Skip to main content
  • ASM Journals
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Research and News from ASM Journals
    • mSphere of Influence: Commentaries from Early Career Microbiologists
    • Archive
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Getting Started
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mSphere
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • ASM Journals
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
mSphere
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Research and News from ASM Journals
    • mSphere of Influence: Commentaries from Early Career Microbiologists
    • Archive
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Getting Started
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mSphere
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
Research Article | Host-Microbe Biology

Functional Characterization of Secreted Aspartyl Proteases in Candida parapsilosis

Dhirendra Kumar Singh, Tibor Németh, Alexandra Papp, Renáta Tóth, Szilvia Lukácsi, Olga Heidingsfeld, Jiri Dostal, Csaba Vágvölgyi, Zsuzsa Bajtay, Mihály Józsi, Attila Gácser
Aaron P. Mitchell, Editor
Dhirendra Kumar Singh
aDepartment of Microbiology, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Dhirendra Kumar Singh
Tibor Németh
aDepartment of Microbiology, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alexandra Papp
bComplement Research Group, Department of Immunology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Renáta Tóth
aDepartment of Microbiology, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Szilvia Lukácsi
cMTA-ELTE Immunology Research Group, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Olga Heidingsfeld
dInstitute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czechia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jiri Dostal
dInstitute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czechia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Csaba Vágvölgyi
aDepartment of Microbiology, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zsuzsa Bajtay
cMTA-ELTE Immunology Research Group, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary
eDepartment of Immunology, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mihály Józsi
bComplement Research Group, Department of Immunology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Attila Gácser
fDepartment of Microbiology, University of Szeged Interdisciplinary Excellence Centre, Szeged, Hungary
gMTA-SZTE Lendület Mycobiome Research Group, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Attila Gácser
Aaron P. Mitchell
Carnegie Mellon University
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/mSphere.00484-19
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Candida parapsilosis is an emerging non-albicans Candida species that largely affects low-birth-weight infants and immunocompromised patients. Fungal pathogenesis is promoted by the dynamic expression of diverse virulence factors, with secreted proteolytic enzymes being linked to the establishment and progression of disease. Although secreted aspartyl proteases (Sap) are critical for Candida albicans pathogenicity, their role in C. parapsilosis is poorly elucidated. In the present study, we aimed to examine the contribution of C. parapsilosis SAPP genes SAPP1, SAPP2, and SAPP3 to the virulence of the species. Our results indicate that SAPP1 and SAPP2, but not SAPP3, influence adhesion, host cell damage, phagosome-lysosome maturation, phagocytosis, killing capacity, and cytokine secretion by human peripheral blood-derived macrophages. Purified Sapp1p and Sapp2p were also shown to efficiently cleave host complement component 3b (C3b) and C4b proteins and complement regulator factor H. Additionally, Sapp2p was able to cleave factor H-related protein 5 (FHR-5). Altogether, these data demonstrate the diverse, significant contributions that SAPP1 and SAPP2 make to the establishment and progression of disease by C. parapsilosis through enabling the attachment of the yeast cells to mammalian cells and modulating macrophage biology and disruption of the complement cascade.

IMPORTANCE Aspartyl proteases are present in various organisms and, among virulent species, are considered major virulence factors. Host tissue and cell damage, hijacking of immune responses, and hiding from innate immune cells are the most common behaviors of fungal secreted proteases enabling pathogen survival and invasion. C. parapsilosis, an opportunistic human-pathogenic fungus mainly threatening low-birth weight neonates and children, possesses three SAPP protein-encoding genes that could contribute to the invasiveness of the species. Our results suggest that SAPP1 and SAPP2, but not SAPP3, influence host evasion by regulating cell damage, phagocytosis, phagosome-lysosome maturation, killing, and cytokine secretion. Furthermore, SAPP1 and SAPP2 also effectively contribute to complement evasion.

INTRODUCTION

Candida infections are associated with a high socioeconomic impact and with morbidity and mortality among infants, children, and the elderly worldwide (1, 2). Among the non-albicans species, the incidence of infections caused by Candida parapsilosis is increasing worldwide and C. parapsilosis is currently the second or third most common yeast species associated with invasive candidiasis in hospitals in Asian, European, and South American countries (3). C. parapsilosis is commonly associated with low-birth-weight neonate infections, invasive infections of hospitalized immunocompromised patients, and the receipt of parenteral nutrition or prolonged use of intravascular devices (4). Despite its clinical significance, the pathogenicity of C. parapsilosis and its virulence factors and interactions with the host are still poorly understood (5–7).

Aspartyl proteases are present in various organisms and are most active at acidic pH (pH 1.9 to 4.0), share a catalytic apparatus, and cleave dipeptide bonds between two hydrophobic amino acid residues (8). Fungal secreted aspartyl proteases are reported to directly mediate virulence (9–13). C. parapsilosis possesses three aspartyl acid protease-encoding genes, namely, SAPP1, SAPP2, and SAPP3. SAPP1 is duplicated in the species’ genome (SAPP1a, SAPP1b) (14). A previously established Δ/Δsapp1a Δ/Δsapp1b strain, lacking SAPP1, was shown to be hypersusceptible to human serum (HS), caused attenuated host cell damage, and was phagocytosed and killed more efficiently by human monocytes and macrophages than the wild-type strain (15). In another study using reconstituted human oral epithelium (RHOE), levels of tissue damage caused by C. parapsilosis were significantly reduced in the presence of the Sapp inhibitor pepstatin, further highlighting the role of secreted proteases in the species’ pathogenicity (16).

Upon superficial infection, epithelial cells trigger an inflammatory response by producing antimicrobial peptides and recruiting and activating innate immune cells, including macrophages and neutrophils (17–19). Candida species can efficiently avoid macrophage-mediated killing by host membrane rupture, secretion of proteases and lipases, and induction of pyroptosis and by nutrient competition with the host (20–22). Upon infection, the complement cascade also activates and plays a role in combating pathogens via enhancing chemotaxis, phagocytosis, or T and B cell differentiation (23). Pathogenic species have adopted several strategies to evade complement attack (24). In particular, C. albicans either recruits complement regulator proteins on its surface or cleaves complement proteins by secreting the proteases. C. parapsilosis can also bind to human complement proteins; however, the effect of this binding has not been fully resolved (25, 26).

To date, multiple studies have shown that C. albicans aspartyl proteases have different abilities to damage epithelial cells, alter the host complement cascade, induce macrophage chemotaxis or cytokine production, and mediate NLRP3 inflammasome activation; less is known about the immune modulatory effects of aspartyl proteases in C. parapsilosis (12, 27). Therefore, to elucidate the role of individual aspartyl proteases in the virulence of C. parapsilosis, SAPP mutant strains were generated. Functional characterization of these genes revealed that SAPP1 and SAPP2 (but not SAPP3) play an important role in C. parapsilosis pathogenicity.

RESULTS

Generation and characterization of RI_SAPP1, RI_SAPP2, and RI_SAPP3 strains.Aspartyl protease-encoding genes in C. albicans are associated with various physiological and pathogenic roles. For instance, expression of SAPI to SAPIII has been associated with the yeast form of this species and linked with phenotypic switching. Previously, high levels of expression of SAPIV to SAPVI have been associated with the hyphal phase, suggesting their assistance in pathogenicity development; however, their involvement in virulence regulation is still debatable (14, 28, 29). The precise role of these genes in virulence in C. parapsilosis is not well studied. Therefore, we sought to expand upon prior work to further evaluate the biology of C. parapsilosis SAPP1 and to robustly characterize the function of SAPP2 and SAPP3. To delineate the roles of C. parapsilosis aspartyl proteases in virulence, we aimed to overexpress SAPP1, SAPP2, and SAPP3 genes individually under the control of a constitutive promoter (CaTDH3), integrated into the C. parapsilosis neutral locus (CpNEUT5L) of the SAPP1-SAPP2-SAPP3 (sapp1/2/3−/−) null mutant strain.

All reintegrant mutant strains were established on the sapp1/2/3−/− background to avoid cross-interference from each Sapp. Mutant strains were confirmed by colony PCR and Southern blotting (data not shown).

Expression levels of SAPP genes in the reintegrant mutant strains were determined using real-time PCR. Wild-type and mutant strains were cultivated in secreted-protease-inducing medium (yeast carbon base [YCB] plus 0.2% bovine serum albumin [BSA]), and the levels of expression of SAPP1, SAPP2, and SAPP3 were monitored after 48 h of incubation. The levels of expression of genes SAPP1 and SAPP2 in reintegrant strains RI_SAPP1 and RI_SAPP2 were similar to what was observed in the wild-type strains, while the level of expression of SAPP3 was upregulated in the RI_SAPP3 strain by ≥4-fold (Fig. 1).

