Skip to main content
  • ASM Journals
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotheraphy
    • Applied and Environmental Mircobiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • Archive
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Getting Started
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mSphere
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • Data Policy
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • ASM Journals
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotheraphy
    • Applied and Environmental Mircobiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
mSphere
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • Archive
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Getting Started
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mSphere
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • Data Policy
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
Research Article | Host-Microbe Biology

The Genetic Transformation of Chlamydia pneumoniae

Kensuke Shima, Maximilian Wanker, Rachel J. Skilton, Lesley T. Cutcliffe, Christiane Schnee, Thomas A. Kohl, Stefan Niemann, Javier Geijo, Matthias Klinger, Peter Timms, Thomas Rattei, Konrad Sachse, Ian N. Clarke, Jan Rupp
Craig D. Ellermeier, Editor
Kensuke Shima
Department of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, University of Luebeck, Luebeck, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maximilian Wanker
Department of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, University of Luebeck, Luebeck, GermanyGerman Center for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner Site, Hamburg-Luebeck-Borstel-Riems, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rachel J. Skilton
Molecular Microbiology Group, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lesley T. Cutcliffe
Molecular Microbiology Group, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christiane Schnee
Institute of Molecular Pathogenesis, Friedrich-Loeffler-lnstitute (Federal Research Institute for Animal Health), Jena, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas A. Kohl
German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner Site, Hamburg-Luebeck-Borstel-Riems, GermanyMolecular and Experimental Mycobacteriology, Research Center Borstel, Borstel, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stefan Niemann
German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner Site, Hamburg-Luebeck-Borstel-Riems, GermanyMolecular and Experimental Mycobacteriology, Research Center Borstel, Borstel, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Javier Geijo
Division of Computational Systems Biology, University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthias Klinger
Institute of Anatomy, University of Luebeck, Luebeck, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter Timms
University of Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas Rattei
Division of Computational Systems Biology, University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Konrad Sachse
RNA Bioinformatics and High-Throughput Analysis, Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Jena, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Konrad Sachse
Ian N. Clarke
Molecular Microbiology Group, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jan Rupp
Department of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, University of Luebeck, Luebeck, GermanyGerman Center for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner Site, Hamburg-Luebeck-Borstel-Riems, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jan Rupp
Craig D. Ellermeier
University of Iowa
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/mSphere.00412-18
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

We demonstrate the genetic transformation of Chlamydia pneumoniae using a plasmid shuttle vector system which generates stable transformants. The equine C. pneumoniae N16 isolate harbors the 7.5-kb plasmid pCpnE1. We constructed the plasmid vector pRSGFPCAT-Cpn containing a pCpnE1 backbone, plus the red-shifted green fluorescent protein (RSGFP), as well as the chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) gene used for the selection of plasmid shuttle vector-bearing C. pneumoniae transformants. Using the pRSGFPCAT-Cpn plasmid construct, expression of RSGFP in koala isolate C. pneumoniae LPCoLN was demonstrated. Furthermore, we discovered that the human cardiovascular isolate C. pneumoniae CV-6 and the human community-acquired pneumonia-associated C. pneumoniae IOL-207 could also be transformed with pRSGFPCAT-Cpn. In previous studies, it was shown that Chlamydia spp. cannot be transformed when the plasmid shuttle vector is constructed from a different plasmid backbone to the homologous species. Accordingly, we confirmed that pRSGFPCAT-Cpn could not cross the species barrier in plasmid-bearing and plasmid-free C. trachomatis, C. muridarum, C. caviae, C. pecorum, and C. abortus. However, contrary to our expectation, pRSGFPCAT-Cpn did transform C. felis. Furthermore, pRSGFPCAT-Cpn did not recombine with the wild-type plasmid of C. felis. Taken together, we provide for the first time an easy-to-handle transformation protocol for C. pneumoniae that results in stable transformants. In addition, the vector can cross the species barrier to C. felis, indicating the potential of horizontal pathogenic gene transfer via a plasmid.

IMPORTANCE The absence of tools for the genetic manipulation of C. pneumoniae has hampered research into all aspects of its biology. In this study, we established a novel reproducible method for C. pneumoniae transformation based on a plasmid shuttle vector system. We constructed a C. pneumoniae plasmid backbone shuttle vector, pRSGFPCAT-Cpn. The construct expresses the red-shifted green fluorescent protein (RSGFP) fused to chloramphenicol acetyltransferase in C. pneumoniae. C. pneumoniae transformants stably retained pRSGFPCAT-Cpn and expressed RSGFP in epithelial cells, even in the absence of chloramphenicol. The successful transformation in C. pneumoniae using pRSGFPCAT-Cpn will advance the field of chlamydial genetics and is a promising new approach to investigate gene functions in C. pneumoniae biology. In addition, we demonstrated that pRSGFPCAT-Cpn overcame the plasmid species barrier without the need for recombination with an endogenous plasmid, indicating the potential probability of horizontal chlamydial pathogenic gene transfer by plasmids between chlamydial species.

INTRODUCTION

Obligate intracellular chlamydiae infect humans and animals, causing a wide range of different diseases (1). Two species of Chlamydia are major human pathogens: Chlamydia trachomatis is the most common bacterial sexually transmitted disease (STD) worldwide and the leading cause of infectious blindness (1), and C. pneumoniae causes acute and chronic infections of the upper and lower respiratory tracts and is associated with cardiovascular diseases (2). The phylogenetic tree of C. pneumoniae genome sequences shows a clear separation of vascular C. pneumoniae isolates from respiratory isolates, indicating a specific tissue tropism in humans (3).

Interestingly and in contrast to C. trachomatis, C. pneumoniae is widely distributed in different animals, such as horses, koalas, and the western barred bandicoot, as well as amphibians and reptiles (1, 3–5), causing ocular, urogenital, and respiratory tract infections (5, 6).

All Chlamydia spp. share a developmental cycle that alternates between two distinct bacterial forms, infectious elementary bodies (EBs) and the replicating reticulate bodies (RBs) (2).

Although plasmids have never been found in any human isolates of C. pneumoniae, most Chlamydia spp., including animal isolates of C. pneumoniae, carry plasmids sized approximately 7.5 kb. The plasmid contains eight putative coding DNA sequences (CDS1 to CDS8) (7). CDS1 and CDS2 possibly regulate plasmid replication (7), whereas CDS3, CDS4, and CDS8 play a pivotal role in plasmid maintenance (7). CDS2 also contains an antisense small RNA (sRNA-2), which is necessary for plasmid maintenance (7). Moreover, CDS5 acts as a virulence factor in C. trachomatis- or C. muridarum-infected mice (7). It has also been shown that some chromosomal genes, for example, the glycogen synthase gene glgA, are regulated by proteins encoded by CDS6 or CDS7 (7).

Tools for genetic manipulation, such as a plasmid shuttle vector system of C. trachomatis, have only recently become available (8–10). The utilization of C. trachomatis-derived plasmid shuttle vectors has allowed the introduction of plasmids into C. trachomatis (8, 11).

Although plasmid shuttle vector pGFP::SW2 derived from C. trachomatis serovar E can be transformed into other C. trachomatis serovars (8–10, 12, 13), transformation into other species such as C. muridarum has not been successful, indicating the presence of a species barrier for transformation and/or replication (14). Importantly, Wang et al. demonstrated that the barrier was encountered not at the plasmid acquisition stage but rather during plasmid replication or maintenance (15). In addition, they showed that CDS2 was required for plasmid maintenance, thus making it a significant determinant of plasmid tropism (15).

In our study, we describe for the first time a robust, reproducible transformation protocol for human as well as animal isolates of C. pneumoniae. It uses an animal C. pneumoniae-derived plasmid shuttle vector, and transformation results in stable transformants that can grow in the absence of selection. In addition, we demonstrate that the species barrier in chlamydial transformation between C. pneumoniae and C. felis (16–18) can be overcome.

