (Fig. 2E). This phenotype is a little bit different from that in A. nidulans, which formed abacus-like structures (14, 15). Meanwhile, although deletion of PlwetA did not inhibit the initiation of conidiation, the conidia of the PlwetA mutant were immature. The cell walls of conidia were aberrant, with vacuoles and shallow pigmentation, and the germination of these conidia was delayed. The number of conidia was significantly lower than in the ku80 KO strain and the complemented strain. Collectively, the results suggest that like in other fungal species, the three regulators PlBrlA, PlAbaA, and PlWetA play a central role in conidiation regulation in P. lavendulum.

Genetic studies showed that several upstream developmental activators (the fluffy genes fluG, flbA, flbB, flbC, flbD, and flbE) are required for activation of the central regulatory pathway and play important roles in conidiation initiation in A. nidulans (16, 17). In parallel to the conidiation signaling cascade, two main G-protein-mediated signaling pathways, FadA (Gα) and SfaD (Gβ)::GpgA (Gγ) and GanB (Gα) and SfaD (Gβ)::GpgA (Gγ), can negatively influence fungal development and brlA expression via modulating cAMP/protein kinase A (PKA) signaling (7, 18). The FadA and SfaD::GpgA pathway activates vegetative growth and represses conidiation (18–20). Surprisingly, besides the PlflbA gene, knocking out the fluffy genes PlflbC and PlflbD did not cause decreases in conidia. This result was different from that for the homologous genes in A. nidulans. The specific functions of PlflbA, PlflbC, PlflbD, and PlfluG require further study.

The conidium maturation regulated by PlWetA also affected conidium germination under both normal and stressful culture conditions. Loss-of-function mutations in the wetA locus in A. nidulans and Aspergillus fumigatus led to defects in the crenulation of the C1 wall layer and in condensation of the C2 wall layer in conidia (11, 21). Similarly, crenulation of the C1 wall layer was observed in the ΔPlwetA mutant and the C2 layer in the ΔPlwetA mutant turned quite loose and thick. Meanwhile, large vacuoles were found inside the conidia, indicating an additional role besides the conidial wall completion in P. lavendulum. In A. fumigatus and Fusarium graminearum, the conidia of the wetA ortholog deletion mutant had a survival rate of less than 10% at 20 days after incubation (11, 22). However, in spite of delayed germination for ΔPlwetA conidia, about 70% conidia could finally germinate after 13 h of incubation. A stress tolerance test indicated that conidia of the ΔPlwetA strain were more sensitive to osmotic stress, SDS, CR, CFW, heat shock, and oxidative stress. These results were likely due to deficient conidia produced by the PlwetA deletion mutant.

Trehalose is now recognized to serve highly diverse functions for prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells, ranging from cellular protection to symbiotic and pathogenic host interactions (23). The lack of trehalose in fungal spores and hyphae often leads to rapid loss of viability and increased sensitivity to a variety of physiological stresses (10, 24, 25). In aspergilli, such as A. nidulans and A. fumigatus, trehalose is known to be required for spore viability and stress resistance, and wetA is required for trehalose production in A. fumigatus (10, 11, 26). However, there was no significant difference in trehalose content in hyphae between the ku80 KO and ΔPlwetA strains. In contrast, the spores of the ΔPlwetA mutant contained much less trehalose than the ku80 KO strain. The mRNA levels of some trehalose biosynthesis genes were analyzed by RT-qPCR. Our results suggest that PlWetA expression was likely involved in regulating the biosynthesis of trehalose. Together, these results revealed that though the WetA orthologs have highly conserved functions, additional functions may have evolved for this gene in P. lavendulum.

