Skip to main content
  • ASM Journals
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Research and News from ASM Journals
    • mSphere of Influence: Commentaries from Early Career Microbiologists
    • Archive
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Getting Started
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mSphere
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • ASM Journals
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
mSphere
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Research and News from ASM Journals
    • mSphere of Influence: Commentaries from Early Career Microbiologists
    • Archive
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Getting Started
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mSphere
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
Research Article | Molecular Biology and Physiology

A Fungus-Specific Protein Domain Is Essential for RasA-Mediated Morphogenetic Signaling in Aspergillus fumigatus

Qusai Al Abdallah, Tiffany S. Norton, Amy M. Hill, Lawrence L. LeClaire, Jarrod R. Fortwendel
Aaron P. Mitchell, Editor
Qusai Al Abdallah
cDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tiffany S. Norton
aDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of South Alabama, Mobile, Alabama, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amy M. Hill
aDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of South Alabama, Mobile, Alabama, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lawrence L. LeClaire
bDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of South Alabama, Mobile, Alabama, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jarrod R. Fortwendel
cDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Aaron P. Mitchell
Carnegie Mellon University
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/mSphere.00234-16
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Supplemental Material
  • FIG 1
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 1

    The RasA protein displays an extended N terminus harboring an invariant arginine residue. (A) Comparison of Ras protein structure. A ribbon representation of H-ras (blue) (16) (PDB entry 4EFL ) was superimposed with the predicted structure of RasA (red) using UCSF Chimera (54). Chimera was developed by the Resource for Biocomputing, Visualization, and Informatics at the University of California, San Francisco. Homology modeling of RasA structure was predicted using the known H-Ras structure as a template. The RasA amino acid sequence was mapped to the H-Ras structure using ProtSkin (55). The figure displays RasA amino acids 1 to 166. (B) Multiprotein alignment of N-terminal RasA homolog sequences from multiple fungal species and higher eukaryotes. Organisms and Ras homologs (with GenBank accession numbers in parentheses) employed for alignment include Homo sapiens H-ras (AAM12630.1 ), Mus musculus Hras1 (AAQ81319.1 ), Drosophila melanogaster Ras1 (AAF15514.1 ), Aspergillus fumigatus RasA (EAL91488.1 ), Aspergillus terreus Ras-1 (EAU31971.1 ), Neurospora crassa Ras-1 (P22126.1 ), Colletotrichum trifolii CT-Ras (AAC03781.1 ), Magnaporthe oryzae Ras (ELQ42826.1 ), Blastomyces dermatitidis Ras (EEQ88958.1 ), Histoplasma capsulatum Ras (EEH06649.1 ), Paracoccidioides brasiliensis Ras1p (AAZ81605.2 ), Coccidioides immitis K-Ras (KMU89545.1 ), Penicillium marneffei RasA (EEA28487.1 ), Schizosaccharomyces pombe Ras1 (CAB11218 ), Candida albicans Ras1p (AF177670.1 ), Candida glabrata Ras (XP_445167.1 ), Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ras2 (DAA10447.1 ), Laccariabicolor Ras (AAD01987.1 ), Suillus bovinus Ras1p (AF250024.1 ), Cryptococcus neoformans Ras1 (AF294647.1 ), Ustilago maydis Ras1 (AAO19640.1 ), Mucor racemosus MRAS3 (AAA83379.1 ), and Phycomycesblakesleeanus Ras (OAD74690.1 ). The areas shaded in blue, red, and green denote organisms characterized as Ascomycetes, Basidiomycetes, or Zygomycetes, respectively. Note the invariant arginine residue (highlighted as red text) located in the same position for each fungal RasA homolog.

