Skip to main content
  • ASM Journals
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Research and News from ASM Journals
    • mSphere of Influence: Commentaries from Early Career Microbiologists
    • Archive
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Getting Started
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mSphere
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • ASM Journals
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
mSphere
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Research and News from ASM Journals
    • mSphere of Influence: Commentaries from Early Career Microbiologists
    • Archive
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Getting Started
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mSphere
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
Editor's Pick Research Article | Therapeutics and Prevention

Identification of Simplified Microbial Communities That Inhibit Clostridioides difficile Infection through Dilution/Extinction

Jennifer M. Auchtung, Eva C. Preisner, James Collins, Armando I. Lerma, Robert A. Britton
Vincent B. Young, Editor
Jennifer M. Auchtung
aAlkek Center for Metagenomics and Microbiome Research, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
bDepartment of Molecular Virology and Microbiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
cNebraska Foods for Health Center, University of Nebraska—Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA
dDepartment of Food Science and Technology, University of Nebraska—Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jennifer M. Auchtung
Eva C. Preisner
aAlkek Center for Metagenomics and Microbiome Research, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
bDepartment of Molecular Virology and Microbiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James Collins
aAlkek Center for Metagenomics and Microbiome Research, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
bDepartment of Molecular Virology and Microbiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Armando I. Lerma
aAlkek Center for Metagenomics and Microbiome Research, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
bDepartment of Molecular Virology and Microbiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert A. Britton
aAlkek Center for Metagenomics and Microbiome Research, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
bDepartment of Molecular Virology and Microbiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Robert A. Britton
Vincent B. Young
University of Michigan—Ann Arbor
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/mSphere.00387-20
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Supplemental Material
  • FIG 1
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 1

    Identification of simplified communities that inhibit C. difficile proliferation through dilution/extinction community assembly. (A) Overview of process to identify simplified communities. (B) Log10 C. difficile levels measured in diluted communities on day 5 or 6 following challenge. Closed triangles, C. difficile (CD) cultured alone; open circles:, C. difficile cultured in the presence of undiluted communities (0) and communities diluted 10−4 (4) and 10−5 (5) cultured from indicated fecal sample donors. Solid lines represent geometric means of samples. Dashed lines demarcate inhibition of C. difficile levels by 102 and 104, with the number of samples per category indicated. (C) Schematic representation of samples generated over the course of experiments as described in the text. Red typeface indicates samples that failed to provide protection from C. difficile colonization at the step indicated.

  • FIG 2
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 2

    Comparison of microbial communities present in undiluted and simplified communities that inhibit C. difficile growth. (A and B) The number of OTUs (A) and microbial diversity (inverse Simpson) (B) detected in undiluted communities (squares) and communities diluted 10−4 (circles) and 10−5 (triangles) are plotted. Lines represent medians; P values of <0.05 as calculated by one-way Kruskal-Wallis testing are reported. (C) Principal-coordinate analysis (PCoA) visualization of Bray-Curtis dissimilarities between C. difficile-resistant communities SC1 to SC5. Colors represent different SCs as indicated; dilutions are indicated by shapes. Percent variation described by each axis is indicated in parentheses. (D) Forty-five OTUs that most significantly contribute to partitioning of SC1 to SC5 into the indicated four community types (A to D). The log2-transformed percent abundance of each OTU is plotted across all samples. Samples are arranged by donor and community type as indicated at the top. Values ranged from 0.01% (yellow) to 64% (dark blue) of total sequences as indicated; pale yellow indicates that there were no detected sequences (ND). Simplified community replicate names are indicated in boldface, underlining indicates communities selected for reculturing as described in the text. Table S1 contains data from all 147 OTUs that account for differences between community types.

