Skip to main content
  • ASM Journals
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Research and News from ASM Journals
    • mSphere of Influence: Commentaries from Early Career Microbiologists
    • Archive
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Getting Started
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mSphere
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • ASM Journals
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
mSphere
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Research and News from ASM Journals
    • mSphere of Influence: Commentaries from Early Career Microbiologists
    • Archive
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Getting Started
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mSphere
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
Observation | Host-Microbe Biology

Comparative Genomic Study of Lactobacillus jensenii and the Newly Defined Lactobacillus mulieris Species Identifies Species-Specific Functionality

Catherine Putonti, Jason W. Shapiro, Adriana Ene, Oleksandra Tsibere, Alan J. Wolfe
Krishna Rao, Editor
Catherine Putonti
aDepartment of Biology, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
bBioinformatics Program, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
cDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, Illinois, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Catherine Putonti
Jason W. Shapiro
aDepartment of Biology, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jason W. Shapiro
Adriana Ene
bBioinformatics Program, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Oleksandra Tsibere
aDepartment of Biology, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alan J. Wolfe
cDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, Illinois, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Alan J. Wolfe
Krishna Rao
University of Michigan—Ann Arbor
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/mSphere.00560-20
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Lactobacilli are dominant members of the “healthy” female urogenital microbiota. One of these species, Lactobacillus jensenii, is routinely identified in the urinary microbiota of women both with and without urinary tract symptoms. In March 2020, the new bacterial species Lactobacillus mulieris was introduced, and phylogenetic and average nucleotide identity analysis identified eight L. jensenii strains that should be classified as members of the L. mulieris species. This prompted our phylogenomic study of all publicly available L. jensenii and L. mulieris genome sequences. While there is little variation in the 16S rRNA gene sequences, the core genome shows a clear distinction between genomes of the two species. We find eight additional strains of the species L. mulieris among these genomes. Furthermore, one strain, currently classified as L. mulieris UMB7784, is distinct from both L. jensenii and L. mulieris strains. As part of our comparative genomic study, we also investigated the genetic content that distinguishes these two species. Unique to the L. jensenii genomes are several genes related to catabolism of disaccharides. In contrast, L. mulieris genomes encode several cell surface and secreted proteins that are not found within the L. jensenii genomes. These L. jensenii-specific and L. mulieris-specific loci provide insight into phenotypic differences of these two species.

IMPORTANCE Lactobacillus species play a key role in the health of the urinary tract. For instance, Lactobacillus crispatus and L. jensenii have been found to inhibit uropathogenic Escherichia coli growth. While L. crispatus is typically found only within the microbiota of women without lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), L. jensenii has been found in the microbiota of women both with and without LUTS. With the recent introduction of the new species Lactobacillus mulieris, several strains of L. jensenii were reclassified as L. mulieris based upon gene marker and average nucleotide identity. We took a phylogenomic and comparative genomic approach to ascertain the genetic determinants of these two species. Looking at a larger data set, we identified additional L. mulieris strains, including one distinct from other members of the species—L. mulieris UMB7784. Furthermore, we identified unique loci in each species that may have clinical implications.

OBSERVATION

The Lactobacillus species L. crispatus, L. gasseri, L. iners, and L. jensenii are predominant members of the “healthy” female urogenital microbiota (1, 2). L. jensenii has been shown to be a protective species, reducing growth of uropathogenic Escherichia coli and sexually transmitted infections (3–6). Recently, Rocha et al. (7) presented a new Lactobacillus species, L. mulieris. The type strain for this new species is L. mulieris c10Ua161M, isolated from a urine sample. Rocha et al. (7) found that the L. mulieris c10Ua161M genome, with eight L. jensenii strains, had an average nucleotide identity (ANI) with the L. jensenii type strain genome below the 95% species threshold (8). Coinciding with the Rocha et al. publication (7), we deposited and published two new Lactobacillus urinary isolates (9, 10); while matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) classified these strains as L. jensenii, ANI analysis suggested they were members of the new L. mulieris species. This prompted us to investigate 43 publicly available L. jensenii and L. mulieris genomes (see Table S1 in the supplemental material).