  • FIG 2
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 2

    The IRD is required for hyphal growth and asexual development. (A) Colony morphologies of the control strain, the rasA deletion mutant (ΔrasA), the IRD truncation mutant (RasAΔIRD), and mutants expressing N-terminal chimeras including the IRD regions from S. cerevisiae (ScAf), N. crassa (NcAf), and C. neoformans (CnAf). For each mutant, the N-terminal RasA protein sequence resulting from mutational analysis is displayed. Equal numbers of conidia (104 total conidia) were inoculated onto the middle of AMM agar plates and allowed to grow for 5 days at 37°C. (B) Graphical representation of colony diameters from each strain (104 total conidia) over 5 days of growth at 37°C. Each culture was assayed in triplicate, and results were averaged. The graph displays the average for each time point ± standard deviation. (C) Enumeration of conidia produced by each strain after 3 days of growth at 37°C. Equal numbers of conidia (2 × 104 total conidia) were spread onto AMM agar and incubated for 3 days. Conidia were harvested from each plate in 20 ml of water, washed 3 times with water, resuspended in 10 ml of water, and enumerated. Data are presented as the total conidia per plate and are the average from two experiments ± standard deviation.

  • FIG 3
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 3

    The invariant arginine residue is critical for IRD-mediated RasA functions. (A) Colony morphologies of the control strain, the rasA deletion mutant (ΔrasA), the alanine-scanning mutants (RasAS3A, RasAK4A, RasAF5A, RasAL6A, and RasAR7A), and the mutant with lysine mutation of the invariant arginine residue (RasAR7K). Equal numbers of conidia (104 total conidia) were inoculated onto the middle of AMM agar plates and allowed to grow for 5 days at 37°C. (B) Graphical representation of colony diameters from each strain (104 total conidia) over 5 days of growth at 37°C. Each culture was assayed in triplicate, and results were averaged. The graph displays the average for each time point ± standard deviation. (C) Enumeration of conidia produced by each strain after 3 days of growth at 37°C. Equal numbers of conidia (2 × 104 total conidia) were spread onto AMM agar and incubated for 3 days. Conidia were harvested from each plate in 20 ml of water, washed 3 times with water, resuspended in 10 ml of water, and enumerated. Data are presented as the total conidia per plate and are the average from two experiments ± standard deviation.

  • FIG 4
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 4

    IRD truncation abrogates RasA function. (A) Comparison of germination rates between the control strain and the RasAΔIRD mutant. Equal numbers of conidia were inoculated onto AMM broth and incubated at 37°C. At the noted time points, samples were removed, and 100 random conidia from each strain were scored for germ tube production (polarity establishment). Data are presented as the percentage of germinated conidia for each time point. (B) Representative micrographs of germinating conidia from each strain after 5 h of incubation at 37°C. Note the irregular conidial size of the RasAΔIRD mutant, indicating higher variability in the timing of germination initiation. (C) Representative micrographs of hyphal development aberrancies in the RasAΔIRD mutant after 16 h of growth at 37°C. Conidia from each strain were cultured as described for the germination studies. Note the stunted, highly branched hyphae produced by RasAΔIRD. (D) Representative micrographs of conidiophore development in the control strain and RasAΔIRD mutant. After 24 h of culture at 37°C on AMM agar, the control strain produced conidiophores with swollen vesicles and numerous conidia arranged in chains (left panel). The RasAΔIRD mutant produced no conidiophores at 24 h of identical culture (data not shown) and produced distorted conidiophore structures by 48 h (right panel), characterized by minimally swollen vesicles and few conidia.