RESULTS

Selection criteria and vector design for transformation of C. pneumoniae.The 7,368-bp plasmid pCpnE1 (7,368 bp; GenBank accession no. X82078.1) was isolated from plasmid-bearing C. pneumoniae N16 and cloned into vector pRSGFPCAT. We verified the transformation method in C. trachomatis using pGFP::SW2 (8). We therefore used a similar design strategy for the construction of a C. pneumoniae-derived plasmid shuttle vector.

NdeI-cleaved pCpnE1 was ligated into VspI-digested pRSGFPCAT, resulting in pRSGFPCAT-Cpn (Fig. 1A). We confirmed the expected fragment sizes by digestion of pRSGFPCAT-Cpn with NdeI (1,476-bp and 8,562-bp fragments) and SalI (10,038-bp fragment) (see Fig. S1A in the supplemental material) in addition to sequencing of pRSGFPCAT-Cpn (Fig. S1B).

FIG 1
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1

Map of the C. pneumoniae-derived shuttle vector pRSGFPCAT-Cpn and the RSGFP expression in C. pneumoniae LPCoLN. (A) The CDSs of pCpnE1 and pRSGFPCAT are shown in orange and light gray, respectively. The red-shifted green fluorescent protein gene (RSGFP) is shown in green. MCIP, meningococcal class I protein promoter; CAT, chloramphenicol acetyltransferase gene. (B) pRSGFPCAT-Cpn-transformed and untransformed C. pneumoniae LPCoLN. Transformed (+) C. pneumoniae was grown in HEp-2 cells with chloramphenicol, and untransformed (−) C. pneumoniae was grown without chloramphenicol for 48 h. GFP fluorescence of chlamydial inclusions was visualized in living cells without fixing and staining. Images are representative of three independent experiments. White arrows show chlamydial inclusions. Bars, 10 µm.

FIG S1

The digestion and the nucleotide sequence of pRSGFPCAT-Cpn. (A) Digestion of pRSGFPCAT-Cpn with NdeI and SalI. (B) The nucleotide sequence of pRSGFPCAT-Cpn. pCpnE1 is shown by gray. pRSGFPCAT is shown in white. Three additional (green) or three different (red) nucleotides compared to original sequence of pCpnE1 (GenBank accession no. X82078.1). Six nucleotides, AATTCG, are missing in this sequence compared to the sequence of GenBank entry X82078.1. The region of pRSGFPCAT is 100% identical compared to the previous report. The region of pCpnE1 is 99.998% identical compared to original sequence of pCpnE1 (GenBank accession no. X82078.1). The sequence presented here is correct for vector pRSGFPCAT-Cpn shown in this study. Download FIG S1, TIF file, 0.7 MB.
Copyright © 2018 Shima et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Since no viable culture of the parent strain of C. pneumoniae N16 was available to us, we investigated whether we could utilize a different animal-isolate plasmid-bearing C. pneumoniae strain for the transformation. In the plasmid sequence comparison, more than 94% of total CDSs were identical between pCpnE1 derived from C. pneumoniae N16 and pCpnKo derived from C. pneumoniae LPCoLN, indicating highly conserved plasmid sequences (Table S1). We considered that the high homology of plasmid sequences between these two C. pneumoniae plasmids gave the optimal chance of success, and thus, we selected C. pneumoniae LPCoLN as the recipient C. pneumoniae strain to perform our initial transformation.

TABLE S1

Sequence homology between C. pneumoniae N16 and other Chlamydia spp. Download Table S1, DOCX file, 0.02 MB.
Copyright © 2018 Shima et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

The wild-type untransformed C. pneumoniae LPCoLN inclusions have no naturally occurring fluorescence; in contrast, a strong red-shifted green fluorescent protein (RSGFP) signal was detected in C. pneumoniae LPCoLN (C. pneumoniae LPCoLN-pRSGFPCAT-Cpn) inclusions after transformation of this recipient with the recombinant shuttle vector and infection in HEp-2 cells (Fig. 1B).

The properties of pRSGFPCAT-Cpn-transformed C. pneumoniae LPCoLN.We investigated whether the transformation of C. pneumoniae LPCoLN using pRSGFPCAT-Cpn influenced chlamydial growth and morphological characteristics (Fig. 2). C. pneumoniae LPCoLN-pRSGFPCAT-Cpn showed similar growth characteristics in the absence or presence of chloramphenicol (CAM) as wild-type C. pneumoniae LPCoLN (Fig. 2A). In addition to growth characteristics, both immunofluorescence and transmission electron microscopic (TEM) analyses revealed similar inclusion morphologies between the wild type and C. pneumoniae LPCoLN-pRSGFPCAT-Cpn (Fig. 2B and C).

FIG 2
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 2

One-step growth curve and the inclusion morphology of pRSGFPCAT-Cpn-transformed and untransformed C. pneumoniae LPCoLN. (A) Recoverable C. pneumoniae at 5, 24, 48, and 72 hpi. pRSGFPCAT-Cpn-transformed and untransformed C. pneumoniae bacteria were grown in HEp-2 cells with or without chloramphenicol. The numbers of recoverable C. pneumoniae bacteria under each condition (II, III, and IV) at the indicated time were compared to those of untransformed C. pneumoniae without chloramphenicol (I) (n = 3, mean ± SEM; Sidak’s multiple comparison; *, P ≤ 0.05; ***, P ≤ 0.001). (B) Representative immunofluorescence images of pRSGFPCAT-Cpn-transformed and untransformed C. pneumoniae at 24, 48, and 72 hpi. Chlamydial inclusions were stained by FITC-labeled monoclonal chlamydial-LPS antibodies. Evans blue counterstaining of host cells was used for better characterization of intracellular inclusions. Images are representative of three independent experiments. Bars, 10 µm. (C) pRSGFPCAT-Cpn-transformed and untransformed C. pneumoniae bacteria with or without chloramphenicol treatment were analyzed with a TEM at 24, 48, and 72 hpi. Black bars, 2 µm; white bars, 10 µm.

The plasmid stability can be assessed by the ratio of RSGFP-expressing inclusions to antichlamydial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) antibody-stained inclusions. As shown, the ratio of live RSGFP-expressing inclusions to immunofluorescence staining of chlamydial inclusions showed no significant difference (Fig. 3A and B). This indicates that the pRSGFPCAT-Cpn plasmid could be stably retained over five passages of C. pneumoniae LPCoLN-pRSGFPCAT-Cpn even in the absence of CAM. Taken together, these data indicate that C. pneumoniae LPCoLN-pRSGFPCAT-Cpn is stable and the presence of the shuttle vector does not affect the growth and morphology of C. pneumoniae LPCoLN.

FIG 3
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 3

The pRSGFPCAT-Cpn plasmid can be stably retained in C. pneumoniae LPCoLN and expresses RSGFP. (A) pRSGFPCAT-Cpn-transformed C. pneumoniae was subcultured in HEp-2 cells with and without chloramphenicol every 3 to 4 days over 5 passages. The ratio of live RSGFP expressed in inclusions to immunofluorescence staining (IF) of chlamydial inclusions by mouse anti-chlamydial LPS antibody was calculated. No statistically significant difference by one-way analysis of variance was found (n = 3, mean ± SEM, Sidak’s multiple comparison). (B) Representative RSGFP and immunofluorescence images of pRSGFPCAT-Cpn-transformed C. pneumoniae LPCoLN 48 hpi at passage 5. After an RSGFP signal was detected by fluorescence microscopy, the cells were fixed by methanol and chlamydial inclusions were stained by FITC-labeled monoclonal chlamydial-LPS antibodies. Evans blue counterstaining of host cells was used for better characterization of intracellular inclusions. Bars, 20 µm.

RSGFP is expressed in human isolates of C. pneumoniae.We next investigated whether transformation was possible in a plasmid-free human isolate of C. pneumoniae. Since we found unique genotypes in cardiovascular isolates (CVs) (3) and characterization of CVs has been the focus of our recent research, C. pneumoniae CV-6 isolated from coronary arteries (19, 20) was selected in this study. We first compared the whole-genome sequence of C. pneumoniae CV-6 to the previously reported sequence of cardiovascular isolate C. pneumoniae CV-14. The genome sequence revealed that C. pneumoniae CV-6 is >99.99829% identical to previously sequenced cardiovascular C. pneumoniae CV-14. Only 8 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), 2 insertions and deletions (indels), and no inversions were found in C. pneumoniae CV-6 compared to C. pneumoniae CV-14, indicating high homology of genome sequences within different cardiovascular isolates (Table S2) (3).