FIG 1
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1

mRNA expression of RI_SAPP1, RI_SAPP2, and RI_SAPP3 strains. Data represent fold changes in expression levels of SAPP genes in RI_SAPP mutants compared to the corresponding genes in the wild-type strain after growth in YCB plus 0.2% BSA medium. The figure represents data obtained from triplicate experiments.

Next, we examined whether reintegration of SAPP genes altered the viability, morphology, or biofilm-forming ability of the mutant strains. No difference was observed between the levels of growth of the mutants in either yeast extract-peptone-dextrose (YPD) or YCB liquid medium at 30°C and the levels seen with the wild-type strain (see Fig. S1A and B in the supplemental material), and the SAPP mutant strains produced elongated pseudohyphae to the same extent as the reference strain in YPD or RPMI medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and spider liquid medium (Fig. S2A to C). We observed no difference in colony morphologies (Fig. S3) or in biofilm-forming abilities (Fig. S4). We also tested the ability of the sapp1/2/3−/− mutant to cope with stress by monitoring cell growth in the presence of several stressors (Table S3). The sapp1/2/3−/− mutant strain showed no differences in growth in the presence of stressors (Fig. S5). These results demonstrate that the mutant strains retained the physiological attributes and stress responses of the parental strain.

FIG S1

Growth kinetics of the wild-type and mutant strains. Data represent levels of growth of the wild-type and mutant strains in YPD (A) and in YCB plus BSA medium (B). Strains were grown at 30°C, and the optical density (OD) at 600 nm was measured every 30 min for 24 h. Download FIG S1, TIF file, 0.5 MB.
Copyright © 2019 Singh et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S2

Pseudohypha formation by C. parapsilosis wild-type and mutant strains. (A) Representative images of C. parapsilosis wild-type and mutant strains stained with concanavalin A-fluorescein isothiocyanate (ConA-FITC). (B) Percentage of cells forming pseudohyphae based on manual image analysis of microscopic pictures. (C) Percentage of cells forming pseudohyphae analyzed by flow cytometry. Bar, 20 μm. Download FIG S2, TIF file, 1.4 MB.
Copyright © 2019 Singh et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S3

Deletion and overexpression of the SAPP gene in C. parapsilosis did not alter morphology. Morphology was examined after growth of wild-type and mutant strains on YPD and spider agaric plates for 5 days at 37 and 30°C. Download FIG S3, TIF file, 0.7 MB.
Copyright © 2019 Singh et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S4

Biofilm formation. Biofilm levels were quantified by crystal violet (A) and 3-(4,5-dimethyl-2-thiazolyl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide (MTT) (B) assays. C. parapsilosis wild-type and mutant strains formed biofilm after growth either in RPMI or in yeast nitrogen base (YNB) media. Download FIG S4, TIF file, 0.2 MB.
Copyright © 2019 Singh et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S5

Phenotypical characterization of C. parapsilosis wild-type and sapp1/2/3−/− strains. Strains grown overnight in YPD were serially diluted, and 5-μl volumes of the dilutions containing 104, 103, 102, and 10 cells were plated on YPD plates without or with the addition of stress-inducing reagents (described in Materials and Methods) and grown at 30°C. Download FIG S5, TIF file, 0.8 MB.
Copyright © 2019 Singh et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Semiquantitative detection of extracellular protease activity of SAPP mutant strains.Candida secreted aspartyl proteases hydrolyze BSA present in agar plates. In order to examine the secreted protease activity of the established strains, the wild-type and SAPP mutant strains were spotted on plates containing YCB plus 0.2% BSA and, following amido black staining, the width of the clearance zone was measured. The C. parapsilosis wild-type strain showed a clear halo zone (7.3 mm in diameter) on BSA-containing plates similar to the zones seen with strains RI_SAPP1 (5.78 mm) and RI_SAPP2 (5.76 mm). The RI_SAPP3 and sapp1/2/3−/− strains, however, showed no proteolytic activity (Fig. 2). These results suggest that, in contrast to SAPP1 and SAPP2, reintegration of SAPP3 does not restore the aspartyl protease activity of the sapp1/2/3−/− strain; thus, SAPP3 does not contribute to aspartyl protease secretion in this species.

FIG 2
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 2

The protease activity of wild-type, sapp1/2/3−/−, and RI_SAPP strains was examined by BSA degradation assay. (A) A total of 106 Candida cells were spotted on YCB plus 0.2% BSA solid plates and incubated at 30°C for 3 days. The width of the proteolytic halo zone was determined by amido black staining. Images are representative of results from 3 independent repeated experiments. WT, wild type. (B) The radius (in millimeters) of each clearance (or proteolytic) zone was also measured.

C. parapsilosis RI_SAPP3 and sapp1/2/3−/− strains are sensitive to human serum.To investigate the fungicidal effect of human serum on the examined strains, yeast cells were cultivated in the presence of normal human serum (NHS) and CFU determinations were performed at different time intervals. C. parapsilosis strains were also grown in the presence of 20% heat-inactivated serum (HiS). The viability of the RI_SAPP3 and sapp1/2/3−/− strains was reduced significantly after 18 and 24 h of incubation in intact serum compared to the wild-type strain results, while the RI_SAPP1 and as RI_SAPP2 strains showed no sensitivity to NHS (Fig. 3A). However, no sensitivity was observed after HiS treatment (Fig. 3B). These data suggest that Sapp1 and Sapp2 are involved in protection against human serum proteins but that Sapp3 is not associated with this effect.

FIG 3
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 3

Serum sensitivity assay. The growth of C. parapsilosis wild-type and mutant strains in 20% NHS (A) and HiS (B) was examined by determination of CFUs at 0, 6, 24, and 48 h. Data were obtained from three independent experiments. Differences between groups were considered statistically significant at P < 0.05. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01.

Secreted aspartyl proteases affect the adhesion capabilities of C. parapsilosis.We further examined whether SAPP genes influence the adhesion properties of C. parapsilosis by the use of biotic and abiotic surfaces. Results of the cell adhesion assays showed that all three reintegrated mutant strains had significantly reduced capabilities of adhesion to polystyrene surfaces compared to the reference strain (Fig. 4A). The highest reduction in adhesion was observed with the sapp1/2/3−/− strain (approximately 40%), followed by RI_SAPP2 (25%), RI_SAPP3 (25%), and the RI_SAPP1 strain (20%).

FIG 4
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 4

In vitro cell adhesion assay. The ability of the wild-type and mutant strains to adhere to polystyrene surfaces (A) and to TR146 epithelial cells (B) was assayed. Results (means ± standard errors of the means [SEM]) were gained from at least three independent experiments. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.002; ****, P < 0.0001.

A significant reduction in adhesion to cells of the TR146 human oral epithelial cell line was observed with strain RI_SAPP3, while a moderate decrease was detected in the case of the sapp1/2/3−/− strain (Fig. 4B).

SAPP1 and SAPP2 partially restore the damage-causing capability of the sapp1/2/3−/− strain.The ability of the wild-type, SAPP mutant, and sapp1/2/3−/− strains to damage peripheral blood mononuclear cell-derived macrophages (PBMC-DMs) was monitored by lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release 24 and 48 h after coincubation. As shown in Fig. 5, the wild-type, RI_SAPP1, and RI_SAPP2 strains induced levels of damage similar to those seen with PBMC-DMs (7.779% ± 1.001% and 6.807% ± 1.642%, respectively), whereas the RI_SAPP3 and sapp1/2/3−/− strains caused significantly less damage (5.843% ± 0.5715% and 6.862% ± 1.340%, respectively) than the wild-type strain (9.944% ± 0.6143%) after 24 h of coincubation. Differences between the examined strains became more evident following 48 h of coincubation. Host cell damage was least severe in macrophages infected with the RI_SAPP3 and sapp1/2/3−/− strains (11.28% ± 0.8304% and 13.95% ± 1.153%, respectively), followed by RI_SAPP2 (19.98% ± 1.238%) and RI_SAPP1 (23.04% ± 1.661), compared to that seen with the wild-type strain (40.36% ± 0.6912%) (Fig. 5). These results suggest that SAPP1 and SAPP2 (but not SAPP3) contribute to the killing of PBMC-DMs.

