Skip to main content
  • ASM Journals
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Research and News from ASM Journals
    • mSphere of Influence: Commentaries from Early Career Microbiologists
    • Archive
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Getting Started
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mSphere
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • ASM Journals
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
mSphere
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Research and News from ASM Journals
    • mSphere of Influence: Commentaries from Early Career Microbiologists
    • Archive
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Getting Started
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mSphere
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
Research Article | Host-Microbe Biology

Binding of Leishmania infantum Lipophosphoglycan to the Midgut Is Not Sufficient To Define Vector Competence in Lutzomyia longipalpis Sand Flies

Iliano V. Coutinho-Abreu, James Oristian, Waldionê de Castro, Timothy R. Wilson, Claudio Meneses, Rodrigo P. Soares, Valéria M. Borges, Albert Descoteaux, Shaden Kamhawi, Jesus G. Valenzuela
Ira J. Blader, Editor
Iliano V. Coutinho-Abreu
aVector Molecular Biology Section, Laboratory of Malaria and Vector Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Iliano V. Coutinho-Abreu
James Oristian
aVector Molecular Biology Section, Laboratory of Malaria and Vector Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Waldionê de Castro
aVector Molecular Biology Section, Laboratory of Malaria and Vector Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Timothy R. Wilson
aVector Molecular Biology Section, Laboratory of Malaria and Vector Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Claudio Meneses
aVector Molecular Biology Section, Laboratory of Malaria and Vector Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rodrigo P. Soares
bFundação Oswaldo Cruz—FIOCRUZ, Instituto René Rachou, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Valéria M. Borges
cFundação Oswaldo Cruz—FIOCRUZ, Instituto Gonçalo Moniz, Salvador, BA, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Albert Descoteaux
dINRS—Centre Armand-Frappier Santé Biotechnologie, Laval, Quebec, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shaden Kamhawi
aVector Molecular Biology Section, Laboratory of Malaria and Vector Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jesus G. Valenzuela
aVector Molecular Biology Section, Laboratory of Malaria and Vector Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jesus G. Valenzuela
Ira J. Blader
University at Buffalo
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/mSphere.00594-20
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

The major surface lipophosphoglycan (LPG) of Leishmania parasites is critical to vector competence in restrictive sand fly vectors in mediating Leishmania attachment to the midgut epithelium, considered essential to parasite survival and development. However, the relevance of LPG for sand flies that harbor multiple species of Leishmania remains elusive. We tested binding of Leishmania infantum wild-type (WT), LPG-defective (Δlpg1 mutants), and add-back (Δlpg1 + LPG1) lines to sand fly midguts in vitro and their survival in Lutzomyia longipalpis sand flies in vivo. Le. infantum WT parasites attached to the Lu. longipalpis midgut in vitro, with late-stage parasites binding to midguts in significantly higher numbers than were seen with early-stage promastigotes. Δlpg1 mutants did not bind to Lu. longipalpis midguts, and this was rescued in the Δlpg1 + LPG1 lines, indicating that midgut binding is mediated by LPG. When Lu. longipalpis sand flies were infected with the Le. infantum WT or Le. infantum Δlpg1 or Le. infantum Δlpg1 + LPG1 line of the BH46 or BA262 strains, the BH46 Δlpg1 mutant, but not the BA262 Δlpg1 mutant, survived and grew to numbers similar to those seen with the WT and Δlpg1 + LPG1 lines. Exposure of BH46 and BA262 Δlpg1 mutants to blood-engorged midgut extracts led to mortality of the BA262 Δlpg1 but not the BH46 Δlpg1 parasites. These findings suggest that Le. infantum LPG protects parasites on a strain-specific basis early in infection, likely against toxic components of blood digestion, but that it is not necessary to prevent Le. infantum evacuation along with the feces in the permissive vector Lu. longipalpis.

IMPORTANCE It is well established that the presence of LPG is sufficient to define the vector competence of restrictive sand fly vectors with respect to Leishmania parasites. However, the permissiveness of other sand flies with respect to multiple Leishmania species suggests that other factors might define vector competence for these vectors. In this study, we investigated the underpinnings of Leishmania infantum survival and development in its natural vector, Lutzomyia longipalpis. We found that LPG-mediated midgut binding persists in late-stage parasites. This observation is of relevance for the understanding of vector-parasite molecular interactions and suggests that only a subset of infective metacyclic-stage parasites (metacyclics) lose their ability to attach to the midgut, with implications for parasite transmission dynamics. However, our data also demonstrate that LPG is not a determining factor in Leishmania infantum retention in the midgut of Lutzomyia longipalpis, a permissive vector. Rather, LPG appears to be more important in protecting some parasite strains from the toxic environment generated during blood meal digestion in the insect gut. Thus, the relevance of LPG in parasite development in permissive vectors appears to be a complex issue and should be investigated on a strain-specific basis.

INTRODUCTION

Phlebotomine sand flies (Diptera—Psychodidae) are biological vectors of Leishmania parasites (Kinetoplastidae). Different species of Leishmania cause a spectrum of diseases collectively known as leishmaniasis. Leishmaniasis is endemic in over 88 countries, putting over 350 million people at risk of becoming infected (1). Overall, 2 million people are infected with Leishmania annually, resulting in between 40,000 and 90,000 patient deaths due to complications from the most dangerous form of the disease, visceral leishmaniasis (1).

In order to establish a mature transmissible infection, Leishmania needs to escape from the barriers imposed by the sand fly midgut (2–8). Digestive enzymes in the sand fly gut were shown to be detrimental to the transitional stages during differentiation of Leishmania major amastigotes to procyclic promastigotes (5, 7). This susceptibility was also attributed to toxic by-products from the digested blood for Leishmania donovani (9). Upon activation, the sand fly immune system is also known to be effective at reducing parasite loads by means of the Imd pathway (8). The peritrophic matrix (PM) represents another strong barrier to Leishmania development in the sand fly midgut (2, 3, 5, 10). Leishmania relies on breakdown of the PM, mediated by a sand fly-secreted chitinase, to escape its confinement (2). After this step, the parasites attach to the midgut epithelium (6, 11), and such attachment in restrictive vectors requires specific carbohydrate side chains on the surface of the parasite that bind a specific receptor on the midgut microvilli (6, 12).

Among the barriers preventing Leishmania development within the sand fly, midgut attachment has been suggested as the defining factor of sand fly vector competence (6, 12). The Leishmania surface is decorated with a rich glycocalyx (13–15), exhibiting four major types of GPI (glycosylphosphatidylinositol)-anchored glycoconjugates (16). The lipophosphoglycan (LPG) molecule is the most abundant component of the promastigote surface coat and consists of an oligosaccharide cap, a backbone of galactose-mannose repeated units [Gal(β1,3)Man(α1)-PO4], a conserved glycan core {Gal(α1,6)Gal(α1,3)Galf(β1,3)[Glc(α1)-PO4]Man(α1,3)Man(α1,4)-GlcN(α1)}, and a PI (1-O-alkyl-2-lyso-phosphatidylinositol) anchor (13, 14, 17). The galactose-mannose repeats exhibit different carbohydrate side chains, depending upon the Leishmania species, strains, and stages (16, 18). It has been demonstrated that variations in the nature of the side chain sugars decorating the LPG molecule of nonmetacyclic stages (nonmetacyclics) confer specificity to interactions with vectors (16). Further, these side chains are modified to ensure release of metacyclic parasites (metacyclics) from the midgut (16); in some instances, the LPG molecule conformationally prevents binding of sugars to the midgut (16, 19–21). Such studies of vector competence, mostly undertaken under laboratory conditions, sorted sand flies into two groups (16). The restrictive, or specific, vectors, such as Phlebotomus papatasi, P. duboscqi, and P. sergenti, are able to support the development of only one species of Leishmania (16). The permissive sand fly vectors, such as Phlebotomus perniciosus, Phlebotomus argentipes, and Lutzomyia longipalpis, are capable of supporting multiple Leishmania species (22–24).