TABLE S2

Whole-genome sequence comparison between C. pneumoniae CV-14 and C. pneumoniae CV-6. Download Table S2, DOCX file, 0.01 MB.
Copyright © 2018 Shima et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

At 48 and 72 h postinfection (hpi), a strong RSGFP signal was detected in inclusions of the successful transformant of C. pneumoniae CV-6 (C. pneumoniae CV-6-pRSGFPCAT-Cpn) (Fig. 4 and Table 1). When we further performed genome sequencing analysis of C. pneumoniae CV-6-pRSGFPCAT-Cpn, >99.99902% of the whole genome was identical between wild-type C. pneumoniae CV-6 and C. pneumoniae CV-6-pRSGFPCAT-Cpn. Moreover, only 9 SNPs, no indels, and no inversions were found in C. pneumoniae CV-6-pRSGFPCAT-Cpn compared to wild-type C. pneumoniae CV-6, excluding the possibility of contamination with other chlamydial isolates (Table S3). In addition, the sequence of pRSGFPCAT-Cpn of C. pneumoniae CV-6-pRSGFPCAT-Cpn was 100% identical, indicating no insertions and deletions (indels) and no inversions compared to the original shuttle vector pRSGFPCAT-Cpn.

FIG 4
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 4

RSGFP expression in pRSGFPCAT-Cpn-transformed human cardiovascular isolate C. pneumoniae CV-6. pRSGFPCAT-Cpn-transformed (+) C. pneumoniae CV-6 was grown in HEp-2 cells with chloramphenicol, and untransformed (−) C. pneumoniae was grown without chloramphenicol for 24, 48, and 72 h. GFP fluorescence of chlamydial inclusions was visualized in living cells without fixing and staining. Images are representative of three independent experiments. Bars, 10 µm.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

RSGFP expression in different chlamydial species

TABLE S3

Whole-genome sequence comparison between wild-type C. pneumoniae CV-6 and C. pneumoniae CV-6-pRSGFPCAT-Cpn. Download Table S3, DOCX file, 0.01 MB.
Copyright © 2018 Shima et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Furthermore, C. pneumoniae CV-6-pRSGFPCAT-Cpn showed similar growth characteristics and chlamydial morphology in the absence or presence of CAM as wild-type C. pneumoniae CV-6 (Fig. 5A to C). Stable plasmid retention with and without CAM treatment was also observed in C. pneumoniae CV-6-pRSGFPCAT-Cpn (Fig. 6).

FIG 5
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 5

One-step growth curve and the inclusion morphology of pRSGFPCAT-Cpn-transformed and untransformed C. pneumoniae CV-6. (A) Recoverable C. pneumoniae at 5, 24, 48, and 72 hpi. pRSGFPCAT-Cpn-transformed and untransformed C. pneumoniae bacteria were grown in HEp-2 cells with or without chloramphenicol. The numbers of recoverable C. pneumoniae bacteria under each condition (II, III, and IV) at the indicated time were compared to those of untransformed C. pneumoniae without chloramphenicol (I) (n = 4, mean ± SEM; Sidak’s multiple comparison, ***, P ≤ 0.001). (B) Representative immunofluorescence images of pRSGFPCAT-Cpn-transformed and untransformed C. pneumoniae at 24, 48, and 72 hpi. Chlamydial inclusions were stained by FITC-labeled monoclonal chlamydial-LPS antibodies. Evans blue counterstaining of host cells was used for better characterization of intracellular inclusions. Images are representative of four independent experiments. Bars, 10 µm. (C) pRSGFPCAT-Cpn-transformed and untransformed C. pneumoniae bacteria with or without chloramphenicol treatment were analyzed with a TEM at 24, 48, and 72 hpi. Black bars, 2 µm; white bars, 5 µm.

FIG 6
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 6

The pRSGFPCAT-Cpn plasmid can be stably retained in C. pneumoniae CV-6 and expresses RSGFP. pRSGFPCAT-Cpn-transformed C. pneumoniae was subcultured in HEp-2 cells with and without chloramphenicol every 2 to 3 days. Representative RSGFP and immunofluorescence staining (IF) images of pRSGFPCAT-Cpn-transformed C. pneumoniae CV-6 were taken 72 hpi at passage 5. After an RSGFP signal was detected by fluorescence microscopy, the cells were fixed by methanol and chlamydial inclusions were stained by FITC-labeled monoclonal chlamydial-LPS antibodies. Evans blue counterstaining of host cells was used for better characterization of intracellular inclusions. Bars, 20 µm.

These results were repeated in three independent experiments and demonstrate the successful transformation of pRSGFPCAT-Cpn into a human cardiovascular isolate of C. pneumoniae.

The reproducibility of the protocol was confirmed by the successful transformation of the human C. pneumoniae IOL-207 isolate that is associated with community-acquired pneumonia using the same method with pRSGFPCAT-Cpn in the Southampton lab (Fig. S2).

FIG S2

The RSGFP expression in pRSGFPCAT-Cpn-transformed human isolate C. pneumoniae IOL-207. pRSGFPCAT-Cpn-transformed C. pneumoniae IOL-207 was grown in McCoy cells with chloramphenicol for 72 h. GFP fluorescence of chlamydial inclusions was visualized in living cells without fixing and staining. Bars, 10 µm. Download FIG S2, TIF file, 1.3 MB.
Copyright © 2018 Shima et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

The C. pneumoniae-derived plasmid shuttle vector pRSGFPCAT-Cpn is able to cross the species barrier.Species barriers for the plasmid-mediated transformation between different Chlamydia species have been reported (14, 15). Understanding the nature of this phenomenon is important for improving the repertoire of tools needed for the genetic modification of chlamydiae, particularly for horizontal gene transfer between different chlamydial species. Therefore, we investigated the limits of potential species barriers with our shuttle vector.

Since a functional species-matched CDS2 is essential (supplied by the recipient host) in forcing a C. trachomatis plasmid to replicate in C. muridarum (15), we selected different plasmid-bearing Chlamydia spp. such as C. muridarum, C. caviae, and C. felis for the transformation experiments. Furthermore, we also expanded the investigation to plasmid-free Chlamydia spp. such as C. trachomatis L2 (25667R), C. pecorum, and C. abortus, but we had to exclude C. psittaci due to biosafety considerations.

In accordance with previous observations, we did not obtain RSGFP-fluorescent inclusions in plasmid-bearing Chlamydia spp. such as C. muridarum and C. caviae, as well as plasmid-free Chlamydia spp. including C. trachomatis, C. pecorum, and C. abortus. In contrast, a strong RSGFP signal was observed in plasmid-bearing C. felis strain N.I. (for “not identified”) (Fig. 7A and Fig. S3), which is 99.98533% identical in the whole genome and 100% identical in plasmid sequence to C. felis Fe/C-56 (Table S4). To investigate whether this was a serendipitous finding for a single strain or whether it was a new novel tropism for the transformative C. pneumoniae plasmid, we tested another plasmid-bearing C. felis isolate, C. felis Cello (Fig. 7B and Fig. S3). In addition to the successful transformation of plasmid-bearing C. felis N.I. and Cello, the naturally occurring plasmid-free C. felis strain 02DC26 could also be transformed using pRSGFPCAT-Cpn (Fig. 7C and Fig. S3). These results indicate that there is no barrier to selecting recombinants within the distinct and separate species C. felis. To investigate whether this was a plasmid-related or host-related phenomenon, we checked if our C. felis strains could be transformed by C. trachomatis plasmid backbone pGFP::SW2. None of these C. felis isolates (C. felis N.I., C. felis Cello, and C. felis strain 02DC26) could be transformed by the C. trachomatis shuttle vector pGFP::SW2 (unpublished observation).

