Skip to main content
  • ASM Journals
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Research and News from ASM Journals
    • mSphere of Influence: Commentaries from Early Career Microbiologists
    • Archive
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Getting Started
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mSphere
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • ASM Journals
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
mSphere
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Research and News from ASM Journals
    • mSphere of Influence: Commentaries from Early Career Microbiologists
    • Archive
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Getting Started
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mSphere
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
Observation | Clinical Science and Epidemiology

Characterization of Staphylococcal Cassette Chromosome mec Elements from Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius Infections in Australian Animals

Kate A. Worthing, Sybille Schwendener, Vincent Perreten, Sugiyono Saputra, Geoffrey W. Coombs, Stanley Pang, Mark R. Davies, Sam Abraham, Darren J. Trott, Jacqueline M. Norris
Paul D. Fey, Editor
Kate A. Worthing
aSydney School of Veterinary Science, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
bDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, The University of Melbourne at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, VIC, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Kate A. Worthing
Sybille Schwendener
cInstitute of Veterinary Bacteriology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vincent Perreten
cInstitute of Veterinary Bacteriology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Vincent Perreten
Sugiyono Saputra
dAustralian Centre for Antimicrobial Resistance Ecology, School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, University of Adelaide, Roseworthy, SA, Australia
eResearch Center for Biology, Indonesian Institute of Sciences, Bogor, Indonesia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Geoffrey W. Coombs
fAustralia Antimicrobial Resistance and Infectious Diseases Laboratory, School of Veterinary Life Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA, Australia
gPathWest Laboratory Medicine—WA, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Murdoch, WA, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stanley Pang
fAustralia Antimicrobial Resistance and Infectious Diseases Laboratory, School of Veterinary Life Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA, Australia
gPathWest Laboratory Medicine—WA, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Murdoch, WA, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mark R. Davies
bDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, The University of Melbourne at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, VIC, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Mark R. Davies
Sam Abraham
fAustralia Antimicrobial Resistance and Infectious Diseases Laboratory, School of Veterinary Life Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Darren J. Trott
dAustralian Centre for Antimicrobial Resistance Ecology, School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, University of Adelaide, Roseworthy, SA, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jacqueline M. Norris
aSydney School of Veterinary Science, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jacqueline M. Norris
Paul D. Fey
University of Nebraska Medical Center
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/mSphere.00491-18
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

We examined the oxacillin resistance phenotype and genomic structure of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) elements from 77 veterinary methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius (MRSP) isolates. Isolates were characterized by oxacillin broth microdilution, whole-genome sequencing, and bioformatics analysis. Five previously described SCCmec elements, and a sixth novel element, were identified: SCCmec III (also known as II-III), ΨSCCmec57395, and SCCmecNA45 (a SCCmec VII variant), all previously described in MRSP, and SCCmec IVg and SCCmec VT, previously described in both methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and MRSP. The sixth element was novel and found among nine geographically clustered isolates. This novel pseudostaphylococcal cassette chromosome (ΨSCCmecKW21) contained a class A mec gene complex but lacked ccr genes. It also harbored heavy metal (cadmium) resistance determinants. The median oxacillin MIC values among ΨSCCmecKW21, SCCmec III, and SCCmec VT isolates were significantly higher than those determined for the SCCmecNA45 VII variant isolates and ΨSCCmec57395 and SCCmec IVg isolates. ΨSCCmecKW21 was found exclusively in sequence type 497 (ST497), an MRSP clone that is locally successful in Victoria, Australia. Future studies are necessary to determine if this clone has disseminated further afield and if ΨSCCmecKW21 has moved into other MRSP lineages or staphylococcal species.

IMPORTANCE Staphylococcus pseudintermedius is a significant veterinary pathogen and occasional cause of infections in humans. β-Lactams are an important group of antimicrobials used to treat staphylococcal infections in humans and animals. However, when staphylococci become methicillin resistant via the acquisition of a mobile genetic element called staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec), they become resistant to all β-lactams. This study detected a novel SCCmec element among a cluster of methicillin-resistant S. pseudintermedius isolates from animals in Australia. It also detected SCCmec elements in S. pseudintermedius that had high similarity to those identified in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, demonstrating how human and animal pathogens can share the same resistance determinants.