The functional binding properties of Le. major LPG have been extensively studied (6, 12, 25, 26). It has been demonstrated that the purified nonlipidic portion of the Le. major LPG (PG) binds only to midgut receptors of its natural sand fly vector, Phlebotomus papatasi, but that the binding is restricted to the LPG from the procyclic stage (6). Whereas the PG of the nonbinding metacyclic stage is a much longer molecule and displays arabinose side chains (6), the procyclic LPG is shorter and exhibits galactose side chains (6), which are recognized by a galactose-binding lectin (PpGalec) expressed on the P. papatasi midgut epithelium (11). Supporting the importance of LPG in sand fly vector competence, a Le. major strain devoid of LPG side chains was not capable of developing in P. papatasi (12), nor was wild-type (WT) Le. major fed along with anti-PpGalec antibodies (11). In both cases, the infections were mostly lost once the digested blood was passed. Le. major lpg1 knockout (KO) parasites also failed to develop in another natural vector of Le. major, Phlebotomus duboscqi (25, 26).

Although the factors defining vector competence of the sand fly P. papatasi for Le. major are well known (6), they may not govern interactions of other sand fly-Leishmania pairs (12, 24–29). In fact, purified LPGs from multiple Leishmania species bind to the midgut of the sand fly P. argentipes (12), a permissive vector, despite exhibiting divergent carbohydrate side chains (16). Interestingly, Le. major and Le. tropica outcompete Le. infantum binding to midguts of its natural vector Lu. longipalpis when simultaneously in contact with the epithelium (29). In addition, the Le. major lpg1 knockout line can successfully develop in both permissive Lu. longipalpis (25) and permissive P. perniciosus (26) sand flies. Even though an LPG-independent mechanism based on a potential Leishmania lectin attaching to the microvilli glycocalyx has been proposed for Leishmania development in permissive vectors (24, 28, 30) and a candidate midgut mucin of 45 kDa that binds to Le. major was identified previously (30), confirmation of its function as a midgut receptor is yet to be demonstrated. Further, there is also a possibility that this phenomenon is restricted to Le. major development in permissive vectors and is not extendable to other Leishmania species naturally transmitted by such vectors. Such species-specific features have been demonstrated for the FLAG1/SMP1 flagellar protein that mediates midgut attachment of Le. major to P. papatasi but not Le. infantum to Lu. longipalpis (31, 32), and the data are further supported by apparent survival of Le. infantum line Δlpg1 in P. perniciosus (27) and of Le. mexicana line Δlpg1 in Lu. longipalpis (33).

The nature of the mechanisms defining vector competence in permissive sand fly vectors is still an open issue. The importance of LPG for midgut binding and parasite survival needs to be further analyzed, particularly as the lack of Δlpg1 + LPG1 add-back lines in a previous study (27) precluded a definitive conclusion about the importance of LPG in vector competence of permissive vectors. Here, we assessed midgut binding and survival and development of Le. infantum in the sand fly Lu. longipalpis using multiple wild-type strains as well as two Δlpg1 mutants and Δlpg1 + LPG1 add-back lines to answer the following questions. (i) Does Le. infantum bind to the midgut of Lu. longipalpis? (ii) If it does, is the Leishmania binding to the midgut stage specific? (iii) Is Le. infantum LPG necessary for parasite binding to the midgut? (iv) Is the Le. infantum LPG sufficient to define vector competence in the natural permissive vector? (v) Do components of the blood bolus affect Le. infantum survival?

RESULTS

Le. infantum binds to the midgut epithelium of Lu. longipalpis.In order to confirm previous results (6) and standardize the technique, we exposed P. papatasi midguts to Le. major (WR 2885) harvested from a 3-day-old culture. As expected, Le. major parasite bound to P. papatasi midguts (median 7,500 parasites/midgut; Fig. 1A). Unexpectedly, Le. infantum LLM-320 (MHOM/ES/92/LLM-320) harvested on day 3 failed to bind to the midguts of the sand fly Lu. longipalpis (median 2,700 parasites/midgut; Fig. 1B). To our surprise, Le. infantum parasites from an older, day 4 culture showed a greater number of parasites binding to Lu. longipalpis open midguts (median 17,850 parasites/midgut; Fig. 1C). In a control experiment, 4-day-old parasites did not bind intact, unopened, Lu. longipalpis midguts (median 1,600 parasites/midgut), pointing to the specificity of parasite binding to the sand fly midgut epithelium (Fig. 1C).

FIG 1
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1

In vitro binding of Leishmania major and Leishmania infantum to midgut epithelia of natural sand fly vectors. (A and B) binding of Le. major (A) and Le. infantum LLM-320 (B) parasites, harvested from 3-day-old cultures, to open midguts of Phlebotomus papatasi and Lutzomyia longipalpis sand flies, respectively. n = 2. (C) Binding of Le. infantum parasites from cultures harvested at day 4 to unopened and opened Lu. longipalpis midguts. n = 2. Unopen midguts were intact; open midguts were cut longitudinally along the anterior-posterior axis. Unfed midguts were used. *, statistically significant at P < 0.05.

Le. infantum binding to the midgut epithelium of Lu. longipalpis is stage dependent.To validate and extend our observations, we used a different strain of Le. infantum, MCAN/BR/09/52 (LAB), and assessed its binding to sand fly midguts. Parasites harvested on day 3 attached to the midgut epithelium of Lu. longipalpis at a median of 5,250 parasites/midgut (Fig. 2A). As the LAB parasite cultures aged, the number of parasites binding the sand fly midgut increased proportionally, peaking with day 6 parasites at a median of 8,500 parasites/midgut (Fig. 2A). A greater proportion of parasite binding to the midgut epithelium as the culture aged was also observed for the Le. infantum BH46 strain (see Fig. S1A to D in the supplemental material), ranging from a median of 4,200 parasites/midgut for 4-day-old culture parasites (Fig. S1A) to a median of 26,000 parasites/midgut with 6-day-old culture parasites (Fig. S1C). As the culture got older (Fig. 2B; see also Fig. S2A), the parasites began to differentiate to the infective form, the metacyclic promastigotes, increasing from 10% to 30% on day 4 to about 70% to 80% on day 7 of culture (Fig. 2C; see also Fig. S2B). As we had observed that many, if not most, of the bound parasites were at late stages of differentiation (leptomonads and metacyclic), we used a Ficoll gradient to separate early-stage parasites (ESP) from late-stage parasites (LSP) and tested if they could bind to sand fly midgut epithelium. Surprisingly, we observed that significantly more LSP than ESP bound to the sand fly midgut epithelium, for both Le. infantum LAB (Fig. 2D and E) and BH46 (Fig. 2F and G) strains, harvested on both day 4 and day 5.

FIG 2
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 2

Temporal and stage-specific binding of Leishmania infantum parasites to unfed Lutzomyia longipalpis midguts. (A to E) Le. infantum (MCAN/BR/09/52, LAB). (A) Binding of parasites harvested on different days of culture. n = 2. 3d, day 3; 4d, day 4; 5d, day 5; 6d, day 6. (B) Growth curve in culture. n = 3. (C) Metacyclic emergence on day 4, day 5, day 6, and day 7 of culture. n = 3. (D and E) Differential binding of ESP and LSP from cultures harvested on days 4 (D) and 5 (E). n = 2. (F and G) Differential binding of ESP and LSP of Le. infantum BH46 wild-type strain from cultures harvested on days 4 (F) and 5 (G). n = 2. ESP, early-stage parasites; LSP, late-stage parasites. Midguts were opened longitudinally along the anterior-posterior axis. *, statistically significant at P < 0.05. (H and I) Numbers of BH46 wild-type parasites stained by anti-LPG antibody in metacyclic-enriched samples (light green) and procyclic-enriched samples (dark green) for the 4-day-old (H) and 5-day-old (I) parasite cultures. FITC, fluorescein isothiocyanate.

FIG S1

Binding of Leishmania infantum BH46 wild-type, Δlpg1, and Δlpg1 + LPG1 lines to unfed Lutzomyia longipalpis midguts. (A to D) Cultures of Le. infantum BH46 WT (wild-type), −/− (Δlpg1), and add-back (Δlpg1 + LPG1) lines were harvested on days 4 (A), 5 (B), 6 (C), and 7 (D) and incubated with unfed midguts opened longitudinally along the anterior-posterior axis. n = 2. *, statistically significant at P < 0.05. Download FIG S1, PDF file, 0.4 MB.