  • FIG 3
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 3

    SC1 and SC2 suppress C. difficile-associated disease in the HMbmouse model. (A) Overview of infection and recurrence protocol used to evaluate simplified communities and FMT treatments. Mice were treated with a mixture of five antibiotics (+5 Abx) in the drinking water for 6 days as described previously (42). After 2 days on fresh water, mice were treated once daily with microbial communities as indicated in panels B to E or with a vehicle (PBS) for 3 days. One day prior to C. difficile infection, clindamycin was administered intraperitoneally (Clinda IP). On the third day of administration of microbial communities, mice were challenged with C. difficile (Cdiff). Disease severity and levels of C. difficile were monitored during initial infection and following induction of relapse with intraperitoneal injection of clindamycin. In panels B to E, treatments are indicated as follows: PBS, dark blue (n = 9); HMbmouse FMT (M-FMT), magenta (n = 9); human FMT (H-FMT), teal (n = 9); SC1, dark purple (n = 9); SC2, light blue (n = 9); SC3, violet (n = 9); and SC4, black (n = 8). (B) Percentage of day −2 body mass on day 0 (prior to C. difficile challenge) following 2 days of treatment with simplified communities. (C) Percentage of day 0 body mass on day 2 following initial infection (D) Percentage of relapse day 0 body mass 2 days following relapse. (E) Levels of C. difficile measured in the feces of treated mice on days indicated below the graph. Boxes represent the interquartile ranges, horizontal lines indicate the medians, and vertical lines indicate the ranges of data collected from replicate mouse samples at each time point. Significance of differences between microbe- and PBS-treated mice in each panel were evaluated with one-way Kruskal-Wallis testing with Dunn’s correction for multiple comparisons. P values less than 0.05 are reported. Two mice lost from PBS (days 3 and 4) and HMbmouse FMT-treated groups (day 3) were included in calculations until death. Mice treated with SC3 were not tested for resistance to recurrent infection. C. difficile levels in H-FMT-treated mice were not tested on relapse day 10. Longitudinal data collected during initial infection and relapse are plotted in Fig. S2.

  • FIG 4
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 4

    Identification of final simplified (FS) microbial communities that suppress C. difficile in MBRA and HMbmouse models of CDI. (A) Plot of log10 C. difficile levels on the final day in culture with recultured SC1 (closed blue circles) and SC2 (closed green circles) and in recultured SC1 and SC2 that were further simplified to 10−6-fold (open circles) and 10−7-fold (open squares). Lines represent medians. (B to D) Number of OTUs (B), microbial diversity (inverse Simpson index) (C), and species evenness (Simpson evenness index) (D) of recultured SC2 and communities diluted 10−6 and 10−7. Lines represent medians; any significant differences (P < 0.05) detected in distributions of communities as determined by one-way Kruskal-Wallis testing are reported. (E) Differences in abundance of OTUs present above 0.1% of total sequences in at least two replicate SC2, FS2A, FS2B, or FS2C cultures. Samples are indicated to the left of the plot; data in boldface type are from the cultures shown in panel A; the first SC2 replicate is from the data reported in Fig. 2, and the additional SC2, FS2A, and FS2B replicates were collected from bioreactor cultures used to gavage HMbmice in panels F to H. Yellow represents <0.01% abundance and blue represents > 64% of total sequences as indicated by shading of log2-transformed relative abundance data; pale yellow indicates that no sequences were detected (ND). In panels F to H, data were collected from HMbmice subjected to treatment indicated as follows: PBS, dark blue (n = 18); M-FMT, magenta (n = 17); SC2, light blue (n = 17); FS2A, violet (n = 9); FS2B, teal (n = 17); and FS2C, black (n = 8). Treatments were administered as described for Fig. 3A. (F) Percentage of day 0 body mass on day 2 of infection. (G) Percentage of relapse day 0 body mass on day 2 of relapse. (H) Log10 levels of C. difficile in mouse feces on days indicated. Boxes represent the interquartile ranges, horizontal lines indicate the medians, and vertical lines indicate the ranges of data collected from replicate mouse samples at each time point. Significant differences (P < 0.05) in distributions of community-treated mice compared to PBS-treated mice as determined by one-way Kruskal-Wallis testing with Dunn’s correction for multiple comparisons are reported. Longitudinal data from treatments shown in panels F to H are reported in Fig. S3.

  • FIG 5
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 5

    Treatment with SC2 and FS2C restores microbial diversity and shifts microbiome composition toward baseline state observed in HMbmice not treated with antibiotics. 16S rRNA gene sequence data were obtained from bacteria present in the feces of mice treated with PBS (dark blue), M-FMT (magenta), SC2 (light blue), FS2A (violet), FS2B (teal), or FS2C (black) on days 1, 4 or 5, and 7 following initial C. difficile infection and days 0, 2, and 7 relative to initiation of relapse with clindamycin i.p. (For FS2A-treated mice, 16S rRNA gene sequence data were obtained only from samples collected during initial infection for FS2A-treated mice.) 16S rRNA sequence data were also obtained from a pooled fecal sample collected from an HMbmice not treated with antibiotics that was used for FMT administration. (A and B) Number of OTUs (A) and microbial diversity (inverse Simpson index) (B) measured in sample collected from HMbmice not treated with antibiotics used for FMT administration (HMbmouse) and in samples collected from treated mice at time points indicated below the graph. (C) Similarity to baseline HMbmouse sample used for FMT administration measured in samples at time points indicated below graph (similarity = 1 − Bray-Curtis dissimilarity). Boxes represent the interquartile ranges, horizontal lines indicate the medians, and vertical lines indicate the ranges of data collected from replicate mouse samples at each time point. Significance of differences in microbe-treated compared to PBS-treated animals at each time point were evaluated with one-way Kruskal-Wallis testing with Dunn’s correction for multiple comparisons; P values of <0.05 are reported.