FIG 7
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 7

The RSGFP expression in different C. felis strains. pRSGFPCAT-Cpn-transformed and untransformed C. felis strains, C. felis N.I. (A), C. felis Cello (B), and C. felis 02DC26 (Cf02-23) (C). Transformed (+) C. felis strains were grown in HEp-2 cells with chloramphenicol, and untransformed (−) C. felis strains were grown without chloramphenicol for 48 h. GFP fluorescence of chlamydial inclusions was visualized in living cells without fixing and staining. Images are representative of three independent experiments. Arrows show chlamydial inclusions. Bars, 10 µm.

FIG S3

PCR analysis revealing the plasmid-bearing C. felis strains. Two different primer sets, pCFelis-F and pCFelis-R for lanes 2 to 6 and pCF01-F and pCF01-R for lanes 7 to 11, were used to confirm whether each strain is plasmid positive or negative. Lanes: 1, 100-bp DNA ladder; 2 and 7, C. felis N.I.; 3 and 8, C. felis 02DC26; 4 and 9, C. felis Cello; 5 and 10, pRSGFPCAT-Cpn shuttle vector; 6 and 11, negative control (water). Download FIG S3, TIF file, 0.1 MB.
Copyright © 2018 Shima et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

TABLE S4

Whole-genome sequence comparison between C. felis Fe/C-56 and C. felis N.I. Download Table S4, DOCX file, 0.01 MB.
Copyright © 2018 Shima et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Wang et al. demonstrated that CDS2 with short adjoining sequences in the chlamydial plasmid is a major determinant of plasmid tropism (15). Therefore, we investigated whether a recombination between the wild-type C. felis plasmid and the pCpnE1 region of pRSGFPCAT-Cpn took place in the pRSGFPCAT-Cpn-transformed C. felis Cello. The sequence analysis revealed 100% identity between pRSGFPCAT-Cpn isolated from C. felis Cello and one from C. pneumoniae, indicating no recombination between pRSGFPCAT-Cpn and a wild-type plasmid from C. felis Cello (Fig. S1B and S4). These data indicate that plasmid species barriers can be exceptionally crossed in C. felis species without a recombination between plasmids of different species.

FIG S4

Map of pRSGFPCAT-Cpn that was isolated from RSGFP expressed in C. felis Cello. The CDSs of pCpnE1 are shown in red. The red-shifted green fluorescent protein gene (RSGFP) is shown in green. MCIP, meningococcal class I protein promoter; CAT, chloramphenicol acetyltransferase gene. The pRSGFPCAT region is 100% identical and the pCpnE1 region is 99.6% identical to original sequences. CDSs 1 to 4, 7, and 8 are 100% identical to those of pCpnE1. Only 2 bp in CDS5 and 1 bp in CDS6 are mismatches of those of pCpnE1 (GenBank accession no. X82078.1). Download FIG S4, TIF file, 0.9 MB.
Copyright © 2018 Shima et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

DISCUSSION

The C. trachomatis-derived plasmid was modified and developed as a plasmid shuttle vector for use as a transformation tool in recent years (8). This plasmid shuttle vector system has been broadly used in studies of C. trachomatis and C. muridarum (21). However, it was not known whether this system could be utilized in C. pneumoniae or in other chlamydial species.

In this study, we demonstrated that the C. pneumoniae plasmid shuttle vector pRSGFPCAT-Cpn was stably retained not only in an animal isolate of C. pneumoniae but also in different human isolates of C. pneumoniae. In a previous study, we found that cardiovascular isolates of C. pneumoniae were genetically closely related and could be distinguished from the respiratory tract isolates on the basis of unique nonsynonymous SNPs (nsSNPs) (3). Importantly, these nsSNPs are located in genes involved in chlamydial RB-to-EB transition, inclusion membrane formation, bacterial stress response, and metabolism (3). Therefore, the ultimate aim of transformation in cardiovascular isolates of C. pneumoniae is to decipher the functions of such genes that might be linked to tissue tropism.

Human and animal C. pneumoniae isolates can be distinguished by the presence or absence of plasmids, respectively (22–25). While plasmids have never been found in any human isolates of C. pneumoniae studied, animal isolates of C. pneumoniae harbor plasmids that are similar to the plasmids from other Chlamydia spp. in nucleotide sequence, size, and gene organization (4, 22–24). In addition, whole-genome analysis revealed 6,213 SNPs (3,298 synonymous and 2,915 nonsynonymous) between animal isolate C. pneumoniae and human isolate C. pneumoniae (4). Importantly, human isolates of C. pneumoniae have evolved from animal isolates that have adapted to humans through fragmentation and decay of functional genes (22, 26). Since plasmids are also not essential for infection and survival, they might have been lost in human isolates during evolutional processes (22). Considering evolutionary linkage between animal isolates and human isolates of C. pneumoniae, we suggest that the equine C. pneumoniae-derived plasmid shuttle vector pRSGFPCAT-Cpn can replicate in plasmid-free human isolates of C. pneumoniae.

A range of antimicrobials have been used for the selection of transformed Chlamydia spp. (8, 10, 13). β-Lactam antimicrobial treatment is commonly and successfully used for selection of tranformants of C. trachomatis. However, while this is permissible for urogenital isolates, there are no guidelines from the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) for respiratory chlamydiae (21). Therefore, chloramphenicol was chosen to select pRSGFPCAT-Cpn-transformed Chlamydia spp.

There is one report that a C. trachomatis-derived plasmid shuttle vector was introduced into different chlamydial species (27). However, Song et al. demonstrated that Chlamydia spp. could be transformed when the plasmid shuttle vector was constructed with the same backbone as the plasmid harbored in the identical species (14). Furthermore, Wang et al. showed that recombination of the CDS2 region was required for stable replication in a new host species and that this sequence is a determinant of plasmid tropism (15). Along with other research groups (14, 15), we were unable to transform the C. trachomatis plasmid to other chlamydial species including C. pneumoniae under various conditions. Therefore, it was crucial for us to construct a C. pneumoniae-derived plasmid shuttle vector for transformation of C. pneumoniae.

Similar plasmid tropism was also observed using the plasmid shuttle vector pRSGFPCAT-Cpn. We did not observe an RSGFP signal in the Chlamydia species C. trachomatis, C. muridarum, C. caviae, C. abortus, and C. pecorum when transformations were attempted using the C. pneumoniae pCpnE1 backbone plasmid shuttle vector pRSGFPCAT-Cpn. In contrast, three different C. felis strains were stably transformed by pRSGFPCAT-Cpn. The sequencing showed no changes in the transforming shuttle vector, confirming that it had not recombined with the endogenous plasmid. Thus, we show that plasmid recombination is not necessary to cross the species barrier in C. felis.

Although most C. felis strains, including strains Cello and Pring, harbor plasmids, a few, including the Baker strain, lack a plasmid (16, 18). Since we could observe strong RSGFP signals from plasmid-harboring or plasmid-free C. felis strains, we conclude that the presence or absence of a wild-type plasmid does not influence transformation of C. felis. C. felis strains could be transformed only by C. pneumoniae backbone plasmid shuttle vector pRSGFPCAT-Cpn but not by the C. trachomatis backbone plasmid shuttle vector pGFP::SW2, although both posssess approximately 60% homologies compared with the plasmid sequence of C. felis N.I. (see Table S5 in the supplemental material). This indicates that an as-yet-unknown biological property of the C. pneumoniae plasmid is shared with the C. felis plasmid.

TABLE S5

Sequence homology among C. felis N.I., C. trachomatis, and C. pneumoniae. Download Table S5, DOCX file, 0.01 MB.
Copyright © 2018 Shima et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Horizontal gene transfer plays a crucial role in bacterial genome evolution and adaptation to environmental stresses (28). In forced coinfections of cells in culture, Suchland et al. showed fusion of inclusions between different chlamydial species such as C. suis and C. muridarum, indicating the possibility of direct contact between chlamydial species in host cells (29). Furthermore, gene recombination, such as insertion of antibiotic-resistant genes into the chlamydial genome, has been observed not only from strain to strain within species but also between Chlamydia species in vitro (29, 30). Our data indicate that horizontal gene transfer via plasmids is possible between some chlamydial species, in contrast to previous suggestions (31). C. felis is a chlamydial species that causes pneumonia and conjunctivitis in cats (16–18). If one considers the high proportion of households owning cats worldwide (approximately one-third of all households) (32, 33), horizontal gene transfer between C. pneumoniae and C. felis may even be relevant for public health.