This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Foreign copyrights may apply.

FIG S2

Growth curves of Leishmania infantum BH46 wild-type, Δlpg1, and Δlpg1 + LPG1 parasites. (A) Growth curve Le. infantum BH46 strains in culture through day 7. n = 4. (B) Emergence of metacyclic Le. infantum BH46 strains in culture between days 4 and 10. n = 4. Download FIG S2, PDF file, 0.4 MB.

This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Foreign copyrights may apply.

In order to assess the abundance of LPG on the surface of BH46 WT parasites, we stained LSP and ESP Ficoll-purified parasites with a LPG backbone-specific monoclonal antibody (CA7AE). Using flow cytometry, we found that LSPs exhibited 2-fold-higher and 20-fold-higher levels of antibody binding than ESP samples for 4-day-old and 5-day-old cultures, respectively (Fig. 2H and I), indicative of the increased abundance of LPG in the former. The increase in fluorescence intensity as the parasites aged (Fig. 2H and I) correlated with a greater number of parasites binding the sand fly midgut from 4-day-old and 5-day-old cultures (Fig. 2F and G). In order to further evaluate such observations, we measured LPG abundance in these parasites by confocal microscopy (Fig. 3A to H). The LPG staining that we observed was more intense in LSP (Fig. 3A to D) than in ESP (Fig. 3E to H). In comparison, 3-day-old parasite cultures stained poorly with the CA7AE antibody (Fig. 3I to L).

FIG 3
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 3

Immunostaining of LPG on the surface of different Leishmania infantum BH46 developmental stages. (A to L) Wild-type parasites were stained with green fluorescent protein (GFP)-conjugated anti-LPG CA7AE antibody. (A to H) Seven-day-old cultures were harvested, and parasites were sorted into metacyclic (A to D) and procyclic (E to H) promastigotes in a Ficoll gradient. (I to L) Staining of 3-day-old culture parasites. Bar = 5 μm. Green = LPG. Blue = DAPI (nuclear DNA). Gray pictures = DIC (differential interference contrast).

Le. infantum binding to the midgut epithelium of Lu. longipalpis is LPG dependent.In order to assess whether or not the major surface glycoconjugate of Le. infantum (LPG) was the parasite ligand attaching to the midgut epithelium of Lu. longipalpis, we carried out midgut binding assays with the Le. infantum BH46 wild-type strain (BH46 WT) as well as with both the LPG-deficient (Δlpg1) and add-back (Δlpg1 + LPG1) lines. Similarly to what was observed for unfed midguts (Fig. S1), aging parasites from the BH46 WT line bound to the epithelium of midguts dissected 5 days after blood feeding with increasing efficiency, whereas parasite binding was limited in unopened midguts (Fig. 4). For both fed and unfed Lu. longipalpis midguts, binding of the BH46 Δlpg1 + LPG1 line was intermediate and the level of binding was significantly higher than that seen with the BH46 Δlpg1 mutant, which failed to bind, exhibiting less than 1,500 parasite/midgut regardless of the age of the harvested parasites or the feeding status of the midguts (Fig. 4; see also Fig. S1). Similar results were obtained with the Le. infantum BA262 Δlpg1 mutant, which also failed to bind to unfed midguts (Fig. S3). Comparatively, the BA262 WT bound with increased efficiency as the parasites aged (Fig. S3 and S4). Despite the low level of midgut binding of the BA262 Δlpg1 + LPG1 line, such parasites bound to midguts in significantly greater proportions than the BA262 Δlpg1 mutant (Fig. S3).

FIG 4
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 4

Binding of Leishmania infantum BH46 wild-type, Δlpg1, and Δlpg1 + LPG1 lines to Lutzomyia longipalpis midguts dissected 5 days after blood feeding. (A to D) Cultures of Le. infantum BH46 WT (wild-type), −/− (Δlpg1), and add-back (Δlpg1 + LPG1) lines were harvested on days 3 (A), 5 (B), 6 (C), and 7 (D) and incubated with midguts of sand flies 5 days after blood feeding. Midguts were opened longitudinally along the anterior-posterior axis. The WT strain was also incubated with intact (unopened) midguts. n = 2. *, statistically significant at P < 0.05.

FIG S3

Binding of Leishmania infantum BA262 wild-type, Δlpg1, and Δlpg1 + LPG1 lines to Lutzomyia longipalpis midguts. (A to D) Cultures of Le. infantum BA262 WT (wild-type), −/− (Δlpg1), and add-back (Δlpg1 + LPG1) lines were harvested on days 3 (A), 4 (B), 5 (C), and 6 (D) and incubated with unfed midguts opened longitudinally along the anterior-posterior axis. n = 2. *, statistically significant at P < 0.05. Download FIG S3, PDF file, 0.1 MB.

This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Foreign copyrights may apply.

FIG S4

Growth curves of Leishmania infantum BA262 wild-type, Δlpg1, and Δlpg1 + LPG1 parasites. (A) Growth curves of Le. infantum BA262 strains in culture through day 7. n = 3. (B) Emergence of metacyclics in cultures of Le. infantum BA262 strains between days 4 and 7. n = 3. Download FIG S4, PDF file, 0.4 MB.

This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Foreign copyrights may apply.

Le. infantum BH46 Δlpg1 mutants grow in the midguts of Lu. longipalpis.As the presence of Le. infantum LPG is sufficient to mediate midgut epithelium attachment in vitro but binding was substantially increased in LSP compared to ESP, we tested whether this ligand is necessary for in vivo parasite development in the midgut of the sand fly Lu. longipalpis. We infected Lu. longipalpis sand flies with the BH46 WT, BH46 Δlpg1, and BH46 Δlpg1 + LPG1 lines and followed both parasite load and infection prevalence at five time points after infection. When seeded at 5 million parasites/ml, the BH46 Δlpg1 mutant exhibited a significantly lower parasite load and a lower infection prevalence than the BH46 WT strain or the BH46 Δlpg1 + LPG1 strain on day 3 postinfection (Fig. 5A and B), but it recovered on subsequent days, exhibiting a parasite load and infection prevalence similar to those seen with either the BH46 WT or BH46 Δlpg1 + LPG1 line (Fig. 5C to J). When the infection was started with 2 million parasites/ml, the BH46 Δlpg1 mutant displayed a lower, and yet not statistically significant, parasite load on day 3 (Fig. S5A) but higher loads than either the WT strain or the Δlpg1 + LPG1 line from day 6 onward (Fig. S5B to E).

FIG 5
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 5

Lutzomyia longipalpis midgut infection with Leishmania infantum BH46 wild-type, Δlpg1, and Δlpg1 + LPG1 parasites. (A to J) Upon infection with 5 million parasites per ml, parasite load and infection prevalence were assessed on days 3 (A and B), 6 (C and D), 9 (E and F), 12 (G and H), and 15 (I and J) postinfection (Pi), respectively. Data represent WT (wild-type), −/− (Δlpg1), and add-back (Δlpg1 + LPG1) lines. Low, 500 to 5,000 parasites/midgut; Moderate, 5,000 to 10,000 parasites/midgut; Heavy, >10,000 parasites/midgut. n = 2. *, statistically significant at P < 0.05.

FIG S5

Lutzomyia longipalpis midgut infection with Leishmania infantum strain BH46 wild-type, Δlpg1, and Δlpg1 + LPG1 parasites. (A to E) Sand flies were infected with 2 million parasites per ml. Parasite load per midgut was assessed on days 3 (A), 6 (B), 9 (C), 12 (D), and 15 (E) after infection with WT (wild-type), −/− (Δlpg1), and add-back (Δlpg1 + LPG1) lines. n = 2. *, statistically significant at P < 0.05. Download FIG S5, PDF file, 0.4 MB.

This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Foreign copyrights may apply.

