Skip to main content
  • ASM Journals
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Research and News from ASM Journals
    • mSphere of Influence: Commentaries from Early Career Microbiologists
    • Archive
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Getting Started
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mSphere
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • ASM Journals
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
mSphere
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Research and News from ASM Journals
    • mSphere of Influence: Commentaries from Early Career Microbiologists
    • Archive
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Getting Started
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mSphere
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
Research Article | Therapeutics and Prevention

Designed Ankyrin Repeat Protein (DARPin) Neutralizers of TcdB from Clostridium difficile Ribotype 027

Zeyu Peng, Rudo Simeon, Samuel B. Mitchell, Junjie Zhang, Hanping Feng, Zhilei Chen
Brandi M. Limbago, Editor
Zeyu Peng
aDepartment of Microbial Pathogenesis and Immunology, Texas A&M University Health Science Center, College Station, Texas, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rudo Simeon
aDepartment of Microbial Pathogenesis and Immunology, Texas A&M University Health Science Center, College Station, Texas, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Samuel B. Mitchell
aDepartment of Microbial Pathogenesis and Immunology, Texas A&M University Health Science Center, College Station, Texas, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Junjie Zhang
bDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hanping Feng
cDepartment of Microbial Pathogenesis, University of Maryland Dental School, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zhilei Chen
aDepartment of Microbial Pathogenesis and Immunology, Texas A&M University Health Science Center, College Station, Texas, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brandi M. Limbago
U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/mSphere.00596-19
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Supplemental Material
  • FIG 1
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 1

    (A) Schematics of the different DARPins. The identity of the randomized residues in each repeat module is indicated in the legend on the right. The different colors represent the different positions on the ankyrin repeat module and are pictorially represented in panel B. The number of clones with the same AR configuration (with or without additional framework mutations) is shown in parentheses. The asterisk (*) indicates a DARPin that contains one framework mutation. (B) A crystal structure illustrating the structure of DARPin. Residues colored in red, green, and blue are randomized in the library.

  • FIG 2
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 2

    (A and B) DARPins strongly exhibited the ability to neutralize (A) and bind (B) the different TcdB toxins. conc., concentration. (C) TcdB neutralization potency of different DARPins and bezlotoxumab. For neutralization assays, serially diluted immobilized-metal affinity chromatography (IMAC)-purified DARPins were mixed with the appropriate toxin and then added to Vero cells seeded the night before in 96-well plates. The cell viability was quantified by the CellTiterGlo assay 72 h later and normalized to naive Vero cells. For ELISAs, the MaxiSorp plates were coated with the appropriate toxin followed by treatment with serially diluted DARPins. The amounts of plate-bound DARPins (containing Myc tags) were quantified using an anti-c-Myc antibody. Data in panel A represent averages of results from at least 2 independent experiments. Data presented in panel B are representative of results from two independent experiments performed in duplicate.

  • FIG 3
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 3

    Anti-TcdBUK1 DARPins block the interaction between TcdB and its receptor CSPG4. ***, P < 0.001 (t test). The wells of an ELISA plate were coated with TcdBUK1 followed by treatment with a 1 nM concentration of a CSPG4 extracellular domain-GFP fusion protein alone or in a mixture with a 250 nM concentration of the indicated DARPins. The amounts of plate-bound CSPG4 were detected using an anti-GFP antibody. The data are representative of results from two independent experiments and of averages of results from quadruplicate samples.

  • FIG 4
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 4

    DARPin dimer U3D16 showed enhanced neutralization ability against TcdBVPI (A) and TcdBM68 (B). Serially diluted DARPins were mixed with the appropriate toxins and then added to Vero cells that had been seeded the night before. Cell viability was quantified by the CellTiterGlo assay 72 h later and normalized to naive Vero cells. The error bars represent mean deviations of results from two independent experiments. (C) U3 lacks the ability to bind to TcdBUK1 as determined by ELISA. The ELISA plates were coated with the appropriate toxin and then blocked with BSA prior to the addition of serially diluted DARPin U3. The amounts of plate-bound DARPin were quantified using an anti-c-Myc antibody. The data are representative of results from two independent experiments performed in duplicate. OD450, optical density at 450 nm.

