Skip to main content
  • ASM Journals
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Research and News from ASM Journals
    • mSphere of Influence: Commentaries from Early Career Microbiologists
    • Archive
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Getting Started
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mSphere
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • ASM Journals
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
mSphere
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Research and News from ASM Journals
    • mSphere of Influence: Commentaries from Early Career Microbiologists
    • Archive
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Getting Started
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mSphere
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
Commentary | Ecological and Evolutionary Science

mSphere of Influence: the Wild Genetic Diversity of Our Closest Yeast Companions

Douda Bensasson
Douda Bensasson
aUniversity of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Douda Bensasson
DOI: 10.1128/mSphere.00650-19
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Douda Bensasson uses the population genomics of model yeast species to understand how wild yeast colonize new environments, such as humans or their food. In this mSphere of Influence article, she reflects on how the discovery of “Surprisingly diverged populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in natural environments remote from human activity” (Q.-M. Wang, W.-Q. Liu, G. Liti, S.-A. Wang, and F.-Y. Bai, Mol Ecol 21:5404–5417, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05732.x) showed that a field survey and population genetic analysis of old growth forests could “unveil the hidden part of the iceberg” of natural variation in S. cerevisiae that went unnoticed for over a hundred years of yeast research.

The views expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of the journal or of ASM.

COMMENTARY

Wang et al. (1) searched the primeval forests of China for the yeast species that humans used to make food and drink for millennia and discovered “Surprisingly diverged populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in natural environments remote from human activity.” This came at a time when we knew that S. cerevisiae lived wild on the bark of oak trees (2, 3), but there was a world shortage of environmental isolates. Wang et al. (1) showed that the genetic diversity of forest S. cerevisiae isolates on a single Chinese island smaller than Belgium exceeded the genetic diversity seen across all other continents or habitats. This enormous diversity implied that old-growth trees represent the ancestral habitat of S. cerevisiae and finally dispelled the concern that it is too domesticated to be useful as a model for ecology and evolution.

The tropics have always been poorly sampled for yeast (4, 5), and Wang et al. closed this gap by comparing S. cerevisiae isolation frequencies among 11 provinces in tropical, subtropical, and temperate regions (1). By coupling fieldwork with population genetics, they noticed that genetic diversity centered in hot climates, while known domesticated lineages clustered around Chinese cities in temperate regions and could be feral. They therefore proposed that S. cerevisiae is tropical and subtropical. Leaving no loose ends, they also generated mutants for crossing experiments and showed that the new lineages are S. cerevisiae and not new species. Seven years on, the known genetic diversity of S. cerevisiae in Far East Asia has grown and remains unsurpassed despite the discovery of large-scale diversity in Brazilian rainforests (6). The East Asian origin for S. cerevisiae that Wang et al. proposed is probably true (7).

If correct, Wang et al.’s proposal that S. cerevisiae is tropical and subtropical would explain why generations of yeast biologists living in temperate regions believed that S. cerevisiae was a domesticated species with no natural conspecifics. It also would explain why yeast labs in cool temperate climates found few wild S. cerevisiae isolates in their large field surveys (8–11). When Wang et al. published, I realized that my lab had sampled woodlands in the wrong climate. Most immediately, this paper inspired me to develop climate envelope models using field data on the closest relative of S. cerevisiae. The labs in temperate climates (including mine) had no trouble isolating the sister species, Saccharomyces paradoxus (8–11), which prefers cooler temperatures in the lab (12). We used our European S. paradoxus data and the known species difference in thermal preference to show that S. cerevisiae is indeed subtropical and tropical and to correctly predict the temperate locations where only feral S. cerevisiae strains occur in China (11). Unsurprisingly, the interdisciplinary work of Wang et al. influenced me in other ways. It inspired me to combine population genomic analyses with ecological data to show that old oak trees provide a natural habitat for Candida albicans, previously considered an obligate commensal (13). There was also a sociological lesson: despite over a hundred years of research into “man’s best (micro) friend” (14), most of the natural diversity of the model S. cerevisiae remained unnoticed until Wang et al.’s exciting discovery.

