Skip to main content
  • ASM Journals
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Research and News from ASM Journals
    • mSphere of Influence: Commentaries from Early Career Microbiologists
    • Archive
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Getting Started
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mSphere
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • ASM Journals
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
mSphere
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Research and News from ASM Journals
    • mSphere of Influence: Commentaries from Early Career Microbiologists
    • Archive
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Getting Started
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mSphere
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
Research Article | Host-Microbe Biology

Reproductive System Symbiotic Bacteria Are Conserved between Two Distinct Populations of Euprymna scolopes from Oahu, Hawaii

Allison H. Kerwin, Spencer V. Nyholm
Katherine McMahon, Editor
Allison H. Kerwin
aDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Allison H. Kerwin
Spencer V. Nyholm
aDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Katherine McMahon
University of Wisconsin—Madison
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/mSphere.00531-17
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Supplemental Material
  • FIG 1
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 1

    (A) Ventral dissection of adult female squid showing the nidamental glands (NG), accessory nidamental gland (ANG), and light organ (LO). (B) Map of Oahu, HI, showing locations of two squid populations, Kaneohe Bay (21°25′44.0″N, 157°47′32.4″W) and Maunalua Bay (21°16′51.42″N, 157°43′33.07″W).

  • FIG 2
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 2

    Bray-Curtis beta diversity analysis of Kaneohe Bay (KB) ANG and JC bacterial communities. (A) The overall community composition of KB and Maunalua Bay (MB) ANGs and JCs overlapped, but the KB samples had lower dispersion and clustered apart from the MB samples. (B) ANG and JC bacterial community compositions were not distinct in Kaneohe Bay. (C) KB ANG and JC samples clustered by associated female. Ellipses represent 95% confidence intervals. Results of ANOSIM are presented in parentheses in each plot.

  • FIG 3
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 3

    Alpha diversity analysis of Kaneohe Bay ANG and JC bacterial communities. Two-way ANOVA (see Table S1 in the supplemental material) revealed no effect of population or tissue type on bacterial community richness/evenness (A), phylogenetic diversity (B), or richness informed by the number of rare taxa present (C). Thick bars indicate means; thin bars indicate standard deviations.

  • FIG 4
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 4

    (A) Kaneohe Bay (KB) ANG and JC bacterial communities resembled those observed in Maunalua Bay (MB) at the class level. (B) KB animals had significantly more Gammaproteobacteria in their ANGs than MB hosts (t36 = 5.129, P < 0.0001). (C) JCs from KB animals had significantly more Gammaproteobacteria than MB JCs (t53 = 4.73, P = 0.0001) and also fewer Flavobacteriia (t53 = 3.138, P = 0.01). Taxa are presented at the class level (Verrucomicrobiae and Opitutae are both classes within the Verrucomicrobia phylum); the scatter plot is presented on a log scale to show variation for taxa present at lower average abundances. Thick bars represent means; thin bars represent standard deviations; asterisks represent significant differences between populations (B and C). Error bars that would have extended below 0.1% sequences/sample have been omitted from the graph (B and C). The “other” component included taxa present in more than one sample and at less than 0.3% average abundance.

  • FIG 5
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 5

    A higher abundance of Gammaproteobacteria in the Kaneohe Bay (KB) ANG and JC bacterial communities was due to a shift in BD2-13, a genus from the Alteromonadaceae family. BD2-13 (t38 = 5.22, P = 0.0001) was significantly more abundant in KB ANGs (A) and in KB JCs (t53 = 5.612, P = 0.00001) (B). One Alphaproteobacteria taxon (Leisingera: t53 = 3.085, P = 0.04) was also significantly higher in KB JCs (B), while two others were significantly lower in KB JCs (Rhizobiales: t53 = 3.107, P = 0.04; Methylocystaceae: t53 = 3.639, P = 0.009). Taxa are presented at the finest level obtained (c, class; o, order; f, family; g, genus); the scatter plot is presented on a log scale to show variation for taxa present at lower average abundances. Thick bars represent means; thin bars represent standard deviations; asterisks represent significant differences between populations. Error bars that would have extended below 0.01% sequences/sample have been omitted from the graph (A and B). The “other” component included taxa present in more than one sample and at less than 0.3% average abundance.

Supplemental Material

  • Figures
  • TABLE S1

    Two-way ANOVA of alpha diversity analysis of Kaneohe Bay ANGs and JCs (Fig. 3) found no effect of population or sample type on bacterial community richness/evenness (A), phylogenetic diversity (B), or richness informed by the number of rare taxa present (C). Thick bars indicate means; thin bars indicate standard deviations. Download TABLE S1, TIF file, 0.2 MB.

    Copyright © 2018 Kerwin and Nyholm.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Reproductive System Symbiotic Bacteria Are Conserved between Two Distinct Populations of Euprymna scolopes from Oahu, Hawaii
Allison H. Kerwin, Spencer V. Nyholm
mSphere Mar 2018, 3 (2) e00531-17; DOI: 10.1128/mSphere.00531-17

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print
Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this mSphere article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Reproductive System Symbiotic Bacteria Are Conserved between Two Distinct Populations of Euprymna scolopes from Oahu, Hawaii
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from mSphere
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in mSphere.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Reproductive System Symbiotic Bacteria Are Conserved between Two Distinct Populations of Euprymna scolopes from Oahu, Hawaii
Allison H. Kerwin, Spencer V. Nyholm
mSphere Mar 2018, 3 (2) e00531-17; DOI: 10.1128/mSphere.00531-17
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

16S rRNA
Euprymna
community analysis
host-microbe interactions
symbiosis

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About mSphere
  • Board of Editors
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • Embargo Policy
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Warranty
  • Types of Articles
  • Getting Started
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #mSphereJ

@ASMicrobiology

       

 

Website feedback

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Online ISSN: 2379-5042