Taken together, our findings indicate that the C. pneumoniae pCpnE1 backbone plasmid shuttle vector pRSGFPCAT-Cpn is a useful C. pneumoniae transformation tool. Critically, the methods are reproducible, having been repeated in two independent laboratories. Since various chlamydial mutagenesis methods have been developed recently (21), their combination with the C. pneumoniae shuttle vector system will enable more precise elucidation of pathogenic factors and mechanisms underlying C. pneumoniae infection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains, epithelial cells, and chemicals.Chlamydial strains which were used for transformation are listed in Table 1. The cardiovascular C. pneumoniae strain CV-6 was provided by Matthias Maass in 1998 (University of Luebeck, Luebeck, Germany) (19, 20). C. pneumoniae IOL-207 was donated by John Treharne in 1990 (Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom) (34–38). C. pneumoniae strains CV-6 and IOL-207 came from anonymized patients, for whom records no longer exist as the strains were isolated before 1998 and 1972, respectively (38). Concerning the ethics regulations at the University of Luebeck, this approach was feasible at that time without informed consent and was recently updated by an opt-out regulation that allows basic research with clinical isolates including minimal parametric data from the patient as long as not otherwise indicated by the patient on admission. The usage of clinical isolates that have been collected before the opt-out regulation has been approved by the local ethics committee when the reference of the initial publication is given and no further clinical data from the patient are given. Furthermore, with respect to the isolates CV-6 and IOL-207, these are anonymized, and therefore no data entry exists that allows access to the original patient information. C. trachomatis strain L2 (25667R) was kindly provided from the already existing bacterial collection of Luis de la Maza (University of California, Irvine, CA, USA) (39).

The following animal strains were provided by the National and OIE Reference Laboratory for Chlamydioses at FLI Jena: C. felis 02DC26 (Cf02-23), C. muridarum MoPn/Nigg (DSM-28544), C. abortus C18/98 (B577, DSM-27654), C. caviae 03DC25 (GPIC, DSM-19441), and C. pecorum 14DC102 (E58, DSM-29919). C. pneumoniae LPCoLN came from the bacterial collection of Peter Timms (University of Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore, Australia) (4). C. felis strains came from the bacterial collection of Ian N. Clarke (University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom). To confirm the species identity and rule out mixed cultures, genomic DNA of all strains was examined using a DNA microarray as described previously (40). Escherichia coli DH5α and Dam and Dcm methylase-deficient strain JM110 (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) were used to construct and manipulate plasmids. HEp-2 cells (ATCC CCL-23) or McCoy cells (European Collection of Authenticated Cell Cultures 90010305) were used for the growth of chlamydiae. All chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Deisenhofen, Germany).

Construction of C. pneumoniae-derived plasmid shuttle vector.The plasmid vector pRSGFPCAT was constructed as described previously (8). In brief, 2,670-bp pRSGFPCAT contains the pUC origin and the RSGFP-chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) gene fusion which were regulated by the meningococcal class I protein promoter (MCIP) derived from Neisseria meningitidis MC50 (8). C. pneumoniae N16 plasmid pCpnE1 (7,368 bp; GenBank accession no. X82078.1) was cleaved by NdeI and ligated into VspI-digested pRSGFPCAT, resulting in pRSGFPCAT-Cpn.

Cell culture.HEp-2 cells in 1 ml or 4 ml Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Invitrogen), 1 mM sodium pyruvate (Pan-Biotech GmbH, Aidenbach, Germany), and 30 mM HEPES were seeded into 24- or 6-well plates (Greiner Bio-One, Frickenhausen, Germany) and cultured overnight at 37°C under 5% CO2. Cells treated with 1 µg/ml cycloheximide were infected with chlamydiae by centrifugation at 700 × g for 1 h at 35°C.

Genetic transformation.Transformation was performed as described in the previous study with minor modifications (8). pRSGFPCAT-Cpn was isolated from Dam and Dcm methylase-deficient strain JM110 with the Qiagen plasmid megakit (Hilden, Germany). Following optimization, subinhibitory concentrations of CAM (0.2 to 0.5 µg/ml) were used for the selection of transformed chlamydiae.

A 1 × 107-inclusion-forming-unit (IFU) quantity of chlamydiae and 6 to 15 µg of pRSGFPCAT-Cpn were incubated in 200 µl calcium chloride buffer (10 mM Tris, 50 mM calcium chloride, pH 7.4) for 30 min at room temperature. Then, 200 µl of chlamydiae mixed with pRSGFPCAT-Cpn was incubated with 200 µl of trypsinized HEp-2 cells (4 × 106) in calcium chloride buffer for 20 min with mild agitation.

The total volume, 100 µl, of the mixture of HEp-2 cells, pRSGFPCAT-Cpn, and chlamydiae was added to each well containing 2 ml DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 30 mM HEPES, and 1 µg/ml cycloheximide in a 6-well plate and incubated for 72 h at 37°C under 5% CO2. To increase the infection rate for the initial culture, the monolayer of 1.4 × 106 HEp-2 cells per well in a 6-well plate was also used, and infected cells were cultured at 37°C under a 5% CO2 and 20 or 2% O2 atmosphere. Infected HEp-2 cells were scraped and lysed with glass beads.

Freshly prepared HEp-2 cells were infected with transformed or untransformed chlamydiae in 6-well plates containing 5 ml DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 30 mM HEPES, 1 µg/ml cycloheximide, and 0.2 to 0.5 µg/ml CAM. Medium was changed every 72 h, and passages were performed every 3 to 7 days. If an RSGFP signal was not observed in chlamydial inclusions within 40 days or by passage 5, we designated those strains “not transformed.”

Recovery assay.Cells were infected with either untransformed or pRSGFPCAT-Cpn-transformed C. pneumoniae strains at 0.5 IFU/cell. Cycloheximide (1 µg/ml) and CAM with concentrations of 0.8 µg/ml (C. pneumoniae LPCoLN) and 1.1 µg/ml (C. pneumoniae CV-6) were used in chlamydial infection. The plate was further centrifuged at 700 × g for 1 h at 35°C and incubated for 5, 24, 48, and 72 h. After the indicated time points, the cells were subsequently cultured for 48 h for determination of the recoverable C. pneumoniae.

Plasmid stability.HEp-2 cells were initially infected with pRSGFPCAT-Cpn-transformed C. pneumoniae LPCoLN or CV-6 at 0.5 IFU/cell in the presence or absence of CAM (0.8 µg/ml for C. pneumoniae LPCoLN and 1.1 µg/ml for C. pneumoniae CV-6) under standard conditions. The infected cells were subcultured every 2 to 4 days for 5 times. From the second subculture, HEp-2 cells were infected with serial dilutions of C. pneumoniae at 0.5 to 0.8 IFU/cell. After the RSGFP signal was detected by fluorescence microscopy, cells were fixed by methanol. Afterward, chlamydial inclusions were stained by fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labeled monoclonal chlamydial-LPS antibodies. In the counting of RSGFP-expressing C. pneumoniae inclusions and immunofluorescence-staining inclusions, 24 independent images were used. The counted IFU were used for calculating the ratio of the RSGFP-expressing C. pneumoniae inclusions and immunofluorescence-staining inclusions.

Fluorescence microscopy.A Keyence BZ-9000 fluorescence microscope (Keyence, Osaka, Japan) was used to detect a fluorescence signal of RSGFP-expressing chlamydiae in HEp-2 cells. In addition, untransformed or pRSGFPCAT-Cpn-transformed C. pneumoniae LPCoLN- or CV-6-infected cells were analyzed by immunofluorescence staining with mouse anti-chlamydial LPS antibody (green), which stained chlamydial inclusions. Evans blue was used for counterstaining of host cells (red).