FIG 5
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 5

Damage-causing efficiency of wild-type and mutant strains by LDH release. Human PBMC-DMs were infected with the C. parapsilosis wild-type strain or mutant strain RI_SAPP or sapp1/2/3−/− for 24 and 48 h, and levels of LDH release were measured. The obtained data represent macrophages obtained from six healthy donors. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.002; ****, P < 0.0001; ns, not significant.

Macrophages phagocytose and kill RI_SAPP3 and sapp1/2/3−/− mutants more efficiently than wild-type and RI_SAPP1 and RI_SAPP2 cells.We first examined the phagocytic capacity of PBMC-DMs by fluorescence-activated cell sorter (FACS) analysis. Yeast cells were labeled with the fluorescent dye Alexa Fluor 488 and coincubated with PBMC-DMs for 2 h at 37°C in the presence of 5% CO2. Our results indicated that PBMC-DMs ingested RI_SAPP3 and sapp1/2/3−/− more efficiently than the wild-type strain (Fig. 6). We also examined the yeast cell killing efficiency of PBMC-DMs by comparing the recovered fungal CFU counts after coincubation. Our data showed that PBMC-DMs were able to kill significantly more RI_SAPP3 (50.39% ± 2.328%) and sapp1/2/3−/− (53.90% ± 2.262%) cells than the wild-type strain (36.14% ± 2.652%) and strains RI_SAPP1 (36.72% ± 2.930%) and RI_SAPP2 (44.82% ± 3.598%) (Fig. 7).

FIG 6
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 6

Phagocytosis of wild-type and RI_SAPP and sapp1/2/3−/− mutant strains by human-blood-derived macrophages determined by flow cytometry. Human PBMC-DMs were coincubated individually with Alexa Fluor 488-labeled fungal strains at 37°C for 2 h. Fungal cell-containing macrophages (phago+) were identified by flow-cytometry and the percentage of phagocytosis was determined. Data were obtained from five independent experiments. *, P < 0.05.

FIG 7
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 7

Killing of C. parapsilosis strains by human PBMC-DMs. Human PBMC-DMs were coincubated with C. parapsilosis wild-type and sapp mutant strains at 37°C for 3 h, and levels of yeast killing efficiency were determined by CFU counting. Data were obtained using four healthy donors. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.002.

Aspartyl proteases promote intracellular survival of C. parapsilosis by altering phagosome-lysosome maturation.A previous study reported that Candida cells can replicate and survive within macrophages, either by diverting the normal process of phagosome maturation, causing physical damage, or by withstanding the hostile environment of the mature phagosome-lysosome (30). Here, we aimed to examine if C. parapsilosis aspartyl proteases influence phagosome-lysosome maturation in human PBMC-DMs. We analyzed the phagosome-lysosome maturation after coincubating pHrodo-stained Candida cells with PBMC-DMs for 2 h. Interestingly, PBMC-DMs infected with the wild-type strain, mutant strain RI_SAPP1, and mutant strain RI_SAPP2 showed a lower rate of phagosome-lysosome fusion (16.66% ± 0.5732%, 20.76% ± 0.7194%, and 13.78% ± 1.216%, respectively) than was seen with RI_SAPP3 (29.52% ± 2.719%) and sapp1/2/3−/− (28.70% ± 2.025%), indicating that Sapp1 and Sapp2 (but not Sapp3) may promote intracellular survival of C. parapsilosis in human macrophages (Fig. 8).

FIG 8
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 8

Phagosome-lysosome fusion following the uptake of wild-type and SAPP mutants. PBMC-DMs were infected with yeast cells labeled with pHrodo at a 1:5 ratio and were then incubated at 37°C for 2 h. Phagosome-lysosome fusion was then determined by flow cytometry. Ch1, bright-field image; Ch3, green fluorescence channel; Ch1/Ch3, merged image. Graph showing the extent of phagosome-lysosome fusion for the wild-type and mutant strains. n = 5. **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.002.

C. parapsilosis Sapp proteins regulate the cytokine response of host macrophages.In order to examine if the cytokine responses triggered by the wild-type strain, the RI_SAPP mutants, and strains sapp1/2/3−/− differed significantly, we stimulated human PBMC-DMs for 24 h with each strain and measured interleukin-1β (IL-1β), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), IL-6, and IL-8 responses. The obtained results indicated that PBMC-DMs stimulated with either the wild-type strain or the RI_SAPP1 and RI_SAPP2 strains produced similar IL-1β, IL-8, and TNF-α levels. In contrast, macrophages stimulated with strain sapp1/2/3−/− produced significantly less IL-1β and IL-6 and moderately but not significantly less IL-8 than the wild-type strain (Fig. 9). PBMC-DMs stimulated with RI_SAPP3 produced significantly lower IL-8 and moderately low IL-6 levels; however, no significant differences were observed in the production of IL-1β and TNF-α compared to wild type.

FIG 9
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 9

Cytokine secretion by human-blood-derived macrophages in response to wild-type and SAPP mutant strains. Levels of IL-1β (upper left panel), TNF-α (upper right panel), IL-6 (lower left panel), and IL-8 (lower right panel) were measured by ELISA after stimulation of PBMC-DMs with the wild-type strain or a SAPP mutant strain for 24 h. Data represent levels of cytokine production by macrophages obtained from 5 healthy donors. *, P < 0.05.

Sapp1p and Sapp2p have differential cleavage capacities against human complement proteins.C. albicans secreted aspartyl proteases can cleave components of human serum, including complement proteins (such as complement component 3b [C3b], C4b, and C5 and the complement regulator FH) and other microbicidal plasma proteins (31, 32). Therefore, to test if C. parapsilosis Sapp proteins are also able to cleave human complement proteins, we incubated C3b and C4b and complement regulatory proteins with the purified Sapp proteins. Our results indicated that the cleavage efficiency of Sapp1p against C3b was higher (shown with stronger cleavage fragment) than that of Sapp2p, which may suggest a difference in the substrate preferences of the two proteases (Fig. 10A). Moreover, Sapp1p and Sapp2p were also able to cleave human C4b (Fig. 10B). Purified C3b and C4b were incubated without Sapp proteins for the same 3-h time period and used as negative controls; cleavage of C3b and cleavage of C4b by factor I in the presence of its cofactors were included as positive controls. To investigate if C. parapsilosis Sapp1p and Sapp2p can cleave complement regulators of the FH protein family, we measured the capacity of Sapp1p and Sapp2p to degrade FH, FHL-1, FHR-1, and FHR-5. Coincubation of Sapp1p or Sapp2p with FHL-1 or FHR-1 revealed that the proteases were not able to cleave these human complement proteins, as visualized by Western blotting (Fig. S6). However, FH was cleaved by both fungal proteases after 15 h of incubation. Interestingly, Sapp2p but not Sapp1p was able to cleave FHR-5 at the early time point of 3 h, further indicating a difference in the substrate preferences of C. parapsilosis Sapp proteins (Fig. 11).

FIG 10
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 10

Sapp-mediated cleavage of human complement components C3b and C4b. Sapp1p and Sapp2p were incubated with the main opsonic human complement proteins C3b and C4b. After incubation, the mixture was separated by SDS-PAGE and cleaved C3b (A) and C4b (B) fragments were identified by Western blotting.

FIG 11
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 11

Sapp-mediated cleavage of human complement regulators. Cleavage of FH (A) and FHR-5 (B) by Sapp1p and Sapp2p was determined after 3h and 15 h of incubation.

FIG S6

Analysis of Sapp-mediated cleavage of human complement regulator proteins. (A and B) Factor H-like protein 1 (FHL-1) and factor H-related protein 1 (FHR-1) were incubated with Sapp1p and Sapp2p for 3 h and 15 h, as indicated. No cleavage of FHL-1 and FHR-1 was detected. Download FIG S6, TIF file, 1.6 MB.
Copyright © 2019 Singh et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Since attachment of opsonic complement proteins to pathogens enhances CR3-mediated phagocytosis by macrophages and C. albicans cleaves CR3 and CR4 on macrophages (31), we also tested whether C. parapsilosis Sapp1p and Sapp2p can cleave complement receptors CR3 and CR4; however, we did not find substantial differences in the levels of expression of CR3 and CR4 receptors on macrophages after protease treatment (Fig. S7).

FIG S7

Sapp proteins of C. parapsilosis are not able to inactivate CR3 (CD11b/CD18) and CR4 (CD11c/CD18). The levels of expression of CD11b (A and B), CD11c (C and D), and CD18 (E and F) were measured using flow cytometry with monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) specific to these receptor chains. Representative histograms and means ± standard deviations (SD) of mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) values determined for 3 independent donors are shown. Download FIG S7, TIF file, 0.7 MB.
Copyright © 2019 Singh et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Fungal burden and Galleria mellonella survival.CFU recovery data show that RI_SAPP1 produced CFU numbers similar to those seen with wild-type C. parapsilosis in G. mellonella larvae (Fig. 12A). In contrast, the virulence of the other mutants was attenuated compared to that of the parental strain.