Le. infantum BA262 Δlpg1 mutants fail to grow in the midguts of Lu. longipalpis.As the LPG side chain decorations are polymorphic among Le. infantum strains (34), we also assessed the ability of the BA262 WT strain, along with the BA262 Δlpg1 and BA262 Δlpg1 + LPG1 lines (35), to develop in Lu. longipalpis (Fig. 6). Differing from the BH46 strain, which exhibits side chains with 1 to 3 β-glucose residues, the LPG of BA262 is devoid of side chains, like most of the Le. infantum strains (34). Seeded at 5 million parasites/ml, the BA262 Δlpg1 mutant displayed lower parasite loads on days 2 and 3 (median 0 to 500 parasites/midgut) than the WT (median 3,000 to 5,000 parasites/midgut) and the Δlpg1 + LPG1 line (median 1,600 to 13,750 parasites/midgut) lines and a lower infection prevalence before the blood was passed (Fig. 6A to D). After the blood meal was passed, the BA262 Δlpg1 mutant was lost in the majority of sand flies, persisting in only a few specimens that displayed a reduced number of parasites and a decreased infection prevalence (Fig. 6E to L). The BA262 WT and Δlpg1 + LPG1 lines, on the other hand, developed well in the midguts, reaching medians of 27,000 and 35,000 parasites per midgut, respectively, and an 80% to 85% infection prevalence on day 15 postinfection (Fig. 6K and L).

FIG 6
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 6

Lutzomyia longipalpis midgut infection with Leishmania infantum BA262 wild-type, Δlpg1, and Δlpg1 + LPG1 parasites. (A to J) Upon infection with 5 million parasites per ml, parasite load and infection prevalence were assessed on days 2 (A and B), 3 (C and D), 6 (E and F), 8 (G and H), 12 (I and J), and 15 (K and L) after infection, respectively. Data represent WT (wild-type), −/− (Δlpg1), and add-back (Δlpg1 + LPG1) lines. Low, 500 to 5,000 parasites/midgut; Moderate, 5,000 to 10,000 parasites/midgut; Heavy, >10,000 parasites/midgut. n = 2. *, statistically significant at P < 0.05.

Le. infantum BH46 and BA262 Δlpg1 mutants display different susceptibilities to components of the blood meal.To investigate the differences in sand fly survival rates of the BH46 and BA262 Δlpg1 mutants, we tested if resistance to by-products of blood meal digestion could be a factor that explains these differences. For this, we incubated in vitro parasites in the exponential phase of growth with extracts of midguts, collected at 24 and 48 h after blood feeding, for 4 h at 26°C, and compared them to the WT and Δlpg1 + LPG1 lines (Fig. 7). BH46 Δlpg1 mutants were not affected by the components of the digested sand fly blood meal (Fig. 7A). In contrast, the BA262 Δlpg1 mutants were severely affected by incubation with midguts collected 24 h and 48 h post-blood feeding (Fig. 7B). The WT and Δlpg1 + LPG1 lines of both strains were not affected by incubation with midgut extracts (Fig. 7).

FIG 7
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 7

Leishmania infantum survival after incubation with extracts of blood-engorged Lutzomyia longipalpis midguts in vitro. (A) BH46 WT (wild-type), −/− (Δlpg1), and add-back (Δlpg1 + LPG1) lines were exposed in vitro to either a PBS control (CTR) or extracts of engorged midguts dissected at 24 h or 48 h post-blood meal. (B) BA262 WT (wild-type), −/− (Δlpg1), and add-back (Δlpg1 + LPG1) parasites were exposed in vitro to either a PBS control (CTR) or extracts of engorged midguts dissected at 24 h or 48 h post-blood meal. n = 2. *, statistically significant at P < 0.05.

DISCUSSION

Many studies have demonstrated that binding of Le. major to the midguts of the restrictive vectors is mediated by LPG (6, 11, 12, 24–26, 36). Incubation of P. papatasi midguts with purified PGs from procyclic Le. major parasites prevented the binding of procyclic Le. major parasites (6), and Le. major Δlpg1 parasites cannot develop in P. papatasi or P. duboscqi (25, 26) sand flies. On the other hand, the Le. major Δlpg1 mutant binds to midguts and develops well in permissive vectors, such as Lu. longipalpis (24, 25), as well as Phlebotomus arabicus (24), P. argentipes (26), and P. perniciosus (26). Based on such findings, an LPG-independent mechanism for midgut binding was proposed for the permissive vectors (28). Differences in midgut glycosylation between restrictive and permissive vectors were observed that could possibly account for nonspecific binding of parasites in the latter. It was hypothesized that a lectin on the Leishmania surface might bind to the O-linked glycans of the midgut microvilli of permissive vectors, thus allowing parasite binding (26, 28, 30). Nonetheless, such studies were carried out using Le. major and unnatural permissive vectors (24–26, 28); thus, the LPG-independent mechanism might be restricted to Le. major development in unnatural permissive vectors. Therefore, we decided to revisit the role of LPG in parasite development in natural permissive vectors, focusing on two Le. infantum strains bearing intraspecies polymorphisms in their LPGs (25). The LPG of one strain, BA262, is devoid of side chains (type I) whereas that of the BH46 strain has β-glucose sugars branching off the repeat unit backbone (type III [20]). Here, we demonstrate that Le. infantum (BH46) wild-type and Δlpg1 + LPG1 lines bound to both unfed and day-5-post-feeding midgut epithelia of Lu. longipalpis in vitro. In contrast, the LPG-deficient Δlpg1 mutant failed to bind to Lu. longipalpis unfed and fed midguts. Similar results were reported for Δlpg1 mutants of Le. mexicana (MPRO/BR/72/M1845) and Le. infantum (MHOM/BR/76/M4192), which exhibited poor binding to midguts of Lu. longipalpis and P. perniciosus (27), respectively. Altogether, these data indicate that LPG mediates Leishmania binding to midguts of natural permissive vectors and suggest that the previously described LPG-independent midgut binding mechanism may be limited to Le. major binding to midguts of permissive vectors.

Similarly to the conclusions regarding Le. major binding to the midgut of its natural restrictive vector, previous reports claimed that Le. infantum and Le. donovani binding to the midgut of a naturally permissive vector was also restricted to early-stage parasites (20, 21). Nonetheless, the use of peanut agglutinin (PNA) to sort procyclic and metacyclic Le. infantum (21) and Le. donovani (20) parasites may have confounded interpretation of results. PNA has been used to purify Le. major metacyclics as the LPGs of such parasite stages are decorated with arabinose, which replaces numerous β-galactose sugars on side chains of early-stage parasites (37). In contrast, Le. infantum (21) and Le. donovani (20) LPGs display only a single β-galactose residue in the cap. Whereas it is not clear whether or not the same residue is absent in the Le. infantum metacyclic stage LPG cap (21), the Le. donovani cap bears β-galactose or mannose residues at the same proportions as procylic parasites (20), precluding accurate purification of procyclics and metacyclics by PNA. Additionally, experiments showing the developmental differences of Le. infantum LPG (21) and Le. donovani LPG (20) found that PNA-purified metacyclic LPG was representative of only 10% of the parasites in stationary-phase cultures (20, 21). It is possible that PNA-purified metacyclic LPGs are representative of a small metacyclic subpopulation that does not bind to PNA, as the whole metacyclic population usually accounts for about 80% of late-phase cultures. Importantly, this small population of nonbinding/free-swimming Leishmania parasites likely comprises the metacyclics that are transmitted, as the parasites inoculated by sand flies represented only 0.02% to 14% of the population in a mature Leishmania infection in all sand fly species investigated to date (38–40). The observed increase in the intensity of LPG labeling as Le. infantum aged in culture, which correlated positively with the number of parasites bound to midguts, supports this hypothesis. Knowing whether stronger LPG labeling is related to an increase in the number and/or length of LPG molecules during metacyclogenesis will shed light on the mechanism of binding of the Le. infantum LPG to the receptor on the midgut microvilli.