  • FIG 6
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 6

    Treatment with simplified communities alters recovery of indigenous microbes. We used linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) to identify significantly enriched or depleted taxa between treatments that accelerated microbiome recovery in Fig. 5C (M-FMT, FS2C, and SC2 [Restored]) and treatments with more prolonged disruption (PBS, FS2A, and FS2B [Disrupted]). Independent analyses were performed for samples on days 1, 4 or 5, and 7 and relapse day 0; OTUs with LDA values determined by LEfSe of >3 for at least one time point are shown. Intensity of shading correlates to the log2-transformed median percent abundance measured for the treated mice at the indicated time points, with median abundances of >64% shaded dark blue and median values equal to 0.01% shaded dark yellow. Samples in which sequences were below the detection limit (ND, not detected) are shaded pale yellow. OTUs in bold typeface are indigenous to HMbmice as described in Table S2. OTUs in standard typeface were found only in simplified communities. Blautia number 31 and Bacteroides number 3 were found in both HMbmice and simplified communities. Peptostreptococcaceae number 35 is likely C. difficile, as the representative sequence has 100% identity to C. difficile and abundance over the course of infection correlates well with C. difficile levels reported in Fig. 3 and 4. The complete set of OTUs identified by LEfSe is provided in Table S4.

  • FIG 7
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 7

    A subset of bacteria from simplified communities persists over time in treated mice. (A) Numbers of OTUs in SC2 (light blue), FS2A (violet), FS2B (teal), and FS2C (black) in vitro cultures that persist over time in the feces of treated mice. Lines represent median values at each time point, and error bars represent interquartile ranges. Significance of differences observed between treatment groups at each time point during the initial infection (days 1, 4 or 5, and 7) were evaluated with one-way Kruskal-Wallis testing with Dunn’s correction for multiple comparisons; P values of <0.05 are reported in panel B. (B) Data from days 4 or 5 and 7 replotted from panel A. The box represents the interquartile range, horizontal line indicates the median, and vertical lines indicate the range of data collected from fecal communities. (C) Log2-transformed percent abundance of OTUs that persist over time in mice treated with SC2, FS2A, FS2B, and/or FS2C. OTUs detected in in vitro samples were designated persistent if the median level in a treatment group on day 7 and/or relapse day 2 sample was >0.01%. Intensity of shading correlates to the median percent abundance measured for the treated mice at the indicated time points. OTUs in boldface type have also been detected in HMbmice as described in Table S2. Abundance data from persistent OTUs at later times during infection (relapse days 0 and 7) and from OTUs abundant in day 0 samples that did not persist over time in treated mice are presented in Table S5.

  • FIG 8
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 8

    Treatment with SC2, FS2C and FS2B led to distinct microbiome responses during disease relapse. LEfSe was used to identify OTUs that differed significantly between treatment groups in the feces of mice on days 2 and 7 following induction of relapse with clindamycin i.p. Independent analyses were performed for samples on relapse days 2 and 7; OTUs with LDA values determined by LEfSe of >3 for at least one time point are shown. The complete set of LEfSe data is shown in Table S6. Median abundance of OTUs in in vitro SC2, FS2C, and FS2B cultures as well as all the feces of treated mice on day 1 and relapse day 0 samples are included for comparison as described in the text.

Supplemental Material

  • Figures
  • TABLE S1

    OTUs that contribute to partitioning of simplified communities by Dirichlet multinomial mixtures. Download Table S1, XLSX file, 0.04 MB.

    Copyright © 2020 Auchtung et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • FIG S1

    C. difficile proliferation in recultured triplicate cultures seeded with initially suppressive communities. C. difficile levels from triplicate reactors (closed circles) recultured from cryopreserved simplified communities are plotted with the simplified community designation and replicate letter indicated below the graph as indicated in Fig. 2 in the main text. Open circles indicate levels of C. difficile detected in the initial culture reported in Fig. 1B in the main text. Lines represent medians of all four data points. Dotted lines indicate levels of C. difficile that are >102 and >104 times lower than the maximum C. difficile levels reported in Fig. 1. Download FIG S1, PDF file, 0.4 MB.