TABLE S1

Metadata for the 43 genomes examined in this study. The isolation site and host health status listed are based upon GenBank annotation. Bladder indicates that the sample was from a catheterized urine specimen, while urinary tract indicates that the urine collection method was not specified. Download Table S1, DOCX file, 0.02 MB.
Copyright © 2020 Putonti et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

First, we examined the L. jensenii and L. mulieris 16S rRNA gene sequences, which were ≥99.54% identical (Fig. 1A). The two species can be distinguished by just two nucleotides in the 16S rRNA gene sequence (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). The L. mulieris clade included the type strain, L. mulieris c10Ua161M, as well as strains identified by Rocha et al. (7) as L. mulieris based upon pheS and rpoA gene sequence trees. Our two recent sequences UMB7784 and UMB9245, as well as six other strains, form a clade with the L. mulieris type strain, suggesting that they too represent this new species.

FIG 1
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1

Comparison of L. jensenii and L. mulieris genomes. (A) 16S rRNA gene sequence comparison. L. gasseri ATCC 33323 = JCM 1131 (GenBank accession no. NC_008530) and L. crispatus ST1 (NC_014106) are included as an outgroup. The range of pairwise identity between groups is shown on the branches. (B) Phylogenetic tree of single-copy-number genes in the core genome. The range of pairwise identity between groups is shown on the branches. In the legend or key, the colors used for the species designation determined in this study and the isolation site are indicated for all genomes in both trees.

FIG S1

Alignment of 16S rRNA gene sequences for L. jensenii and L. mulieris strains. In total, 13 positions in the alignment were discordant between the sequences. Strains having the same nucleotide at these positions are shown in the same color (red or black). “Lj” indicates the nucleotide at the position in L. jensenii strains. “Lm” indicates the nucleotide at the position in L. mulieris strains. Nucleotides at these positions are listed for the aligned 16S rRNA sequences of L. gasseri ATCC 33323 = JCM 1131 (NC_008530) (“Lg”) and L. crispatus ST1 (NC_014106) (“Lc”). Download FIG S1, PDF file, 0.1 MB.
Copyright © 2020 Putonti et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Next, the pangenome and set of single-copy genes in the core genome of the 43 L. jensenii and L. mulieris genomes were identified using the tool anvi’o (11) (see Text S1 in the supplemental material). Phylogenomic analysis is based upon the concatenated protein sequences of the 453 single-copy core genes found, and sequence identities are reported for these concatenated sequences (Fig. 1B). This tree showed clear distinction between genomes of the two species. Pairwise amino acid sequence comparisons between L. jensenii and L. mulieris core genomes ranged from 95.05 to 95.36% sequence identity. In contrast, the core genome sequence of the 26 genomes that form a clade with the L. jensenii type strain are 99.60% to 100% identical. On the basis of this core genome analysis, we propose that 17 strains should be classified as members of the species L. mulieris (Table S1).

TEXT S1

Supplemental methods. Download Text S1, DOCX file, 0.03 MB.
Copyright © 2020 Putonti et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

The variation within the L. mulieris clade of the core genome tree is primarily due to one isolate—L. mulieris UMB7784 (10). The core genome of strain UMB7784 is less similar to other L. mulieris strains than they are to each other. Using JSpeciesWS (12), we compared the two species’ type strains to L. mulieris UMB7784. L. mulieris UMB7784 had an ANI value of 87.81% to L. jensenii DSM 20557 and 96.29% to L. mulieris c10Ua161M. Excluding UMB7784, the L. mulieris strains have an average ANI value of 99.66% (Table S2). While UMB7784 is best grouped with L. mulieris, additional sequencing of L. mulieris strains may reveal a third group to which it belongs.

