Skip to main content
  • ASM Journals
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Research and News from ASM Journals
    • mSphere of Influence: Commentaries from Early Career Microbiologists
    • Archive
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Getting Started
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mSphere
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • ASM Journals
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
mSphere
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Research and News from ASM Journals
    • mSphere of Influence: Commentaries from Early Career Microbiologists
    • Archive
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Getting Started
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mSphere
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
Editor's Pick Research Article | Clinical Science and Epidemiology

Characterization of Aspergillus fumigatus Isolates from Air and Surfaces of the International Space Station

Benjamin P. Knox, Adriana Blachowicz, Jonathan M. Palmer, Jillian Romsdahl, Anna Huttenlocher, Clay C. C. Wang, Nancy P. Keller, Kasthuri Venkateswaran
Yong-Sun Bahn, Editor
Benjamin P. Knox
aMicrobiology Doctoral Training Program, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
bDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Adriana Blachowicz
cBiotechnology and Planetary Protection Group, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA
dDepartment of Pharmacology and Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jonathan M. Palmer
eCenter for Forest Mycology Research, Northern Research Station, U.S. Forest Service, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jonathan M. Palmer
Jillian Romsdahl
dDepartment of Pharmacology and Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anna Huttenlocher
bDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
fDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Clay C. C. Wang
dDepartment of Pharmacology and Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
gDepartment of Chemistry, Dornsife College of Letters, Arts and Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nancy P. Keller
bDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
hDepartment of Bacteriology, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kasthuri Venkateswaran
cBiotechnology and Planetary Protection Group, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Kasthuri Venkateswaran
Yong-Sun Bahn
Yonsei University
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/mSphere.00227-16
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

One mission of the Microbial Observatory Experiments on the International Space Station (ISS) is to examine the traits and diversity of fungal isolates to gain a better understanding of how fungi may adapt to microgravity environments and how this may affect interactions with humans in a closed habitat. Here, we report an initial characterization of two isolates, ISSFT-021 and IF1SW-F4, of Aspergillus fumigatus collected from the ISS and a comparison to the experimentally established clinical isolates Af293 and CEA10. Whole-genome sequencing of ISSFT-021 and IF1SW-F4 showed 54,960 and 52,129 single nucleotide polymorphisms, respectively, compared to Af293, which is consistent with observed genetic heterogeneity among sequenced A. fumigatus isolates from diverse clinical and environmental sources. Assessment of in vitro growth characteristics, secondary metabolite production, and susceptibility to chemical stresses revealed no outstanding differences between ISS and clinical strains that would suggest special adaptation to life aboard the ISS. Virulence assessment in a neutrophil-deficient larval zebrafish model of invasive aspergillosis revealed that both ISSFT-021 and IF1SW-F4 were significantly more lethal than Af293 and CEA10. Taken together, these genomic, in vitro, and in vivo analyses of two A. fumigatus strains isolated from the ISS provide a benchmark for future investigations of these strains and for continuing research on specific microbial isolates from manned space environments.

IMPORTANCE As durations of manned space missions increase, it is imperative to understand the long-term consequence of microbial exposure on human health in a closed human habitat. To date, studies aimed at bacterial and fungal contamination of space vessels have highlighted species compositions biased toward hardy, persistent organisms capable of withstanding harsh conditions. In the current study, we assessed traits of two independent Aspergillus fumigatus strains isolated from the International Space Station. Ubiquitously found in terrestrial soil and atmospheric environments, A. fumigatus is a significant opportunistic fungal threat to human health, particularly among the immunocompromised. Using two well-known clinical isolates of A. fumigatus as comparators, we found that both ISS isolates exhibited normal in vitro growth and chemical stress tolerance yet caused higher lethality in a vertebrate model of invasive disease. These findings substantiate the need for additional studies of physical traits and biological activities of microbes adapted to microgravity and other extreme extraterrestrial conditions.

INTRODUCTION

Microorganisms are unavoidable inhabitants of human-made structures in space due to anthropogenic sources, including human and cargo movement (1). Our understanding of how the stressors of such environments, which include microgravity and increased exposure to irradiation, influence microbial biology over time remains in its infancy (2). Changes in microbial community composition and microbial species characteristics have the potential to affect human health and safety, particularly in light of the fact that extended periods of time in space have been shown to alter vertebrate and human immunity (3, 4). Furthermore, as durations of manned space missions increase, such as going to Mars, it becomes of heightened importance to understand the breadth and potential consequences of host-microbe interactions in crew habitation. There exists an unmet need for studies characterizing individual microbial species isolated directly from space environments, as sampling experiments to date have aimed at understanding changes in microbial community composition at the species level (4–6), and it has been documented that simulated space environments provide a poor comparison for what is actually observed in orbit (7), highlighting a need for additional experimentation with samples derived from space environments.

While, unsurprisingly, most of the sampled bacterial diversity from space environments aligns with commensal organisms (8), many fungi represent a unique component of microbial communities in space environments, as their populations are not replenished by virtue of human presence, suggesting they have exploited or adapted to a proliferative niche aboard these human-made structures. Fungal colonization of space vessels is nothing new, as various species have been isolated from the Skylab, Mir, and various modules of the International Space Station (ISS) (United States, Japan’s KIBO, and the Russian segments) (5, 6, 9–13). Fungi have been reported to cause damage to electrical and structural components through the decomposition of wire insulation and window gaskets (13). The most commonly sampled fungal genera from space environments include the terrestrially ubiquitous sporulating molds Cladosporium, Penicillium, and Aspergillus. Airborne spores, also known as conidia, are ubiquitous in terrestrial environments and can exacerbate pulmonary allergic reactions (14) and cause life-threatening invasive infections after germinating in immunocompromised individuals (15, 16). Among airborne fungi, Aspergillus fumigatus is the most frequently encountered agent of pulmonary complications and invasive infections, as infections can result in invasive aspergillosis (IA) in immunocompromised populations, with average mortality rates of 50% even with proper diagnosis and treatment (17).

Globally encountered in soil and air, A. fumigatus is well adapted to colonizing diverse environments through its metabolic diversity, broad stress and thermal tolerances, and easily dispersed conidia (18–20). Likely underlying the ubiquity and pathogenic capacity of A. fumigatus is a great degree of genetic diversity observed among strains from diverse environmental and clinical sources (21–23). While many factors may contribute to the ubiquity of A. fumigatus, the production of small bioactive molecules, or secondary metabolites (SMs), has become of particular interest, as these compounds have been shown to play central roles in niche exploitation, stress tolerance, and virulence (17, 24, 25). Considering A. fumigatus as a ubiquitously encountered opportunistic pathogen with great metabolic and genetic diversity, it is an organism of particular interest to monitor and examine as a contaminant of human space vessels.

Here, we report an initial characterization of two A. fumigatus strains isolated from different sources of the ISS. Our experimental approach aimed to investigate each strain’s genetic origins and characteristics, in vitro growth and stress tolerance, secondary metabolite production, and virulence. Given the importance of A. fumigatus as an opportunistic pathogen, both ISS strains were studied in comparison to two well-known clinical isolates to assess pathogenic traits that may be of consequence to human health.

RESULTS

Identification of A. fumigatus sampled from the ISS.Air and surface sampling during the Microbial Observatory Experiments on the ISS identified numerous bacterial and fungal isolates (7). For this study, we chose to focus on two independently sampled strains of A. fumigatus which were initially identified by morphological characteristics and later verified by internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region sequencing (ITS sequences for ISSFT-021 and IF1SW-F4 are available under GenBank accession numbers KT832787 and KX675260 , respectively). Strain ISSFT-021 was sampled from a high-efficiency particulate arrestance (HEPA) filter, and strain IF1SW-F4 was obtained from a hard surface adjacent to the cupola window (Fig. 1A) via wiping surface materials. By nature of this sampling method, it is impossible to know exact residence times aboard the ISS for each strain.

FIG 1
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1

Isolation and phylogenetic characterization of ISS strains. (A) IF1SW-F4 was isolated from the wall area outlined in blue adjacent to the cupola window aboard the ISS. ISSFT-021 was independently isolated from a HEPA filter (not shown). (B) Frequency distribution of total SNPs found in 94 sequenced clinical and environmental isolates of A. fumigatus in comparison to a reference genome (Af293). Colored arrows designate the bin groups to which each strain included in this study belongs. (C) Phylogenetic tree of 95 sequenced isolates of A. fumigatus, showing mating type (MAT1-1 or MAT1-2), clinical or environmental origin, and geographical sampling location. Strains of interest used in this study are highlighted in yellow.

Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) of ISSFT-021 and IF1SW-F4 (26) reveal 54,960 and 52,129 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) compared to the clinical isolate and model laboratory strain Af293, respectively, which is not outside the genetic diversity observed among 95 sequenced A. fumigatus isolates (Fig. 1B). Figure 1C shows a phylogeny of these isolates of A. fumigatus inferred using maximum likelihood from SNP sequences covered in every genome (147,792 total SNP positions). The tree also includes information on individual isolate mating type, clinical or environmental origin, and also geographical location. This analysis illustrates the genomic variation that exists with A. fumigatus and, moreover, suggests that we are unable to predict phenotypic characteristics (i.e., virulence) based on clinical/environmental origin, mating type, or geographical isolation source. With regard to mating type, strains ISSFT-021 and CEA10 (another clinical isolate and model laboratory strain) are MAT1-1, while IF1SW-F4 and Af293 are MAT1-2. Interestingly, ISSFT-021 and IF1SW-F4 show a close relationship to the patient isolate Af300 (27), suggesting these three strains may have arisen from a common origin. Figure S1 in the supplemental material shows the same phylogenic data represented in a phylogram. As it has been suggested previously that genetic consequences resulting from irradiation exposure during time in space may manifest as insertions and deletions (indels) over point mutations (28–30), we analyzed ISSFT-021, IF1SW-F4, and CEA10 and averages from all sequenced isolates included in this study against the reference genome (Af293) and found no obvious enrichment for indels in the ISS isolates (see Fig. S2 in the supplemental material).

Figure S1

Phylogram of 95 sequenced A. fumigatus isolates. The phylogram represents the same data used to create the cladogram in Fig. 1C. All strains included in the present study are highlighted in red. Download Figure S1, PDF file, 0.7 MB.
Copyright © 2016 Knox et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license .

Figure S2

Insertion and deletion size range and frequency distribution. Indel sizes and frequencies of occurrence in relation to that in the reference genome (Af293) are shown for CEA10, ISSFT-021, and IF1SW-F4, along with averages for all isolates included in the genomic analyses. Download Figure S2, PDF file, 0.3 MB.
Copyright © 2016 Knox et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license .

Visual characterization and growth rates of ISS strains in vitro.To assess basic physiological phenotypes of strains ISSFT-021 and IF1SW-F4, growth characteristics of the ISS strains were investigated on defined glucose minimal medium (GMM) (31). Gross visual assessment of point-inoculated GMM plates revealed slight differences in colony diameter and pigment production after a 5-day incubation (Fig. 2A), indicating that each strain possesses unique physical and chemical properties under these conditions. An examination of radial growth rates revealed that both ISS strains significantly outgrew both Af293 and CEA10 at all time points investigated (Fig. 2B), which is consistent with previous reports of strain-dependent variations in growth rates of A. fumigatus isolates (21) as well as increased biomass production for some microbes during exposure to space environments (32). As early spore germination rates may favor niche exploitation and establishment of robust growth (21), we next sought to determine whether ISS isolates exhibited different germination dynamics in vitro. Figure 2C shows there were no differences in germination rates between ISSFT-021, IF1SW-F4, and CEA10 in liquid GMM, as nearly all spores germinated after an 8-h incubation, while Af293 showed a marked delay in germination.

FIG 2
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 2

In vitro growth of ISS isolates compared to growth of the clinical isolates Af293 and CEA10. (A) Growth on GMM at 37°C, showing colony morphology and color. (B) Radial growth at 37°C on GMM. Statistical analyses were performed by one-way ANOVA. (C) Germination rates in liquid GMM at 37°C, 250 rpm. Spores were considered germinated after germ tube lengths were observed to be greater than or equal to the swollen spore base.

ISS strains show no enhanced resistance to chemical stresses in vitro.While unstressed growth (Fig. 2) revealed several differences between ISS and patient isolate strains, it is reasonable to posit that resistance to stressful conditions may play a greater role in colonization and propagation aboard harsh space vessel environments. Therefore, we challenged all strains to a variety of classical chemical stresses on GMM to assay susceptibility to osmotic stress (sodium chloride [NaCl]), DNA damage stress (methyl methanesulfonate [MMS]), cell wall stress (Congo red), and oxidative stress (hydrogen peroxide [H2O2]) (Fig. 3). Figure 3A shows colony appearance and growth reduction on supplemented media compared to that under unstressed growth conditions. No significant differences in growth reduction were observed for either ISS strain in comparison to Af293 or CEA10 (Fig. 3B). For oxidative stress tests, we chose a diffusion assay (33) to reduce experimental variation in working with this chemical (unpublished observations). Zones of inhibition (Fig. 3C) were measured to infer sensitivity to hydrogen peroxide. No significant differences were observed between ISS strains regarding hydrogen peroxide sensitivity (Fig. 3D); however, both were significantly more resistant than Af293 and less resistant than CEA10, demonstrating an intermediate phenotype of ISS isolates between the two clinical strains.

FIG 3
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 3

ISS isolates showed no enhanced resistance to chemical stresses in vitro. (A) Colony appearance after point inoculations of 10 µl containing 1 × 104 conidia on solid GMM supplemented with the following stressors: 1.0 M NaCl, 0.02% MMS, and 25 mg/ml Congo red (CR). (B) Quantification of growth inhibition was measured by colony diameters after a 72-h incubation at 37°C. Data shown are the radial growth versus that in controls. (C) Hydrogen peroxide sensitivity was assayed by diffusion assay with 1-cm holes filled with 100 µl of 4% H2O2 in plates containing 5 × 107 spores suspended in top agar. (D) Zones of inhibition were measured as diameters after 48 h of growth, and significance determined via one-way analysis of variance.

Secondary metabolite analysis among ISS and clinical isolates.SM profiles of ISSFT-021, IF1SW-F4, CEA10, and Af293 were examined after culture on solid GMM by using high-performance liquid chromatography–photodiode array detection–mass spectroscopy (HPL-DAD-MS) analysis. Examination of the SM profiles revealed a distinct chemical signature for each strain under the condition tested (Fig. 4A). Detailed yield analysis of each SM produced was carried out (Fig. 4B). Compared to Af293, an increase in fumigaclavine A production was observed with IF1SW-F4 (P = 0.0001) but not with ISSFT-021, whereas a significant decrease in fumigaclavine C production was noticed in both strains (P = 0.04 and 0.0001 in ISSFT-021 and IF1SW-F4, respectively). Fumiquinazoline production increased in ISSFT-021 (P = 0.0004) but not in IF1SW-F4 compared to the two controls. Pyripyropene A production increased in both ISSFT-021 and IF1SW-F4 (P = 0.0063 and 0.0018, respectively). Observed SM yields for CEA10 were lower than for any other strain, with an observed decrease in production of all but two compounds (pyripyropene A and fumagillin) (Fig. 4A). Nevertheless, as production of SMs in media does not necessarily replicate the pattern of SM production during infections, the potential in vivo SM profiles of the ISS strains remain unclear.

FIG 4
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 4

Secondary metabolite production of ISS strains. (A) Secondary metabolite profiles of ISSFT-021, IF1SW-F4, CEA10, and Af293 when grown on GMM. Individual metabolite production is reported as either increased, decreased, or no difference. compared to that of Af293. (B) Metabolite quantification, showing the percent change for each metabolite in relation to Af293; significance was determined using a one-way ANOVA.