  • FIG 5
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 5

    RasA localization and activation are not affected by IRD truncation. (A) Representative fluorescence micrographs of the control strain and RasAΔIRD. AMM broth cultures of each strain were incubated at 37°C until approximately equal hyphal lengths were achieved for each strain. Cultures were then mounted for fluorescence microscopy, and images were acquired using identical exposure settings for both strains. (B) Ras activation assay performed on lysate from the control strain comparing the amount of total Ras bound under no treatment (NT), after GTP preloading (+GTP), and after GDP preloading (+GDP). GFP-fused RasA is detected at 51 kDa using an anti-Ras antibody. The control assay was repeated twice to ensure the ability of RasA to bind the Raf1 RBD-agarose bead and to appropriately respond to activation (+GTP) and inactivation (+GDP). Lane M, molecular mass (kilodaltons) marker lane.(C, top panel) Western blot analysis of total RasA detected in lysates from each strain (Total) and the amount of active RasA detected by Raf1-RBD pulldown (Active). The gel image is representative of three independent experiments. Ctrl, control. (C, bottom panel) Quantification of active/total Ras ratios. Western blot bands were quantified by densitometry analysis, and the average signal abundance ratio of detectable active RasA to total RasA was calculated. Data are presented as an average from three replicates ± standard deviation. No statistical difference was noted in Ras activation levels between the control and RasAΔIRD mutant.

  • FIG 6
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 6

    PKA activation is deficient in the RasAΔIRD mutant. (A) PKA activity assay performed on lysates of the control strain, a strain expressing constitutively active RasA (DArasA1), and the RasAΔIRD mutant. Equal numbers of conidia from each strain were cultured in either (i) AMM glucose-based medium (Glucose 16 hr) overnight or (ii) AMM modified to contain glycerol as the sole carbon source, followed by a 2-min stimulation with glucose (Glycerol 16 hr/Glucose 2 min). Lysates were generated from each strain and condition and assayed for PKA activity using the PepTag nonradioactive cAMP-dependent protein kinase assay (Promega). The agarose gel electrophoresis image is representative of three independent experiments and shows migration of phosphorylated PKA-target peptide toward the cathode (+) and unphosphorylated target toward the anode (−). Control experiments, including addition of the bovine PKA catalytic subunit and exogenous cAMP to measure induction of PKA activity, are provided in Fig. S3 in the supplemental material. (B) Densitometric quantification of phosphorylated PKA-target peptide (migrating toward the cathode) for each strain, relative to the control strain. Results are the average from three separate experiments ± standard deviation. Data were compared using Student’s t test.

  • FIG 7
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 7

    RasA interaction with Cdc42 is mediated by the IRD in A. fumigatus. (A) Lysates of the control strain and RasAΔIRD mutant were immunoprecipitated with anti-GFP agarose beads and subjected to Western blot analysis with either an anti-mCherry antibody (for mCherry-Cdc42 detection) or an anti-GFP antibody (for Ras protein detection). Images are from one representative experiment. Control experiments, including the inverse-pulldown reaction, are provided in Fig. S4 in the supplemental material. (B) Quantification of the amount of mCherry-Cdc42 immunoprecipitated with either RasA (from the control strain) or RasAIRD. Densitometry analysis was performed using ImageJ software, and the ratio of anti-mCherry signal to anti-GFP signal was calculated. The graph represents the average result from three separate experiments ± standard deviation. Data were compared using Student’s t test.

  • FIG 8
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 8

    The IRD is required for RasA-mediated actin polarization. Immunofluorescence micrographs showing actin cytoskeleton distribution in the control strain (upper panel) and the RasAΔIRD mutant (lower panel). AMM broth cultures of each strain were incubated at 37°C until approximately equal hyphal lengths were achieved for each strain. Images were acquired under identical exposure times and are representative of the entire culture for both strains. Note the decreased presence of actin polarization to the hyphal tip in the RasAΔIRD mutant (inset panels). Arrowheads denote locations of hyphal tips for both panels.