TABLE S2

ANIb values for the 17 L. mulieris genomes examined in this study. Highlighted is UMB7784, the most divergent strain of the species. An asterisk indicates identity. Values were calculated by JSpeciesWS (Richter and Rosselló-Móra [12]). Download Table S2, DOCX file, 0.02 MB.
Copyright © 2020 Putonti et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

The accessory genome for these strains includes 1,738 gene clusters (Fig. 2), which is larger than the core genome. L. mulieris UMB7784 contains the most genes (n = 83) that are unique to a single genome (singleton genes). Prior genome analyses of lactobacilli found that the genus has an open pangenome (13, 14). Species that colonize diverse habitats and/or coexist with other microbes in large communities, such as many Lactobacillus species, typically have open pangenomes (15). While the majority of comparative genome studies of lactobacilli have focused on those species most relevant to the dairy industry, a recent analysis of L. paragasseri and L. gasseri considered isolates from the human gut microbiota (16). In addition to inhabiting the gut microbiota, L. paragasseri and L. gasseri are common inhabitants of the female urogenital tract, and Zhou et al. (16) found that they also have an open pangenome. Our pangenome analysis of the L. jensenii and L. mulieris strains finds that they too have an open pangenome.

FIG 2
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 2

Pangenome analysis of 26 L. jensenii (blue) and 17 L. mulieris (pink) genomes. Each ring corresponds to a single genome, and each radial extension in the ring corresponds to a particular gene. If the gene is present in the genome, the color is darker than if it is absent from the genome. The outer ring includes the percentage of the genomes including the gene. The three largest number of singleton genes from the center out are L. jensenii UMB0077, L. jensenii UMB8651, and L. mulieris UMB7784. The inset shows the increase in the pangenome size as new genomes are examined.

Last, we investigated the genetic content that distinguishes these two species. We examined each species individually and identified genes conserved among all genomes of that species that were not present in genomes of the other species. This analysis found 32 genes for L. jensenii (Table S3) and 62 genes for L. mulieris (Table S4). Some L. jensenii genes support the findings of Rocha et al. (7). For instance, L. jensenii can use ribose and trehalose, while L. mulieris cannot; only the L. jensenii genomes encode a ribose transporter and trehalose operon repressor (Table S3). Rocha et al. (7) also noted that only L. jensenii can use arbutin. Our genome analysis identified a L. jensenii locus for disaccharide catabolism. Further investigation would be needed to ascertain whether this is arbutin. We also found new signs of functional specificity, including a conserved respiratory chain pathway present only in L. jensenii (Table S3) and multiple cell surface and secreted proteins in L. mulieris (Table S4). While none of these L. mulieris-specific genes are found in a L. jensenii strain, some of these genes do have homologs within L. psittaci, L. crispatus, and L. paragasseri (based on blastp to the nr database).

TABLE S3

Genes conserved and unique to L. jensenii strains. Genome positions listed are for the coding region locations within the genome of L. jensenii SNUV360 (GCF_001936235). The product accession refers to the protein product annotated for this genome. Download Table S3, DOCX file, 0.01 MB.
Copyright © 2020 Putonti et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

TABLE S4

Genes conserved and unique to L. mulieris strains. Genome positions listed are for the coding region locations within the genome of L. mulieris c10Ua161M (GCF_007095465). As this assembly is not a single chromosome sequence, the contig containing the coding region is also listed. The product accession refers to the protein product annotated for this genome. Download Table S4, DOCX file, 0.02 MB.
Copyright © 2020 Putonti et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

While other lactobacilli of the urinary tract have been associated with or without lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), L. jensenii has been found in communities regardless of urinary symptoms (17). As our 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis suggests, distinguishing between L. jensenii and L. mulieris by 16S amplicon sequencing surveys is error-prone. Thus, whole-genome sequencing of the microbiota or directed searches for the genes identified here (Tables S3 and S4) is likely the best way to distinguish the two species in a community. With this knowledge, we can determine whether L. jensenii and/or L. mulieris have any association with LUTS. Furthermore, previous studies associating L. jensenii with the benefit of inhibiting the growth of urogenital pathogens must be revisited to assess whether both species have this beneficial role. The distinction of these two species may explain reported phenotypic variation among L. jensenii isolates, including H2O2 production (18, 19). Twenty-three of the 43 genomes examined here are from our own collection of urinary isolates, and none of our 6 L. mulieris strains were isolated from women without LUTS (Table S1).