    Copyright © 2020 Auchtung et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • FIG S2

    Simplified microbial communities SC1 and SC2 suppress C. difficile in HMbmouse model of CDI. Longitudinal data collected from HMbmice that were administered treatments described in Fig. 3 in the main text. (A to I) Percentage of day 0 body mass (A to D) and Log10 C. difficile levels in feces (E to I) of mice over the first 7 days following infection. (L to R) Percentage of relapse day 0 body mass (L to O) and log10 C. difficile levels in feces (P to R) of mice over time following initiation of relapse by intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of clindamycin. Data presented are from mice treated with HMbmouse FMT (M-FMT [A, F, K, and O]), human FMT (H-FMT [B, G, L, and P]), SC1 (C, H, M, and Q), SC2 (D, I, N, and R) and SC3 (E and J). Data from PBS-treated mice (dark blue lines) are repeated in each panel for reference. Lines indicate medians and error bars indicate interquartile ranges. Data points identified as statistically significant in Fig. 3 are indicated by asterisks. Response during relapse was not tested in SC3-treated mice. Download FIG S2, PDF file, 1.7 MB.

    Copyright © 2020 Auchtung et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • FIG S3

    FS2B and FS2C communities suppress C. difficile in the HMbmouse model of CDI. Longitudinal data collected from HMbmice that were administered treatments as for Fig. 4 and as described in the main text are shown. (A to J) Percentage of day 0 body mass (A to E) and log10 levels of C. difficile in feces over time (F to J) during the first 7 days following infection. (K to S) Percentage of relapse day 0 body mass (K to O) and levels of C. difficile in feces over time (P to S) during the 7 days following initiation of relapse by i.p. injection of clindamycin. Data are from mice treated with M-FMT (A, F, K, and P), SC2 (B, G, L, and Q), FS2A (C, H, and M), FS2B (D, I, N, and R) and FS2C (E, J, O, and S). Data from PBS-treated mice (dark blue lines) are repeated in each panel for reference. Lines represent median values, and error bars represent interquartile ranges. Data points identified as statistically significant in Fig. 4 are indicated by asterisks. Download FIG S3, PDF file, 1.2 MB.

    Copyright © 2020 Auchtung et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • TABLE S2

    Characterization of OTUs clustered at >99% ANI shared by simplified communities and HMbmice. Download Table S2, XLSX file, 0.03 MB.

    Copyright © 2020 Auchtung et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • TABLE S3

    Characterization of OTUs clustered at >97% ANI shared by simplified communities and HMbmice. Download Table S3, XLSX file, 0.02 MB.

    Copyright © 2020 Auchtung et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • TABLE S4

    Abundance of OTUs that differed significantly between treatments that restored microbiome diversity towards baseline (FMT, FS2C, and SC2) and those that remained disrupted (PBS, FS2A, and FS2B). Download Table S4, XLSX file, 0.04 MB.

    Copyright © 2020 Auchtung et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • TABLE S5

    Persistence of OTUs present in SC2, FS2A, FS2B, and FS2C over time in treated HMbmice. Download Table S5, XLSX file, 0.03 MB.

    Copyright © 2020 Auchtung et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • TABLE S6

    Abundance of OTUs in control and microbe-treated HMbmice that differ significantly between treatments. Download Table S6, XLSX file, 0.08 MB.

    Copyright © 2020 Auchtung et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • FIG S4

    Correlation analysis of levels of C. difficile and body mass change during initial infection. Correlation analysis of percent body mass on day 2 of infection relative to C. difficile levels on day 1 (A), day 4 or 5 (B), or (C) day 7 from all mice tested in experiments 1 to 3. Linear regression formulas and correlation coefficients for each plot are indicated in the corner of each graph. For regression plots, P < 0.0001. Download FIG S4, PDF file, 0.5 MB.

    Copyright © 2020 Auchtung et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Identification of Simplified Microbial Communities That Inhibit Clostridioides difficile Infection through Dilution/Extinction
Jennifer M. Auchtung, Eva C. Preisner, James Collins, Armando I. Lerma, Robert A. Britton
mSphere Jul 2020, 5 (4) e00387-20; DOI: 10.1128/mSphere.00387-20

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print
Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this mSphere article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Identification of Simplified Microbial Communities That Inhibit Clostridioides difficile Infection through Dilution/Extinction
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from mSphere
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in mSphere.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Identification of Simplified Microbial Communities That Inhibit Clostridioides difficile Infection through Dilution/Extinction
Jennifer M. Auchtung, Eva C. Preisner, James Collins, Armando I. Lerma, Robert A. Britton
mSphere Jul 2020, 5 (4) e00387-20; DOI: 10.1128/mSphere.00387-20
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Clostridioides difficile
FMT
colonization resistance
microbiome
simplified communities

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About mSphere
  • Board of Editors
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • Embargo Policy
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Warranty
  • Types of Articles
  • Getting Started
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #mSphereJ

@ASMicrobiology

       

 

Website feedback

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Online ISSN: 2379-5042