FIG 12
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 12

Virulence of C. parapsilosis wild-type and SAPP mutant strains in G. mellonella. (A) Fungal burden of G. mellonella larvae infected with the wild-type strain or a SAPP mutant strain. Larvae were incubated at 30°C for 24 h. (B) Survival curves of G. mellonella infected with C. parapsilosis wild-type strain and sapp mutant strains. The infected larvae were incubated at 30°C for 7 days. Four individual experiments were performed using at least five larvae per round for CFU counting. Two individual experiments were performed using 24 larvae per round for the survival assay. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ****, P < 0.0001.

Overall, larvae infected with wild-type and mutant strains showed no significant difference in survival after the 7 days of infection (Fig. 12B).

DISCUSSION

Aspartyl proteases are present in a diverse range of microorganisms and play a crucial role in nutrition acquisition and pathogenesis. The presence of aspartyl proteases in pathogenic Candida species and their absence in nonpathogenic fungal species such as Saccharomyces cerevisiae suggests their role in pathogenesis. Previously, we showed that C. parapsilosis Δ/Δsapp1a, Δ/Δsapp1b, and Δ/Δsapp1a-/Δ/Δsapp1b deletion mutant strains are less virulent than the wild-type strain, demonstrating that Sapp1p plays a role in pathogenesis regulation. To date, the roles of SAPP2 and SAPP3 in C. parapsilosis virulence have not been investigated. Therefore, in the present study, we aimed to delineate their roles in pathogenicity using a secreted aspartyl protease-deficient strain (sapp1/2/3−/−) and mutant strains that express each SAPP gene individually under the control of a constitutive promoter (pCaTDH3).

In C. albicans, secreted proteins play an important role in morphology and biofilm formation (33–36). Hence, we first determined the corresponding effects of SAPP proteins in C. parapsilosis. In contrast to C. albicans, C. parapsilosis SAPP proteins do not affect either of these properties. SapII, SapV, and SapVI were previously reported to play a role in tissue adhesion C. albicans in addition to their role in biofilm formation (37). Furthermore, C. albicans Sap1p, Sap2p, Sap3p, and Sap9p were previously reported to be involved in adherence to epithelial cells (10, 38, 39). In the present study, we showed that Sapp1p, Sapp2p, and Sapp3p in C. parapsilosis also contribute to adhesion, although possibly to differing degrees.

As shown by examining the effect of cell wall-perturbing agents, disruption of the SAPP genes did not affect the mutant strain’s survival, indicating that C. parapsilosis aspartyl proteases do not influence the species’ fitness and viability.

On the other hand, disruption of SAPP1 and SAPP2 but not SAPP3 resulted in serum sensitivity. These results suggest that only the former two proteases are required for serum survival in this species. This observation is consistent with a previous finding according to which enhanced Sapp1p production was detected in C. parapsilosis cells in the presence of serum albumin (28).

Pathogenic fungi have been previously reported to overcome the fungicidal effects of human serum via actively secreting aspartyl proteases to neutralize proteins with antimicrobial effects (15, 40). For instance, complement proteins have diverse functions that include opsonization of microbes to facilitate phagocytosis, activation of cellular responses, initiation of inflammation, and direct lysis of microbial cells (41, 42). The protective effects of Sapp1p and Sapp2p mentioned above might be the result of their ability to cleave complement components. Therefore, we further aimed to examine the complement cleavage activity of purified Sapp1p and Sapp2p proteins. Complement component 3 (C3) plays a central role in all three complement pathways. Following its cleavage by C3 convertase, the resulting C3b fragment forms the C5 convertases that are necessary for the progression of the complement cascade. Our results suggest that C. parapsilosis is able to escape such complement-mediated attacks through the activity of its secreted aspartyl proteases, as both Sapp1p and Sapp2p are able to efficiently degrade the active complement C3b and C4b fragments required for convertase functioning and opsonization, similarly to the degradation and thus inactivation in the host mediated by serine protease factor I, a complement control protein (CCC).

FH and FHL-1 inhibit complement activation in the host but also do so when sequestered from serum by pathogenic microbes as an immune escape mechanism. FH and FHL-1 bind to microbial ligands through specific domains that are partially conserved among other members of the FH protein family, i.e., the FHR proteins (43, 44). FHRs were also reported previously to be involved in complement cascade regulation, although this is a controversial issue (43, 45, 46). FHR-1 was reported to inhibit C5 and the terminal pathway, whereas FHR-2 inhibits the alternative pathway and activation of the terminal pathway. FHR-5 displays weak cofactor activity and inhibits the C3 convertase and was recently reported to inhibit C5 conversion (47–51). On the other hand, FHR-1, FHR-4, and FHR-5 were shown to support alternative pathway activation at the C3 level by binding C3b and allowing the formation of the C3 convertase (52–54). Thus, FHRs—due to the presence of conserved domains—may competitively inhibit FH/FHL-1 binding to microbes and enhance opsonization (50, 55). According to our results, neither FHL-1 nor FHR-1 is cleaved by C. parapsilosis Sapp1p or Sapp2. Furthermore, a difference in substrate preference is also evident, as Sapp2p, but not Sapp1p, is able to cleave FHR-5. The cleavage of FHR-5 but not FHL-1 and FHR-1 suggests that Sapp2p presumably cleaves at locations near complement control protein (CCP) domains 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7, which are absent in FHL-1 and FHR-1 but present in FHR-5 and FH, although further studies are needed to confirm this hypothesis. These data suggest that the secreted aspartyl proteases of this species show a substrate preference for complement proteins involved in activation of the cascade, rather than for complement control proteins (e.g., factor H family proteins).

C. albicans attachment and subsequent colonization are necessary to induce inflammatory responses in epithelial cells (56). Activation of epithelial cells also shapes the responses of monocytes, macrophages, and other immune cells during a fungal infection. Professional antigen-presenting cells such as macrophages connect the innate and adaptive arms of the host’s immune responses by processing and presenting antigens to other effector cells and actively eliminating pathogens. Thus, we next examined if disruption of any of the C. parapsilosis SAPP genes would have an effect on macrophage activity. Our results indicate that human PBMC-DMs were able to phagocytose and eliminate sapp1/2/3−/− and RI_SAPP3 cells more efficiently than the wild-type and RI_SAPP1 or RI_SAPP2 strains.

The aspartyl proteases of C. albicans induce proinflammatory cytokine responses to differing degrees. For instance, SapI, SapII, and SapVI significantly induce IL-1β, TNF-α, and IL-6 production, while SapIII is able to stimulate IL-1β and TNF-α secretion (57). Besides inducing low levels of host cell damage, the sapp1/2/3−/− and RI_SAPP3 strains also induced lower levels of proinflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-8) than the parental and RI_SAPP1 or RI_SAPP2 strains. These results, together with the data gathered from G. mellonella infection (an invertebrate model commonly applied to mimic basic cellular and humoral mammal-like immune responses in vivo [58]), further suggest differences in the contribution of C. parapsilosis Sapp proteins to virulence.

In conclusion, we demonstrated in the present study that C. parapsilosis Sapp proteins did not affect formation of pseudohyphae or biofilm. However, Sapp1p and Sapp2p play roles in adhesion to epithelial cells and in host cell damage and might promote survival within macrophages. Sapp-mediated cleavage of complement proteins also suggests that C. parapsilosis might also interfere with human complement attack. In summary, Sapp1p and Sapp2p, but not Sapp3p, are the major and fully functional aspartyl proteases in C. parapsilosis that actively affect the species’ pathogenicity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Strains and growth conditions.The strains used in the present study and their abbreviations are listed in Table S1 in the supplemental material. Strains were cultured overnight in YPD broth at 30°C, with shaking. Cells from overnight cultures were collected by centrifugation and washed twice with sterile 1× PBS (phosphate-buffered saline), and the number of cells was adjusted as indicated in descriptions of the respective experiments. For growth assays and gene expression studies, the wild-type and mutant strains were cultivated in YCB (yeast carbon base) medium supplemented with 0.2% BSA (bovine serum albumin) at 30°C. Escherichia coli DH5α was grown in LB (Luria-Bertani broth) or on LB plates supplemented with ampicillin (0.1 mg/ml) for plasmid construction and propagation.