Electron microscopy images of Le. infantum developing in Lu. longipalpis show that the parasites, previously described as long and short nectomonads (41) and now termed nectomonads and leptomonads (42), respectively, were observed attached to the posterior and anterior midguts throughout the parasite life cycle in the sand fly (41). In our experiments, early-stage parasites were not able to attach to midguts in vitro, which might be explained by a lack of bona fide nectomonad parasites in cultures expressing LPG on their surface. On the other hand, we observed strong Lu. longipalpis midgut binding by late-stage Le. infantum parasites, enriched in leptomonads and metacyclics, confirming early observations by electron microscopy that Le. infantum late-stage parasites also bind to the Lu. longipalpis midgut epithelium (41). Whether midgut binding by late-stage parasites is necessary for parasite migration to the anterior midgut (42), for genetic exchange (43, 44), and/or for preventing the pushing of metacyclic parasites to posterior midgut upon sequential blood meals (45) has yet to be determined.

Our proposed model of LPG-mediated Le. infantum attachment to the midgut of a permissive vector complements and expands upon previous findings that demonstrated that changes in LPG during metacyclogenesis mediated parasite detachment from the midgut epithelium to be transmitted. Here, we propose that metacyclics encompass two subpopulations: one that binds to the midgut epithelium, as was observed in this study and also earlier (41), and a free-swimming one that is transmitted by a sand fly bite (20, 21). The existence of such subpopulations is also supported by polymorphisms in the LPG cap of metacyclic Le. infantum (21) and Le. donovani (20) parasites.

It was previously shown that lack of LPG in Le. infantum seems to affect the ability of this parasite to develop in the midgut of the permissive natural vector P. perniciosus (27). A closer look at the results, nonetheless, suggests that the Le. infantum Δlpg1 infection showed some recovery on day 8 postinfection, after the digested blood was passed, compared to day 4, a time point when the blood meal is still being digested (27), as the prevalence of sand flies infected with heavy (>10,000 parasites/midgut) and moderate (5,000 to 10,000 parasites/midgut) populations increased. In order to further investigate the importance of LPG for Le. infantum development in Lu. longipalpis, we assessed survival and development of the Le. infantum BH46 and BA262 WT, Δlpg1, and Δlpg1 + LPG1 lines in the naturally permissive vector Lu. longipalpis for 15 days. In accordance with a previous report (27), the Le. infantum BH46 Δlpg1 mutant struggled to survive at the time of blood digestion on day 3, and yet it thrived after the blood was passed, reaching parasite loads similar to those seen with the WT and add-back lines at later time points. In contrast, the BA262 Δlpg1 mutant not only struggled to survive up to day 3 but succumbed afterward, revealing important interstrain differences in Le. infantum in vivo development. These data indicate that LPG-mediated epithelium binding is not a determinant of parasite survival in the midgut for this parasite-vector pair. However, the presence of LPG does confer protection to some Le. infantum strains such as BA262.

Toxicity of blood components can affect the survival of Leishmania parasites in the sand fly midgut during digestion (9). In the present study, incubation of Le. infantum strains BH46 and BA262, harvested from 3-day-old cultures with extracts of engorged midguts, produced different outcomes. Whereas the BH46 and BA262 WT and Δlpg1 + LPG1 lines, as well as the BH46 Δlpg1 mutant, survived exposure to the toxic components of the digested blood, the BA262 Δlpg1 mutant was highly affected by midgut extracts. These results correlated well with the survival of the BH46 Δlpg1 mutant and the lack of further development of the BA262 lpg1 KO line in sand flies. Together, these results indicate that neither LPG type I nor LPG type III is needed to prevent Le. infantum from being eliminated along with the digested blood bolus in a permissive vector, but it is likely important for early survival during the digestive period for some but not all parasite strains. The survival of the BH46 Δlpg1 mutant after exposure to engorged midgut extracts is intriguing; the nature of the glycosylation of the galactose-mannose backbone of other surface glycoconjugates may correlate with protection for this strain and needs to be further explored. This possibility is supported by early findings showing that Le. major lacking LPG survived within the bloodmeal (24, 26) whereas Le. major lacking LPG and proteophosphoglycans succumbed within the blood bolus (25, 26).

As stated previously by Sacks and Kamhawi (16), for permissive species such as Lu. longipalpis, persistence of parasites in the midgut after blood is passed is possibly due to factors other than attachment, such as a slower peristaltic movement. These observations are supported by our findings which indicate that LPG docking of parasites does occur but appears not to define vector competence for Le. infantum in Lu. longipalpis. Rather, vector competence in permissive vectors seems to be more complex, affected by strain-specific differences and involving multiple stages of parasite development in the midgut.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sand flies, Leishmania strains, and parasite cultivation.The sand flies used in this study belonged to either the Lu. longipalpis Jacobina colony or the P. papatasi Jordan colony, both maintained at the Laboratory of Malaria and Vector Research (LMVR)/NIH sand fly insectary. The different Le. infantum strains used in this study, including strain LAB (MCAN/BR/09/52) (46), the BH46 wild-type strain (BH46 WT; MCAN/BR/89/BH46), the LPG-deficient BH46 Δlpg1 and the BH46 Δlpg1 + LPG1 add-back (BH46 res) strains, strain BA262 (MCAN/BR/89/BA262) (35), the LPG-deficient BA262 Δlpg1 and the BA262 Δlpg1 + LPG1 (BA262 res) strains, the RFP strain (MHOM/ES/92/LLM-320, red fluorescent protein [RFP] expressing) (47), and Le. major WR 2885 (RFP expressing) (38), were cultivated in Grace medium (Lonza BioWhittaker and Sigma-Aldrich) supplemented with 20% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum (FCS; Gibco, 16140071) and penicillin/streptomycin (pen/strep; 100 μg/ml) in 25-cm2 flasks. For BA262, FCS was subjected to further heat inactivation at 56°C for 1 h. For all the experiments, cultures were seeded with 1 × 105 parasites/ml, and parasites were grown at 26°C in a biological oxygen demand (B.O.D.) chamber. For both the BH46 −/− and BH46 add-back lines, hygromycin (50 μg/ml) and geneticin (G418, 5 μg/ml) were added to the medium. In addition, Zeocin (75 μg/ml) was added to BH46 add-back cultures. For both the BA262 Δlpg1 and BA262 Δlpg1 + LPG1 lines, hygromycin (50 μg/ml) and Geneticin (G418, 70 μg/ml) were added to the medium. In addition, Zeocin (100 μg/ml) was added to BA262 Δlpg1 + LPG1 cultures.

Sorting of early-stage and late-stage parasites in Ficoll gradient.The sorting procedure was performed as described elsewhere (48), with slight modifications. Briefly, cultures were spun down, and parasites were washed twice in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and resuspended in 2 ml PBS. Then, parasites were overlaid with 40% Ficoll–2 ml PBS, followed by addition of 10% Ficoll–2 ml M199 medium, and were spun at 365 × g for 10 min at room temperature. Metacyclic-enriched parasites were collected from the layer in the interface between 10% Ficoll and PBS, whereas procyclic-enriched parasites were collected after removing supernatant and resuspending the pellet. Thereafter, both parasite samples were washed twice in PBS for further experimentation.

Parasite growth curves.Parasite cultures were seeded with 1 × 105 parasites/ml as described above, and parasites were counted daily direct from the medium or diluted in PBS using Neubauer improved chambers (Incyto).

Midgut binding assays.Parasite cultures were spun down once and washed with PBS twice at 3,500 rpm for 15 min. Parasites were counted and diluted to 5 × 107 parasites/ml in PBS. The midguts of P. papatasi and Lu. longipalpis unfed parasites as well as Lu. longipalpis parasites 5 days after blood feeding were dissected in a drop of PBS and opened up transversally in Y shape with fine entomological pins when needed, and groups of 10 midguts were exposed to 2 × 106 parasites in 40 μl of PBS in a well of an electron microscopy 9-cavity Pyrex pressed plate (Fisher Scientific). The preparations were transferred to a humidified chamber, and incubation was performed for 45 min at room temperature. Afterward, midguts were passed through fresh PBS twice and transferred individually to 1.7-ml Eppendorf tubes (Denville Scientific) with 30 μl of PBS.