OBSERVATION

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius (MRSP) has become an important opportunistic pathogen in veterinary small-animal practice (1) and is an occasional zoonotic pathogen (2). S. pseudintermedius is part of the canine skin microbiota but can cause a wide range of opportunistic clinical infections across many body systems. MRSP infections are more complicated than methicillin-susceptible S. pseudintermedius (MSSP) infections due to the lack of potential treatment options. In staphylococci, methicillin resistance is determined by the mecA gene and its homologues, mecB and mecC (3–5). mecA and mecC are harbored within a mobile genetic element called the staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) element (4, 6), whereas mecB, typically found in Macrococcus caseolyticus (7), has recently been detected on a multidrug resistance plasmid in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) (5). SCCmec elements are composed of a methicillin resistance determinant (mecA, mecB, or mecC) contained within a mec gene complex and include site-specific recombinase genes (ccr), which are responsible for insertion of the SCCmec cassette into the core genome (6). SCCmec types were initially defined by their combination of the mec gene class complex and the ccr gene complex (8). However, assignment of nomenclature and classification of SCCmec elements have been hampered by the existence of composite cassettes (9, 10) and pseudo-SCCmec elements that do not harbor ccr genes (11). Eleven SCCmec cassettes are formally recognized in the database of the International Working Group on the Staphylococcal Cassette Chromosome (IWG-SCC) and were named I to XI according to the chronological order in when they were first reported. Several SCCmec elements are reported in MRSP, including SCCmec III (previously described as II-III [12]), which is found in the globally dominant sequence type 71 (ST71) lineage (13); SCCmec VT variants (14); and a newly reported cassette, SCCmecNA45, which harbors a class C1 mec gene complex and ccrC recombinase gene (15). Other SCCmec elements have been identified in S. pseudintermedius that are not recorded in the IWG-SCC database, including ΨSCCmec57395 (11), which lacks ccr genes, and SCCmecKM241 (12) and SCCmecAI16 (10) (Table 1). Despite the difficulties associated with characterizing some SCCmec elements, SCCmec typing can provide useful information about the phylogenetic and epidemiological origin of isolates. Echoing the epidemiological division of human-derived MRSA into health care-associated (HA) and community-associated (CA) lineages (16, 17), Kasai et al. found that veterinary MRSP isolates with SCCmec III tended to be HA-MRSP lineages whereas isolates with SCCmec V tended to be CA-MRSP (18). Recently, we described the molecular epidemiology of 77 MRSP isolates collected from clinical infections in animals in Australia during a national surveillance study and found that the population was phylogenetically diverse (19). The current study characterized the SCCmec elements in these isolates.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

SCCmec elements previously identified in methicillin-resistant S. pseudintermedius isolates that are not described in the SCCmec database of the IWG-SCC

Characterization of SCCmec elements.Isolates originated from a larger collection of 669 S. pseudintermedius isolates collected during the first Australian survey into antimicrobial resistance in veterinary pathogens (20, 21). All isolates were identified using a BD Bruker MALDI Biotyper and were screened for methicillin resistance using manual oxacillin broth microdilution according to CLSI guidelines (22). The end dilution for MIC testing was 64 mg/liter oxacillin. Oxacillin resistance was confirmed by detection of an oxacillin MIC of ≥0.5 mg/liter using Vitek 2, in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions, and detection of the mecA gene by whole-genome sequencing as previously described (19). DNA extraction, library preparation, and initial de novo assembly were undertaken as previously described (19). SCCmec typing was undertaken by downloading the sequences of the mec gene complex and ccr elements of the SCCmec elements described by the IWG-SCC (8) from the NCBI online database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). SCCmec elements previously identified in S. pseudintermedius but not included in the SCCmec working group website were also downloaded (Table 1). Downloaded SCCmec element sequences underwent BLASTn searches against de novo contigs using CLC Genomics Workbench. BLASTn results required more than 85% sequence homology to be assigned a particular ccr gene. mec gene complexes were assigned based on the gene structure of mecA, its regulators, and associated insertion sequences (ISs). If a SCCmec type could not be assigned, contigs were mapped against a scaffold of reference SCCmec types (8) and the reference methicillin-susceptible S. pseudintermedius genome, ED99 (accession no. CP002478.1). The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to determine whether the median oxacillin MICs differed across SCCmec types. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to assess differences between SCCmec types in the median oxacillin MIC. SCCmec types with more than eight isolates were compared as separate entities in analyses; other isolates were grouped together.