While a detailed analysis of SNPs with potential consequence on SM regulation and production was beyond the scope of the present study, Data Set S1 in the supplemental material shows polymorphisms within 26 SM gene clusters that produce either known SMs or have strong bioinformatic support to produce a likely SM (34). The combined analysis of CEA10, ISSFT-021, and IF1SW-F4 identified 1,578 variants in comparison with Af293 within the boundaries of the 26 SM gene clusters, and 504 of these variants were predicted to result in nonsynonymous substitution in an SM cluster gene (see Data Set S1). Importantly, our analysis corroborated the previously published point mutation R202L in FtmD (Afu8g00200), which results in loss of fumitremorgin production in Af293 (35), as well as the previously described frameshift mutation in TpcC in the CEA10 trypacidin cluster that leads to loss of function of the trypacidin polyketide synthase (36). A metabolite between pyripyropene A (peak no. 5) and fumagillin (peak no. 6) (Fig. 4A, starred) was observed via liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC/MS) in the CEA10, ISSFT-021, and IF1SW-F4 strains (see Fig. S3 in the supplemental material). We used high-resolution mass spectrometry (494.2276 positive mode) to obtain a proposed molecular formula of C27H31O6N3 for the compound (see Fig. S4 in the supplemental material). A chemical database (Reaxys) search using the proposed formula revealed no known A. fumigatus metabolite that matched this formula. However, the metabolites versicamide F from Aspergillus versicolor (37) and taichunamides C and F from Aspergillus taichungensis (38) matched the proposed formula. These findings might indicate that the compound is a previously uncharacterized prenylated indole alkaloid produced by A. fumigatus.

Figure S3

Secondary metabolite production of ISS strains, with a focus on an unknown A. fumigatus compound. Secondary metabolite profiles shown are for ISSFT-021, IF1SW-F4, and CEA10 when grown on glucose minimal medium. Traces present PDA, total, and extracted ion counts and ESIMS (positive mode) data for the unknown compound analyzed by LC/MS. Download Figure S3, PDF file, 1.2 MB.
Copyright © 2016 Knox et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license .

Figure S4

High-resolution mass spectrometry of unknown compound. ESIMS (positive mode) spectrum of a new, unknown compound, with its proposed molecular formula. Download Figure S4, PDF file, 0.7 MB.
Copyright © 2016 Knox et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license .

Data Set S1

Polymorphisms in 26 A. fumigatus SM biosynthetic clusters. Using Af293 as the reference genome, polymorphisms within 26 supported SM biosynthetic clusters found in CEA10, ISSFT-021, and IF1SW-F4 are detailed as deletions, insertions, multiple nucleotide variants (MNV), replacements, or single nucleotide variants (SNV). Download Data Set S1, PDF file, 1.6 MB.
Copyright © 2016 Knox et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license .

ISS strains exhibit increased virulence in a vertebrate model of invasive aspergillosis.Given the ISS’s intimate environment and potential for frequent exposure between astronauts and A. fumigatus, it is of high importance to investigate the virulence potential of these isolates. Therefore, we tested the virulence of both ISS strains against CEA10 and Af293 in a larval zebrafish model of IA, which has been shown to recapitulate key aspects of disease observed in murine models and human disease (39, 40). As immunocompetent zebrafish larvae, like humans and mice, do not succumb to lethal infection following A. fumigatus challenge (39), we utilized neutrophil-deficient larvae [Tg(mpx:mCherry-2A-Rac2D57N)] (41) to investigate virulence differences between strains. Recapitulating previous reports in a murine infection model (27), we found that CEA10 was more virulent than Af293 (P < 0.0001), while ISSFT-021 caused significantly more lethality than CEA10 (P = 0.0075) (Fig. 5A). Furthermore, no significant difference was observed in virulence between ISSFT-021 and IF1SW-F4 (P > 0.1), while IF1SW-F4, like ISSFT-021 (Fig. 5A), was significantly more virulent than CEA10 (P = 0.0025) (Fig. 5B).

FIG 5
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 5

Virulence assessment in a larval zebrafish model of invasive aspergillosis. (A) Survival outcome through 7 days postinfection (dpi) of neutrophil-deficient mpx:mCherry-2A-Rac2D57N larvae, in which neutrophils specifically are unable to reach the site of infection. (B) Survival outcome of the second ISS isolate, IF1SW-F4, compared to that of CEA10 and ISSFT-021 in mpx:mCherry-2A-Rac2D57N larvae. Shown are data pooled from three (A) or four (B) independent experimental replicates. Statistical analyses were performed using the Cox proportional hazard regression analysis.

DISCUSSION

In the present study, we investigated two independently isolated strains of A. fumigatus from the ISS for differences in genetic makeup, growth characterizations, stress tolerance, secondary metabolite production, and virulence. While microbial colonization of space vessels is unavoidable and is well-established in the literature (1, 8), less understood is how the unique stresses found aboard space vessels, such as increased irradiation and microgravity, affect microorganisms and their biology. Therefore, as A. fumigatus is the most significant airborne opportunistic mold pathogen of humans (42), it became prudent to investigate the ISS A. fumigatus strains for factors that may affect health-related interactions with astronauts aboard the ISS and initiate lines of investigation into how space flight may influence this particular pathogen.

Samples from HEPA filters, 16 surface locations, 12 air samples, and debris collected using vacuum cleaners across multiple spaceflights during the Microbial Observatory Experiments (7) revealed the presence of many microbial species aboard the ISS. Among ~200 bacterial and fungal isolates identified using molecular methods (7), fungal strains were particularly enriched with members of the genera Penicillium, Aspergillus, and Rodoturulla. However, only two isolates were identified as A. fumigatus from these samples; one each from a 40-month-old HEPA filter (ISSFT-021) and a surface location adjacent to the cupola window (IF1SW-F4) (Fig. 1A). Interestingly, since the inception of the ISS, ~20 years of environmental monitoring did not reveal the presence of A. fumigatus (43). Considering the environmental ubiquity of this species, this anomaly might be partly due to collections from small surface areas (25 cm2), compared to the larger 1-m2 sampling areas adapted during this study. In addition, regular ISS operation and environmental monitoring protocols utilized conventional methods, in which the isolation of Aspergillus was reported but not identified to the species level (43). Unfortunately, ISS operations did not archive any fungal strains isolated during these 20 years of operation; therefore, we could not address whether or not any of the Aspergillus isolates were A. fumigatus. Hence, even though A. fumigatus is ubiquitous in the terrestrial atmospheres and would thus be an unsurprising contaminant of the ISS, this is the first report about the isolation of A. fumigatus from the ISS.

Following initial culture and ITS sequence-based identification of the isolates as A. fumigatus, we undertook WGS to facilitate the current and future studies of ISSFT-021 and IF1SW-F4 (26). Analysis of SNPs among all publicly available sequenced isolates (>100 total; 95 unique isolates included in the present study) across a global range of clinical and environmental sources shows considerable genetic diversity, consistent with previous reports of genetic variance in A. fumigatus (22). Given that we are unable to know how, when, and where ISSFT-021 and IF1SW-F4 initially colonized the ISS, it is curious that both strains bare the closest relationship to the strains Af300 and JN10 (27) (Fig. 1C; see also Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). Af300 was isolated in 1995 in Manchester, United Kingdom, from a leukemia patient (David Denning, personal communication), and JN10 is an environmental isolate of unknown sampling origin. Further clouding the origins of these strains is that cargo shipments to the ISS are manufactured and launched from all over the world.

Notably, both ISS isolates show no enhanced accumulation of SNPs (Fig. 1B; see also Fig. S2 in the supplemental material), suggesting that life aboard the space station was not accompanied by an accumulation of mutations presumably from enhanced exposure to irradiation and microgravity; however, since the proper terrestrial control strains do not exist for ISSFT-021 and IF1SW-F4, we cannot determine/quantify mutations that may have accumulated during time aboard the ISS. Interestingly, previous data suggest that DNA damage resulting from time aboard the ISS may favor chromosomal aberrations and large deletions over point mutations (28–30), a conclusion that may have been fueled by studies that reported finding no detectable mutations from time in space, although these experiments utilized experimental setups that would favor detection of point mutations over large genetic lesions, or the studies were possibly too short in duration for mutations to accumulate (44). Sequence analysis with ISS A. fumigatus strains suggested that there is no enrichment for any type of mutation we could identify through our resequencing-based mapping approach, namely, indels, in comparison with Af293 (see Fig. S2), yet it remains to be determined whether A. fumigatus possesses inherent characteristics that would facilitate maintenance of genomic integrity over other biological systems in space (including humans and other eukaryotes) from which mutation data have been inferred.