Sand fly infections.Defibrinated naive rabbit blood (Noble Life Sciences, Gaithersburg, MD), was spun down at 2,000 rpm for 10 min, and plasma was collected and transferred to a fresh vial. Red blood cells (RBCs) were washed at least twice with PBS (until most of the free heme was removed), whereas plasma was subjected to heat inactivation at 56°C for 1 h. Parasite cultures were spun down and washed twice with PBS as described above. Then, RBCs were reconstituted with heat-inactivated plasma and seeded with either 5 × 106 (BH46 and BA262) or 2 × 106 (BH46) parasites/ml. Infectious blood was loaded into a custom-made glass feeder (Chemglass Life Sciences, CG183570), capped with a chick skin, and heated by a circulating water bath set for 37°C. Sand flies were allowed to feed for 3 h. Afterward, midguts were dissected and transferred individually to 1.7-ml Eppendorf tubes (Denville Scientific) in 50 μl PBS.

Midgut Leishmania load assessment.Midguts were homogenized by the use of a cordless motor and disposable pellet mixers (Kimble). In order to assess metacyclic proportions, formalin was added to the vials at a 0.005% final concentration. Samples were diluted as necessary, and 10 μl was loaded onto Neubauer improved chambers (Incyto).

Leishmania incubation with extracts of blood-engorged midguts.For sand fly feeding on naive rabbit blood (Noble Life Sciences, Gaithersburg, MD), RBCs and plasma were processed as described above. Sand flies were fed on the naive (heat-inactivated) blood, and midguts were dissected at 24 and 48 h after feeding. Midguts were individually transferred to 0.2-ml tubes, frozen in dry ice, and stored at −80°C. Two batches of midguts were obtained from sand flies fed on two different days. Before incubation with parasites, midguts underwent 10 cycles of freeze-thaw (dry ice/room temperature; 5 min each cycle). Parasites were harvested from 3-day-old cultures, washed twice in 1× PBS, and diluted to 5 × 106 parasites/ml in complete Grace medium. One microliter (5,000 parasites) was incubated with either the extract of a single midgut or PBS (1 μl) for 4 h at 26°C. Afterward, 20 μl of PBS was added to each sample, and parasites were counted with Neubauer improved chambers.

Confocal microscopy.The Le. infantum BH46 WT line was grown as described above and harvested at days 3 and 7. For day 7 parasites, procyclics and metacyclics were isolated in a Ficoll gradient as described above. In μ-Slide angiogenesis slides (Ibidi, 81506) coated with poly-l-lysine (Sigma-Aldrich, P8920), one million parasites were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde on ice for 15 min, blocked with goat serum (Sigma-Aldrich, G9023) for 1 h, and incubated with CA7AE primary antibody (1 μg/μl) at 1:1,000 dilution for 30 min and with the secondary antibody Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti-mouse IgG (H+L; Molecular Probes, A11001) at 1:5,000 dilution for 30 min. Samples were mounted with DAPI (4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole)-containing Fluoromount-G (Southern Biotech, 0100-20). Images were obtained with a Leica TSC SP5 microscope in z-stacks of 0.42 μm. Images were analyzed with Imaris software (Oxford Instruments).

Flow cytometry.Metacyclic- and procyclic-enriched samples were sorted from both BH46 and BA262 4-day-old and 5-day-old cultures by Ficoll gradient centrifugation as described above. One million parasites of each sample/strain were washed twice in cell staining buffer (BioLegend, 420201) and resuspended in 100 μl of the LPG backbone-specific CA7AE antibody at 0.125 μl/100-μl dilution in staining buffer. Samples were incubated with primary antibody for 30 min at 4°C, washed twice with staining buffer, and then incubated with the Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti-mouse IgG secondary antibody under the same conditions. After this step, samples were fixed in 250 μl fixation buffer (BioLegend, 420801) for 20 min at 4°C. Flow cytometer experiments were performed with a MACSQuant 16 analyzer (MACS Miltenyi Biotec). For compensation, an AbC total antibody compensation bead kit (Molecular Probes, A10497) was used upon incubation with both primary and secondary antibodies, following manufacturer recommendations. Data were analyzed with FlowJo software (BD).

Statistical analyses.For all the data sets, the nature of the distribution was tested with the D’Agostino-Pearson normality test. Pairwise comparisons of data following a normal distribution were carried out with unpaired t tests; otherwise, the Mann-Whitney U-test was performed. In order to assess the statistical significance of infection prevalence, the chi-square test was carried out. Statistical evaluation was carried out with GraphPad Prism v.8.

Ethics statement.All animal experimental procedures were reviewed and approved by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Animal Care and Use Committee under animal protocol LMVR4E. The NIAID Division of Intramural Research (DIR) Animal Care and Use Program complies with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and with the NIH Office of Animal Care and Use and Animal Research Advisory Committee guidelines. Details of the NIH animal research guidelines can be accessed at https://oma1.od.nih.gov/manualchapters/intramural/3040-2/.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are thankful to Brian G. Bonilla and the other members of the sand fly insectary (LMVR/NIAID) for support. We are also thankful to Eva Iniguez and Ana Beatriz Barletta Ferreira (LMVR/NIAID) for scientific support.

This research was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the NIH, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. A.D. holds the Canada Research Chair on the Biology of Intracellular Parasitism. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

I.V.C.-A. designed and performed the experiments and analyzed the data. J.O. supported flow cytometry experiments. W.D.C. performed parasite staining. T.R.W. helped with sand fly infections. C.M. performed sand fly insectary work. R.P.S. provided monoclonal antibody. A.D. and V.M.B. provided the various Leishmania BH46 and BA262 lines. J.G.V. and S.K. were involved in the design, interpretation, and supervision of this study. I.V.C.-A. wrote the first draft of the manuscript. J.G.V. and S.K. edited the manuscript.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received June 20, 2020.
    • Accepted August 20, 2020.