Diversity of SCCmec types.Six SCCmec types were identified among 74 of the 77 MRSP from Australia (Table 2). The SCCmec type of the remaining three isolates (two ST497 isolates and one ST71 isolate) could not be determined because of poor sequencing quality (low read coverage and contig breaks) in the region around the mecA gene. Isolates from the same multilocus sequence type (MLST) tended to harbor the same SCCmec type. Four of the SCCmec types have previously been characterized in MRSP or MRSA as follows: SCCmec III (n = 34) and ΨSCCmec57395 (n = 7), previously described in MRSP; and SCCmec VT (n = 10) and SCCmec IVg (n = 5), previously described in MRSP and MRSA (11, 12, 23, 24). The 34 SCCmec III isolates, which were mostly ST71 and ST316, demonstrated 98% to 100% sequence homology to the mec and ccr gene complexes of the III element from MRSP KM1381 (12). ΨSCCmec57395 isolates had no ccr genes but had 99 to 100% sequence homology to the region spanning from orfx to IS256 from MRSP 57395 (11). The VT isolates displayed 96% to 100% homology to the ccrC1 gene from MRSP 06-3228 (23) and 100% homology to its mecA and IS431 genes, but the mecR1 gene was variably truncated from 23 bp to 93 bp. SCCmec IVg isolates had 97% to 100% sequence homology to the entire cassette from MRSA isolated from bovine milk described previously by Kwon et al. (24).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2

SCCmec types and multilocus sequence types (MLST) of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius isolates from clinical infections in animals in Australia, 2013 to 2014

The fifth SCCmec element has 99% sequence homology to the novel element recently reported in MRSP NA45 (15). In our study, this element was identified in nine geographically dispersed isolates from eight different STs (Table 2). These isolates harbored a class C1 mec complex with 99% sequence homology to SCCmec X from MRSA JCSC6945 but did not harbor the same ccr genes as this element. Instead, the isolates harbored a recombinase gene with 99% homology to ccrC6, recently identified in a 43,922-bp SCCmec element in ST84 MRSP (15) and methicillin-resistant S. schleiferi (MRSS) (25). This element is also present in ST398 MRSA RIVM3897 (26), but the RIVM3987 element lacks the final 8,164 bp at the 3′ end of the SCCmec cassette in ST84 MRSP and MRSS. The nine isolates in this study showed 99% homology to the entire SCCmec cassette from MRSP NA45, which contained heavy metal resistance genes arsB, arsC, arsR (arsenic resistance) and copA (copper resistance) but no antimicrobial resistance genes. On the basis of typing recommendations of the IWG-SCC (8), the element in these nine isolates and in MRSP NA45 could be described as SCCmec VII because it harbors a class C1 mec gene complex and ccrC recombinase gene (Fig. S1). However, as the mec gene complex is positioned in reverse orientation in comparison to SCCmec VII, we feel that it is more appropriate to refer to this cassette as “SCCmecNA45,” a SCCmec VII variant. Most of the isolates harboring the SCCmec VII variant SCCmecNA45 did not harbor the variable repeat region of the spa gene and therefore could not be assigned a spa type (19).

FIG S1

Alignment of the SCCmec cassette from MRSP isolate NA45 (15), found in nine isolates in this study. The cassette is aligned with SCCmec X and VII from MRSA. The NA45 cassette shows high homology to the class C1 mec gene complex of SCCmec X and >90% homology to the ccrC gene of SCCmec VII, but the orientation of the mec gene complex is reversed between NA45 and SCCmec VII. The alignment was produced in EasyFig V.5 (34). Download FIG S1, TIF file, 2.7 MB.
Copyright © 2018 Worthing et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

The final nine MRSP isolates, all ST497, could not be mapped to previously described SCCmec elements. All ST497 isolates were from a geographic cluster in Melbourne, Victoria (19). To characterize the novel element found in the remaining nine isolates, a representative ST497 isolate (KW21) underwent further sequencing by Illumina HiSeq and Nanopore long-read technology using MinIon. MinIon long reads were used to verify the structure of the de novo assembly. De novo assembly of Illumina HiSeq reads using Geneious yielded a 319,216-bp contig that contained the entire putative SCCmec element. This contig was subjected to a blast search against the NCBI database to determine putative components of the element. The element was annotated using PROKKA (27) and manually verified using the BLASTn algorithm in CLC Genomics Workbench.