The central regulatory pathway of conidiation could also influence secondary-metabolite production. The production of secondary metabolites in some nematophagous fungi has been linked to their nematicidal activities. For example, culture filtrates of P. lilacinum, in which leucinostatin was produced, had nematicidal activity and inhibited nematode reproduction (13). The gene cluster of leucinostatin production in P. lilacinum had been identified and characterized (27). We also found that a similar gene cluster existed in the P. lavendulum genome. Thus, we speculated whether leucinostatin was produced in P. lavendulum and correlated leucinostatin production to conidiation. Using HPLC analysis, we found that leucinostatins A and B were produced in the liquid culture of P. lavendulum. The ΔPlwetA strain seemed to produce more leucinostatins as well as other secondary metabolites, while the production of leucinostatins was inhibited in the ΔPlbrlA and ΔPlabaA strains. These results implied that PlbrlA and PlabaA were required for the expression of the gene cluster involved in leucinostatin production. The expression of PlbrlA, PlabaA, and PlwetA in liquid-cultured hyphae was indicated by conidium production, although the amount of conidia was very low compared with that of organisms cultured on solid agar media (Fig. 8). The bioassays against root-knot nematode eggs showed no direct roles of these genes, as well as leucinostatins A and B (maybe due to low production under such conditions), in fungal pathogenesis. However, the decreased spore amounts and the decreased abilities of the mutants to survive environmental stresses indicate their indirect roles in their biocontrol efficiencies against nematodes.

In this study, we functionally characterized several conidiation regulation genes in P. lavendulum and composed a basic framework of P. lavendulum conidiogenesis (Fig. 10). These results expand our knowledge of conidiogenesis and conidium maturation in filamentous fungi. However, a great deal of information remains to be obtained, such as the molecular processes that regulate PlbrlA, PlabaA, and PlwetA expression and the downstream genes that are directly regulated by these three genes. Further studies are needed to reveal the genetic network underlying conidiogenesis in P. lavendulum and the metabolic processes involved in its development.

FIG 10
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 10

A putative framework for gene regulation in P. lavendulum conidiation. Orange rectangles indicate positive regulators in conidiation, and black rectangles indicate negative ones. The arrangement and relationship between regulators were based on their homologs in A. nidulans.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Strains, vector, and bacterial strains.Purpureocillium lavendulum wild-type strain YMF1.00683 was isolated from soil in Yunnan Province, China. The ku80 gene, involved in the nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) pathway, was knocked out in this strain to create a deletion mutant which showed a high efficiency in homologous recombination (8). This deletion mutant was the main strain used for subsequent molecular analyses in this study. Both the ku80 KO strain and its derived knockout mutant strains were maintained in minimal solid or liquid medium (MM) with 2% glucose and incubated at 28°C (8). Escherichia coli DH5α was used for vector construction. Agrobacterium tumefaciens AGL-1 was used for fungal transformation (28). Strains used in this study are described in Table 1.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
TABLE 1

Strains used in this study

Construction of mutant strains.To search for putative sporulation genes in the genome of P. lavendulum for our investigation, we first used the sequences of the core regulatory genes and the fluffy genes involved in the sporulation in A. nidulans as queries and compared them to the genome sequence of P. lavendulum by BLASTp search (29).

Gene knockouts were performed by the homologous recombination strategy. Knockout plasmids were generated by the Gateway-based method described previously (8). Briefly, the 5′ and 3′ homologous arms of the candidate sporulation genes were PCR amplified with a specific attB recombination site added at each 5′ end. Then the two arms and two plasmids, pPK2-OSCAR-GFP and pA-Sur-OSCAR, were assembled by Gateway cloning with the BP clonase II enzyme mix (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific). The assembled knockout plasmids were transformed into the P. lavendulum ku80 strain by A. tumefaciens-mediated transformation. Colonies grown on selective medium containing 50 μg/ml of chlorimuron were then screened by gene-specific PCR and confirmed by Southern hybridization.

