Skip to main content
  • ASM Journals
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Research and News from ASM Journals
    • mSphere of Influence: Commentaries from Early Career Microbiologists
    • Archive
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Getting Started
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mSphere
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • ASM Journals
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
mSphere
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Research and News from ASM Journals
    • mSphere of Influence: Commentaries from Early Career Microbiologists
    • Archive
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Getting Started
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mSphere
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
Observation | Applied and Environmental Science

Metagenomic Evidence for the Presence of Comammox Nitrospira-Like Bacteria in a Drinking Water System

Ameet J. Pinto, Daniel N. Marcus, Umer Zeeshan Ijaz, Quyen Melina Bautista-de lose Santos, Gregory J. Dick, Lutgarde Raskin
Steven J. Hallam, Editor
Ameet J. Pinto
aInfrastructure and Environment Research Division, School of Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel N. Marcus
bDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
cDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Umer Zeeshan Ijaz
aInfrastructure and Environment Research Division, School of Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Quyen Melina Bautista-de lose Santos
aInfrastructure and Environment Research Division, School of Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gregory J. Dick
bDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lutgarde Raskin
cDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Steven J. Hallam
University of British Columbia
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/mSphere.00054-15
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

We report metagenomic evidence for the presence of a Nitrospira-like organism with the metabolic potential to perform the complete oxidation of ammonia to nitrate (i.e., it is a complete ammonia oxidizer [comammox]) in a drinking water system. This metagenome bin was discovered through shotgun DNA sequencing of samples from biologically active filters at the drinking water treatment plant in Ann Arbor, MI. Ribosomal proteins, 16S rRNA, and nxrA gene analyses confirmed that this genome is related to Nitrospira-like nitrite-oxidizing bacteria. The presence of the full suite of ammonia oxidation genes, including ammonia monooxygenase and hydroxylamine dehydrogenase, on a single ungapped scaffold within this metagenome bin suggests the presence of recently discovered comammox potential. Evaluations based on coverage and k-mer frequency distribution, use of two different genome-binning approaches, and nucleic acid and protein similarity analyses support the presence of this scaffold within the Nitrospira metagenome bin. The amoA gene found in this metagenome bin is divergent from those of canonical ammonia and methane oxidizers and clusters closely with the unusual amoA gene of comammox Nitrospira. This finding suggests that previously reported imbalances in abundances of nitrite- and ammonia-oxidizing bacteria/archaea may likely be explained by the capacity of Nitrospira-like organisms to completely oxidize ammonia. This finding might have significant implications for our understanding of microbially mediated nitrogen transformations in engineered and natural systems.

IMPORTANCE Nitrification plays an important role in regulating the concentrations of inorganic nitrogen species in a range of environments, from drinking water and wastewater treatment plants to the oceans. Until recently, aerobic nitrification was considered to be a two-step process involving ammonia-oxidizing bacteria or archaea and nitrite-oxidizing bacteria. This process requires close cooperation between these two functional guilds for complete conversion of ammonia to nitrate, without the accumulation of nitrite or other intermediates, such as nitrous oxide, a potent greenhouse gas. The discovery of a single organism with the potential to oxidize both ammonia and nitrite adds a new dimension to the current understanding of aerobic nitrification, while presenting opportunities to rethink nitrogen management in engineered systems.

OBSERVATION

Until recently, aerobic nitrification was considered to be a two-step process involving two functional guilds. The process of nitrification was considered split between ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB) (1) and ammonia-oxidizing archaea (AOA) (2), which oxidize ammonia to nitrite, and strict nitrite-oxidizing bacteria (NOB) (3), which oxidize nitrite to nitrate. The phylogenetic distribution of AOB is limited to the Betaproteobacteria and Gammaproteobacteria; AOA fall within the Thaumarchaea, and NOB span the Proteobacteria, Chloroflexi, Nitrospirae, and Nitrospinae. However, the recent discovery of complete ammonia oxidizer (comammox) organisms, i.e., bacteria that completely oxidize ammonia to nitrate (4), within the genus Nitrospira has significantly changed our understanding of the aerobic nitrification process (5, 6). In the current study, we report metagenomic evidence of a Nitrospira-like organism that has the potential to perform both steps of the aerobic nitrification process and thus is likely to be a comammox bacterium. Specifically, it has genes to oxidize nitrite to nitrate (nitrite oxidoreductase) and possesses all genes required for ammonia oxidation, i.e., ammonia monooxygenase (amoA, amoB, amoC) and hydroxylamine dehydrogenase (also known as hydroxylamine oxidoreductase) (hao). This metagenome bin was discovered through shotgun DNA sequencing of samples from biologically active filters at a drinking water treatment plant (Ann Arbor, MI). IDBA-UD assembly (7), CONCOCT genome binning (8), and manual curation (see Text S1 in the supplemental material) resulted in 51 high-quality draft genomes with 2 to 755 scaffolds (median = 73), N50 ranging from 7.4 to 114 kbp (median = 86.9 kbp), and levels of completeness ranging from 77 to 100% (9). All genome bins were annotated by the Integrated Microbial Genomes Expert Review (IMG ER) system (10).