Our reported in vitro analysis showing increased radial growth rates for space isolates versus clinical isolates (Fig. 2) is not without precedent, as enhanced fungal growth from Aspergillus and Penicillium species recovered from Mir, compared to terrestrial reference strains, has previously been reported (8). However, there is a considerable difference among growth rates for terrestrial strains of A. fumigatus, and so whether or not the increased growth rate observed in this report is a consequence of life in space (i.e., mutation) or simply due to natural variation is not possible to determine without comparison to original terrestrial isolates. While a detailed analysis of specific SNPs in the ISS isolates was beyond the scope of our present study, the number total SNP differences of ISSFT-021 and IF1SW-F4 compared to Af293 were within the range of documented variance among existing sequences of environmental A. fumigatus strains (Fig. 1), suggesting that, without a more detailed analysis, the ISS strains likely reflect genetic diversity already found on Earth (22).

While it is conceivable that differential growth rates among A. fumigatus isolates (21) may favor more rapidly growing strains in gaining a niche foothold, the stresses aboard the ISS likely influence microbial colonization to a greater extent than de novo growth rates. As such, stress tolerance may play a more dominant role in the ability of A. fumigatus to colonize harsh niches. Given that the stress response pathways of A. fumigatus are unarguably involved in this organism’s environmental ubiquity and its leading position as an opportunistic pathogen (18, 45, 46), it is still unclear how existing genetic heterogeneity plays a role in stress tolerance. While limited in scope, we found no enhanced ability of the ISS strains over Af293 and CEA10 to tolerate a diversity of chemical stresses (Fig. 3), suggesting that stress tolerance may not play a dominant role in A. fumigatus persistence aboard the ISS. Future studies aimed at guiding enhanced disinfectant protocols aboard space vessels should consider these data and pursue effective methods for clearing surfaces of A. fumigatus. However, it was observed that both ISSFT-021 and IF1SW-F4 were significantly more resistant to UV irradiation than clinical isolates (26), and current studies are under way that will leverage sequence data and molecular approaches to elucidate these mechanisms. It is critical to note that care must be taken in interpreting these results, as terrestrial equivalents or reference strains, even if identified as the same species, do not represent experimental controls. Future studies aimed at determining the effects of microgravity and space irradiation on A. fumigatus biology will require direct comparison to terrestrial clones not subjected to time in space.

Examination of secondary metabolite profiles of clinical and ISS strains revealed differences in SM production (Fig. 4). Whether these changes are due to adaptations to unfavorable environmental conditions, such as low nutrient availability, enhanced irradiation, and microgravity, remains to be determined and will be the focus of future studies. One clear example linking genomic data to SM production was found with strain IF1SW-F4, with which increased levels of fumigaclavine A (47) were detected, whereas fumigaclavine C (48) production was significantly decreased (Fig. 4). The prenyl transferase FgaPT1 in A. fumigatus is known to be responsible for the prenylation of fumigaclavine A to form fumigaclavine C (49), and in the IF1SW-F4 strain there exists a frameshift mutation in fgaPT1 (see Data Set S1 in the supplemental material) that might be responsible for the observed accumulation of fumigaclavine A. Additional differences in metabolite production between the two ISS strains compared to Af293 could be due to SNPs found within regions of the secondary metabolite gene clusters (see Data Set S1). Fumagillin, a toxic SM (50), is produced by both Af293 and CEA10, while production was significantly decreased in both of the ISS strains (Fig. 4). While fumagillin can alter neutrophil responses to pathogenic stimuli (51, 52), among other elements of host defense (17), it has been proposed as a potential virulence factor. Interestingly, the more virulent ISS strains showed lower fumagillin production, suggesting that in vitro fumagillin production profiles may not be accurate predictors of virulence potential, based on our in vivo findings with the neutrophil-deficient larval zebrafish model. Monomethylsulochrin, a proposed precursor in the trypacidin pathway, is produced by both ISS strains and Af293 but not by CEA10, despite the ability of this strain to produce trypacidin (36). However, our study was insufficient to pinpoint which, if any, of the metabolites has influence on the increased virulence observed in the two ISS strains, and additional experiments will be necessary to identify the connection between increased virulence and specific metabolite production.

As A. fumigatus is a ubiquitous environmental organism and multifaceted opportunistic pathogen (19), many studies have aimed at understanding traits underlying pathogenesis and whether a strain’s virulence potential can be inferred preemptively and indirectly from isolation source, physical traits, or genetic data. Interestingly, studies have been unable to consistently support the hypothesis that clinical strains have undergone a selective bottleneck and are therefore more virulent than environmental isolates (21, 22, 53). As both ISSFT-021 and IF1SW-F4 are environmental isolates, albeit from a highly unusual environment, our finding that both ISS strains are more virulent than the two clinical strains reinforces the idea that isolation source is not predictive of pathogenic potential and also reinforces the conclusion that all strains of A. fumigatus, regardless of origin, possess an infective potential (54). Alternatively, previous reports have suggested a correlation between in vitro growth rates and virulence (21, 55). While we did observe higher growth and germination rates of ISS isolates in vitro (Fig. 2), the greatest difference was the slower growth and germination of Af293 compared to all others, which may contribute to the lower virulence of this strain; however, the identical germination rates and slightly reduced radial growth of CEA10 are less suggestive of an underlying influence on virulence potential. Additionally, the growing body of literature characterizing A. fumigatus strain-dependent phenotypes has revealed broad phenotypes, including toxin production (54, 56) and host immune responses (27), that suggest a complex milieu of factors involved in predicting the outcome of host-A. fumigatus interactions. Furthermore, there has been speculation that mating type (MAT1-1, MAT1-2) may offer insight into the pathogenic potential of A. fumigatus isolates (53, 57), yet this supposition has been challenged by more recent studies using isogenic mating-type pairs (58). Both ISS strains are closely related (Fig. 1C; see also Fig. S1 in the supplemental material) but possess opposite mating types (Fig. 1C) and were found to be more virulent than either Af293 (MAT1-2) or CEA10 (MAT1-1) and equally virulent as each other (Fig. 5). Regardless of these strains coming from uncontrolled genetic backgrounds, our finding supports current data that suggest there is no link between mating type and virulence. Despite the ISS isolates coming from an extreme environment and possessing opposite mating types, different growth rates in vitro, and distinct SM profiles between themselves and Af293 and CEA10, our cumulative data are unable to offer a predictive potential of enhanced virulence for these strains.

This study has shown the existence of distinct A. fumigatus isolates on the ISS. The origin of these strains remains unknown, yet analysis of genome sequence data showed their relationship to 93 other sequenced genomes of this species and revealed a close relationship to a known patient isolate, Af300. Considering the genetic diversity and environmental ubiquity of A. fumigatus, it is not surprising to observe significant phenotypic variation among isolates, including growth rates, stress tolerance, SM production, and virulence, with virulence being a multifaceted phenotype in this opportunistic pathogen and likely a culmination of traits that render the pathogenic potential of any given isolate difficult to predict. Altogether, the present study reinforces the idea that all A. fumigatus strains, regardless of isolation source or genetic origin, represent potential pathogens and should serve to guide current and future sampling and maintenance regimens for space vessels.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Isolation and verification of A. fumigatus isolates from the ISS.Particulates associated with HEPA filters were scraped, and approximately 1 mg of material was resuspended in sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; pH 7.4) before being spread onto potato dextrose agar (PDA) plates (7). To collect samples from cupola surfaces, sterile polyester wipes were used. The sampling wipes were assembled and manifested in the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL, Pasadena, CA) prior to space flight. Briefly, each polyester wipe (9 by 9 in.; ITW Texwipe, Mahwah, NJ) was folded two times and soaked in 15 ml of sterile molecular-grade water (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) for 30 min, followed by transfer to a sterile zip lock bag (59). The wipes were packed along with the other kit elements at Ames Research Center (ARC; Moffett Field, CA) and included TC (total count, tryptic soy agar) and SDA (Sabouraud dextrose agar) contact slides (Hycon, EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA), Opsite adhesive tape (Smith & Nephew, Inc., London, United Kingdom), and an air sampling device with gelatin filters (Sartorius, Göttingen, Germany). Each sampling kit was sent to the ISS as a part of the Space-X cargo and was returned to Earth on Soyuz TM-14 or the Dragon capsule. The kits were delivered to JPL immediately after returning to Earth. During each sampling session on the ISS, only one astronaut collected samples from eight different locations, using wipes and contact slides. Each wipe was used to collect a sample 1 m2. The control wipe (environmental control) was only taken out from the zip lock bag, unfolded, and packed back into the zip lock. The samples were stored at 4°C until the return trip to Earth and subsequent processing.