  • Copyright © 2019 Bensasson.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Wang Q-M,
    2. Liu W-Q,
    3. Liti G,
    4. Wang S-A,
    5. Bai F-Y
    . 2012. Surprisingly diverged populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in natural environments remote from human activity. Mol Ecol 21:5404–5417. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05732.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    1. Fay JC,
    2. Benavides JA
    . 2005. Evidence for domesticated and wild populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Genet 1:e5. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0010005.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. 3.↵
    1. Aa E,
    2. Townsend JP,
    3. Adams RI,
    4. Nielsen KM,
    5. Taylor JW
    . 2006. Population structure and gene evolution in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res 6:702–715. doi:10.1111/j.1567-1364.2006.00059.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.↵
    1. Robert V,
    2. Stalpers J,
    3. Boekhout T,
    4. Tan S
    . 2006. Yeast biodiversity and culture collections, p 31–44. In Rosa CA, Péter G (ed), Biodiversity and ecophysiology of yeasts. Springer, Berlin, Germany.
  5. 5.↵
    1. Kurtzman CP,
    2. Mateo RQ,
    3. Kolecka A,
    4. Theelen B,
    5. Robert V,
    6. Boekhout T
    . 2015. Advances in yeast systematics and phylogeny and their use as predictors of biotechnologically important metabolic pathways. FEMS Yeast Res 15:fov050. doi:10.1093/femsyr/fov050.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Barbosa R,
    2. Almeida P,
    3. Safar SVB,
    4. Santos RO,
    5. Morais PB,
    6. Nielly-Thibault L,
    7. Leducq J-B,
    8. Landry CR,
    9. Gonçalves P,
    10. Rosa CA,
    11. Sampaio JP
    . 2016. Evidence of natural hybridization in Brazilian wild lineages of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genome Biol Evol 8:317–329. doi:10.1093/gbe/evv263.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Peter J,
    2. De Chiara M,
    3. Friedrich A,
    4. Yue J-X,
    5. Pflieger D,
    6. Bergström A,
    7. Sigwalt A,
    8. Barre B,
    9. Freel K,
    10. Llored A,
    11. Cruaud C,
    12. Labadie K,
    13. Aury J-M,
    14. Istace B,
    15. Lebrigand K,
    16. Barbry P,
    17. Engelen S,
    18. Lemainque A,
    19. Wincker P,
    20. Liti G,
    21. Schacherer J
    . 2018. Genome evolution across 1,011 Saccharomyces cerevisiae isolates. Nature 556:339–344. doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0030-5.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. 8.↵
    1. Charron G,
    2. Leducq J-B,
    3. Bertin C,
    4. Dubé AK,
    5. Landry CR
    . 2014. Exploring the northern limit of the distribution of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces paradoxus in North America. FEMS Yeast Res 14:281–288. doi:10.1111/1567-1364.12100.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    1. Kowallik V,
    2. Miller E,
    3. Greig D
    . 2015. The interaction of Saccharomyces paradoxus with its natural competitors on oak bark. Mol Ecol 24:1596–1610. doi:10.1111/mec.13120.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. 10.↵
    1. Sylvester K,
    2. Wang Q-M,
    3. James B,
    4. Mendez R,
    5. Hulfachor AB,
    6. Hittinger CT
    . 2015. Temperature and host preferences drive the diversification of Saccharomyces and other yeasts: a survey and the discovery of eight new yeast species. FEMS Yeast Res 15:fov002. doi:10.1093/femsyr/fov002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Robinson HA,
    2. Pinharanda A,
    3. Bensasson D
    . 2016. Summer temperature can predict the distribution of wild yeast populations. Ecol Evol 6:1236–1250. doi:10.1002/ece3.1919.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  12. 12.↵
    1. Sweeney JY,
    2. Kuehne HA,
    3. Sniegowski PD
    . 2004. Sympatric natural Saccharomyces cerevisiae and S. paradoxus populations have different thermal growth profiles. FEMS Yeast Res 4:521–525. doi:10.1016/S1567-1356(03)00171-5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. 13.↵
    1. Bensasson D,
    2. Dicks J,
    3. Ludwig JM,
    4. Bond CJ,
    5. Elliston A,
    6. Roberts IN,
    7. James SA
    . 2019. Diverse lineages of Candida albicans live on old oaks. Genetics 211:277–288. doi:10.1534/genetics.118.301482.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Eberlein C,
    2. Leducq J-B,
    3. Landry CR
    . 2015. The genomics of wild yeast populations sheds light on the domestication of man’s best (micro) friend. Mol Ecol 24:5309–5311. doi:10.1111/mec.13380.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
mSphere of Influence: the Wild Genetic Diversity of Our Closest Yeast Companions
Douda Bensasson
mSphere Sep 2019, 4 (5) e00650-19; DOI: 10.1128/mSphere.00650-19

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print
Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this mSphere article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
mSphere of Influence: the Wild Genetic Diversity of Our Closest Yeast Companions
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from mSphere
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in mSphere.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
mSphere of Influence: the Wild Genetic Diversity of Our Closest Yeast Companions
Douda Bensasson
mSphere Sep 2019, 4 (5) e00650-19; DOI: 10.1128/mSphere.00650-19
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • COMMENTARY
    • REFERENCES
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

wine yeast
Candida albicans
climate

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About mSphere
  • Board of Editors
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • Embargo Policy
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Warranty
  • Types of Articles
  • Getting Started
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #mSphereJ

@ASMicrobiology

       

 

Website feedback

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Online ISSN: 2379-5042