  • FIG 9
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 9

    The endocytic rate is decreased in the RasAΔIRD mutant. Fluorescence micrographs showing FM4-64 uptake in a single hypha of the control strain (upper panels) and the RasAΔIRD mutant (lower panels) over 60 min at 37°C. AMM broth cultures of each strain were incubated at 37°C until approximately equal hyphal lengths were achieved for both strains. Cultures were then washed, loaded with 10 µM FM4-64 at 25°C, and further incubated at 37°C to monitor endocytic uptake of the dye. Images were acquired under identical exposure times. Note the delayed internal staining of RasAΔIRD hyphae (lower panels). Arrowheads denote locations of septa for both panels.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Supplemental Material
  • TABLE 1

    Strains used in this study

    StrainGenetic backgroundSource or reference
    H237Wild typeClinical isolate
    ΔrasA mutantH237Fortwendel et al. (9)
    RasAΔIRDΔrasAThis study
    NcAfΔrasAThis study
    ScAfΔrasAThis study
    CnAfΔrasAThis study
    GFP-RasAS3AΔrasAThis study
    GFP-RasAK4AΔrasAThis study
    GFP-RasAF5AΔrasAThis study
    GFP-RasAL6AΔrasAThis study
    GFP-RasAR7AΔrasAThis study
    GFP-RasAR7KΔrasAThis study
    Control strain (GFP-RasA)ΔrasAFortwendel et al. (18)
    GFP-RasAΔIRDΔrasAThis study
    GFP-RasA/mCh-Cdc42H237This study
    GFP-RasAΔIRD/mCh-Cdc42H237This study
  • TABLE 2

    Primers used in this study

    PrimerSequenceaUse
    RasA ΔIRD For NotI5′-TTTTGCGGCCGCATGGCTGAGTACAAGCTAGTTGTTG-3′RasAΔIRD mutant
    RasA Rev NotI5′-TTTTGCGGCCGCTTACATAATAACGCATTTTCC-3′All RasA mutants
    ScIRD For NotI5′-TTTTGCGGCCGCATGCCACTGAACAAGTCAAACATCCGGGAGTACAAGCTAGTTGTT-3′N-terminal chimeras
    CnIRD For NotI5′-TTTTGCGGCCGCATGTCAAAGGCTCAATTCCTGCGGGAGTACAAGCTAGTTGTT-3′N-terminal chimeras
    NcIRD For NotI5′-TTTTGCGGCCGCATGGCTAACAAGTTCACACGGGAGTACAAGCTAGTTGTT-3′N-terminal chimeras
    S3A For NotI5′-TTTTGCGGCCGCATGGCTGCAAAGTTCCTTAGAGAGTACAAGC-3′IRD mutation
    K4A For NotI5′-TTTTGCGGCCGCATGGCTTCAGCATTCCTTAGAGAGTACAAGC-3′IRD mutation
    F5A For NotI5′-TTTTGCGGCCGCATGGCTTCAAAGGCACTTAGAGAGTACAAGC-3′IRD mutation
    L6A For NotI5′-TTTTGCGGCCGCATGGCTTCAAAGTTCGCAAGAGAGTACAAGC-3′IRD mutation
    R7A For NotI5′-TTTTGCGGCCGCATGGCTTCAAAGTTCCTTGCAGAGTACAAGC-3′IRD mutation
    R7K For NotI5′-TTTTGCGGCCGCATGGCTTCAAAGTTCCTTAAAGAGTACAAGC-3′IRD mutation
    AfCdc42 For NotI5′-TTTTGCGGCCGCATGGTGGTAGCTACAATT-3′mCherry-Cdc42 fusion
    AfCdc42 Rev NotI5′-TTTTGCGGCCGCTTACAGCAAGACGCATCT-3′mCherry-Cdc42 fusion
    • ↵a Boldface indicates nucleotides changed from the wild-type sequence to introduce the indicated mutation.

Supplemental Material

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Figure S1

    Expression levels of chimeric RasA proteins. (A) Expression levels were compared by quantitative Western blotting using an anti-GFP antibody. Loading controls were performed to ensure that equal amounts of lysate were loaded for Western blot analysis. ScAf, CnAf, and NcAf are strains expressing the N-terminal regions from S. cerevisiae Ras2, C. neoformans Ras1, and N. crassa Ras-1, respectively, fused to the A. fumigatus RasA G domain. A negative control for the anti-GFP antibody included lysate from the ΔrasA mutant and is shown in Fig. 2. (B) The quantification of the Western blot bands was performed using ImageJ software. Expression levels were obtained by computing the expression level ratios of RasA chimeras to RasA from the control strain. The graph represents the average result from three separate experiments ± standard deviation. Download Figure S1, JPG file, 0.7 MB.