ΨSCCmecKW21 element.The novel SCCmec element, designated “ΨSCCmecKW21,” was integrated at the 3′ end of the orfX gene (rmlH) (Fig. 1). The characteristic direct repeat and insertion sequences (ISs) that typically flank SCCmec elements were absent at the right side (10, 28). The element contained a class A mec gene complex that had 99% BLASTn similarity to the class A mec gene complex SCCmec cassettes from MRSA JKD6008 (29), MRSP KM241 (12) and MRSP AI16 (10) (accession numbers CP002120.1, AM904731.1, and LN864705 respectively). The element did not contain any ccr genes. The 16,711-bp region of ΨSCCmecKW21 that spanned from orfX to the cadmium resistance operon, cadCAD, had 99% sequence homology to the same region of SCCmec III from ST239 MRSA isolate JKD6008 (Fig. 1). We therefore propose that ΨSCCmecKW21 is a truncated version of SCCmec III that lost the segment containing ccr genes after the cassette was inserted into the genome. Unlike SCCmec III from ST239 MRSA, ΨSCCmecKW21 does not harbor ccr genes; instead, cadA and cadC are bordered by a truncated IS30 family transposase. To the right of this transposase is a 10,116-bp region that had 97% BLASTn similarity to a chromosomal region of Macrococcus sp. IME1152 (accession number CP017156.1) that includes the copY gene, encoding a putative copper transport repressor. BLASTn analysis of the de novo contigs of ST497 isolates against the SCCmec element from KW21 revealed that all nine isolates had the same mec gene complex, the genomic region with Macrococcus sequence homology, and no ccr genes. Consequently, they were considered to have the same pseudoelement as KW21. ST239 is an important health care-associated MRSA lineage in humans, so screening of healthy and diseased animals across Australia is now indicated to determine if ST497 and/or other lineages harboring ΨSCCmecKW21 continue to exist within a geographic cluster or whether this lineage has disseminated across Australia or overseas, as has occurred with ST239 MRSA in humans (30).

FIG 1
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1

Alignment of the novel SCCmec element ΨSCCmecKW21, its flanking regions, and related sequences. The 16,711-bp ΨSCCmecKW21 element, delineated by orfX and a truncated IS30 transposase, is a truncated version of SCCmec III. The mecA gene complex and cadmium resistance genes (cadCAD) of ΨSCCmecKW21 have high homology the same region in ST239 MRSA (S. aureus JKD6008). ΨSCCmecKW21 inserts into the genome of KW21 at the 3′ end of the orfX gene and is bordered by an ∼10,000-bp region with 99% homology to Macrococcus sp. IME1552. This region, which includes a putative copper transport repressor (copY), is then bordered by sequence with 99% homology to the region harboring the spa gene in methicillin-susceptible S. pseudintermedius ED99. Areas of sequence homology, determined by BLASTn, are indicated with gray shading. Green arrows, coding DNA sequences (CDS) shared with MSSP ED99; orange arrows, CDS shared with S. aureus JKD6008; blue arrows, class A mec gene complex; yellow arrows, CDS shared with Macrococcus IME1152; black arrows, unique CDS. The alignment was created in EasyFig V.5 (34).