TABLE S1

List of strains used in the present study. Download Table S1, DOCX file, 0.02 MB.
Copyright © 2019 Singh et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Generation of C. parapsilosis secreted aspartyl protease mutant strains.sapp1/2/3−/− mutants were generated as described previously (15) with minor modifications. Briefly, ∼500-bp upstream and downstream regions of SAPP2 and SAPP3 were PCR amplified and cloned in the pSFS2a plasmid with a recyclable NAT cassette. Further, the SAPP2 deletion cassette was introduced in the ΔΔsapp1a ΔΔsapp1b deletion mutant strains to generate ΔΔsapp1a ΔΔsapp1b ΔΔsapp2 mutants. Finally, the SAPP3 deletion cassette was generated similarly to SAPP2, and ΔΔsapp1a ΔΔsapp1b ΔΔsapp2 mutant strains were transformed with the construct to generate the sapp1/2/3−/− strain.

Mutant strains expressing the individual SAPP genes were generated using the SAPP1-SAPP2-SAPP3 (sapp1/2/3−/−) null mutant strain. Solely SAPP1-, SAPP2-, and SAPP3-expressing mutants were established using a replacement cassette targeting the Neut5l locus and containing the respective SAPP open reading frames (ORFs) under the control of the CaTDH3 constitutive promoter. In each case, nourseothricin was used as a selection marker. C. parapsilosis strains were transformed by electroporation as described previously (59). The transformants were confirmed by colony PCR and Southern blot analysis.

Gene expression studies.Total RNA was isolated from C. parapsilosis wild-type cells grown in YCB plus 0.2% medium for 48 h using a RiboPure RNA purification kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions. A 500-ng volume of RNA was subjected to reverse transcription using a RevertAid first-strand cDNA synthesis kit according to the protocol provided by the manufacturer. Quantitative PCR (qPCR) was performed using the primers listed in Table S2. The amplification conditions were as follows: one cycle of denaturation for 3 min at 95°C; denaturation at 95°C for 10 s; 49 cycles of annealing at 60°C for 30 s, and elongation at 65°C for 30 s; with a final extension step at 72°C for 30 s. TUB4 was used as an internal control.

TABLE S2

Primers used for SAPP gene expression. Download Table S2, DOCX file, 0.02 MB.
Copyright © 2019 Singh et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

TABLE S3

Phenotype screening of sapp1/2/3−/− strain. Growth of the deletion collection was determined under different stress conditions designed to identify the YPD used as a base media (except when YCB medium was used). Download Table S3, DOCX file, 0.02 MB.
Copyright © 2019 Singh et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Functional studies of the generated mutant strains.Functional studies of the generated strains were performed as described previously (55, 60). Detailed descriptions of growth analysis and assays required to determine extracellular protease activity, formation of pseudohyphae, biofilm formation, adhesion capabilities, stress response, serum sensitivity, phagocytosis, and yeast cell killing are available in the supplemental material.

Human epithelial cell lines (TR146).The human buccal epithelial squamous carcinoma TR146 cell line was kindly provided by Julian Naglik, Kings College London, United Kingdom, and cultured as described previously (61).

Isolation and differentiation of PBMCs.Human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated from buffy coats of healthy donors by Ficoll Paque Plus (GE Healthcare) density gradient centrifugation and used to produce macrophages as described previously (62).

Cell damage (lactate dehydrogenase activity) assay.LDH activity in cell culture supernatants was measured at 24 or 48 h of postinfection using a cytotoxicity detection kit (LDH; Roche) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Macrophages were stimulated with C. parapsilosis wild-type, RI_SAPP, and sapp1/2/3−/− cells at a ratio of 1:5 (host cell/Candida cell) for 24 or 48 h or left untreated. During analysis, the values corresponding to the levels of LDH activity measured in cultures containing yeast cells alone were subtracted from the values measured in stimulated samples. Experiments were performed with PBMC-DMs derived from six independent donors in triplicate experiments.

Phagolysosome fusion.Fusion of phagosomes-lysosomes after infection was assayed as described previously (63). Both the phagocytosis and phagolysosome fusion assays were performed with PBMC-DMs derived from five independent donors.

Cytokine measurements.PBMC-DMs were infected with 5 × 105 fungal cells, and supernatant was collected after 24 h of incubation. Then, the concentrations of secreted IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α in cell culture supernatants were determined by the use of commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits (R&D Systems) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The experiments were performed with PBMC-DMs derived from the blood of at least five independent donors.

Purification of Sapp1p and Sapp2p.Sapp1p and Sapp2p were purified as described previously (64, 65). Proteins were stored at –80°C until use.

Cleavage activity.The proteolytic activity of purified Sapp1p and Sapp2p (1 μg each) was assayed by incubating them with purified human complement proteins C3b, C4b, and factor H (FH) (Merck) or with recombinant factor H-like protein 1 (FHL-1) (expressed and purified as described previously) (66) or FHR-1 or FHR-5 (Novoprotein) for 3 h or 15 h at 37°C. Aliquots were taken at the indicated time points, separated by SDS-PAGE, and analyzed by Western blotting. C3b was identified by the use of polyclonal goat anti-human C3 (Calbiochem, Quidel) in combination with a horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated goat antibody (DAKOCytomation). C4b was detected with a monoclonal anti-C4c antibody (Quidel) and with HRP-conjugated goat anti-mouse Ig (Dako). To detect cleavage of FH, FHL-1, FHR-1, and FHR-5, polyclonal goat anti-FH (Calbiochem, Merck), mouse monoclonal anti-FH (A254; from Quidel), and polyclonal goat anti-FHR-5 (R&D System) and the corresponding HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies rabbit anti-goat Ig and goat anti-mouse Ig (Dako) were used. In addition, cleavage of C3b and C4b by the natural, complement-specific protease factor I in the presence of the cofactors factor H and C4BP (Hyphen Biomed) was assayed to compare with the cleavage patterns generated by the Sapp proteases.

Galleria mellonella infection.Galleria mellonella larvae (TruLarv) (0.20 to 0.35 g) were purchased from Biosystems Technology Ltd., Exeter, United Kingdom. Upon arrival, the larvae were handled and injected with wild-type or mutant strains as described previously (55).

For CFU determination, larvae (0.25 to 0.30 g) were infected with 105 Candida cells/10 μl and sacrificed at 24 h postinfection and the fungal load of each individual larva was determined. Briefly, each larva was homogenized in 5 ml of PBS. The homogenate was plated on YPD plates and incubated at 30°C for 2 days, and the colonies were counted.

To monitor survival, the larvae used in the infection experiments were infected with 106 Candida cells/10 μl and kept at 30°C for 7 days and larval death was monitored every day. Groups of 5 larvae were used per strain with four experimental replicates for CFU and 24 larvae per strain with two experimental replicates for survival.

Ethics statement.For PBMC isolation, blood was collected from healthy individuals. The Institutional Human Medical Biological Research Ethics Committee of the University of Szeged gave approval for the procedure and the respective consent documents. Healthy individuals provided written informed consent. The experiments were performed in accordance with the guidelines and regulations of the Ethics Committee of the University of Szeged, and the experimental protocols were approved by the same institutional committee.

Statistical analysis.Unpaired t tests were used to determine differences between the group results determined by adhesion assay, LDH assay, phagocytosis assay, killing assay, cytokine analysis, and CFU data analysis. Mantel-Cox (log rank) tests were used for evaluation of survival data. Differences were considered statistically significant at P values of ≤0.05 (*, P ≤ 0.05; **, P ≤ 0.01; ***, P ≤ 0.001).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Joshua D. Nosanchuk for critically reading the manuscript and for valuable suggestions. We also thank Peter Horvath for providing us the sapp1/2/3−/− mutant strain for subsequent characterizations and Csaba Papp, Katalin Csonka, Erik Zajta, and Tanmoy Chakraborty for assistance with the experiments.

D.K.S. was supported by the Stipendium Hungaricum Program (2015 to 2018). O.H. and J.D. were supported by NPU project LO1302 from the Ministry of Education, Czech Republic. M.J. was supported by the Institutional Excellence Program of the Ministry of Human Capacities of Hungary (20460-3/2018/FEKUTSTRAT) and grant K125219. S.L. and Z.B. were supported by the Hungarian National Science Fund (OTKA) grant K112011 and by the Hungarian Academy of Sciences. T.N., R.T., and A.G. were supported by grants 20391-3/2018/FEKUSTRAT, NKFIH K 123952, and GINOP-2.3.2.-15-2016-00015. A.G. was further funded by LP2018-15/2018.

We declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received July 8, 2019.
    • Accepted July 31, 2019.
  • Copyright © 2019 Singh et al.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Falagas ME,
    2. Roussos N,
    3. Vardakas KZ
    . 2010. Relative frequency of albicans and the various non-albicans Candida spp among candidemia isolates from inpatients in various parts of the world: a systematic review. Int J Infect Dis 14:e954–e966. doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2010.04.006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Lockhart SR
    . 2014. Current epidemiology of Candida infection. Clin Microbiol Newsl 36:131–136. doi:10.1016/j.clinmicnews.2014.08.001.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. 3.↵
    1. Tóth R,
    2. Nosek J,
    3. Mora-Montes HM,
    4. Gabaldon T,
    5. Bliss JM,
    6. Nosanchuk JD,
    7. Turner SA,
    8. Butler G,
    9. Vágvölgyi C,
    10. Gácser A
    . 2019. Candida parapsilosis: from genes to the bedside. Clin Microbiol Rev 32:1–38.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    1. van Asbeck EC,
    2. Clemons KV,
    3. Stevens DA
    . 2009. Candida parapsilosis: a review of its epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical aspects, typing and antimicrobial susceptibility. Crit Rev Microbiol 35:283–309. doi:10.3109/10408410903213393.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    1. Gow NAR,
    2. van de Veerdonk FL,
    3. Brown AJP,
    4. Netea MG
    . 2012. Candida albicans morphogenesis and host defence: discriminating invasion from colonization. Nat Rev Microbiol 10:112–122. doi:10.1038/nrmicro2711.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Naglik JR,
    2. Richardson JP,
    3. Moyes DL
    . 2014. Candida albicans pathogenicity and epithelial immunity. PLoS Pathog 10:e1004257. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1004257.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Araújo D,
    2. Henriques M,
    3. Silva S
    . 2017. Portrait of Candida species biofilm regulatory network genes. Trends Microbiol 25:62–75. doi:10.1016/j.tim.2016.09.004.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. 8.↵
    1. Jaskolski M,
    2. Miller M,
    3. Mohana Rao JK,
    4. Gustchina A,
    5. Wlodawer A
    . 2015. Elucidation of the structure of retroviral proteases: a reminiscence. FEBS J 282:4059–4066. doi:10.1111/febs.13397.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. 9.↵
    1. Dutton LC,
    2. Jenkinson HF,
    3. Lamont RJ,
    4. Nobbs AH
    . 2016. Role of Candida albicans secreted aspartyl protease SapIX in interkingdom biofilm formation. Pathog Dis 74:ftw005. doi:10.1093/femspd/ftw005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Wu H,
    2. Downs D,
    3. Ghosh K,
    4. Ghosh AK,
    5. Staib P,
    6. Monod M,
    7. Tang J
    . 2013. Candida albicans secreted aspartic proteases 4–6 induce apoptosis of epithelial cells by a novel Trojan horse mechanism. FASEB J 27:2132–2144. doi:10.1096/fj.12-214353.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Naglik JR,
    2. Challacombe SJ,
    3. Hube B
    . 2003. Candida albicans secreted aspartyl proteinases in virulence and pathogenesis. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 67:400–428. doi:10.1128/mmbr.67.3.400-428.2003.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Pietrella D,
    2. Pandey N,
    3. Gabrielli E,
    4. Pericolini E,
    5. Perito S,
    6. Kasper L,
    7. Bistoni F,
    8. Cassone A,
    9. Hube B,
    10. Vecchiarelli A
    . 2013. Secreted aspartic proteases of Candida albicans activate the NLRP3 inflammasome. Eur J Immunol 43:679–692. doi:10.1002/eji.201242691.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Rasheed M,
    2. Battu A,
    3. Kaur R
    . 2018. Aspartyl proteases in Candida glabrata are required for suppression of the host innate immune response. J Biol Chem 293:6410–6433. doi:10.1074/jbc.M117.813741.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Rapala-Kozik M,
    2. Bochenska O,
    3. Zajac D,
    4. Karkowska-Kuleta J,
    5. Gogol M,
    6. Zawrotniak M,
    7. Kozik A
    . 2018. Extracellular proteinases of Candida species pathogenic yeasts. Mol Oral Microbiol 33:113–124. doi:10.1111/omi.12206.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  15. 15.↵
    1. Horváth P,
    2. Nosanchuk JD,
    3. Hamari Z,
    4. Vágvölgyi C,
    5. Gácser A
    . 2012. The identification of gene duplication and the role of secreted aspartyl proteinase 1 in Candida parapsilosis virulence. J Infect Dis 205:923–933. doi:10.1093/infdis/jir873.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Silva S,
    2. Henriques M,
    3. Oliveira R,
    4. Azeredo J,
    5. Malic S,
    6. Hooper SJ,
    7. Williams DW
    . 2009. Characterization of Candida parapsilosis infection of an in vitro reconstituted human oral epithelium. Eur J Oral Sci 117:669–675. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0722.2009.00677.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Williams DW,
    2. Jordan RPC,
    3. Wei X,
    4. Alves CT,
    5. Wise P,
    6. Wilson MJ,
    7. Lewis M
    . 2013. Interactions of Candida albicans with host epithelial surfaces. J Oral Microbiol 5. doi:10.3402/jom.v5i0.2243.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  18. 18.↵
    1. Verma AH,
    2. Richardson JP,
    3. Zhou C,
    4. Coleman BM,
    5. Moyes DL,
    6. Ho J,
    7. Huppler AR,
    8. Ramani K,
    9. Mcgeachy MJ,
    10. Mufazalov IA,
    11. Waisman A,
    12. Kane LP,
    13. Biswas PS,
    14. Hube B,
    15. Naglik JR,
    16. Gaffen SL
    . 2017. Oral epithelial cells orchestrate innate type 17 responses to Candida albicans through the virulence factor candidalysin. Sci Immunol 2:eaam8834. doi:10.1126/sciimmunol.aam8834.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Drummond RA,
    2. Gaffen SL,
    3. Hise AG,
    4. Brown GD
    . 2015. Innate defense against fungal pathogens. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 5:a019620. doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a019620.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Tucey TM,
    2. Verma J,
    3. Harrison PF,
    4. Snelgrove SL,
    5. Lo TL,
    6. Scherer AK,
    7. Barugahare AA,
    8. Powell DR,
    9. Wheeler RT,
    10. Hickey MJ,
    11. Beilharz TH,
    12. Naderer T,
    13. Traven A
    . 2018. Glucose homeostasis is important for immune cell viability during Candida challenge and host survival of systemic fungal infection. Cell Metab 27:988–1006.e7. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2018.03.019.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  21. 21.↵
    1. Kasper L,
    2. König A,
    3. Koenig P,
    4. Gresnigt MS,
    5. Westman J,
    6. Drummond RA,
    7. Lionakis MS,
    8. Groß O,
    9. Ruland J,
    10. Naglik JR,
    11. Hube B
    . 2018. The fungal peptide toxin Candidalysin activates the NLRP3 inflammasome and causes cytolysis in mononuclear phagocytes. Nat Commun 9:4260. doi:10.1038/s41467-018-06607-1.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  22. 22.↵
    1. Brown AJP,
    2. Gow NAR,
    3. Warris A,
    4. Brown GD
    . 2019. Memory in fungal pathogens promotes immune evasion, colonisation, and infection. Trends Microbiol 27:219–230. doi:10.1016/j.tim.2018.11.001.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  23. 23.↵
    1. Lubbers R,
    2. van Essen MF,
    3. van Kooten C,
    4. Trouw LA
    . 2017. Production of complement components by cells of the immune system. Clin Exp Immunol 188:183–194. doi:10.1111/cei.12952.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Rosbjerg A,
    2. Genster N,
    3. Pilely K,
    4. Garred P
    . 2017. Evasion mechanisms used by pathogens to escape the lectin complement pathway. Front Microbiol 8:1–7. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2017.00868.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  25. 25.↵
    1. Karkowska-Kuleta J,
    2. Zajac D,
    3. Bochenska O,
    4. Kozik A
    . 2015. Surfaceome of pathogenic yeasts, Candida parapsilosis and Candida tropicalis, revealed with the use of cell surface shaving method and shotgun proteomic approach. Acta Biochim Pol 62:807–819. doi:10.18388/abp.2015_1140.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  26. 26.↵