    Copyright © 2016 Al Abdallah et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license .

  • Figure S2

    Expression levels of alanine-scanning mutants of RasA. (A) Expression levels were compared by quantitative Western blotting using an anti-GFP antibody. Loading controls were performed to ensure that equal amounts of lysate were loaded for Western blot analysis. (B) The quantification of Western blot bands was performed using ImageJ software. Expression levels were obtained by computing the expression level ratios of RasA alanine-scanning mutants to RasA from the control strain. The graph represents the average result from three separate experiments ± standard deviation. Download Figure S2, TIF file, 0.6 MB.

    Copyright © 2016 Al Abdallah et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license .

  • Figure S3

    Control reactions for the PKA activity assay. (A) Negative (NC) and positive (PC) control reactions were run using the kit components following the manufacturer’s protocols. Reaction conditions were identical, except for the addition of the bovine PKA catalytic subunit to the PCR. (B) Activation of PKA activity in A. fumigatus lysate via addition of exogenous cAMP. Lysates from the control strain were isolated and quantified as described for Fig. 6. For cAMP stimulation, 50 µg of total protein lysate was then treated with 1 µM cAMP (Sigma) at room temperature for 30 min. NT, no treatment. Download Figure S3, JPG file, 0.5 MB.

    Copyright © 2016 Al Abdallah et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license .

  • Figure S4

    Control reactions for coimmunoprecipitation of RasA and Cdc42. (A) Coomassie-stained SDS-PAGE of the input (I), unbound (U), and bound (B) fractions from both the GFP-Ras/mCherry-Cdc42- and GFP-RasIRD/mCherry-Cdc42-expressing strains. The left panel shows results from coimmunoprecipitation reactions using the GFP-Trap agarose beads, and the right panel shows results from reactions with the RFP-Trap agarose beads (Chromotek). MW, molecular weight marker. (B) Western blot analysis of reverse coimmunoprecipitation reaction using the RFP-Trap agarose beads to immunoprecipitate mCherry-Cdc42 from each strain. The assay was run as described for GFP-Trap immunoprecipitation in the legend to Fig. 7. Download Figure S4, JPG file, 0.4 MB.

    Copyright © 2016 Al Abdallah et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license .

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
A Fungus-Specific Protein Domain Is Essential for RasA-Mediated Morphogenetic Signaling in Aspergillus fumigatus
Qusai Al Abdallah, Tiffany S. Norton, Amy M. Hill, Lawrence L. LeClaire, Jarrod R. Fortwendel
mSphere Nov 2016, 1 (6) e00234-16; DOI: 10.1128/mSphere.00234-16

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print
Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this mSphere article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A Fungus-Specific Protein Domain Is Essential for RasA-Mediated Morphogenetic Signaling in Aspergillus fumigatus
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from mSphere
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in mSphere.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
A Fungus-Specific Protein Domain Is Essential for RasA-Mediated Morphogenetic Signaling in Aspergillus fumigatus
Qusai Al Abdallah, Tiffany S. Norton, Amy M. Hill, Lawrence L. LeClaire, Jarrod R. Fortwendel
mSphere Nov 2016, 1 (6) e00234-16; DOI: 10.1128/mSphere.00234-16
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENT
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Aspergillus
Ras
actin
morphogenesis
signal transduction

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About mSphere
  • Board of Editors
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • Embargo Policy
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Warranty
  • Types of Articles
  • Getting Started
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #mSphereJ

@ASMicrobiology

       

 

Website feedback

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Online ISSN: 2379-5042