Variation in oxacillin MICs amongst different SCCmec types.Fig. 2 shows the oxacillin MIC range for the major SCCmec types. The median oxacillin MICs differed significantly depending on SCCmec type (Fig. 2; P < 0.001). The median oxacillin MICs of ΨSCCmec57395 and SCCmec IVg isolates (1 mg/liter) and of SCCmecNA45-VII variant isolates (4 mg/liter) were significantly lower than the median oxacillin MIC of SCCmec III, SCCmec VT and ΨSCCmecKW21 isolates (64 mg/liter; P < 0.01). Recently, Kasai and colleagues (18) similarly reported differences in oxacillin MIC on the basis of MRSP SCCmec types. Specifically, they found that isolates with SCCmec III generally had higher oxacillin MICs and were more often associated with suspected hospital-acquired infections than isolates with SCCmec V. Analogous to analyses of MRSA in human medicine, they concluded that oxacillin MIC may give clues as to an isolate’s epidemiological origin, where a high oxacillin MIC may indicate that an MRSP isolate is from a successful “health care-associated” clone whereas isolates with lower MICs may represent “community-associated” clones (18). There were insufficient epidemiological data available in our study to draw similar conclusions, but our results do support the notion that the oxacillin MIC is significantly affected by the SCCmec type and that isolates of the same multilocus sequence type generally harbor the same SCCmec type. Thus, it follows that different MRSP lineages would demonstrate different oxacillin MICs. The mecA gene can be repressed by either mecI or blaI, but MRSA and MRSP isolates with bla regulators typically demonstrate more rapid induction and higher expression of mecA than isolates with mec regulators alone (31–33). To determine whether the oxacillin MIC was influenced by the presence of the blaI and mecI genes rather than simply by the SCCmec type, we screened all isolates for these repressor genes using a BLAST-based command line script (screen_assembly3.py: https://github.com/shimbalama/screen_assembly). Most (45/77) isolates harbored blaI, but only SCCmec III and ΨSCCmecKW21 harbored both blaI and mecI. The high median oxacillin MIC (64 mg/liter) of III and ΨSCCmecKW21 isolates could have been due to the fact that blaI attenuates the strong mecA repression expected from the cognate mec regulators (32).

FIG 2
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 2

Oxacillin MIC for SCCmec types of MRSP isolates from Australia collected in 2013 to 2014. Black dots indicate the median MIC value; error bars indicate the interquartile range.

In summary, we found six SCCmec types among 77 MRSP isolates collected from clinical infections in Australian animals. The oxacillin MIC varied according to SCCmec type. We also described ΨSCCmecKW21, a novel pseudo-SCCmec element that was found only in a geographic cluster of clinical isolates. This report highlights the utility of nation-wide surveillance studies in unearthing novel and emerging resistance determinants and demonstrates how genomic resistance elements found in significant human pathogens such as S. aureus can also be found in veterinary pathogens such as S. pseudintermedius.

Accession number(s).The genomic sequence of ΨSCCmecKW21 has been deposited in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database under GenBank accession number MH713898. The contig sequences of the MRSP isolates described in this study were also deposited under BioProject number PRJNA439160 and BioSample accession numbers SAMN08741522 to SAMN08741590.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We acknowledge the assistance and support of all private, governmental, and university veterinary diagnostic laboratories within Australia for the provision of isolates. We gratefully thank Thomas Gottlieb, Charlotte Webster, and John Huynh and the team at the Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases at Concord Hospital (NSW, Australia) for their assistance in using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight (MALDI-TOF). We acknowledge the Sydney Informatics Hub and University of Sydney Core Research Facilities for providing subsidized access to CLC Genomics Workbench and associated support. We thank Emily Hudson for her assistance in processing the isolates and Seamus O’Reilly and Harvey Norman for their ongoing support in reviewing the manuscript.