The sample processing took place in a class 10K cleanroom at JPL immediately upon delivery of the return kits. Each wipe was aseptically taken out from the zip lock bag and transferred to a 500-ml sterile bottle containing 200 ml of sterile PBS. The bottle with the wipe was shaken for 2 min followed by concentration with a concentrating pipette (InnovaPrep, Drexel, MO) using 0.45-µm hollow fiber polysulfone tips and PBS elution fluid. The environmental control and each sample were concentrated to 4 ml. A 200-µl aliquot was serially diluted in PBS to estimate the cultivable population.

Concentrated samples were diluted in PBS (up to 10−6 of each original sample), plated on the media (100 µl; in duplicates) Reasoner’s 2A agar (R2A) for environmental bacteria and PDA for fungi, and incubated at 25°C for 7 days; CFU were then counted. A minimum of five isolates of distinct morphologies was picked up for each location from each type of medium. The isolates were archived in the semisolid R2A or PDA slants (agar media diluted 1:10) and stored at room temperature. For identification purposes, each fungal isolate was revived on PDA medium. Once a culture was confirmed to be pure, DNA extraction was performed by colony PCR (UltraClean DNA kit [Mo Bio, Carlsbad, CA] or Maxwell automated system [Promega, Madison, WI]). Concurrently, two cryobead stocks (Copán Diagnostics, Murrieta, CA) were prepared for each isolate. Fungal DNA was used for PCR to amplify ITS regions with primers ITS1F (5′ TTGGTCATTTAGAGGAAGTAA 3′) and Tw13 (5′ GGTCCGTGTTTCAAGACG 3′) (60) following an established protocol (61). The fungal sequences were searched against the UNITE database and identified based on the closest similarity to ITS sequences of fungal type strains (62).

Publicly available raw sequencing reads of all A. fumigatus strains used in this study were downloaded from either the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) or the EBI European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) for comparison to the ISS isolates. SNPs were called against the Af293 genome reference (NCBI accession number GCA_000002655.1 ) using the Snippy pipeline and default settings (63). Briefly, the Snippy program aligns reads to the genome reference sequence by using BWA v0.7.12-r1044 (64), and variants are called using the FreeBayes program v0.9.21-7-g7dd41db (65). The variants are then quality filtered, and a “core” set of SNP variants (defined as those SNPs with sufficient sequencing coverage for the genomic location for all isolates) are extracted from the data using Snippy. A custom python script (https://github.com/nextgenusfs/genome_scripts/blob/master/snippy2tree.py ) was used to convert the SNP data to binary format, and a maximum likelihood phylogeny was inferred using RAxML v8.2.8 (66) with 1,000 bootstrap replicates. Snippy variant call files (VCF) from CEA10, ISSFT-021, and IF1SW-F4 were imported into CLC Genomics Workbench v9.01, and the variants were filtered and annotated based on overlap with secondary metabolite gene cluster predictions (34). To determine which variants would result in nonsynonymous changes to coding genes, the variants were annotated using the Amino Acid Changes module of CLC Genomics Workbench.

Fungal culture.After initial isolation on PDA plates, all A. fumigatus strains were grown on solid glucose minimal medium at 37°C, unless otherwise noted, for conidial preparation, physiological analysis, and stress tests. Conidial preparations for in vitro analyses were harvested after approximately 72 h with sterile 0.01% Tween–water and gentle agitation with an L-shaped spreader before being passed through a double layer of sterile mica cloth into a 50-ml screw-cap tube. Conidia were enumerated with a hemocytometer before adjustment to various concentrations as needed. Original spore suspensions maintained as glycerol stocks were stored at − 80°C.

Physiological analysis.All GMM plates for physiological analysis and stress testing were measured to contain 25 ml. For radial growth assessment, 1 × 104 conidia in a volume of 10 µl were centrally inoculated onto GMM plates. Radial growth was measured daily at the time points indicated. For spore germination rate assays, 100 ml of liquid GMM was inoculated with 5 × 106 spores/ml and grown at 37°C and 250 rpm. At 2, 4, 6, and 8 h, 1-ml samples were drawn, pelleted in a tabletop centrifuge for 1 min at maximum rpm and resuspended in a final volume of 100 µl to concentrate spores and germlings for facile enumeration. As germlings can clump, clouding clear counts, each sample was briefly sonicated in a water bath for 10 s. One hundred cells per condition were counted and scored. A spore was considered germinated when the germ tube diameter was greater than or equal to the diameter of the swollen base.

Stress tests.Radial growth was assayed as described above but after supplementation with various stressors. Concentrations for stress chemicals were as follows: 1 M NaCl, 4 µM menadione, 25 µg/ml Congo red, and 0.01% methyl methanesulfonate. For assessment of H2O2 sensitivity, it is easier to obtain consistent results by using a modified diffusion assay (33) over direct medium supplementation, as done for the stressors listed above. Briefly, spores were evenly suspended in 55°C GMM while still liquid at a final count 1.5 × 104 per 25-ml plate. Following solidification of the agar, a 1-cm circular core was removed from the center of each plate, and the resulting hole was inoculated with 100 µl of 4% H2O2. Zones of inhibition were measured after 48 h.

Secondary metabolite extraction and analysis.Fungal isolates were cultivated at 30°C on GMM agar plates (6 g/liter NaNO3, 0.52 g/liter KCl, 0.52 g/liter MgSO4⋅7H2O, 1.52 g/liter KH2PO4, 10 g/liter d-glucose, 15 g/liter agar supplemented with 1 ml/liter of trace elements) at 10 × 106 spores/µl per plate (10 cm). After 5 days, agar was chopped into small pieces and extracted with 25 ml methanol (MeOH), followed by 1-h sonication and filtration. Extraction and sonication steps were repeated with 25 ml of 1:1 MeOH-dichloromethane. After a second filtration, combined crude extracts of each isolate were evaporated in vacuo to yield a residue that was then suspended in 25 ml of water and partitioned with ethanol acetate (EtOAc; 25 ml). The EtOAc layer was evaporated in vacuo, redissolved in 2 ml of 20% dimethyl sulfoxide–MeOH, and 10 µl was examined by HPLC-DAD-MS analysis. HPLC-MS was carried out using a ThermoFinnigan LCQ Advantage ion trap mass spectrometer with a reverse-phase C18 column (3 μm; 2.1 by 100 μm; Alltech Prevail) at a flow rate of 125 µl/min. The solvent gradient for LC/MS was 95% MeCN–H2O (solvent B) in 5% MeCN–H2O (solvent A), both of which contained 0.05% formic acid, as follows: 0% solvent B from 0 to 5 min, 0 to 100% solvent B from 5 min to 35 min, 100% solvent B from 35 to 40 min, 100 to 0% solvent B from 40 to 45 min, and reequilibration with 0% solvent B from 45 to 50 min.

Zebrafish care and maintenance.Adult zebrafish were reared as described previously (39). Briefly, adults were maintained on a dedicated aquatic system and exposed to a light/dark cycle of 14 h and 10 h, respectively, and fed twice daily. After spawning, embryos were collected in E3 buffer and stored at 28.5°C. Methelyne blue, an ingredient of E3 buffer that inhibits fungal growth, was omitted from E3 buffer (E3-MB) at 24 h postfertilization. All larval zebrafish procedures and adult husbandry were performed in compliance with NIH guidelines and approved by the University of Wisconsin—Madison Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

Larval zebrafish virulence assay.Virulence assays were performed using the larval zebrafish model of invasive aspergillosis as described previously (39) with slight modifications. Larval immune suppression was obtained genetically through the use of transgenic mpx:mCherry-2A-Rac2D57N larvae (41). Prior to infection, larvae were screened and selected for mCherry expression in neutrophils to identify individuals harboring the dominant negative allele. Briefly, hindbrain ventricle infections were performed at 48-h postfertilization, versus 36 h postfertilization, as originally reported. Briefly, conidial stocks in PBS at a concentration of 1.5 × 108 conidia/ml were mixed 2:1 with 1% phenol red to 1.0 × 108 conidia/ml to visualize injection success. Larvae were anesthetized in E3-MB supplemented with 0.2 nM tricaine (ethyl 3-aminobenzoate; Sigma-Aldrich) prior to microinjection of 3 nl spore suspension or PBS vehicle control into the hindbrain ventricle through the otic vesicle. Following microinjection, larvae were rinsed several times to remove anesthetic and housed individually in wells of a 96-well plate in ~100 µl E3-MB. Survival of individual larvae was scored daily using loss of heartbeat as the readout for mortality.