To obtain a complemented strain, a genomic DNA fragment of the target wild-type gene including the promoter region, ORF, and termination region was PCR amplified and inserted into plasmid pPK2-bml-GFP (cut by SbfI/XbaI). The reconstructed plasmid was then transformed into the corresponding mutant strain by A. tumefaciens-mediated transformation. The transformants were selected on MM agar containing 10 μg/ml of benomyl. The colonies were screened by PCR and confirmed by Southern blotting. Primers used in gene knockouts, complementary plasmid constructions, PCR screening, and Southern blotting are listed in Table S1.

TABLE S1

PCR primers used in this study. Download Table S1, DOCX file, 0.03 MB.
Copyright © 2020 Chen et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Quantitative real-time PCR analysis.Total RNA from the P. lavendulum was isolated as described for a previous study (30). cDNA was generated by reverse transcription of the total RNA using SuperScript II (Invitrogen). Real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) analysis was performed using an ABI Prism 7000 system (Applied Biosystems Inc., Norwalk, CT) using SYBR green (TaKaRa, Dalian, China) as described previously (31). The actin gene was used as the reference gene. The primers used for RT-qPCR analysis are listed in Table S1.

Conidium production and morphology comparison.Conidium production was quantified by counting the number of conidia produced after culturing 5 μl of a conidial suspension (1 × 107 conidia/ml) of each strain on solid MM agar at 28°C for 8 days. After incubation, three 0.8-cm-diameter cores were harvested from the center of each plate and homogenized in 1 ml of 0.05% Tween. Counting was performed with a hemocytometer. For colony phenotype, a point inoculation of 2.5 μl of 1 × 104 spores/ml was performed on MM agar and incubated for 10 days at 28°C, followed by colony phenotype observations. In addition, we used another method of spore counting for individual conidiophores. Here, each strain was inoculated onto a thin layer of solid MM agar sandwiched between a sterilized slide and a coverslip. The slides were then placed on top of glass rods in a moist plate containing 20% glycerol in water (moist chamber culture). After 8 days of incubation, the number of spores on each conidiophore was counted under a light microscope.

Stress tolerance tests and trehalose assay.To evaluate the effects of gene knockouts on conidium germination under various stress conditions, germination rates of conidia from the ku80 deletion mutant and other mutants were inoculated onto solid MM supplemented with various concentrations of NaCl (0.2 to 0.8 M), H2O2 (0.2 to 0.8 mM), sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS; 0.1 to 0.2 mg/ml), Congo red (CR; 0.2 mg/ml), or calcofluor white (CFW; 10 μg/ml). To evaluate thermal tolerance, conidia were first exposed to 42°C for various times and then transferred onto MM and incubated at 28°C to obtain germinated spore counts. Moreover, conidia from all strains were inoculated onto MM and cultured at different temperatures, with germination rates determined at 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, and 13 h postinoculation. All experiments were conducted twice, with three replicates for each strain in each experiment.

The trehalose assay was performed as described previously (22), with slight modifications. Briefly, freshly harvested conidia (1 × 108 conidia from a 10-day-old culture) were inoculated onto liquid MM and incubated at 28°C for 2 days on a rotary shaker (140 rpm). Approximately 8 mg of hyphae/conidia were washed three times with 0.05% Tween 20, resuspended in 1 ml of extraction solution, and incubated at 100°C for 3 h. After centrifugation for 10 min at 11,000 × g, 250 μl of supernatant was mixed with 1 ml of reaction mixture and samples were incubated at 95°C for 10 min. The samples were then transferred to room temperature to measure trehalose content by using a trehalose assay kit (Solarbio, Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The experiments were performed independently three times.

Electron microscopy.To determine the effects of gene deletions on hyphal structure, the original strain and the derived deletion mutants were grown in MM for 15 days at 28°C. The conidiophore structures were investigated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) as described previously (32). The cell walls of the ku80 KO and the ΔPlwetA strains were examined by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) as described previously (33).