The collection of the 77 MRSP isolates was supported by Zoetis Pty Ltd. and the Australian Research Council-Linkage Grant (grant number LP130100736). Sequencing of ΨSCCmecKW21 was supported by internal funds of the Institute of Veterinary Bacteriology of the University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received September 4, 2018.
    • Accepted October 17, 2018.
  • Copyright © 2018 Worthing et al.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. dos Santos TP,
    2. Damborg P,
    3. Moodley A,
    4. Guardabassi L
    . 2016. Systematic review on global epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius: inference of population structure from multilocus sequence typing data. Front Microbiol 7:1599. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2016.01599.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  2. 2.↵
    1. Somayaji R,
    2. Priyantha M,
    3. Rubin J,
    4. Church D
    . 2016. Human infections due to Staphylococcus pseudintermedius, an emerging zoonosis of canine origin: report of 24 cases. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 85:471–476. doi:10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2016.05.008.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. 3.↵
    1. Utsui Y,
    2. Yokota T
    . 1985. Role of an altered penicillin-binding protein in methicillin- and cephem-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 28:397–403. doi:10.1128/AAC.28.3.397.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. García-Álvarez L,
    2. Holden MTG,
    3. Lindsay H,
    4. Webb CR,
    5. Brown DFJ,
    6. Curran MD,
    7. Walpole E,
    8. Brooks K,
    9. Pickard DJ,
    10. Teale C,
    11. Parkhill J,
    12. Bentley SD,
    13. Edwards GF,
    14. Girvan EK,
    15. Kearns AM,
    16. Pichon B,
    17. Hill RLR,
    18. Larsen AR,
    19. Skov RL,
    20. Peacock SJ,
    21. Maskell DJ,
    22. Holmes MA
    . 2011. Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with a novel mecA homologue in human and bovine populations in the UK and Denmark: a descriptive study. Lancet Infect Dis 11:595–603. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(11)70126-8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    1. Becker K,
    2. van Alen S,
    3. Idelevich EA,
    4. Schleimer N,
    5. Seggewiß J,
    6. Mellmann A,
    7. Kaspar U,
    8. Peters G
    . 2018. Plasmid-encoded transferable mecB-mediated methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Emerg Infect Dis 24:242–248. doi:10.3201/eid2402.171074.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  6. 6.↵
    1. Katayama Y,
    2. Ito T,
    3. Hiramatsu K
    . 2000. A new class of genetic element, Staphylococcus cassette chromosome mec, encodes methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 44:1549–1555. doi:10.1128/AAC.44.6.1549-1555.2000.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Tsubakishita S,
    2. Kuwahara-Arai K,
    3. Baba T,
    4. Hiramatsu K
    . 2010. Staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec-like element in Macrococcus caseolyticus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54:1469–1475. doi:10.1128/AAC.00575-09.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    International Working Group on the Classification of Staphylococcal Cassette Chromosome Elements (IWG-SCC). 2009. Classification of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec): guidelines for reporting novel SCCmec elements. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53:4961–4967. doi:10.1128/AAC.00579-09.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Wilson LK,
    2. Coombs GW,
    3. Christiansen K,
    4. Grubb WB,
    5. O’Brien FG
    . 2016. Characterization of a novel staphylococcal cassette chromosome composite island from community-associated MRSA isolated in aged care facilities in Western Australia. J Antimicrob Chemother 71:3372–3375. doi:10.1093/jac/dkw317.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Chanchaithong P,
    2. Prapasarakul N,
    3. Perreten V,
    4. Schwendener S
    . 2016. Characterization of a novel composite staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius from Thailand. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60:1153–1157. doi:10.1128/AAC.02268-15.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Perreten V,
    2. Chanchaithong P,
    3. Prapasarakul N,
    4. Rossano A,
    5. Blum SE,
    6. Elad D,
    7. Schwendener S
    . 2013. Novel pseudo-staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec element (ΨSCCmec57395) in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius CC45. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 57:5509–5515. doi:10.1128/AAC.00738-13.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Descloux S,
    2. Rossano A,
    3. Perreten V
    . 2008. Characterization of new staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCC mec) and topoisomerase genes in fluoroquinolone- and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius. J Clin Microbiol 46:1818–1823. doi:10.1128/JCM.02255-07.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Perreten V,
    2. Kadlec K,
    3. Schwarz S,
    4. Andersson UG,
    5. Finn M,
    6. Greko C,
    7. Moodley A,
    8. Kania SA,
    9. Frank LA,