This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Foreign copyrights may apply.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Burza S,
    2. Croft SL,
    3. Boelaert M
    . 2018. Leishmaniasis. Lancet 392:951–970. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31204-2.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  2. 2.↵
    1. Coutinho-Abreu IV,
    2. Sharma NK,
    3. Robles-Murguia M,
    4. Ramalho-Ortigao M
    . 2010. Targeting the midgut secreted PpChit1 reduces Leishmania major development in its natural vector, the sand fly Phlebotomus papatasi. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 4:e901. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0000901.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Coutinho-Abreu IV,
    2. Sharma NK,
    3. Robles-Murguia M,
    4. Ramalho-Ortigao M
    . 2013. Characterization of Phlebotomus papatasi peritrophins, and the role of PpPer1 in Leishmania major survival in its natural vector. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 7:e2132. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0002132.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Kelly PH,
    2. Bahr SM,
    3. Serafim TD,
    4. Ajami NJ,
    5. Petrosino JF,
    6. Meneses C,
    7. Kirby JR,
    8. Valenzuela JG,
    9. Kamhawi S,
    10. Wilson ME
    . 2017. The gut microbiome of the vector Lutzomyia longipalpis is essential for survival of Leishmania infantum. mBio 8:e01121-16. doi:10.1128/mBio.01121-16.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Pimenta PF,
    2. Modi GB,
    3. Pereira ST,
    4. Shahabuddin M,
    5. Sacks DL
    . 1997. A novel role for the peritrophic matrix in protecting Leishmania from the hydrolytic activities of the sand fly midgut. Parasitology 115:359–369. doi:10.1017/S0031182097001510.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    1. Pimenta PF,
    2. Turco SJ,
    3. McConville MJ,
    4. Lawyer PG,
    5. Perkins PV,
    6. Sacks DL
    . 1992. Stage-specific adhesion of Leishmania promastigotes to the sandfly midgut. Science 256:1812–1815. doi:10.1126/science.1615326.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Sant'anna MR,
    2. Diaz-Albiter H,
    3. Mubaraki M,
    4. Dillon RJ,
    5. Bates PA
    . 2009. Inhibition of trypsin expression in Lutzomyia longipalpis using RNAi enhances the survival of Leishmania. Parasit Vectors 2:62. doi:10.1186/1756-3305-2-62.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Telleria EL,
    2. Sant'Anna MR,
    3. Ortigao-Farias JR,
    4. Pitaluga AN,
    5. Dillon VM,
    6. Bates PA,
    7. Traub-Cseko YM,
    8. Dillon RJ
    . 2012. Caspar-like gene depletion reduces Leishmania infection in sand fly host Lutzomyia longipalpis. J Biol Chem 287:12985–12993. doi:10.1074/jbc.M111.331561.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Pruzinova K,
    2. Sadlova J,
    3. Myskova J,
    4. Lestinova T,
    5. Janda J,
    6. Volf P
    . 2018. Leishmania mortality in sand fly blood meal is not species-specific and does not result from direct effect of proteinases. Parasit Vectors 2018:2472508. doi:10.1155/2018/2472508.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. 10.↵
    1. Sadlova J,
    2. Volf P
    . 2009. Peritrophic matrix of Phlebotomus duboscqi and its kinetics during Leishmania major development. Cell Tissue Res 337:313–325. doi:10.1007/s00441-009-0802-1.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Kamhawi S,
    2. Ramalho-Ortigao M,
    3. Pham VM,
    4. Kumar S,
    5. Lawyer PG,
    6. Turco SJ,
    7. Barillas-Mury C,
    8. Sacks DL,
    9. Valenzuela JG
    . 2004. A role for insect galectins in parasite survival. Cell 119:329–341. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2004.10.009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    1. Pimenta PF,
    2. Saraiva EM,
    3. Rowton E,
    4. Modi GB,
    5. Garraway LA,
    6. Beverley SM,
    7. Turco SJ,
    8. Sacks DL
    . 1994. Evidence that the vectorial competence of phlebotomine sand flies for different species of Leishmania is controlled by structural polymorphisms in the surface lipophosphoglycan. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 91:9155–9159. doi:10.1073/pnas.91.19.9155.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Mengeling BJ,
    2. Beverley SM,
    3. Turco SJ
    . 1997. Designing glycoconjugate biosynthesis for an insidious intent: phosphoglycan assembly in Leishmania parasites. Glycobiology 7:873–880. doi:10.1093/glycob/7.7.873-c.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Novozhilova NM,
    2. Bovin NV
    . 2010. Structure, functions, and biosynthesis of glycoconjugates of Leishmania spp. cell surface. Biochemistry (Mosc) 75:686–694. doi:10.1134/s0006297910060027.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Pimenta PF,
    2. Saraiva EM,
    3. Sacks DL
    . 1991. The comparative fine structure and surface glycoconjugate expression of three life stages of Leishmania major. Exp Parasitol 72:191–204. doi:10.1016/0014-4894(91)90137-l.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. 16.↵
    1. Sacks D,
    2. Kamhawi S
    . 2001. Molecular aspects of parasite-vector and vector-host interactions in leishmaniasis. Annu Rev Microbiol 55:453–483. doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.55.1.453.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. 17.↵
    1. Turco SJ,
    2. Descoteaux A
    . 1992. The lipophosphoglycan of Leishmania parasites. Annu Rev Microbiol 46:65–94. doi:10.1146/annurev.mi.46.100192.000433.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. 18.↵
    1. de Assis RR,
    2. Ibraim IC,
    3. Nogueira PM,
    4. Soares RP,
    5. Turco SJ
    . 2012. Glycoconjugates in New World species of Leishmania: polymorphisms in lipophosphoglycan and glycoinositolphospholipids and interaction with hosts. Biochim Biophys Acta 1820:1354–1365. doi:10.1016/j.bbagen.2011.11.001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. McConville MJ,
    2. Turco SJ,
    3. Ferguson MA,
    4. Sacks DL
    . 1992. Developmental modification of lipophosphoglycan during the differentiation of Leishmania major promastigotes to an infectious stage. EMBO J 11:3593–3600. doi:10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05443.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. 20.↵
    1. Sacks DL,
    2. Pimenta PF,
    3. McConville MJ,
    4. Schneider P,
    5. Turco SJ
    . 1995. Stage-specific binding of Leishmania donovani to the sand fly vector midgut is regulated by conformational changes in the abundant surface lipophosphoglycan. J Exp Med 181:685–697. doi:10.1084/jem.181.2.685.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Soares RP,
    2. Macedo ME,
    3. Ropert C,
    4. Gontijo NF,
    5. Almeida IC,
    6. Gazzinelli RT,
    7. Pimenta PF,
    8. Turco SJ
    . 2002. Leishmania chagasi: lipophosphoglycan characterization and binding to the midgut of the sand fly vector Lutzomyia longipalpis. Mol Biochem Parasitol 121:213–224. doi:10.1016/s0166-6851(02)00033-6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Dostalova A,
    2. Volf P
    . 2012. Leishmania development in sand flies: parasite-vector interactions overview. Parasit Vectors 5:276. doi:10.1186/1756-3305-5-276.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Kamhawi S
    . 2006. Phlebotomine sand flies and Leishmania parasites: friends or foes? Trends Parasitol 22:439–445. doi:10.1016/j.pt.2006.06.012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. 24.↵
    1. Myskova J,
    2. Svobodova M,
    3. Beverley SM,
    4. Volf P
    . 2007. A lipophosphoglycan-independent development of Leishmania in permissive sand flies. Microbes Infect 9:317–324. doi:10.1016/j.micinf.2006.12.010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  25. 25.↵
    1. Secundino N,
    2. Kimblin N,
    3. Peters NC,
    4. Lawyer P,
    5. Capul AA,
    6. Beverley SM,
    7. Turco SJ,
    8. Sacks D
    . 2010. Proteophosphoglycan confers resistance of Leishmania major to midgut digestive enzymes induced by blood feeding in vector sand flies. Cell Microbiol 12:906–918. doi:10.1111/j.1462-5822.2010.01439.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Svarovska A,
    2. Ant TH,
    3. Seblova V,
    4. Jecna L,
    5. Beverley SM,
    6. Volf P
    . 2010. Leishmania major glycosylation mutants require phosphoglycans (lpg2-) but not lipophosphoglycan (lpg1-) for survival in permissive sand fly vectors. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 4:e580. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0000580.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Jecna L,
    2. Dostalova A,
    3. Wilson R,
    4. Seblova V,
    5. Chang KP,
    6. Bates PA,
    7. Volf P
    . 2013. The role of surface glycoconjugates in Leishmania midgut attachment examined by competitive binding assays and experimental development in sand flies. Parasitology 140:1026–1032. doi:10.1017/S0031182013000358.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  28. 28.↵
    1. Volf P,
    2. Myskova J
    . 2007. Sand flies and Leishmania: specific versus permissive vectors. Trends Parasitol 23:91–92. doi:10.1016/j.pt.2006.12.010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  29. 29.↵
    1. Wilson R,
    2. Bates MD,
    3. Dostalova A,
    4. Jecna L,
    5. Dillon RJ,
    6. Volf P,
    7. Bates PA