    1. Meri T,
    2. Hartmann A,
    3. Lenk D,
    4. Eck R,
    5. Würzner R,
    6. Hellwage J,
    7. Meri S,
    8. Zipfel PF
    . 2002. The yeast Candida albicans binds complement regulators factor H and FHL-1. Infect Immun 70:5185–5192. doi:10.1128/iai.70.9.5185-5192.2002.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    1. Bryan AM,
    2. Del Poeta M
    . 2016. Secretory aspartyl proteinases induce neutrophil chemotaxis in vivo. Virulence 7:737–739. doi:10.1080/21505594.2016.1206170.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  28. 28.↵
    1. Borg-von Zepelin M,
    2. Beggah S,
    3. Boggian K,
    4. Sanglard D,
    5. Monod M
    . 1998. The expression of the secreted aspartyl proteinases SapIV to SapVI from Candida albicans in murine macrophages. Mol Microbiol 28:543–554. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.00815.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  29. 29.↵
    1. Dunkel N,
    2. Morschhäuser J
    . 2011. Loss of heterozygosity at an unlinked genomic locus is responsible for the phenotype of a Candida albicans sapIVΔ sapVΔ sapVIΔ mutant. Eukaryot Cell 10:54–62. doi:10.1128/EC.00281-10.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. Vylkova S,
    2. Lorenz MC
    . 2014. Modulation of phagosomal pH by Candida albicans promotes hyphal morphogenesis and requires Stp2p, a regulator of amino acid transport. PLoS Pathog 10:e1003995. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1003995.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Svoboda E,
    2. Schneider AE,
    3. Sándor N,
    4. Lermann U,
    5. Staib P,
    6. Kremlitzka M,
    7. Bajtay Z,
    8. Barz D,
    9. Erdei A,
    10. Józsi M
    . 2015. Secreted aspartic protease 2 of Candida albicans inactivates factor H and the macrophage factor H-receptors CR3 (CD11b/CD18) and CR4 (CD11c/CD18). Immunology Lett 168:13–21. doi:10.1016/j.imlet.2015.08.009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Poltermann S,
    2. Kunert A,
    3. Von Der Heide M,
    4. Eck R,
    5. Hartmann A,
    6. Zipfel PF
    . 2007. Gpm1p is a factor H-, FHL-1, and plasminogen-binding surface protein of Candida albicans. J Biol Chem 282:37537–37544. doi:10.1074/jbc.M707280200.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. 33.↵
    1. Gow NAR,
    2. Hube B
    . 2012. Importance of the Candida albicans cell wall during commensalism and infection. Curr Opin Microbiol 15:406–412. doi:10.1016/j.mib.2012.04.005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Joo MY,
    2. Shin JH,
    3. Jang HC,
    4. Song ES,
    5. Kee SJ,
    6. Shin MG,
    7. Suh SP,
    8. Ryang DW
    . 2013. Expression of SAPV and SAPIX in Candida albicans biofilms: comparison of bloodstream isolates with isolates from other sources. Med Mycol 51:892–896. doi:10.3109/13693786.2013.824623.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. Ghannoum M,
    2. Elteen KA
    . 1986. Correlative relationship between proteinase production, adherence and pathogenicity of various strains of Candida albicans. Med Mycol 24:407–413. doi:10.1080/02681218680000621.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  36. 36.↵
    1. Navarro-Arias MJ,
    2. Defosse TA,
    3. Dementhon K,
    4. Csonka K,
    5. Mellado-Mojica E,
    6. Dias Valério A,
    7. González-Hernández RJ,
    8. Courdavault V,
    9. Clastre M,
    10. Hernández NV,
    11. Pérez-García LA,
    12. Singh DK,
    13. Vizler C,
    14. Gácser A,
    15. Almeida RS,
    16. Noël T,
    17. López MG,
    18. Papon N,
    19. Mora-Montes HM
    . 2016. Disruption of protein mannosylation affects Candida guilliermondii cell wall, immune sensing, and virulence. Front Microbiol 7:1951. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2016.01951.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  37. 37.↵
    1. Kumar R,
    2. Saraswat D,
    3. Tati S,
    4. Edgerton M
    . 2015. Novel aggregation properties of Candida albicans secreted aspartyl proteinase sapVI mediate virulence in oral candidiasis. Infect Immun 83:2614–2626. doi:10.1128/IAI.00282-15.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. 38.↵
    1. Watts HJ,
    2. Cheah FS,
    3. Hube B,
    4. Sanglard D,
    5. Gow NA
    . 1998. Altered adherence in strains of Candida albicans harbouring null mutations in secreted aspartic proteinase genes. FEMS Microbiol Lett 159:129–135. doi:10.1111/j.1574-6968.1998.tb12851.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  39. 39.↵
    1. Albrecht A,
    2. Felk A,
    3. Pichova I,
    4. Naglik JR,
    5. Schaller M,
    6. De Groot P,
    7. MacCallum D,
    8. Odds FC,
    9. Schäfer W,
    10. Klis F,
    11. Monod M,
    12. Hube B
    . 2006. Glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored proteases of Candida albicans target proteins necessary for both cellular processes and host-pathogen interactions. J Biol Chem 281:688–694. doi:10.1074/jbc.M509297200.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. 40.↵
    1. Palmeira VF,
    2. Kneipp LF,
    3. Alviano CS,
    4. dos Santos A
    . 2006. Secretory aspartyl peptidase activity from mycelia of the human fungal pathogen Fonsecaea pedrosoi: effect of HIV aspartyl proteolytic inhibitors. Res Microbiol 157:819–826. doi:10.1016/j.resmic.2006.07.003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  41. 41.↵
    1. Noris M,
    2. Remuzzi G
    . 2013. Overview of complement activation and regulation. Semin Nephrol 33:479–492. doi:10.1016/j.semnephrol.2013.08.001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. 42.↵
    1. Arbore G,
    2. Kemper C,
    3. Kolev M
    . 2017. Intracellular complement − the complosome − in immune cell regulation. Mol Immunol 89:2–9. doi:10.1016/j.molimm.2017.05.012.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  43. 43.↵
    1. Józsi M,
    2. Tortajada A,
    3. Uzonyi B,
    4. Goicoechea de Jorge E,
    5. Rodríguez de Córdoba S
    . 2015. Factor H-related proteins determine complement-activating surfaces. Trends Immunol 36:374–384. doi:10.1016/j.it.2015.04.008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. 44.↵
    1. Józsi M
    . 2017. Factor H family proteins in complement evasion of microorganisms. Front Immunol 8:571. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2017.00571.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. 45.↵
    1. Skerka C,
    2. Chen Q,
    3. Fremeaux-Bacchi V,
    4. Roumenina LT
    . 2013. Complement factor H related proteins (CFHRs). Mol Immunol 56:170–180. doi:10.1016/j.molimm.2013.06.001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. 46.↵
    1. Sánchez-Corral P,
    2. Pouw RB,
    3. López-Trascasa M,
    4. Józsi M
    . 2018. Self-damage caused by dysregulation of the complement alternative pathway: relevance of the factor H protein family. Front Immunol 9:1607. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2018.01607.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  47. 47.↵
    1. Zwarthoff SA,
    2. Berends ETM,
    3. Mol S,
    4. Ruyken M,
    5. Aerts PC,
    6. Józsi M,
    7. de Haas CJC,
    8. Rooijakkers SHM,
    9. Gorham RD
    . 2018. Functional characterization of alternative and classical pathway C3/C5 convertase activity and inhibition using purified models. Front Immunol 9:1691. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2018.01691.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  48. 48.↵
    1. McRae JL,
    2. Duthy TG,
    3. Griggs KM,
    4. Ormsby RJ,
    5. Cowan PJ,
    6. Cromer BA,
    7. McKinstry WJ,
    8. Parker MW,
    9. Murphy BF,
    10. Gordon DL
    . 2005. Human factor H-related protein 5 has cofactor activity, inhibits C3 convertase activity, binds heparin and C-reactive protein, and associates with lipoprotein. J Immunol 174:6250–6256. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.174.10.6250.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  49. 49.↵
    1. Hellwage J,
    2. Jokiranta TS,
    3. Koistinen V,
    4. Vaarala O,
    5. Meri S,
    6. Zipfel PF
    . 1999. Functional properties of complement factor H-related proteins FHR-3 and FHR-4: binding to the C3d region of C3b and differential regulation by heparin. FEBS Lett 462:345–352. doi:10.1016/s0014-5793(99)01554-9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  50. 50.↵
    1. Heinen S,