  • FIG 5
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 5

    TcdBUK1 lacks significant ability to interact with FZD2. The wells of an ELISA plate were coated with TcdBVPI or TcdBUK1 followed by treatment with CSPG4-EC-GFP (1 nM) (A), FZD2-Fc (4 nM) (B), or PVRL3 (100 nM) (C). The amount of plate-bound CSPG4, FZD2, or PVRL3 was detected using each of the respective antibodies. Results are representative of at least two independent experiments. Error bars represent the mean deviations of results from duplicate samples.

  • FIG 6
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 6

    Vero and Caco-2 cells exhibit different levels of sensitivity to TcdBUK1 and TcdBVPI. Vero cells (A) or Caco-2 cells (B) were incubated with serial dilutions of TcdBUK1 or TcdBVPI. The cell viability was quantified using CellTiter-Glo reagent 72 h later and normalized to naive cells. The error bars represent standard deviations of results from two independent experiments performed in triplicate.

  • FIG 7
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 7

    Overlay of homology model of FBD from TcdBUK1 with the crystal structure of TcdBVPI (PDB code: 6C0B) in two different views (A, side view; B, front view). The toxin and the cysteine-rich domain 2 (CRD2) from FZD2 are represented in brown and green, respectively. Key positive allosteric modulator (PAM) (silver) binding residues from the toxin (brown) and CRD2 (green) are shown as stick models. The FBD sequence from TcdBM68 is identical to that from TcdBVPI.

Supplemental Material

  • Figures
  • FIG S1

    Purification of DARPins. Each DARPin was expressed in 5 ml of E. coli culture and purified by Ni-NTA affinity chromatography. Purified DARPins were analyzed by SDS-PAGE. Download FIG S1, TIF file, 1.2 MB.

    Copyright © 2019 Peng et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • TABLE S1

    Amino acid sequences of the unique clones of anti-TcdBUK1 DARPins. Download Table S1, DOCX file, 0.02 MB.

    Copyright © 2019 Peng et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • FIG S2

    Schematic of monomeric and dimeric DARPins. (A) Monomeric DARPins contain an N-terminal 6×His tag and a Myc tag. The sequence from D16 is presented as an example. (B) The constituent DARPins in a dimeric DARPin are separated by a (GGGGS) × 3 linker sequence. The sequence from D16U3 is presented as an example. Download FIG S2, TIF file, 1.1 MB.

    Copyright © 2019 Peng et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • FIG S3

    Neutralization potency of engineered dimeric DARPins against UK1 TcdB. Purified DARPins were added to Vero cells together with TcdBUK1 (1 pg/ml). Cell viability was quantified by the CellTiter Glo assay 72 h later and normalized to naïve Vero cells. Experiments were conducted in triplicate. Error bars represent the standard deviation. (A) D16 versus U3D16. (B) D16 versus D16U3. (C) D16 versus mixture of D16 and U3. (D) D16 versus U3D16 and D16U3 with longer linkers. Download FIG S3, TIF file, 0.8 MB.

    Copyright © 2019 Peng et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • FIG S4

    Sequence alignment of the FBD from TcdBUK1 and TcdBVPI. Key residues at the FZD binding interface are shown in blue and red. Download FIG S4, TIF file, 0.7 MB.

    Copyright © 2019 Peng et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Designed Ankyrin Repeat Protein (DARPin) Neutralizers of TcdB from Clostridium difficile Ribotype 027
Zeyu Peng, Rudo Simeon, Samuel B. Mitchell, Junjie Zhang, Hanping Feng, Zhilei Chen
mSphere Oct 2019, 4 (5) e00596-19; DOI: 10.1128/mSphere.00596-19

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print
Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this mSphere article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Designed Ankyrin Repeat Protein (DARPin) Neutralizers of TcdB from Clostridium difficile Ribotype 027
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from mSphere
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in mSphere.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Designed Ankyrin Repeat Protein (DARPin) Neutralizers of TcdB from Clostridium difficile Ribotype 027
Zeyu Peng, Rudo Simeon, Samuel B. Mitchell, Junjie Zhang, Hanping Feng, Zhilei Chen
mSphere Oct 2019, 4 (5) e00596-19; DOI: 10.1128/mSphere.00596-19
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

toxin
therapeutic
infection
protein
antibody
hypervirulent
enterotoxins

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About mSphere
  • Board of Editors
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • Embargo Policy
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Warranty
  • Types of Articles
  • Getting Started
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #mSphereJ

@ASMicrobiology

       

 

Website feedback

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Online ISSN: 2379-5042