Recently, the entire Lactobacillus genus has been reevaluated given the availability of numerous complete and draft genome sequences (20, 21). Our phylogenetic and phylogenomic analyses support the reclassification of the eight L. jensenii genomes identified by Rocha et al. (7) and eight additional genomes into the new L. mulieris species. Furthermore, we found that the L. mulieris UMB7784 genome is distinct from other L. mulieris strains. Looking at the 83 genes unique to this strain (Table S5), we found homologs in other lactobacilli, including L. salivarius, L. crispatus, L. hominis, L. johnsonii, and L. psittaci. UMB7784-specific genes include genes that encode the following metabolism-related proteins or pathways: glucose phosphotransferase system (PTS), arginase, glucocerebrosidase, diaminopropionate ammonia-lyase, and a phospholipase and a phosphate-selective porin. The UMB7784-specific genes also include genes encoding proteins related to survival: dTDP-4-dehydrorhamnose 3,5-epimerase, a bacteriocin, and a protein G-related albumin-binding molecule. L. mulieris UMB7784 suggests that the urogenital tract may contain additional lactobacilli subspecies or species. Further investigation of lactobacilli from the urogenital tract will provide critical insight into the genomic diversity of these two species and potential associations with urogenital symptoms and infections.

TABLE S5

Genes conserved and unique to L. mulieris UMB7784. The best blastp hit as well as the best blastp hit to a Lactobacillus genome is listed for each anvi’o gene cluster identified as UMB7784-specific. Download Table S5, XLSX file, 0.01 MB.
Copyright © 2020 Putonti et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received June 10, 2020.
    • Accepted July 27, 2020.
  • Copyright © 2020 Putonti et al.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Mendes-Soares H,
    2. Suzuki H,
    3. Hickey RJ,
    4. Forney LJ
    . 2014. Comparative functional genomics of Lactobacillus spp. reveals possible mechanisms for specialization of vaginal lactobacilli to their environment. J Bacteriol 196:1458–1470. doi:10.1128/JB.01439-13.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Thomas-White K,
    2. Forster SC,
    3. Kumar N,
    4. Van Kuiken M,
    5. Putonti C,
    6. Stares MD,
    7. Hilt EE,
    8. Price TK,
    9. Wolfe AJ,
    10. Lawley TD
    . 2018. Culturing of female bladder bacteria reveals an interconnected urogenital microbiota. Nat Commun 9:1557. doi:10.1038/s41467-018-03968-5.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. 3.↵
    1. Kalyoussef S,
    2. Nieves E,
    3. Dinerman E,
    4. Carpenter C,
    5. Shankar V,
    6. Oh J,
    7. Burd B,
    8. Angeletti RH,
    9. Buckheit KW,
    10. Fredricks DN,
    11. Madan RP,
    12. Keller MJ,
    13. Herold BC
    . 2012. Lactobacillus proteins are associated with the bactericidal activity against E. coli of female genital tract secretions. PLoS One 7:e49506. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0049506.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Spurbeck RR,
    2. Arvidson CG
    . 2010. Lactobacillus jensenii surface-associated proteins inhibit Neisseria gonorrhoeae adherence to epithelial cells. Infect Immun 78:3103–3111. doi:10.1128/IAI.01200-09.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Yamamoto HS,
    2. Xu Q,
    3. Fichorova RN
    . 2013. Homeostatic properties of Lactobacillus jensenii engineered as a live vaginal anti-HIV microbicide. BMC Microbiol 13:4. doi:10.1186/1471-2180-13-4.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Hudson PL,
    2. Hung KJ,
    3. Bergerat A,
    4. Mitchell C
    . 2020. Effect of vaginal Lactobacillus species on Escherichia coli growth. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 26:146–151. doi:10.1097/SPV.0000000000000827.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. 7.↵