Measurement of leucinostatins.The P. lavendulum ku80 KO strain and three deletion mutants, the ΔPlwetA, ΔPlabaA, and ΔPlbrlA mutants, were cultivated in 200 ml of PDB medium (potato dextrose broth, potato starch [from infusion] 4.0 g/liter, dextrose 20.0 g/liter) at 28°C on a shaker at 140 rpm for 10 days. The culture medium (200 ml) was extracted with the same volume of ethyl acetate two times (each time for 20 min) ultrasonically with vortexing for 20 min. The organic phases were combined and dried with methyl alcohol and acetone three times. The samples were redissolved in 0.5 ml of methanol and measured on an Agilent HPLC instrument. For HPLC measurements, 10 μl of the standard leucinostatin A-B mixture or extracted sample was injected. A ZORBA×ODS (4.6 by 205 mm; 5 μl) column was used at a flow rate of 1 ml/min with the following gradient: fresh extracts of mutant strains were detected for 30 min using a linear gradient of 20% to 100% methyl alcohol (0 to 20 min), 100% methyl alcohol (20 to 25 min), and 20% methyl alcohol (25 to 30 min) (27).

Biocontrol activity assay against the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita.To identify the potential role of sporulation-related genes in infection of nematodes in P. lavendulum, we assayed the infectivity of mutant strains against the root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita. Briefly, 107 conidia of each strain was added to 200 newly isolated eggs of Meloidogyne incognita suspended in 2 ml of distilled water in a 5-cm petri dish and incubated at 28°C for 10 days. The hatched nematodes were counted under a light microscope. The assays were performed three times.

GenBank accession numbers.The sequences for the P. lavendulum genes newly identified in this study have been deposited into GenBank under the following accession numbers: PlfadA, MK603194; PlpkaA, MK603195; PlflbA, MK603196; PlflbC, MK603197; PlflbD, MK603198; and PlfluG, MK603199.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are grateful to Weiguo Fang, Institute of Microbiology and College of Life Sciences, Zhejiang University, for providing plasmids pPK2-OSCAR-GFP and pA-SUR-OSCAR and for his technical guidance.

This work was supported in part by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31860016, 31572063, and 31770064), Yunnan Applied Basic Research Project (2016FB062), and grants from the Young Academic and Technical Leader Raising Foundation of Yunnan Province and the 10-thousand Talents Program in Yunnan province (to Lian-Ming Liang).