Statistical analysis.In order to compare differences in SM production between isolates, the area under the electrospray ionization curve (ESI) was integrated for each compound. SM data collected from three independent biological replicates were used for statistical analysis. Ordinary one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted to compare the level of production of seven identified SMs between Af293 (treated as a control) and CEA10, ISSFT-021, and IF1SW-F4. The data are presented as column charts with corresponding error bars. Data analysis was conducted using GraphPad Prism version 7. Survival analysis for larval zebrafish infection experiments was performed as previously described (39) by pooling experimental replicates and generating P values via Cox proportional hazards regression analysis.

Accession number(s).The ITS sequence for IF1SW-F4 is available under GenBank accession number KX675260 .

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Part of the research described in this publication was carried out at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under a contract with NASA. We thank Jay Perry, Marshall Space Flight Center, for providing the HEPA filter and the implementation team of the Microbial Observatory (Microbial Tracking) project at NASA Ames Research Center. We appreciate the technical help of Alexandra Checinska in isolating the fungal cultures.

B.P.K. wrote the manuscript and performed in vitro physiology, in vivo virulence assays, and corresponding analyses. A.B. and J.R. performed SM assays and corresponding analyses. J.M.P. performed bioinformatics analysis and created phylogenetic trees. N.P.K., C.C.C.W., and K.V. formulated the concept of the study and were involved in execution of all experiments. A.H. provided reagents and aided experimental design of the zebrafish virulence testing. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

We declare no competing interests.

This work was supported in part by the National Science Foundation-Emerging Frontiers in Research and Innovation-MIKS: grant 1136903 (C.C.C.W., N.P.K., and A.H.) and by 2012 Space Biology NNH12ZTT001N grant 19-12829-26 under task order NNN13D111T awarded to K.V., which also funded a graduate fellowship to A.B., and JPL subcontract 1511581 to C.C.C.W.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received August 9, 2016.
    • Accepted October 1, 2016.
  • Copyright © 2016 Knox et al.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license .