Transmission electron microscopy.Untransformed or pRSGFPCAT-Cpn-transformed C. pneumoniae-infected cells were fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde and 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer for 1 h. Postfixation was performed with 1% OsO4 in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer for 2 h. Samples were dehydrated with graded ethanol series and embedded in araldite (Fluka, Buchs, Switzerland). Ultrathin sections were stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate and were examined with a JEOL 1011 transmission electron microscope (TEM) (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan).

Whole-genome and plasmid sequence.Chlamydia spp. were cultivated on HEp-2 cells and purified by centrifugation. Genome DNA of Chlamydia spp. was extracted using the Nucleo Spin tissue kit (Macherey-Nagel, Dueren, Germany) and proteinase K digestion. From extracted genomic DNA, we prepared sequencing libraries using either the Illumina Nextera XT kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions or the Illumina Nextera kit according to a recently published protocol (41). Libraries were sequenced on the Illumina NextSeq 500 instrument in a 2- by 151-bp paired-end run (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA).

For all the libraries, sequence contamination was removed with Deconseq v.0.4.3 (42) and the human reference genome GRCh38.p12. Quality control checks on raw sequence data were done with FastQC v.0.11.5 (43), and then data were trimmed and filtered with Trimmomatic (44) applying minimum quality 28 (parameters, SLIDINGWINDOW:3:28 MINLEN:50).

For the read-based analysis, sequence reads were mapped with bwa v.0.7.16a (45) to their reference genomes; more specifically, C. felis N.I. was mapped to its reference C. felis Fe/C-56 DNA (GenBank accession number AP006861) and library C. pneumoniae CV-6 was mapped to its reference C. pneumoniae CV-14 (GenBank accession number LN846996.1). In addition, the sequence reads were mapped to the sequence of the shuttle vector pRSGFPCAT-Cpn in order to ensure their presence or absence and the possible variants.

The alignments were coverted to bam format, sorted, and indexed with SAMtools (46). Afterward, duplicates were removed with Picard tools v.2.14.0 (https://broadinstitute.github.io/picard/). The result output was submitted for variant calling with freebayes v.1.1.0-54 (47). The vcf files were filtered by removing any sites with an estimated probability of not being polymorphic of less than phred 20. Mapping statistics of the bam files were obtained with bbmap v.37.61 (https://sourceforge.net/projects/bbmap/). The variant calling files were summarized and inspected with bcftools v.16 (46).

In order to compare the library C. pneumoniae CV-6-pRSGFPCAT-Cpn to library C. pneumoniae CV-6, a de novo assembly of the library C. pneumoniae CV-6 was performed with SPADES v.3.11.1 (48) with the careful parameter and a contig minimum of 500. The resulting contigs were filtered by length, discarding those shorter than 500 bp. The resulting set of contigs was evaluated with Quast v.4.6.3 (49) and used as the reference for the library C. pneumoniae CV-6-pRSGFPCAT-Cpn, repeating the read-based analysis.

Reads that were not mapping to their references were extracted with SAMtools and aligned to the nt NCBI database using blastn v.2.6.0 (50). The resulting output was then classified taxonomically with MEGAN v.6.11.1 (51) with a specified weighted last common ancestor (LCA) algorithm, a minimum score of 50, and a Max Expected of 0.1 as parameters and the nucleotide accession to NCBI taxonomy (nucl_acc2tax-Mar2018) as mapping file. Inspection of these classified unmapped reads revealed no chlamydial DNA sequence.

Plasmid.Plasmid maps were made by SnapGene. Using CLUSTALW in GenomeNet (http://www.genome.jp/), sequence data were compared to reference sequences (pCpnE1 and pRSGFPCAT).

PCR.PCR was performed to check whether Chlamydia spp. harbored the plasmid. Isolated Chlamydia spp. were boiled in TE buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 1 mM EDTA) for 10 min, and 5 µl was used as a PCR template. The total 50-µl reaction mixture includes 20 mM deoxynucleoside triphosphate (dNTP) mix, 50 mM MgCl2, 20 µM primers, and 2.5 U Taq polymerase (Invitrogen, Karlsruhe, Germany). PCR primers and conditions are listed in Table S6 in the supplemental material (18, 52–55). The amplified products were electrophoresed on a 3% agarose gel.

TABLE S6

Primers and PCR conditions used in this study. Download Table S6, DOCX file, 0.02 MB.
Copyright © 2018 Shima et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Statistics.Data are indicated as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Statistical analysis was performed with GraphPad Prism 7 statistical software. Sidak’s multiple comparison was used in the case that one-way analysis of variance showed statistically significant values (P values of ≤0.05). In Sidak’s multiple comparison, P values of ≤0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Accession number(s).All raw sequence data sets were deposited at the National Center for Biotechnology (NCBI) Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under Bioproject PRJNA473125 with SRA accession number SRP148963. Other accession numbers were SRR7217469 (C. felis N.I.), SRR7217470 (C. pneumoniae CV-6), and SRR7217471 (C. pneumoniae CV-6-pRSGFPCAT-Cpn).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We gratefully thank Siegrid Paetzmann (Department of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, University of Luebeck) and Christo Orün and Kerstin Fibelkorn (Institute of Anatomy) for technical assistance.

This work was supported by the German Center for Infection Research (DZIF) (TI07.003/80115MDMAW), the University of Luebeck (E10-2013), and the University of Southampton (Faculty of Medicine).