FOOTNOTES

    • Received September 13, 2020.
    • Accepted September 17, 2020.
  • Copyright © 2020 Chen et al.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Abad P,
    2. Gouzy J,
    3. Aury JM,
    4. Castagnone-Sereno P,
    5. Danchin EG,
    6. Deleury E,
    7. Perfus-Barbeoch L,
    8. Anthouard V,
    9. Artiguenave F,
    10. Blok VC,
    11. Caillaud MC,
    12. Coutinho PM,
    13. Dasilva C,
    14. De Luca F,
    15. Deau F,
    16. Esquibet M,
    17. Flutre T,
    18. Goldstone JV,
    19. Hamamouch N,
    20. Hewezi T,
    21. Jaillon O,
    22. Jubin C,
    23. Leonetti P,
    24. Magliano M,
    25. Maier TR,
    26. Markov GV,
    27. McVeigh P,
    28. Pesole G,
    29. Poulain J,
    30. Robinson-Rechavi M,
    31. Sallet E,
    32. Segurens B,
    33. Steinbach D,
    34. Tytgat T,
    35. Ugarte E,
    36. van Ghelder C,
    37. Veronico P,
    38. Baum TJ,
    39. Blaxter M,
    40. Bleve-Zacheo T,
    41. Davis EL,
    42. Ewbank JJ,
    43. Favery B,
    44. Grenier E,
    45. Henrissat B,
    46. Jones JT,
    47. Laudet V,
    48. Maule AG,
    49. Quesneville H,
    50. Rosso MN,
    51. Schiex T,
    52. Smant G,
    53. Weissenbach J,
    54. Wincker P
    . 2008. Genome sequence of the metazoan plant-parasitic nematode Meloidogyne incognita. Nat Biotechnol 26:909–915. doi:10.1038/nbt.1482.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    1. Jatala P
    . 1986. Biological control of plant-parasitic nematodes. Annu Rev Phytopathol 24:453–489. doi:10.1146/annurev.py.24.090186.002321.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. 3.↵
    1. Perveen Z,
    2. Shahzad S
    . 2013. A comparative study of the efficacy of Paecilomyces species against root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita. Pak J Nematol 31:125–131.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    1. Perdomo H,
    2. Cano J,
    3. Gené J,
    4. García D,
    5. Hernández M,
    6. Guarro J
    . 2013. Polyphasic analysis of Purpureocillium lilacinum isolates from different origins and proposal of the new species Purpureocillium lavendulum. Mycologia 105:151–161. doi:10.3852/11-190.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Adams TH,
    2. Wieser JK,
    3. Yu J-H
    . 1998. Asexual sporulation in Aspergillus nidulans. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 62:35–54. doi:10.1128/MMBR.62.1.35-54.1998.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Ni M,
    2. Gao N,
    3. Kwon N-J,
    4. Shin K-S,
    5. Yu J-H
    . 2010. Regulation of Aspergillus conidiation, p 559–576. In Borkovich KA, Ebbole DJ (ed), Cellular and molecular biology of filamentous fungi. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC.
  7. 7.↵
    1. Park H-S,
    2. Yu J-H
    . 2012. Genetic control of asexual sporulation in filamentous fungi. Curr Opin Microbiol 15:669–677. doi:10.1016/j.mib.2012.09.006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Liu L,
    2. Cao Y-R,
    3. Zhang C-C,
    4. Fan H-F,
    5. Guo Z-Y,
    6. Yang H-Y,
    7. Chen M,
    8. Han J-J,
    9. Xu J,
    10. Zhang K-Q,
    11. Liang L-M
    . 2019. An efficient gene disruption system for the nematophagous fungus Purpureocillium lavendulum. Fungal Biol 123:274–282. doi:10.1016/j.funbio.2018.10.009.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. 9.↵
    1. Sewall TC
    . 1994. Cellular effects of misscheduled brlA, abaA, and wetA expression in Aspergillus nidulans. Can J Microbiol 40:1035–1042. doi:10.1139/m94-164.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. 10.↵
    1. Fillinger S,
    2. Chaveroche M-K,
    3. van Dijck P,
    4. de Vries R,
    5. Ruijter G,
    6. Thevelein J,
    7. d’Enfert C
    . 2001. Trehalose is required for the acquisition of tolerance to a variety of stresses in the filamentous fungus Aspergillus nidulans. Microbiology (Reading) 147:1851–1862. doi:10.1099/00221287-147-7-1851.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    1. Tao L,
    2. Yu JH
    . 2011. AbaA and WetA govern distinct stages of Aspergillus fumigatus development. Microbiology (Reading) 157:313–326. doi:10.1099/mic.0.044271-0.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Thammahong A,
    2. Caffrey-Card AK,
    3. Dhingra S,
    4. Obar JJ,
    5. Cramer RA