Text S1

Additional descriptions of analyses. Download Text S1, DOCX file, 0.03 MB.
Copyright © 2015 Pinto et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license .

One of the genomes was phylogenetically assigned to the Nitrospira genus (JGI GOLD identification number Ga0074138) by Amphora2 (11). This 4.1-Mbp genome consists of 61 scaffolds (N50 = 150.74 kbp) with a GC content of 55%, 4,196 coding sequences, a complete 5S rRNA gene, and partial 16S and 23S rRNA genes. The genome bin was 88% complete, with 2.8% likely contamination based on 182 markers (9). The Amphora2 phylogenetic assignment was confirmed by Ribosomal Database Project (RDP) classification (12) of the 574-bp partial 16S rRNA gene in this genome (100% confidence). Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic analyses (13) of 16 syntenic ribosomal proteins (14) (Fig. 1A; see also Fig. S1 in the supplemental material) and the 16S rRNA gene (Fig. 1B) and Bayesian phylogenetic analyses (15) of the nxrA gene (Fig. 1C; Text S1) indicated that this metagenome bin is related to Nitrospira lineage II bacteria. The metagenome bin contains two copies of nxrA, both of which have high levels of similarity to Nitrospira lineage II bacterial genes (Fig. 1C). We were unable to recover the nxrB gene in the metagenome bin and suspect that this was due to assembly issues, as both copies of nxrA were found at the ends of their respective scaffolds. Indeed, mapping of the reads extracted for reassembly indicated that 391 paired-end reads mapped to the nxrB genes of organisms in Nitrospira lineage II, confirming that this gene was present but not assembled. As with Nitrospira moscoviensis, the new metagenome bin also contained a full suite of genes for urea transport and its degradation to ammonia (16).

FIG 1
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1

(A, left) Radial cladogram based on RAxML-based maximum-likelihood phylogeny (500 bootstraps, gamma distribution model, and LG+F substitution model) constructed using 16 syntenic ribosomal proteins, with prominent phylum-level affiliation of branches indicated. The reference sequence from the phylum Aquificae was used as the outgroup for this analysis. (Right) Expanded view showing the placement of the Nitrospira metagenome bin within the phylum Nitrospirae, with >90% bootstrap support indicated. The comammox Nitrospira species are in green, while strict NOB are in red. A detailed annotated tree is provided in the supplemental material, while the concatenated alignment used to perform phylogenetic analyses is available on figshare (http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1619897 ). (B, left) Radial cladogram based on RAxML-based maximum-likelihood phylogeny (1,000 bootstraps, gamma distribution model, GTR substitution model) constructed using 16S rRNA genes from 87 reference sequences within the genus Nitrospira and the partial 16S rRNA gene within the Nitrospira metagenome bin. The different lineages are in different colors. (Right) Expanded view of Nitrospira lineage 2, showing the placement of the 16S rRNA genome from the Nitrospira metagenome bin alongside recently published comammox Nitrospira organisms. Comammox Nitrospira bacteria are in green, while strict NOB are in red. (C) Bayesian inference phylogeny (20,000 generations, standard deviation = 0.02) nxrA genes from Nitrospirae and Planctomycetes, with the root placed on outgroup Nitrococcus mobilis (class Gammaproteobacteria). Nodes with >99% bootstrap support are indicated with black circles. The nxrA genes from the Nitrospira metagenome bin cluster within lineage 2. (D) Arrangement of genes in the region from kbp 69.1 to 92.7 of scaffold 158 with ammonia oxidation genes and those on scaffold 123 with an arrangement similar to that of comammox Nitrospira bacteria. Hypothetical proteins are colored in gray, while genes annotated as coding for hypothetical proteins but showing homology to orfM, amoD, and amoE are also marked. The solid line indicates continuity between two fragments of scaffold 158, while the dotted line indicates likely connectivity between scaffold 123 and scaffold 158.