    2. Hartmann A,
    3. Lauer N,
    4. Wiehl U,
    5. Dahse HM,
    6. Schirmer S,
    7. Gropp K,
    8. Enghardt T,
    9. Wallich R,
    10. Hälbich S,
    11. Mihlan M,
    12. Schlötzer-Schrehardt U,
    13. Zipfel PF,
    14. Skerka C
    . 2009. Factor H-related protein 1 (CFHR-1) inhibits complement C5 convertase activity and terminal complex formation. Blood 114:2439–2447. doi:10.1182/blood-2009-02-205641.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  51. 51.↵
    1. Eberhardt HU,
    2. Buhlmann D,
    3. Hortschansky P,
    4. Chen Q,
    5. Böhm S,
    6. Kemper MJ,
    7. Wallich R,
    8. Hartmann A,
    9. Hallström T,
    10. Zipfel PF,
    11. Skerka C
    . 2013. Human factor H-related protein 2 (CFHR2) regulates complement activation. PLoS One 8:e78617. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0078617.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. 52.↵
    1. Hebecker M,
    2. Józsi M
    . 2012. Factor H-related protein 4 activates complement by serving as a platform for the assembly of alternative pathway C3 convertase via its interaction with C3b protein. J Biol Chem 287:19528–19536. doi:10.1074/jbc.M112.364471.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  53. 53.↵
    1. Csincsi ÁI,
    2. Szabó Z,
    3. Bánlaki Z,
    4. Uzonyi B,
    5. Cserhalmi M,
    6. Kárpáti É,
    7. Tortajada A,
    8. Caesar JJE,
    9. Prohászka Z,
    10. Jokiranta TS,
    11. Lea SM,
    12. Rodríguez de Córdoba S,
    13. Józsi M
    . 2017. FHR-1 binds to C-reactive protein and enhances rather than inhibits complement activation. J Immunol 199:292–303. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1600483.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  54. 54.↵
    1. Goicoechea de Jorge E,
    2. Lea SM,
    3. Daigo K,
    4. Caesar JJE,
    5. Csincsi ÁI,
    6. Zöldi M,
    7. Pickering MC,
    8. Józsi M,
    9. Kopp A,
    10. Hamakubo T,
    11. Bánlaki Z,
    12. Uzonyi B,
    13. Hebecker M
    . 2015. Factor H-related protein 5 interacts with pentraxin 3 and the extracellular matrix and modulates complement activation. J Immunol 194:4963–4973. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1403121.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  55. 55.↵
    1. Tóth R,
    2. Cabral V,
    3. Thuer E,
    4. Bohner F,
    5. Németh T,
    6. Papp C,
    7. Nimrichter L,
    8. Molnár G,
    9. Vágvölgyi C,
    10. Gabaldón T,
    11. Nosanchuk JD,
    12. Gácser A
    . 2018. Investigation of Candida parapsilosis virulence regulatory factors during host-pathogen interaction. Sci Rep 8:1346. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-19453-4.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  56. 56.↵
    1. Richardson JP,
    2. Ho J,
    3. Naglik JR
    . 2018. Candida-epithelial interactions. J Fungi (Basel) 4. doi:10.3390/jof4010022.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  57. 57.↵
    1. Pietrella D,
    2. Rachini A,
    3. Pandey N,
    4. Schild L,
    5. Netea M,
    6. Bistoni F,
    7. Hube B,
    8. Vecchiarelli A
    . 2010. The inflammatory response induced by aspartic proteases of Candida albicans is independent of proteolytic activity. Infect Immun 78:4754–4762. doi:10.1128/IAI.00789-10.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  58. 58.↵
    1. Trevijano-Contador N,
    2. Zaragoza O
    . 2018. Immune response of Galleria mellonella against human fungal pathogens. J Fungi (Basel) 5:3. doi:10.3390/jof5010003.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  59. 59.↵
    1. Gácser A,
    2. Trofa D,
    3. Schäfer W,
    4. Nosanchuk JD
    . 2007. Targeted gene deletion in Candida parapsilosis demonstrates the role of secreted lipase in virulence. J Clin Invest 117:3049–3058. doi:10.1172/JCI32294.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  60. 60.↵
    1. Németh T,
    2. Tóth A,
    3. Szenzenstein J,
    4. Horváth P,
    5. Nosanchuk JD,
    6. Grózer Z,
    7. Tóth R,
    8. Papp C,
    9. Hamari Z,
    10. Vágvölgyi C,
    11. Gácser A
    . 2013. Characterization of virulence properties in the C. parapsilosis sensu lato species. PLoS One 8:e68704. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0068704.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  61. 61.↵
    1. Richardson JP,
    2. Mogavero S,
    3. Moyes DL,
    4. Blagojevic M,
    5. Krüger T,
    6. Verma AH,
    7. Coleman BM,
    8. De La Cruz Diaz J,
    9. Schulz D,
    10. Ponde NO,
    11. Carrano G,
    12. Kniemeyer O,
    13. Wilson D,
    14. Bader O,
    15. Enoiu SI,
    16. Ho J,
    17. Kichik N,
    18. Gaffen SL,
    19. Hube B,
    20. Naglik JR
    . 2018. Processing of Candida albicans Ece1p is critical for candidalysin maturation and fungal virulence. mBio 9:e02178-17. doi:10.1128/mBio.02178-17.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  62. 62.↵
    1. Tóth A,
    2. Németh T,
    3. Csonka K,
    4. Horváth P,
    5. Vágvölgyi C,
    6. Vizler C,
    7. Nosanchuk JD,
    8. Gácser A
    . 2014. Secreted Candida parapsilosis lipase modulates the immune response of primary human macrophages. Virulence 5:555–562. doi:10.4161/viru.28509.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  63. 63.↵
    1. Chakraborty T,
    2. Thuer E,
    3. Heijink M,
    4. Tóth R,
    5. Bodai L,
    6. Vágvölgyi C,
    7. Giera M,
    8. Gabaldón T,
    9. Gácser A
    . 2018. Eicosanoid biosynthesis influences the virulence of Candida parapsilosis. Virulence 9:1019–1035. doi:10.1080/21505594.2018.1475797.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  64. 64.↵
    1. Dostál J,
    2. Brynda J,
    3. Hrusková-Heidingsfeldová O,
    4. Sieglová I,
    5. Pichová I,
    6. Rezácová P
    . 2009. The crystal structure of the secreted aspartic protease 1 from Candida parapsilosis in complex with pepstatin A. J Struct Biol 27:160–165.
    OpenUrl
  65. 65.↵
    1. Hrus O,
    2. Hradilek M,
    3. Majer F,
    4. Havlı J
    . 2009. Two aspartic proteinases secreted by the pathogenic yeast Candida parapsilosis differ in expression pattern and catalytic properties. Biol Chem 390:259–268.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  66. 66.↵
    1. Kopp A,
    2. Strobel S,
    3. Tortajada A,
    4. Rodríguez de Córdoba S,
    5. Sánchez-Corral P,
    6. Prohászka Z,
    7. López-Trascasa M,
    8. Józsi M
    . 2012. Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome-associated variants and autoantibodies impair binding of factor H and factor H-related protein 1 to pentraxin 3. J Immunol 189:1858–1867. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1200357.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Functional Characterization of Secreted Aspartyl Proteases in Candida parapsilosis
Dhirendra Kumar Singh, Tibor Németh, Alexandra Papp, Renáta Tóth, Szilvia Lukácsi, Olga Heidingsfeld, Jiri Dostal, Csaba Vágvölgyi, Zsuzsa Bajtay, Mihály Józsi, Attila Gácser
mSphere Aug 2019, 4 (4) e00484-19; DOI: 10.1128/mSphere.00484-19

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print
Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this mSphere article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Functional Characterization of Secreted Aspartyl Proteases in Candida parapsilosis
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from mSphere
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in mSphere.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Functional Characterization of Secreted Aspartyl Proteases in Candida parapsilosis
Dhirendra Kumar Singh, Tibor Németh, Alexandra Papp, Renáta Tóth, Szilvia Lukácsi, Olga Heidingsfeld, Jiri Dostal, Csaba Vágvölgyi, Zsuzsa Bajtay, Mihály Józsi, Attila Gácser
mSphere Aug 2019, 4 (4) e00484-19; DOI: 10.1128/mSphere.00484-19
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Candida parapsilosis
complement
host-pathogen interactions
proteases
virulence

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About mSphere
  • Board of Editors
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • Embargo Policy
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Warranty
  • Types of Articles
  • Getting Started
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #mSphereJ

@ASMicrobiology

       

 

Website feedback

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Online ISSN: 2379-5042