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Novikova N,
    2. De Boever P,
    3. Poddubko S,
    4. Deshevaya E,
    5. Polikarpov N,
    6. Rakova N,
    7. Coninx I,
    8. Mergeay M
    . 2006. Survey of environmental biocontamination on board the International Space Station. Res Microbiol157:5–12. doi:10.1016/j.resmic.2005.07.010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    1. National Research Council
    . 2011. Recapturing a future for space exploration. Committee for the Decadal Survey on Biological and Physical Sciences in Space. National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
  3. 3.↵
    1. Mehta SK,
    2. Cohrs RJ,
    3. Forghani B,
    4. Zerbe G,
    5. Gilden DH,
    6. Pierson DL
    . 2004. Stress-induced subclinical reactivation of varicella zoster virus in astronauts. J Med Virol72:174–179. doi:10.1002/jmv.10555.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.↵
    1. Hwang SA,
    2. Crucian B,
    3. Sams C,
    4. Actor JK
    . 2015. Post-space flight (STS-135) mouse splenocytes demonstrate altered activation properties and surface molecule expression. PLoS One10:e0124380. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0124380.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Brockett RM,
    2. Ferguson JK,
    3. Henney MR
    . 1978. Prevalence of fungi during Skylab missions. Appl Environ Microbiol36:243–246.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Makimura K,
    2. Hanazawa R,
    3. Takatori K,
    4. Tamura Y,
    5. Fujisaki R,
    6. Nishiyama Y,
    7. Abe S,
    8. Uchida K,
    9. Kawamura Y,
    10. Ezaki T,
    11. Yamaguchi H
    . 2001. Fungal flora on board the Mir-Space Station, identification by morphological features and ribosomal DNA sequences. Microbiol Immunol45:357–363. doi:10.1111/j.1348-0421.2001.tb02631.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Checinska A,
    2. Probst AJ,
    3. Vaishampayan P,
    4. White JR,
    5. Kumar D,
    6. Stepanov VG,
    7. Fox GE,
    8. Nilsson HR,
    9. Pierson DL,
    10. Perry J,
    11. Venkateswaran K
    . 2015. Microbiomes of the dust particles collected from the International Space Station and spacecraft assembly facilities. Microbiome3:50. doi:10.1186/s40168-015-0116-3.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Novikova ND
    . 2004. Review of the knowledge of microbial contamination of the Russian manned spacecraft. Microb Ecol47:127–132. doi:10.1007/s00248-003-1055-2.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    1. Sugita T,
    2. Yamazaki T,
    3. Makimura K,
    4. Cho O,
    5. Yamada S,
    6. Ohshima H,
    7. Mukai C
    . 2016. Comprehensive analysis of the skin fungal microbiota of astronauts during a half-year stay at the International Space Station. Med Mycol54:232–239. doi:10.1093/mmy/myv121.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Venkateswaran K,
    2. Vaishampayan P,
    3. Cisneros J,
    4. Pierson DL,
    5. Rogers SO,
    6. Perry J
    . 2014. International Space Station environmental microbiome—microbial inventories of ISS filter debris. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol98:6453–6466. doi:10.1007/s00253-014-5650-6.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  11. 11.↵
    1. Satoh K,
    2. Nishiyama Y,
    3. Yamazaki T,
    4. Sugita T,
    5. Tsukii Y,
    6. Takatori K,
    7. Benno Y,
    8. Makimura K
    . 2011. Microbe-I: fungal biota analyses of the Japanese experimental module KIBO of the International Space Station before launch and after being in orbit for about 460 days. Microbiol Immunol55:823–829. doi:10.1111/j.1348-0421.2011.00386.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Satoh K,
    2. Yamazaki T,
    3. Nakayama T,
    4. Umeda Y,
    5. Alshahni MM,
    6. Makimura M,
    7. Makimura K
    . 2016. Characterization of fungi isolated from the equipment used in the International Space Station or Space Shuttle. Microbiol Immunol60:295–302. doi:10.1111/1348-0421.12375.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Vesper SJ,
    2. Wong W,
    3. Kuo CM,
    4. Pierson DL
    . 2008. Mold species in dust from the International Space Station identified and quantified by mold-specific quantitative PCR. Res Microbiol159:432–435. doi:10.1016/j.resmic.2008.06.001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Baxi SN,
    2. Portnoy JM,
    3. Larenas-Linnemann D,
    4. Phipatanakul W,
    5. Environmental Allergens Workgroup
    . 2016. Exposure and health effects of fungi on humans. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract4:396–404. doi:10.1016/j.jaip.2016.01.008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Chamilos G,
    2. Luna M,
    3. Lewis RE,
    4. Bodey GP,
    5. Chemaly R,
    6. Tarrand JJ,
    7. Safdar A,
    8. Raad II,
    9. Kontoyiannis DP
    . 2006. Invasive fungal infections in patients with hematologic malignancies in a tertiary care cancer center: an autopsy study over a 15-year period (1989–2003). Haematologica91:986–989.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Pana Z-D,
    2. Farmaki E,
    3. Roilides E
    . 2014. Host genetics and opportunistic fungal infections. Clin Microbiol Infect20:1254–1264. doi:10.1111/1469-0691.12800.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Dagenais TR,
    2. Keller NP
    . 2009. Pathogenesis of Aspergillus fumigatus in invasive aspergillosis. Clin Microbiol Rev22:447–465. doi:10.1128/CMR.00055-08.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Paulussen C,
    2. Hallsworth JE,
    3. Álvarez-Pérez S,
    4. Nierman WC,
    5. Hamill PG,
    6. Blain D,
    7. Rediers H,
    8. Lievens B
    . 7 June2016. Ecology of aspergillosis: insights into the pathogenic potency of Aspergillus fumigatus and some other Aspergillus species. Microb Biotechnol. doi:10.1111/1751-7915.12367.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  19. 19.↵
    1. Kwon-Chung KJ,
    2. Sugui JA
    . 2013. Aspergillus fumigatus—what makes the species a ubiquitous human fungal pathogen?PLoS Pathog9:1–4. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1003743.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  20. 20.↵
    1. Alshareef F,
    2. Robson GD
    . 2014. Prevalence, persistence, and phenotypic variation of Aspergillus fumigatus in the outdoor environment in Manchester, UK, over a 2-year period. Med Mycol52:367–375. doi:10.1093/mmy/myu008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Amarsaikhan N,
    2. O’Dea EM,
    3. Tsoggerel A,
    4. Owegi H,
    5. Gillenwater J,
    6. Templeton SP
    . 2014. Isolate-dependent growth, virulence, and cell wall composition in the human pathogen Aspergillus fumigatus. PLoS One9:e100430. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0100430.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Alshareef F,
    2. Robson GD
    . 2014. Genetic and virulence variation in an environmental population of the opportunistic pathogen Aspergillus fumigatus. Microbiology160:742–751. doi:10.1099/mic.0.072520-0.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Teixeira J,
    2. Amorim A,
    3. Araujo R
    . 2015. Recombination detection in Aspergillus fumigatus through single nucleotide polymorphisms typing. Environ Microbiol Rep7:881–886. doi:10.1111/1758-2229.12321.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Heinekamp T,
    2. Thywißen A,
    3. Macheleidt J,
    4. Keller S,
    5. Valiante V,
    6. Brakhage AA
    . 2012. Aspergillus fumigatus melanins: interference with the host endocytosis pathway and impact on virulence. Front Microbiol3:440. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2012.00440.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Bayram O,
    2. Braus GH
    . 2012. Coordination of secondary metabolism and development in fungi: the velvet family of regulatory proteins. FEMS Microbiol Rev36:1–24. doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.2011.00285.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  26. 26.↵
    1. Singh NK,
    2. Blachowicz A,
    3. Checinska A,
    4. Wang C,
    5. Venkateswaran K
    . 2016. Draft genome sequences of two Aspergillus fumigatus strains, isolated from the International Space Station. Genome Announc4(4):00553-16. doi:10.1128/genomeA.00553-16.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  27. 27.↵
    1. Rizzetto L,
    2. Giovannini G,
    3. Bromley M,
    4. Bowyer P,
    5. Romani L,
    6. Cavalieri D
    . 2013. Strain dependent variation of immune responses to A. fumigatus: definition of pathogenic species. PLoS One8:e56651. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0056651.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. George K,
    2. Rhone J,
    3. Beitman A,
    4. Cucinotta FA
    . 2013. Cytogenetic damage in the blood lymphocytes of astronauts: effects of repeat long-duration space missions. Mutat Res756:165–169. doi:10.1016/j.mrgentox.2013.04.007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Fukuda T,
    2. Fukuda K,
    3. Takahashi A,
    4. Ohnishi T,
    5. Nakano T,
    6. Sato M,
    7. Gunge N
    . 2000. Analysis of deletion mutations of the rpsL gene in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae detected after long-term flight on the Russian space station Mir. Mutat Res470:125–132. doi:10.1016/S1383-5742(00)00054-5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Yatagai F,
    2. Honma M,
    3. Takahashi A,
    4. Omori K,
    5. Suzuki H,
    6. Shimazu T,
    7. Seki M,
    8. Hashizume T,
    9. Ukai A,
    10. Sugasawa K,
    11. Abe T,
    12. Dohmae N,
    13. Enomoto S,
    14. Ohnishi T,
    15. Gordon A,
    16. Ishioka N
    . 2011. Frozen human cells can record radiation damage accumulated during space flight: mutation induction and radioadaptation. Radiat Environ Biophys50:125–134. doi:10.1007/s00411-010-0348-3.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Shimizu K,
    2. Keller NP
    . 2001. Genetic involvement of a cAMP-dependent protein kinase in a G protein signaling pathway regulating morphological and chemical transitions in Aspergillus nidulans. Genetics157:591–600.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. 32.↵
    1. Coil DA,
    2. Neches RY,
    3. Lang JM,
    4. Brown WE,
    5. Severance M,
    6. Cavalier D,
    7. Eisen JA
    . 2016. Growth of 48 built environment bacterial isolates on board the International Space Station (ISS). PeerJ4:e1842. doi:10.7717/peerj.1842.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Thön M,
    2. Al-Abdallah Q,
    3. Hortschansky P,
    4. Brakhage AA
    . 2007. The thioredoxin system of the filamentous fungus Aspergillus nidulans: impact on development and oxidative stress response. J Biol Chem282:27259–27269. doi:10.1074/jbc.M704298200.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. 34.↵
    1. Bignell E,
    2. Cairns TC,
    3. Throckmorton K,
    4. Nierman WC,
    5. Keller NP
    . 2016. Secondary metabolite arsenal of an opportunistic pathogenic fungus. Philos Trans R Soc B371:20160023. doi:10.1098/rstb.2016.0023.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. Kato N,
    2. Suzuki H,
    3. Okumura H,
    4. Takahashi S,
    5. Osada H
    . 2013. A point mutation in ftmD blocks the fumitremorgin biosynthetic pathway in Aspergillus fumigatus strain Af293. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem77:1061–1067. doi:10.1271/bbb.130026.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  36. 36.↵