    . 2010. Stage-specific adhesion of Leishmania promastigotes to sand fly midguts assessed using an improved comparative binding assay. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 4:e816. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0000816.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  30. 30.↵
    1. Myšková J,
    2. Dostálová A,
    3. Pěničková L,
    4. Halada P,
    5. Bates PA,
    6. Volf P
    . 2016. Characterization of a midgut mucin-like glycoconjugate of Lutzomyia longipalpis with a potential role in Leishmania attachment. Parasit Vectors 9:413. doi:10.1186/s13071-016-1695-y.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  31. 31.↵
    1. Di-Blasi T,
    2. Lobo AR,
    3. Nascimento LM,
    4. Cordova-Rojas JL,
    5. Pestana K,
    6. Marin-Villa M,
    7. Tempone AJ,
    8. Telleria EL,
    9. Ramalho-Ortigao M,
    10. McMahon-Pratt D,
    11. Traub-Cseko YM
    . 2015. The flagellar protein FLAG1/SMP1 is a candidate for Leishmania-sand fly interaction. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis 15:202–209. doi:10.1089/vbz.2014.1736.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  32. 32.↵
    1. Warburg A,
    2. Tesh RB,
    3. McMahon-Pratt D
    . 1989. Studies on the attachment of Leishmania flagella to sand fly midgut epithelium. J Protozool 36:613–617. doi:10.1111/j.1550-7408.1989.tb01104.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  33. 33.↵
    1. Rogers ME,
    2. Ilg T,
    3. Nikolaev AV,
    4. Ferguson MA,
    5. Bates PA
    . 2004. Transmission of cutaneous leishmaniasis by sand flies is enhanced by regurgitation of fPPG. Nature 430:463–467. doi:10.1038/nature02675.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  34. 34.↵
    1. Coelho-Finamore JM,
    2. Freitas VC,
    3. Assis RR,
    4. Melo MN,
    5. Novozhilova N,
    6. Secundino NF,
    7. Pimenta PF,
    8. Turco SJ,
    9. Soares RP
    . 2011. Leishmania infantum: lipophosphoglycan intraspecific variation and interaction with vertebrate and invertebrate hosts. Int J Parasitol 41:333–342. doi:10.1016/j.ijpara.2010.10.004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. Lazaro-Souza M,
    2. Matte C,
    3. Lima JB,
    4. Arango Duque G,
    5. Quintela-Carvalho G,
    6. de Carvalho Vivarini A,
    7. Moura-Pontes S,
    8. Figueira CP,
    9. Jesus-Santos FH,
    10. Gazos Lopes U,
    11. Farias LP,
    12. Araujo-Santos T,
    13. Descoteaux A,
    14. Borges VM
    . 2018. Leishmania infantum lipophosphoglycan-deficient mutants: a tool to study host cell-parasite interplay. Front Microbiol 9:626. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.00626.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  36. 36.↵
    1. Sacks DL,
    2. Modi G,
    3. Rowton E,
    4. Spath G,
    5. Epstein L,
    6. Turco SJ,
    7. Beverley SM
    . 2000. The role of phosphoglycans in Leishmania-sand fly interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97:406–411. doi:10.1073/pnas.97.1.406.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. 37.↵
    1. Sacks DL,
    2. Perkins PV
    . 1984. Identification of an infective stage of Leishmania promastigotes. Science 223:1417–1419. doi:10.1126/science.6701528.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. 38.↵
    1. Kimblin N,
    2. Peters N,
    3. Debrabant A,
    4. Secundino N,
    5. Egen J,
    6. Lawyer P,
    7. Fay MP,
    8. Kamhawi S,
    9. Sacks D
    . 2008. Quantification of the infectious dose of Leishmania major transmitted to the skin by single sand flies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:10125–10130. doi:10.1073/pnas.0802331105.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. 39.↵
    1. Secundino NF,
    2. de Freitas VC,
    3. Monteiro CC,
    4. Pires AC,
    5. David BA,
    6. Pimenta PF
    . 2012. The transmission of Leishmania infantum chagasi by the bite of the Lutzomyia longipalpis to two different vertebrates. Parasit Vectors 5:20. doi:10.1186/1756-3305-5-20.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. 40.↵
    1. Maia C,
    2. Seblova V,
    3. Sadlova J,
    4. Votypka J,
    5. Volf P
    . 2011. Experimental transmission of Leishmania infantum by two major vectors: a comparison between a viscerotropic and a dermotropic strain. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 5:e1181. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0001181.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. 41.↵
    1. Walters LL,
    2. Modi GB,
    3. Chaplin GL,
    4. Tesh RB
    . 1989. Ultrastructural development of Leishmania chagasi in its vector, Lutzomyia longipalpis (Diptera: Psychodidae). Am J Trop Med Hyg 41:295–317. doi:10.4269/ajtmh.1989.41.295.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. 42.↵
    1. Rogers ME,
    2. Chance ML,
    3. Bates PA
    . 2002. The role of promastigote secretory gel in the origin and transmission of the infective stage of Leishmania mexicana by the sandfly Lutzomyia longipalpis. Parasitology 124:495–507. doi:10.1017/s0031182002001439.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  43. 43.↵
    1. Tait A,
    2. Macleod A,
    3. Tweedie A,
    4. Masiga D,
    5. Turner CM
    . 2007. Genetic exchange in Trypanosoma brucei: evidence for mating prior to metacyclic stage development. Mol Biochem Parasitol 151:133–136. doi:10.1016/j.molbiopara.2006.10.009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  44. 44.↵
    1. Inbar E,
    2. Akopyants NS,
    3. Charmoy M,
    4. Romano A,
    5. Lawyer P,
    6. Elnaiem DE,
    7. Kauffmann F,
    8. Barhoumi M,
    9. Grigg M,
    10. Owens K,
    11. Fay M,
    12. Dobson DE,
    13. Shaik J,
    14. Beverley SM,
    15. Sacks D
    . 2013. The mating competence of geographically diverse Leishmania major strains in their natural and unnatural sand fly vectors. PLoS Genet 9:e1003672. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003672.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. 45.↵
    1. Serafim TD,
    2. Coutinho-Abreu IV,
    3. Oliveira F,
    4. Meneses C,
    5. Kamhawi S,
    6. Valenzuela JG
    . 2018. Sequential blood meals promote Leishmania replication and reverse metacyclogenesis augmenting vector infectivity. Nat Microbiol 3:548–555. doi:10.1038/s41564-018-0125-7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. 46.↵
    1. Aslan H,
    2. Dey R,
    3. Meneses C,
    4. Castrovinci P,
    5. Jeronimo SM,
    6. Oliva G,
    7. Fischer L,
    8. Duncan RC,
    9. Nakhasi HL,
    10. Valenzuela JG,
    11. Kamhawi S
    . 2013. A new model of progressive visceral leishmaniasis in hamsters by natural transmission via bites of vector sand flies. J Infect Dis 207:1328–1338. doi:10.1093/infdis/jis932.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. 47.↵
    1. Romano A,
    2. Inbar E,
    3. Debrabant A,
    4. Charmoy M,
    5. Lawyer P,
    6. Ribeiro-Gomes F,
    7. Barhoumi M,
    8. Grigg M,
    9. Shaik J,
    10. Dobson D,
    11. Beverley SM,
    12. Sacks DL
    . 2014. Cross-species genetic exchange between visceral and cutaneous strains of Leishmania in the sand fly vector. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111:16808–16813. doi:10.1073/pnas.1415109111.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  48. 48.↵
    1. Spath GF,
    2. Beverley SM
    . 2001. A lipophosphoglycan-independent method for isolation of infective Leishmania metacyclic promastigotes by density gradient centrifugation. Exp Parasitol 99:97–103. doi:10.1006/expr.2001.4656.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Binding of Leishmania infantum Lipophosphoglycan to the Midgut Is Not Sufficient To Define Vector Competence in Lutzomyia longipalpis Sand Flies
Iliano V. Coutinho-Abreu, James Oristian, Waldionê de Castro, Timothy R. Wilson, Claudio Meneses, Rodrigo P. Soares, Valéria M. Borges, Albert Descoteaux, Shaden Kamhawi, Jesus G. Valenzuela
mSphere Sep 2020, 5 (5) e00594-20; DOI: 10.1128/mSphere.00594-20

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print
Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this mSphere article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Binding of Leishmania infantum Lipophosphoglycan to the Midgut Is Not Sufficient To Define Vector Competence in Lutzomyia longipalpis Sand Flies
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from mSphere
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in mSphere.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Binding of Leishmania infantum Lipophosphoglycan to the Midgut Is Not Sufficient To Define Vector Competence in Lutzomyia longipalpis Sand Flies
Iliano V. Coutinho-Abreu, James Oristian, Waldionê de Castro, Timothy R. Wilson, Claudio Meneses, Rodrigo P. Soares, Valéria M. Borges, Albert Descoteaux, Shaden Kamhawi, Jesus G. Valenzuela
mSphere Sep 2020, 5 (5) e00594-20; DOI: 10.1128/mSphere.00594-20
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

LPG
Leishmania
parasite binding
parasite survival
sand fly
sand fly midgut
vector competence

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About mSphere
  • Board of Editors
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • Embargo Policy
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Warranty
  • Types of Articles
  • Getting Started
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #mSphereJ

@ASMicrobiology

       

 

Website feedback

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Online ISSN: 2379-5042