FOOTNOTES

    • Received July 31, 2018.
    • Accepted September 11, 2018.
  • Copyright © 2018 Shima et al.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Bush RM,
    2. Everett KD
    . 2001. Molecular evolution of the Chlamydiaceae. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 51:203–220. doi:10.1099/00207713-51-1-203.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    1. Campbell LA,
    2. Kuo CC
    . 2004. Chlamydia pneumoniae—an infectious risk factor for atherosclerosis? Nat Rev Microbiol 2:23–32. doi:10.1038/nrmicro796.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    1. Weinmaier T,
    2. Hoser J,
    3. Eck S,
    4. Kaufhold I,
    5. Shima K,
    6. Strom TM,
    7. Rattei T,
    8. Rupp J
    . 2015. Genomic factors related to tissue tropism in Chlamydia pneumoniae infection. BMC Genomics 16:268. doi:10.1186/s12864-015-1377-8.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. 4.↵
    1. Myers GS,
    2. Mathews SA,
    3. Eppinger M,
    4. Mitchell C,
    5. O’Brien KK,
    6. White OR,
    7. Benahmed F,
    8. Brunham RC,
    9. Read TD,
    10. Ravel J,
    11. Bavoil PM,
    12. Timms P
    . 2009. Evidence that human Chlamydia pneumoniae was zoonotically acquired. J Bacteriol 191:7225–7233. doi:10.1128/JB.00746-09.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Kutlin A,
    2. Roblin PM,
    3. Kumar S,
    4. Kohlhoff S,
    5. Bodetti T,
    6. Timms P,
    7. Hammerschlag MR
    . 2007. Molecular characterization of Chlamydophila pneumoniae isolates from Western barred bandicoots. J Med Microbiol 56:407–417. doi:10.1099/jmm.0.46850-0.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Wills JM,
    2. Watson G,
    3. Lusher M,
    4. Mair TS,
    5. Wood D,
    6. Richmond SJ
    . 1990. Characterisation of Chlamydia psittaci isolated from a horse. Vet Microbiol 24:11–19. doi:10.1016/0378-1135(90)90046-X.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Zhong G
    . 2017. Chlamydial plasmid-dependent pathogenicity. Trends Microbiol 25:141–152. doi:10.1016/j.tim.2016.09.006.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. 8.↵
    1. Wang Y,
    2. Kahane S,
    3. Cutcliffe LT,
    4. Skilton RJ,
    5. Lambden PR,
    6. Clarke IN
    . 2011. Development of a transformation system for Chlamydia trachomatis: restoration of glycogen biosynthesis by acquisition of a plasmid shuttle vector. PLoS Pathog 7:e1002258. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1002258.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Agaisse H,
    2. Derre I
    . 2013. A C. trachomatis cloning vector and the generation of C. trachomatis strains expressing fluorescent proteins under the control of a C. trachomatis promoter. PLoS One 8:e57090. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0057090.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Ding H,
    2. Gong S,
    3. Tian Y,
    4. Yang Z,
    5. Brunham R,
    6. Zhong G
    . 2013. Transformation of sexually transmitted infection-causing serovars of Chlamydia trachomatis using blasticidin for selection. PLoS One 8:e80534. doi:10.1371/annotation/6b155146-de73-4733-83b0-62224d84717e.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Wang Y,
    2. Kahane S,
    3. Cutcliffe LT,
    4. Skilton RJ,
    5. Lambden PR,
    6. Persson K,
    7. Bjartling C,
    8. Clarke IN
    . 2013. Genetic transformation of a clinical (genital tract), plasmid-free isolate of Chlamydia trachomatis: engineering the plasmid as a cloning vector. PLoS One 8:e59195. doi:10.1371/annotation/5fa9cfb4-9964-4586-845d-d8205f318d68.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Wang Y,
    2. Cutcliffe LT,
    3. Skilton RJ,
    4. Persson K,
    5. Bjartling C,
    6. Clarke IN
    . 2013. Transformation of a plasmid-free, genital tract isolate of Chlamydia trachomatis with a plasmid vector carrying a deletion in CDS6 revealed that this gene regulates inclusion phenotype. Pathog Dis 67:100–103. doi:10.1111/2049-632X.12024.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Xu S,
    2. Battaglia L,
    3. Bao X,
    4. Fan H
    . 2013. Chloramphenicol acetyltransferase as a selection marker for chlamydial transformation. BMC Res Notes 6:377. doi:10.1186/1756-0500-6-377.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Song L,
    2. Carlson JH,
    3. Zhou B,
    4. Virtaneva K,
    5. Whitmire WM,
    6. Sturdevant GL,
    7. Porcella SF,
    8. McClarty G,
    9. Caldwell HD
    . 2014. Plasmid-mediated transformation tropism of chlamydial biovars. Pathog Dis 70:189–193. doi:10.1111/2049-632X.12104.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Wang Y,
    2. Cutcliffe LT,
    3. Skilton RJ,
    4. Ramsey KH,
    5. Thomson NR,
    6. Clarke IN
    . 2014. The genetic basis of plasmid tropism between Chlamydia trachomatis and Chlamydia muridarum. Pathog Dis 72:19–23. doi:10.1111/2049-632X.12175.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Lusher M,
    2. Storey CC,
    3. Richmond SJ
    . 1989. Plasmid diversity within the genus Chlamydia. J Gen Microbiol 135:1145–1151. doi:10.1099/00221287-135-5-1145.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Azuma Y,
    2. Hirakawa H,
    3. Yamashita A,
    4. Cai Y,
    5. Rahman MA,
    6. Suzuki H,
    7. Mitaku S,
    8. Toh H,
    9. Goto S,
    10. Murakami T,
    11. Sugi K,
    12. Hayashi H,
    13. Fukushi H,
    14. Hattori M,
    15. Kuhara S,
    16. Shirai M
    . 2006. Genome sequence of the cat pathogen, Chlamydophila felis. DNA Res 13:15–23. doi:10.1093/dnares/dsi027.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. 18.↵
    1. Di Francesco A,
    2. Donati M,
    3. Salvatore D,
    4. Cevenini R,
    5. Di Paolo M,
    6. Baldelli R
    . 2010. Chlamydophila felis: plasmid detection in Italian isolates. New Microbiol 33:163–166.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Maass M,
    2. Bartels C,
    3. Engel PM,
    4. Mamat U,
    5. Sievers HH
    . 1998. Endovascular presence of viable Chlamydia pneumoniae is a common phenomenon in coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 31:827–832. doi:10.1016/S0735-1097(98)00016-3.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Gieffers J,
    2. Solbach W,
    3. Maass M
    . 1998. In vitro susceptibilities of Chlamydia pneumoniae strains recovered from atherosclerotic coronary arteries. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 42:2762–2764.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Sixt BS,
    2. Valdivia RH
    . 2016. Molecular genetic analysis of Chlamydia species. Annu Rev Microbiol 70:179–198. doi:10.1146/annurev-micro-102215-095539.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  22. 22.↵
    1. Mitchell CM,
    2. Hovis KM,
    3. Bavoil PM,
    4. Myers GS,
    5. Carrasco JA,
    6. Timms P
    . 2010. Comparison of koala LPCoLN and human strains of Chlamydia pneumoniae highlights extended genetic diversity in the species. BMC Genomics 11:442. doi:10.1186/1471-2164-11-442.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Roulis E,
    2. Bachmann N,
    3. Polkinghorne A,
    4. Hammerschlag M,
    5. Kohlhoff S,
    6. Timms P
    . 2014. Draft genome and plasmid sequences of Chlamydia pneumoniae strain B21 from an Australian endangered marsupial, the western barred bandicoot. Genome Announc 2:e01223-13. doi:10.1128/genomeA.01223-13.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    1. Thomas NS,
    2. Lusher M,
    3. Storey CC,
    4. Clarke IN
    . 1997. Plasmid diversity in Chlamydia. Microbiology 143:1847–1854. doi:10.1099/00221287-143-6-1847.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  25. 25.↵
    1. Storey C,
    2. Lusher M,
    3. Yates P,
    4. Richmond S
    . 1993. Evidence for Chlamydia pneumoniae of non-human origin. J Gen Microbiol 139:2621–2626. doi:10.1099/00221287-139-11-2621.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Rattei T,
    2. Ott S,
    3. Gutacker M,
    4. Rupp J,
    5. Maass M,
    6. Schreiber S,
    7. Solbach W,
    8. Wirth T,
    9. Gieffers J
    . 2007. Genetic diversity of the obligate intracellular bacterium Chlamydophila pneumoniae by genome-wide analysis of single nucleotide polymorphisms: evidence for highly clonal population structure. BMC Genomics 8:355. doi:10.1186/1471-2164-8-355.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Gerard HC,
    2. Mishra MK,
    3. Mao G,
    4. Wang S,
    5. Hali M,
    6. Whittum-Hudson JA,
    7. Kannan RM,
    8. Hudson AP
    . 2013. Dendrimer-enabled DNA delivery and transformation of Chlamydia pneumoniae. Nanomedicine 9:996–1008. doi:10.1016/j.nano.2013.04.004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  28. 28.↵
    1. Ochman H,
    2. Lawrence JG,
    3. Groisman EA
    . 2000. Lateral gene transfer and the nature of bacterial innovation. Nature 405:299–304. doi:10.1038/35012500.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  29. 29.↵
    1. Suchland RJ,
    2. Sandoz KM,
    3. Jeffrey BM,
    4. Stamm WE,
    5. Rockey DD
    . 2009. Horizontal transfer of tetracycline resistance among Chlamydia spp. in vitro. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53:4604–4611. doi:10.1128/AAC.00477-09.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. DeMars R,
    2. Weinfurter J,
    3. Guex E,
    4. Lin J,
    5. Potucek Y