    1. Rocha J,
    2. Botelho J,
    3. Ksiezarek M,
    4. Perovic SU,
    5. Machado M,
    6. Carriço JA,
    7. Pimentel LL,
    8. Salsinha S,
    9. Rodríguez-Alcalá LM,
    10. Pintado M,
    11. Ribeiro TG,
    12. Peixe L
    . 2020. Lactobacillus mulieris sp. nov., a new species of Lactobacillus delbrueckii group. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 70:1522–1527. doi:10.1099/ijsem.0.003901.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. 8.↵
    1. Ramasamy D,
    2. Mishra AK,
    3. Lagier J-C,
    4. Padhmanabhan R,
    5. Rossi M,
    6. Sentausa E,
    7. Raoult D,
    8. Fournier P-E
    . 2014. A polyphasic strategy incorporating genomic data for the taxonomic description of novel bacterial species. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 64:384–391. doi:10.1099/ijs.0.057091-0.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Ramotowski L,
    2. Miller-Ensminger T,
    3. Voukadinova A,
    4. Wolfe AJ,
    5. Putonti C
    . 2020. Draft genome sequence of Lactobacillus mulieris UMB9245, isolated from the female bladder. Microbiol Resour Announc 9:e00408-20. doi:10.1128/MRA.00408-20.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Tsibere O,
    2. Miller-Ensminger T,
    3. Voukadinova A,
    4. Wolfe AJ,
    5. Putonti C
    . 2020. Draft genome sequence of Lactobacillus mulieris UMB7784, isolated from the female urinary tract. Microbiol Resour Announc 9:e00403-20. doi:10.1128/MRA.00403-20.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Eren AM,
    2. Esen ÖC,
    3. Quince C,
    4. Vineis JH,
    5. Morrison HG,
    6. Sogin ML,
    7. Delmont TO
    . 2015. anvi’o: an advanced analysis and visualization platform for ’omics data. PeerJ 3:e1319. doi:10.7717/peerj.1319.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Richter M,
    2. Rosselló-Móra R
    . 2009. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:19126–19131. doi:10.1073/pnas.0906412106.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Sun Z,
    2. Harris HMB,
    3. McCann A,
    4. Guo C,
    5. Argimón S,
    6. Zhang W,
    7. Yang X,
    8. Jeffery IB,
    9. Cooney JC,
    10. Kagawa TF,
    11. Liu W,
    12. Song Y,
    13. Salvetti E,
    14. Wrobel A,
    15. Rasinkangas P,
    16. Parkhill J,
    17. Rea MC,
    18. O’Sullivan O,
    19. Ritari J,
    20. Douillard FP,
    21. Ross RP,
    22. Yang R,
    23. Briner AE,
    24. Felis GE,
    25. de Vos WM,
    26. Barrangou R,
    27. Klaenhammer TR,
    28. Caufield PW,
    29. Cui Y,
    30. Zhang H,
    31. O’Toole PW
    . 2015. Expanding the biotechnology potential of lactobacilli through comparative genomics of 213 strains and associated genera. Nat Commun 6:8322. doi:10.1038/ncomms9322.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Inglin RC,
    2. Meile L,
    3. Stevens MJA
    . 2018. Clustering of pan- and core-genome of Lactobacillus provides novel evolutionary insights for differentiation. BMC Genomics 19:284. doi:10.1186/s12864-018-4601-5.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  15. 15.↵
    1. Rouli L,
    2. Merhej V,
    3. Fournier P-E,
    4. Raoult D
    . 2015. The bacterial pangenome as a new tool for analysing pathogenic bacteria. New Microbes New Infect 7:72–85. doi:10.1016/j.nmni.2015.06.005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Zhou X,
    2. Yang B,
    3. Stanton C,
    4. Ross RP,
    5. Zhao J,
    6. Zhang H,
    7. Chen W
    . 2020. Comparative analysis of Lactobacillus gasseri from Chinese subjects reveals a new species-level taxa. BMC Genomics 21:119. doi:10.1186/s12864-020-6527-y.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  17. 17.↵
    1. Pearce MM,
    2. Hilt EE,
    3. Rosenfeld AB,