    1. Throckmorton K,
    2. Lim FY,
    3. Kontoyiannis DP,
    4. Zheng W,
    5. Keller NP
    . 2016. Redundant synthesis of a conidial polyketide by two distinct secondary metabolite clusters in Aspergillus fumigatus. Environ Microbiol18:246–259. doi:10.1111/1462-2920.13007.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  37. 37.↵
    1. Peng J,
    2. Gao H,
    3. Li J,
    4. Ai J,
    5. Geng M,
    6. Zhang G,
    7. Zhu T,
    8. Gu Q,
    9. Li D
    . 2014. Prenylated indole diketopiperazines from the marine-derived fungus Aspergillus versicolor. J Org Chem79:7895–7904. doi:10.1021/jo5010179.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. 38.↵
    1. Kagiyama I,
    2. Kato H,
    3. Nehira T,
    4. Frisvad JC,
    5. Sherman DH,
    6. Williams RM,
    7. Tsukamoto S
    . 2016. Taichunamides: prenylated indole alkaloids from Aspergillus taichungensis (IBT 19404). Angew Chem Int Ed Engl55:1128–1132. doi:10.1002/anie.201509462.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  39. 39.↵
    1. Knox BP,
    2. Deng Q,
    3. Rood M,
    4. Eickhoff JC,
    5. Keller NP,
    6. Huttenlocher A
    . 2014. Distinct innate immune phagocyte responses to Aspergillus fumigatus conidia and hyphae in zebrafish larvae. Eukaryot Cell13:1266–1277. doi:10.1128/EC.00080-14.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. 40.↵
    1. Herbst S,
    2. Shah A,
    3. Moya MM,
    4. Marzola V,
    5. Jensen B,
    6. Reed A,
    7. Birrell MA,
    8. Saijo S,
    9. Mostowy S,
    10. Shaunak S,
    11. Armstrong-James D
    . 2015. Phagocytosis-dependent activation of a TLR 9-BTK-calcineurin-NFAT pathway co-ordinates innate immunity to Aspergillus fumigates. EMBO Mol Med7:240–258. doi:10.15252/emmm.201401556.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. 41.↵
    1. Deng Q,
    2. Yoo SK,
    3. Cavnar PJ,
    4. Green JM,
    5. Huttenlocher A
    . 2011. Dual roles for Rac2 in neutrophil motility and active retention in zebrafish hematopoietic tissue. Dev Cell21:735–745. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2011.07.013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. 42.↵
    1. Latgé JP
    . 1999. Aspergillus fumigatus and aspergillosis. Clin Microbiol Rev12:310–350.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. 43.↵
    1. Pierson DL,
    2. Botkin DJ,
    3. Bruce RJ,
    4. Castro VA,
    5. Smith MJ,
    6. Oubre CM,
    7. Ott CM
    . 2013. Microbial monitoring of the International Space Station. 8th International Workshop on Space Microbiology. NASA, Washington, DC.
  44. 44.↵
    1. Takahashi A,
    2. Ohnishi K,
    3. Yokota A,
    4. Kumagai T,
    5. Nakano T,
    6. Ohnishi T
    . 2002. Mutation frequency of plasmid DNA and Escherichia coli following long-term space flight on Mir. J Radiat Res43:S137–S140. doi:10.1269/jrr.43.S137.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. 45.↵
    1. Askew DS
    . 2008. Aspergillus fumigatus: virulence genes in a street-smart mold. Curr Opin Microbiol11:331–337. doi:10.1016/j.mib.2008.05.009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. 46.↵
    1. Hartmann T,
    2. Sasse C,
    3. Schedler A,
    4. Hasenberg M,
    5. Gunzer M,
    6. Krappmann S
    . 2011. Shaping the fungal adaptome—stress responses of Aspergillus fumigatus. Int J Med Microbiol301:408–416. doi:10.1016/j.ijmm.2011.04.008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. 47.↵
    1. Janardhanan KK,
    2. Sattar A,
    3. Husain A
    . 1984. Production of fumigaclavine A by Aspergillus tamarii Kita. Can J Microbiol30:247–250. doi:10.1139/m84-036.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. 48.↵
    1. Cole RJ,
    2. Kirksey JW,
    3. Dorner JW,
    4. Wilson DM,
    5. Johnson JC,
    6. Johnson AN,
    7. Bedell DM,
    8. Springer JP,
    9. Chexal KK,
    10. Clardy JC,
    11. Cox RH
    . 1977. Mycotoxins produced by Aspergillus fumigatus species isolated from molded silage. J Agric Food Chem25:826–830. doi:10.1021/jf60212a015.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. 49.↵
    1. Unsöld IA,
    2. Li SM
    . 2006. Reverse prenyltransferase in the biosynthesis of fumigaclavine C in Aspergillus fumigatus: gene expression, purification, and characterization of fumigaclavine C synthase FGAPT1. ChemBioChem7:158–164. doi:10.1002/cbic.200500318.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. 50.↵
    1. Lin H-C,
    2. Chooi Y-H,
    3. Dhingra S,
    4. Xu W,
    5. Calvo AM,
    6. Tang Y
    . 2013. The fumagillin biosynthetic gene cluster in Aspergillus fumigatus encodes a cryptic terpene cyclase involved in the formation of β-trans-bergamotene. J Am Chem Soc135:4616–4619. doi:10.1021/ja312503y.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  51. 51.↵
    1. Fallon JP,
    2. Reeves EP,
    3. Kavanagh K
    . 2010. Inhibition of neutrophil function following exposure to the Aspergillus fumigatus toxin fumagillin. J Med Microbiol59:625–633. doi:10.1099/jmm.0.018192-0.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. 52.↵
    1. Fallon JP,
    2. Reeves EP,
    3. Kavanagh K
    . 2011. The Aspergillus fumigatus toxin fumagillin suppresses the immune response of Galleria mellonella larvae by inhibiting the action of haemocytes. Microbiology157:1481–1488. doi:10.1099/mic.0.043786-0.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. 53.↵
    1. Cheema MS,
    2. Christians JK
    . 2011. Virulence in an insect model differs between mating types in Aspergillus fumigatus. Med Mycol49:202–207. doi:10.3109/13693786.2010.512301.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. 54.↵
    1. Dogi C,
    2. Alonso V,
    3. Fochesato A,
    4. Poloni V,
    5. Cavaglieri L
    . 2015. Comparison of toxicogenic and immunosuppressive capacity of Aspergillus fumigatus strains isolated from clinical and corn silage samples. J Appl Microbiol118:175–181. doi:10.1111/jam.12673.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  55. 55.↵
    1. Paisley D,
    2. Robson GD,
    3. Denning DW
    . 2005. Correlation between in vitro growth rate and in vivo virulence in Aspergillus fumigatus. Med Mycol43:397–401. doi:10.1080/13693780400005866.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. 56.↵
    1. Alonso V,
    2. Aminahuel C,
    3. Díaz Vergara L,
    4. Pereyra C,
    5. Poloni V,
    6. Dalcero A,
    7. Cavaglieri L
    . 2016. Ecophysiology of environmental Aspergillus fumigatus and comparison with clinical strains on gliotoxin production and elastase activity. Lett Appl Microbiol62:160–168. doi:10.1111/lam.12523.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  57. 57.↵
    1. Alvarez-Perez S,
    2. Blanco JL,
    3. Alba P,
    4. Garcia ME
    . 2010. Mating type and invasiveness are significantly associated in Aspergillus fumigatus. Med Mycol48:273–277. doi:10.1080/13693780903095414.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  58. 58.↵
    1. Losada L,
    2. Sugui JA,
    3. Eckhaus MA,
    4. Chang YC,
    5. Mounaud S,
    6. Figat A,
    7. Joardar V,
    8. Pakala SB,
    9. Pakala S,
    10. Venepally P,
    11. Fedorova N,
    12. Nierman WC,
    13. Kwon-Chung KJ
    . 2015. Genetic analysis using an isogenic mating pair of Aspergillus fumigatus identifies azole resistance genes and lack of MAT locus’s role in virulence. PLoS Pathog11:e1004834. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1004834.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  59. 59.↵
    1. Venkateswaran K,
    2. La Duc MT,
    3. Vaishampayan P
    . 2012. Genetic inventory task; final report. JPL Publishing Group, Pasadena, CA.
  60. 60.↵
    1. Lai X,
    2. Cao L,
    3. Tan H,
    4. Fang S,
    5. Huang Y,
    6. Zhou S
    . 2007. Fungal communities from methane hydrate-bearing deep-sea marine sediments in South China Sea. ISME J1:756–762. doi:10.1038/ismej.2007.51.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  61. 61.↵
    1. Taylor DL,
    2. Bruns TD
    . 1999. Community structure of ectomycorrhizal fungi in a Pinus muricata forest: minimal overlap between the mature forest and resistant propagule communities. Mol Ecol8:1837–1850. doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.1999.00773.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  62. 62.↵
    1. Abarenkov K,
    2. Henrik Nilsson R,
    3. Larsson K,
    4. Alexander IJ,
    5. Eberhardt U,
    6. Erland S,
    7. Høiland K,
    8. Kjøller R,
    9. Larsson E,
    10. Pennanen T,
    11. Sen R,
    12. Taylor AFS,
    13. Tedersoo L,
    14. Ursing BM,
    15. Vrålstad T,
    16. Liimatainen K,
    17. Peintner U,
    18. Kõljalg U
    . 2010. The UNITE database for molecular identification of fungi—recent updates and future perspectives. New Phytol186:281–285. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03160.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  63. 63.↵
    1. Seemann T
    . 2015. Rapid haploid variant calling and core SNP phylogeny. https://gitbub.com/tseemann/snippy .
  64. 64.↵
    1. Li H
    . 2013. Aligning sequence reads, clone sequences and assembly contigs with BWA-MEM. arXiv:1303.3997. arXiv, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
  65. 65.↵
    1. Garrison E,
    2. Marth G
    . 2012. Haplotype-based variant detection from short-read sequencing. arXiv:1207.3907. arXiv, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
  66. 66.↵
    1. Stamatakis A
    . 2014. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics30:1312–1313. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Characterization of Aspergillus fumigatus Isolates from Air and Surfaces of the International Space Station
Benjamin P. Knox, Adriana Blachowicz, Jonathan M. Palmer, Jillian Romsdahl, Anna Huttenlocher, Clay C. C. Wang, Nancy P. Keller, Kasthuri Venkateswaran
mSphere Oct 2016, 1 (5) e00227-16; DOI: 10.1128/mSphere.00227-16

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print
Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this mSphere article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Characterization of Aspergillus fumigatus Isolates from Air and Surfaces of the International Space Station
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from mSphere
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in mSphere.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Characterization of Aspergillus fumigatus Isolates from Air and Surfaces of the International Space Station
Benjamin P. Knox, Adriana Blachowicz, Jonathan M. Palmer, Jillian Romsdahl, Anna Huttenlocher, Clay C. C. Wang, Nancy P. Keller, Kasthuri Venkateswaran
mSphere Oct 2016, 1 (5) e00227-16; DOI: 10.1128/mSphere.00227-16
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Aspergillus fumigatus
International Space Station
SNP analysis
secondary metabolites
virulence

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About mSphere
  • Board of Editors
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • Embargo Policy
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Warranty
  • Types of Articles
  • Getting Started
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #mSphereJ

@ASMicrobiology

       

 

Website feedback

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Online ISSN: 2379-5042