    . 2007. Lateral gene transfer in vitro in the intracellular pathogen Chlamydia trachomatis. J Bacteriol 189:991–1003. doi:10.1128/JB.00845-06.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. 31.↵
    1. Rockey DD
    . 2011. Unraveling the basic biology and clinical significance of the chlamydial plasmid. J Exp Med 208:2159–2162. doi:10.1084/jem.20112088.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. 32.↵
    1. Murray JK,
    2. Gruffydd-Jones TJ,
    3. Roberts MA,
    4. Browne WJ
    . 2015. Assessing changes in the UK pet cat and dog populations: numbers and household ownership. Vet Rec 177:259. doi:10.1136/vr.103223.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. 33.↵
    1. Carvelli A,
    2. Iacoponi F,
    3. Scaramozzino P
    . 2016. A cross-sectional survey to estimate the cat population and ownership profiles in a semirural area of central Italy. Biomed Res Int 2016:3796872. doi:10.1155/2016/3796872.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  34. 34.↵
    1. Forsey T,
    2. Darougar S
    . 1984. Acute conjunctivitis caused by an atypical chlamydial strain: Chlamydia IOL 207. Br J Ophthalmol 68:409–411. doi:10.1136/bjo.68.6.409.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. 35.↵
    1. Torres A,
    2. el-Ebiary M
    . 1993. Relevance of Chlamydia pneumoniae in community-acquired respiratory infections. Eur Respir J 6:7–8.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  36. 36.↵
    1. Almirall J,
    2. Morato I,
    3. Riera F,
    4. Verdaguer A,
    5. Priu R,
    6. Coll P,
    7. Vidal J,
    8. Murgui L,
    9. Valls F,
    10. Catalan F
    . 1993. Incidence of community-acquired pneumonia and Chlamydia pneumoniae infection: a prospective multicentre study. Eur Respir J 6:14–18.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. 37.↵
    1. Carter MW,
    2. al-Mahdawi SA,
    3. Giles IG,
    4. Treharne JD,
    5. Ward ME,
    6. Clark IN
    . 1991. Nucleotide sequence and taxonomic value of the major outer membrane protein gene of Chlamydia pneumoniae IOL-207. J Gen Microbiol 137:465–475. doi:10.1099/00221287-137-3-465.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  38. 38.↵
    1. Dwyer RS,
    2. Treharne JD,
    3. Jones BR,
    4. Herring J
    . 1972. Chlamydial infection. Results of micro-immunofluorescence tests for the detection of type-specific antibody in certain chlamydial infections. Br J Vener Dis 48:452–459.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  39. 39.↵
    1. Peterson EM,
    2. Markoff BA,
    3. Schachter J,
    4. de la Maza LM
    . 1990. The 7.5-kb plasmid present in Chlamydia trachomatis is not essential for the growth of this microorganism. Plasmid 23:144–148. doi:10.1016/0147-619X(90)90033-9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  40. 40.↵
    1. Sachse K,
    2. Hotzel H,
    3. Slickers P,
    4. Ellinger T,
    5. Ehricht R
    . 2005. DNA microarray-based detection and identification of Chlamydia and Chlamydophila spp. Mol Cell Probes 19:41–50. doi:10.1016/j.mcp.2004.09.005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  41. 41.↵
    1. Baym M,
    2. Kryazhimskiy S,
    3. Lieberman TD,
    4. Chung H,
    5. Desai MM,
    6. Kishony R
    . 2015. Inexpensive multiplexed library preparation for megabase-sized genomes. PLoS One 10:e0128036. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0128036.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. 42.↵
    1. Schmieder R,
    2. Edwards R
    . 2011. Fast identification and removal of sequence contamination from genomic and metagenomic datasets. PLoS One 6:e17288. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0017288.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. 43.↵
    1. Andrews S
    . 2010. FastQC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. Babraham Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom. http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/.
  44. 44.↵
    1. Bolger AM,
    2. Lohse M,
    3. Usadel B
    . 2014. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30:2114–2120. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  45. 45.↵
    1. Li H,
    2. Durbin R
    . 2009. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25:1754–1760. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  46. 46.↵
    1. Li H,
    2. Handsaker B,
    3. Wysoker A,
    4. Fennell T,
    5. Ruan J,
    6. Homer N,
    7. Marth G,
    8. Abecasis G,
    9. Durbin R
    . 2009. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25:2078–2079. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  47. 47.↵
    1. Garrison E,
    2. Marth G
    . 2012. Haplotype-based variant detection from short-read sequencing. https://arxiv.org/abs/1207.3907.
  48. 48.↵
    1. Nurk S,
    2. Bankevich A,
    3. Antipov D,
    4. Gurevich A,
    5. Korobeynikov A,
    6. Lapidus A,
    7. Prjibelsky A,
    8. Pyshkin A,
    9. Sirotkin A,
    10. Sirotkin Y,
    11. Stepanauskas R,
    12. McLean J,
    13. Lasken R,
    14. Clingenpeel CR,
    15. Woyke T,
    16. Tesler G,
    17. Alekseyev MA,
    18. Pevzner PA
    . 2013. Assembling genomes and mini-metagenomes from highly chimeric reads, p 158–170. In Deng M, Jiang R, Sun F, Zhang X (ed), Research in computational molecular biology. RECOMB lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Berlin, Germany.
  49. 49.↵
    1. Gurevich A,
    2. Saveliev V,
    3. Vyahhi N,
    4. Tesler G
    . 2013. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 29:1072–1075. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  50. 50.↵
    1. Altschul SF,
    2. Gish W,
    3. Miller W,
    4. Myers EW,
    5. Lipman DJ
    . 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215:403–410. doi:10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  51. 51.↵
    1. Huson DH,
    2. Beier S,
    3. Flade I,
    4. Gorska A,
    5. El-Hadidi M,
    6. Mitra S,
    7. Ruscheweyh HJ,
    8. Tappu R
    . 2016. MEGAN community edition—interactive exploration and analysis of large-scale microbiome sequencing data. PLoS Comput Biol 12:e1004957. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004957.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  52. 52.↵
    1. Jelocnik M,
    2. Bachmann NL,
    3. Kaltenboeck B,
    4. Waugh C,
    5. Woolford L,
    6. Speight KN,
    7. Gillett A,
    8. Higgins DP,
    9. Flanagan C,
    10. Myers GS,
    11. Timms P,
    12. Polkinghorne A
    . 2015. Genetic diversity in the plasticity zone and the presence of the chlamydial plasmid differentiates Chlamydia pecorum strains from pigs, sheep, cattle, and koalas. BMC Genomics 16:893. doi:10.1186/s12864-015-2053-8.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  53. 53.↵
    1. Harley R,
    2. Day S,
    3. Di Rocco C,
    4. Helps C
    . 2010. The Chlamydophila felis plasmid is highly conserved. Vet Microbiol 146:172–174. doi:10.1016/j.vetmic.2010.05.005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. 54.↵
    1. Frazer LC,
    2. Darville T,
    3. Chandra-Kuntal K,
    4. Andrews CW,
    5. Zurenski M,
    6. Mintus M,
    7. AbdelRahman YM,
    8. Belland RJ,
    9. Ingalls RR,
    10. O’Connell CM
    . 2012. Plasmid-cured Chlamydia caviae activates TLR2-dependent signaling and retains virulence in the guinea pig model of genital tract infection. PLoS One 7:e30747. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0030747.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. 55.↵
    1. O’Connell CM,
    2. Nicks KM
    . 2006. A plasmid-cured Chlamydia muridarum strain displays altered plaque morphology and reduced infectivity in cell culture. Microbiology 152:1601–1607. doi:10.1099/mic.0.28658-0.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
The Genetic Transformation of Chlamydia pneumoniae
Kensuke Shima, Maximilian Wanker, Rachel J. Skilton, Lesley T. Cutcliffe, Christiane Schnee, Thomas A. Kohl, Stefan Niemann, Javier Geijo, Matthias Klinger, Peter Timms, Thomas Rattei, Konrad Sachse, Ian N. Clarke, Jan Rupp
mSphere Oct 2018, 3 (5) e00412-18; DOI: 10.1128/mSphere.00412-18

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print
Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this mSphere article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Genetic Transformation of Chlamydia pneumoniae
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from mSphere
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in mSphere.
Share
The Genetic Transformation of Chlamydia pneumoniae
Kensuke Shima, Maximilian Wanker, Rachel J. Skilton, Lesley T. Cutcliffe, Christiane Schnee, Thomas A. Kohl, Stefan Niemann, Javier Geijo, Matthias Klinger, Peter Timms, Thomas Rattei, Konrad Sachse, Ian N. Clarke, Jan Rupp
mSphere Oct 2018, 3 (5) e00412-18; DOI: 10.1128/mSphere.00412-18
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Chlamydia felis
Chlamydia pneumoniae
genetic manipulation
plasmid shuttle vector
plasmid tropism
transformation

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About mSphere
  • Board of Editors
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • Embargo Policy
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Warranty
  • Types of Articles
  • Getting Started
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #mSphereJ

@ASMicrobiology

       

 

Website feedback

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

Copyright © 2019 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Online ISSN: 2379-5042