    4. Zilliox MJ,
    5. Thomas-White K,
    6. Fok C,
    7. Kliethermes S,
    8. Schreckenberger PC,
    9. Brubaker L,
    10. Gai X,
    11. Wolfe AJ
    . 2014. The female urinary microbiome: a comparison of women with and without urgency urinary incontinence. mBio 5:e01283-14. doi:10.1128/mBio.01283-14.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Antonio MA,
    2. Hawes SE,
    3. Hillier SL
    . 1999. The identification of vaginal Lactobacillus species and the demographic and microbiologic characteristics of women colonized by these species. J Infect Dis 180:1950–1956. doi:10.1086/315109.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. 19.↵
    1. Hütt P,
    2. Lapp E,
    3. Štšepetova J,
    4. Smidt I,
    5. Taelma H,
    6. Borovkova N,
    7. Oopkaup H,
    8. Ahelik A,
    9. Rööp T,
    10. Hoidmets D,
    11. Samuel K,
    12. Salumets A,
    13. Mändar R
    . 2016. Characterisation of probiotic properties in human vaginal lactobacilli strains. Microb Ecol Health Dis 27:30484. doi:10.3402/mehd.v27.30484.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  20. 20.↵
    1. Salvetti E,
    2. Harris HMB,
    3. Felis GE,
    4. O’Toole PW
    . 2018. Comparative genomics of the genus Lactobacillus reveals robust phylogroups that provide the basis for reclassification. Appl Environ Microbiol 84:e00993-18. doi:10.1128/AEM.00993-18.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Zheng J,
    2. Wittouck S,
    3. Salvetti E,
    4. Franz CMAP,
    5. Harris HMB,
    6. Mattarelli P,
    7. O’Toole PW,
    8. Pot B,
    9. Vandamme P,
    10. Walter J,
    11. Watanabe K,
    12. Wuyts S,
    13. Felis GE,
    14. Gänzle MG,
    15. Lebeer S
    . 2020. A taxonomic note on the genus Lactobacillus: description of 23 novel genera, emended description of the genus Lactobacillus Beijerinck 1901, and union of Lactobacillaceae and Leuconostocaceae. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 70:2782–2858. doi:10.1099/ijsem.0.004107.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Comparative Genomic Study of Lactobacillus jensenii and the Newly Defined Lactobacillus mulieris Species Identifies Species-Specific Functionality
Catherine Putonti, Jason W. Shapiro, Adriana Ene, Oleksandra Tsibere, Alan J. Wolfe
mSphere Aug 2020, 5 (4) e00560-20; DOI: 10.1128/mSphere.00560-20

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print
Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this mSphere article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparative Genomic Study of Lactobacillus jensenii and the Newly Defined Lactobacillus mulieris Species Identifies Species-Specific Functionality
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from mSphere
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in mSphere.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Comparative Genomic Study of Lactobacillus jensenii and the Newly Defined Lactobacillus mulieris Species Identifies Species-Specific Functionality
Catherine Putonti, Jason W. Shapiro, Adriana Ene, Oleksandra Tsibere, Alan J. Wolfe
mSphere Aug 2020, 5 (4) e00560-20; DOI: 10.1128/mSphere.00560-20
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • OBSERVATION
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Lactobacillus
Lactobacillus jensenii
Lactobacillus mulieris
urinary microbiome
urogenital microbiome

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About mSphere
  • Board of Editors
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • Embargo Policy
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Warranty
  • Types of Articles
  • Getting Started
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #mSphereJ

@ASMicrobiology

       

 

Website feedback

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Online ISSN: 2379-5042