    . 2017. Aspergillus fumigatus trehalose-regulatory subunit homolog moonlights to mediate cell wall homeostasis through modulation of chitin synthase activity mBio 8:e00056-17. doi:10.1128/mBio.00056-17.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Park J,
    2. Hargreaves J,
    3. McConville E,
    4. Stirling G,
    5. Ghisalberti E,
    6. Sivasithamparam K
    . 2004. Production of leucinostatins and nematicidal activity of Australian isolates of Paecilomyces lilacinus (Thom) Samson. Lett Appl Microbiol 38:271–276. doi:10.1111/j.1472-765x.2004.01488.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Andrianopoulos A,
    2. Timberlake WE
    . 1994. The Aspergillus nidulans abaA gene encodes a transcriptional activator that acts as a genetic switch to control development. Mol Cell Biol 14:2503–2515. doi:10.1128/mcb.14.4.2503.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Sewall TC,
    2. Mims CW,
    3. Timberlake WE
    . 1990. abaA controls phialide differentiation in Aspergillus nidulans. Plant Cell 2:731–739. doi:10.1105/tpc.2.8.731.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Adams TH,
    2. Boylan MT,
    3. Timberlake WE
    . 1988. brlA is necessary and sufficient to direct conidiophore development in Aspergillus nidulans. Cell 54:353–362. doi:10.1016/0092-8674(88)90198-5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. 17.↵
    1. Wieser J,
    2. Lee BN,
    3. Fondon JW,
    4. Adams TH
    . 1994. Genetic requirements for initiating asexual development in Aspergillus nidulans. Curr Genet 27:62–69. doi:10.1007/BF00326580.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Hicks JK,
    2. Yu JH,
    3. Keller NP,
    4. Adams TH
    . 1997. Aspergillus sporulation and mycotoxin production both require inactivation of the FadA Gα protein‐dependent signaling pathway. EMBO J 16:4916–4923. doi:10.1093/emboj/16.16.4916.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Rosén S,
    2. Yu JH,
    3. Adams TH
    . 1999. The Aspergillus nidulans sfaD gene encodes a G protein β subunit that is required for normal growth and repression of sporulation. EMBO J 18:5592–5600. doi:10.1093/emboj/18.20.5592.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Yu J-H,
    2. Wieser J,
    3. Adams T
    . 1996. The Aspergillus FlbA RGS domain protein antagonizes G protein signaling to block proliferation and allow development. EMBO J 15:5184–5190. doi:10.1002/j.1460-2075.1996.tb00903.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. 21.↵
    1. Sewall T,
    2. Mims C,
    3. Timberlake W
    . 1990. Conidium differentiation in Aspergillus nidulans wild-type and wet-white (wetA) mutant strains. Dev Biol 138:499–508. doi:10.1016/0012-1606(90)90215-5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. 22.↵
    1. Son H,
    2. Kim M-G,
    3. Min K,
    4. Lim JY,
    5. Choi GJ,
    6. Kim J-C,
    7. Chae S-K,
    8. Lee Y-W
    . 2014. WetA is required for conidiogenesis and conidium maturation in the ascomycete fungus Fusarium graminearum. Eukaryot Cell 13:87–98. doi:10.1128/EC.00220-13.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Schwarz S,
    2. Van Dijck P
    . 2017. Trehalose metabolism: a sweet spot for Burkholderia pseudomallei virulence. Virulence 8:5–7. doi:10.1080/21505594.2016.1216295.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  24. 24.↵
    1. Lowe RG,
    2. Lord M,
    3. Rybak K,
    4. Trengove RD,
    5. Oliver RP,
    6. Solomon PS
    . 2009. Trehalose biosynthesis is involved in sporulation of Stagonospora nodorum. Fungal Genet Biol 46:381–389. doi:10.1016/j.fgb.2009.02.002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Ribeiro MJ,
    2. Reinders A,
    3. Boller T,
    4. Wiemken A,
    5. De Virgilio C
    . 1997. Trehalose synthesis is important for the acquisition of thermotolerance in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Mol Microbiol 25:571–581. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2958.1997.4961856.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Ni M,
    2. Yu J-H
    . 2007. A novel regulator couples sporogenesis and trehalose biogenesis in Aspergillus nidulans. PLoS One 2:e970. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000970.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Wang G,