    10. Bemis DA,
    11. Franco A,
    12. Iurescia M,
    13. Battisti A,
    14. Duim B,
    15. Wagenaar JA,
    16. Duijkeren E,
    17. Weese JS,
    18. Fitzgerald JR,
    19. Rossano A,
    20. Guardabassi L
    . 2010. Clonal spread of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius in Europe and North America: an international multicentre study. J Antimicrob Chemother 65:1145–1154. doi:10.1093/jac/dkq078.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    1. Duim B,
    2. Verstappen K,
    3. Kalupahana RS,
    4. Ranathunga L,
    5. Fluit AC,
    6. Wagenaar JA
    . 2018. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius among dogs in the description of novel SCCmec variants. Vet Microbiol 213:136–141. doi:10.1016/j.vetmic.2017.11.022.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  15. 15.↵
    1. Riley MC,
    2. Perreten V,
    3. Bemis DA,
    4. Kania SA
    . 2016. Complete genome sequences of three important methicillin-resistant clinical isolates of Staphylococcus pseudintermedius. Genome Announc 4:e01194-16. doi:10.1128/genomeA.01194-16.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  16. 16.↵
    1. Okuma K,
    2. Iwakawa K,
    3. Turnidge JD,
    4. Grubb WB,
    5. Bell JM,
    6. O’Brien FG,
    7. Coombs GW,
    8. Pearman JW,
    9. Tenover FC,
    10. Kapi M,
    11. Tiensasitorn C,
    12. Ito T,
    13. Hiramatsu K
    . 2002. Dissemination of new methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clones in the community. J Clin Microbiol 40:4289–4294. doi:10.1128/JCM.40.11.4289-4294.2002.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Lindsay JA
    . 2013. Hospital-associated MRSA and antibiotic resistance—what have we learned from genomics?. Int J Med Microbiol 303:318–323. doi:10.1016/j.ijmm.2013.02.005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Kasai T,
    2. Saegusa S,
    3. Shirai M,
    4. Murakami M,
    5. Kato Y
    . 2016. New categories designated as healthcare-associated and community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius in dogs. Microbiol Immunol 60:540–551. doi:10.1111/1348-0421.12401.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  19. 19.↵
    1. Worthing KA,
    2. Abraham S,
    3. Coombs GW,
    4. Pang S,
    5. Saputra S,
    6. Jordan D,
    7. Trott DJ,
    8. Norris JM
    . 2018. Clonal diversity and geographic distribution of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius from Australian animals: discovery of novel sequence types. Vet Microbiol 213:58–65. doi:10.1016/j.vetmic.2017.11.018.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  20. 20.↵
    1. Saputra S,
    2. Jordan D,
    3. Worthing KA,
    4. Norris JM,
    5. Wong HS,
    6. Abraham R,
    7. Trott DJ,
    8. Abraham S
    . 2017. Antimicrobial resistance in coagulase-positive staphylococci isolated from companion animals in Australia: a one year study. PLoS One 12:e0176379. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0176379.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  21. 21.↵
    1. Abraham S,
    2. Jordan D,
    3. Wong HS,
    4. Johnson JR,
    5. Toleman MA,
    6. Wakeham DL,
    7. Gordon DM,
    8. Turnidge JD,
    9. Mollinger JL,
    10. Gibson JS,
    11. Trott DJ
    . 2015. First detection of extended-spectrum cephalosporin-and fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia coli in Australian food-producing animals. J Glob Antimicrob Resist 3:273–277. doi:10.1016/j.jgar.2015.08.002.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  22. 22.↵
    CLSI. 2013. Performance standards for antimicrobial disk and dilution susceptibility tests for bacteria isolated from animals; approved standard—4th ed. CLSI, Wayne, PA, USA.
  23. 23.↵
    1. Black CC,
    2. Solyman SM,
    3. Eberlein LC,
    4. Bemis DA,
    5. Woron AM,
    6. Kania SA
    . 2009. Identification of a predominant multilocus sequence type, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis cluster, and novel staphylococcal chromosomal cassette in clinical isolates of mecA-containing, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius. Vet Microbiol 139:333–338. doi:10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.06.029.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. 24.↵
    1. Kwon N,
    2. Park KT,
    3. Moon J,
    4. Jung W,
    5. Kim S,
    6. Kim J,
    7. Hong S,
    8. Koo H,
    9. Joo Y,
    10. Park Y
    . 2005. Staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCC mec) characterization and molecular analysis for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and novel SCC mec subtype IVg isolated from bovine milk in Korea. J Antimicrob Chemother 56:624–632. doi:10.1093/jac/dki306.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  25. 25.↵
    1. Misic AM,
    2. Cain CL,
    3. Morris DO,
    4. Rankin SC,
    5. Beiting DP
    . 2015. Complete genome sequence and methylome of Staphylococcus schleiferi, an important cause of skin and ear infections in veterinary medicine. Genome Announc 3:e01011-15. doi:10.1128/genomeA.01011-15.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  26. 26.↵
    1. Bosch T,
    2. Witteveen S,
    3. Haenen A,
    4. Landman F,
    5. Schouls LM