    2. Liu Z,
    3. Lin R,
    4. Li E,
    5. Mao Z,
    6. Ling J,
    7. Yang Y,
    8. Yin WB,
    9. Xie B
    . 2016. Biosynthesis of antibiotic leucinostatins in bio-control fungus Purpureocillium lilacinum and their inhibition on Phytophthora revealed by genome mining. PLoS Pathog 12:e1005685. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1005685.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  28. 28.↵
    1. Xu C,
    2. Zhang X,
    3. Qian Y,
    4. Chen X,
    5. Liu R,
    6. Zeng G,
    7. Zhao H,
    8. Fang W
    . 2014. A high-throughput gene disruption methodology for the entomopathogenic fungus Metarhizium robertsii. PLoS One 9:e107657. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0107657.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Altschul SF,
    2. Madden TL,
    3. Schäffer AA,
    4. Zhang J,
    5. Zhang Z,
    6. Miller W,
    7. Lipman DJ
    . 1997. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25:3389–3402. doi:10.1093/nar/25.17.3389.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  30. 30.↵
    1. Liang L,
    2. Wu H,
    3. Liu Z,
    4. Shen R,
    5. Gao H,
    6. Yang J,
    7. Zhang K
    . 2013. Proteomic and transcriptional analyses of Arthrobotrys oligospora cell wall related proteins reveal complexity of fungal virulence against nematodes. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 97:8683–8692. doi:10.1007/s00253-013-5178-1.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  31. 31.↵
    1. Chen Y-L,
    2. Gao Y,
    3. Zhang K-Q,
    4. Zou C-G
    . 2013. Autophagy is required for trap formation in the nematode-trapping fungus Arthrobotrys oligospora. Environ Microbiol Rep 5:511–517. doi:10.1111/1758-2229.12054.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  32. 32.↵
    1. Liang L,
    2. Shen R,
    3. Mo Y,
    4. Yang J,
    5. Ji X,
    6. Zhang K-Q
    . 2015. A proposed adhesin AoMad1 helps nematode-trapping fungus Arthrobotrys oligospora recognizing host signals for life-style switching. Fungal Genet Biol 81:172–181. doi:10.1016/j.fgb.2015.02.012.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  33. 33.↵
    1. Liang L,
    2. Gao H,
    3. Li J,
    4. Liu L,
    5. Liu Z,
    6. Zhang KQ
    . 2017. The Woronin body in the nematophagous fungus Arthrobotrys oligospora is essential for trap formation and efficient pathogenesis. Fungal Biol 121:11–20. doi:10.1016/j.funbio.2016.08.010.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Functional Characterization of Core Regulatory Genes Involved in Sporulation of the Nematophagous Fungus Purpureocillium lavendulum
Mi Chen, He-Yu Yang, Yan-Ru Cao, Quan-Quan Hui, Hai-Feng Fan, Chen-Chen Zhang, Jing-Jing Han, Zhi-Yi Guo, Jianping Xu, Ke-Qin Zhang, Lian-Ming Liang
mSphere Oct 2020, 5 (5) e00932-20; DOI: 10.1128/mSphere.00932-20

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print
Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this mSphere article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Functional Characterization of Core Regulatory Genes Involved in Sporulation of the Nematophagous Fungus Purpureocillium lavendulum
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from mSphere
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in mSphere.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Functional Characterization of Core Regulatory Genes Involved in Sporulation of the Nematophagous Fungus Purpureocillium lavendulum
Mi Chen, He-Yu Yang, Yan-Ru Cao, Quan-Quan Hui, Hai-Feng Fan, Chen-Chen Zhang, Jing-Jing Han, Zhi-Yi Guo, Jianping Xu, Ke-Qin Zhang, Lian-Ming Liang
mSphere Oct 2020, 5 (5) e00932-20; DOI: 10.1128/mSphere.00932-20
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Purpureocillium lavendulum
asexuality
development
nematophagous fungi
conidiation
conidiophore

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About mSphere
  • Board of Editors
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • Embargo Policy
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Warranty
  • Types of Articles
  • Getting Started
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #mSphereJ

@ASMicrobiology

       

 

Website feedback

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Online ISSN: 2379-5042