    . 2016. Next-generation sequencing confirms presumed nosocomial transmission of livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the Netherlands. Appl Environ Microbiol 82:4081–4089. doi:10.1128/AEM.00773-16.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    1. Seemann T
    . 2014. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 30:2068–2069. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  28. 28.↵
    1. Ito T,
    2. Ma XX,
    3. Takeuchi F,
    4. Okuma K,
    5. Yuzawa H,
    6. Hiramatsu K
    . 2004. Novel type V staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec driven by a novel cassette chromosome recombinase, ccrC. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 48:2637–2651. doi:10.1128/AAC.48.7.2637-2651.2004.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Howden BP,
    2. Seemann T,
    3. Harrison PF,
    4. McEvoy CR,
    5. Stanton J-AL,
    6. Rand CJ,
    7. Mason CW,
    8. Jensen SO,
    9. Firth N,
    10. Davies JK,
    11. Johnson PDR,
    12. Stinear TP
    . 2010. Complete genome sequence of Staphylococcus aureus strain JKD6008, an ST239 clone of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with intermediate-level vancomycin resistance. J Bacteriol 192:5848–5849. doi:10.1128/JB.00951-10.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. Monecke S,
    2. Slickers P,
    3. Gawlik D,
    4. Müller E,
    5. Reissig A,
    6. Ruppelt-Lorz A,
    7. Akpaka PE,
    8. Bandt D,
    9. Bes M,
    10. Boswihi SS
    . 6 July 2018. Molecular typing of ST239-MRSA-III from diverse geographic locations and the evolution of the SCCmec III element during its intercontinental spread. Front Microbiol doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.01436.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  31. 31.↵
    1. McKinney TK,
    2. Sharma VK,
    3. Craig WA,
    4. Archer GL
    . 2001. Transcription of the gene mediating methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus (mecA) is corepressed but not coinduced by cognate mecA and β-lactamase regulators. J Bacteriol 183:6862–6868. doi:10.1128/JB.183.23.6862-6868.2001.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. 32.↵
    1. Arêde P,
    2. Ministro J,
    3. Oliveira DC
    . 2013. Redefining the role of the β-lactamase locus in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: β-lactamase regulators disrupt the MecI-mediated strong repression on mecA and optimize the phenotypic expression of resistance in strains with constitutive mecA expression. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 57:3037–3045. doi:10.1128/AAC.02621-12.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. 33.↵
    1. Black C,
    2. Eberlein L,
    3. Solyman S,
    4. Wilkes RP,
    5. Hartmann F,
    6. Rohrbach BW,
    7. Bemis DA,
    8. Kania SA
    . 2011. The role of mecA and blaZ regulatory elements in mecA expression by regional clones of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius. Vet Microbiol 151:345–353. doi:10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.03.026.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Sullivan MJ,
    2. Petty NK,
    3. Beatson SA
    . 2011. Easyfig: a genome comparison visualizer. Bioinformatics 27:1009–1010. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btr039.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Characterization of Staphylococcal Cassette Chromosome mec Elements from Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius Infections in Australian Animals
Kate A. Worthing, Sybille Schwendener, Vincent Perreten, Sugiyono Saputra, Geoffrey W. Coombs, Stanley Pang, Mark R. Davies, Sam Abraham, Darren J. Trott, Jacqueline M. Norris
mSphere Nov 2018, 3 (6) e00491-18; DOI: 10.1128/mSphere.00491-18

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print
Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this mSphere article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Characterization of Staphylococcal Cassette Chromosome mec Elements from Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius Infections in Australian Animals
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from mSphere
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in mSphere.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Characterization of Staphylococcal Cassette Chromosome mec Elements from Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius Infections in Australian Animals
Kate A. Worthing, Sybille Schwendener, Vincent Perreten, Sugiyono Saputra, Geoffrey W. Coombs, Stanley Pang, Mark R. Davies, Sam Abraham, Darren J. Trott, Jacqueline M. Norris
mSphere Nov 2018, 3 (6) e00491-18; DOI: 10.1128/mSphere.00491-18
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • OBSERVATION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

SCCmec
Staphylococcus pseudintermedius
antimicrobial resistance
methicillin resistance
veterinary
zoonotic infections

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About mSphere
  • Board of Editors
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • Embargo Policy
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Warranty
  • Types of Articles
  • Getting Started
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #mSphereJ

@ASMicrobiology

       

 

Website feedback

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Online ISSN: 2379-5042