Figure S1

Detailed RAxML-based phylogenetic tree corresponding to the radial cladogram in Fig. 1A. The tree was constructed using a concatenated trimmed alignment of 16 syntenic ribosomal proteins (Text S1) using the gamma distribution model, LG+F substitution model, 500 bootstraps, and a fixed seed. The trimmed and concatenated alignment is available on figshare (http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1619897 ). Bootstrap support is shown at the nodes. Prominent phyla are colored corresponding to the radial cladogram in Fig. 1A. Download Figure S1, PDF file, 0.01 MB.
Copyright © 2015 Pinto et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license .

The newly described metagenome bin contained genes involved in ammonia oxidation (amoA, amoB, amoC, and hao) on a single 92.7-kbp scaffold (scaffold 158; scaffold range, 101 to 161) in close succession on a region beginning at 69 kbp (Fig. 1D). This observation is consistent with reports of recently described comammox bacteria that have radically altered our understanding of the nitrogen cycle (5, 6) and provides further indication of the metabolic versatility of Nitrospira bacteria (16–18). In addition to finding the amo and hao genes, we found several genes on scaffold 158 and a second scaffold (scaffold 123) within this metagenome bin with a gene arrangement similar to that of the recently published comammox bacteria. First, the hao gene cluster was preceded by several genes associated with heme export and cytochrome c biogenesis (ccmA to -H), a feature not seen in any published AOB genomes and thus suggested as a diagnostic feature for comammox Nitrospira (5) (Fig. 1D). Second, we found a gene that likely codes for membrane-bound protein OrfM based on its similarity to the corresponding gene in “Candidatus Nitrospira inopinata” (identity = 69%, E value = 5e−132, bit score = 368) (5). However, IMG annotation and subsequent independent annotation efforts suggested that it was a hypothetical protein. Third, we found homologues of amoD (n = 2) and amoE arranged in close succession on scaffold 123, genes that were originally annotated as encoding hypothetical proteins. Their levels of identity to the corresponding genes in “Ca. Nitrospira inopinata” were 66% (E value = 1e−92) and 66.5% (E value = 4e−97) for amoD and 65% (E value = 2e−86) for amoE. These three genes were preceded by two genes annotated as encoding bacterioferritin and succeeded by the copper binding/resistance genes copC and copD, an arrangement consistent with that of the recently described comammox Nitrospira organism (5, 6). The copD gene was followed by a partial amoC gene at the 5′ end of scaffold 123, which is potentially contiguous to the partial amoC gene found at the 3′ end of scaffold 158. Despite these highly conserved features between our Nitrospira metagenome bin and the three other genome bins described recently, it is important to note that our observation is purely metagenomic in nature. Further experimental analyses need to be performed to (i) estimate the abundance of comammox Nitrospira organisms in the sampled drinking water filters and (ii) confirm the expression of these genes and link them to ammonia/nitrite oxidation.

To assess whether the presence of ammonia oxidation genes in the Nitrospira-like metagenome bin was an artifact, we considered the potential for (i) misannotation, (ii) misassembly, and (iii) incorrect genome binning. First, IMG ER annotation indicated strong support for amoA, amoB, and hao against sequences in the KEGG, InterPro, TIGR, and Pfam databases. amoC was confirmed only against the Pfam database (E value = 1.5e−25), potentially because it was a partial gene at the end of the scaffold. Second, we considered the likelihood of misassembly of scaffold 158 using coverage-per-base information (Fig. S2A and S2B) and also checked the phylogenetic signal along the length of the scaffold (Text S1). Our analyses confirmed that the scaffold not only was properly assembled (there is strong support for this conclusion from properly mapped reads) but also had regions of similarity to Nitrospira-like bacteria across nearly the entire scaffold length, including ribosomal protein L31P found on this scaffold, whose best hit was Nitrospira sp. ENR4 (NCBI accession number CUQ65102.1 , total score = 132, query coverage = 100%, E value = 3e−38, percent identity = 88%), an enrichment of “Ca. Nitrospira inopinata.” Finally, we checked whether the scaffold was correctly binned into the Nitrospira-like metagenome bin. To do this, we compared the coverage per sample of scaffold 158 (Fig. S2C) and the k-mer frequency distribution (Fig. S2D) to those of other scaffolds in this metagenome bin. Both analyses suggested that this scaffold was not an outlier with respect to the other scaffolds in the bin. We also performed an Emergent Self-Organizing Map (ESOM) analysis (19) to test whether an independent binning approach would place the scaffold within this metagenome bin (Fig. 2A). ESOM analysis identified three outlier scaffolds unrelated to ammonia oxidation (Fig. 2B; Text S1), while the scaffold with ammonia oxidation genes binned with the Nitrospira-like metagenome bin (Fig. 2C). Based on these three lines of evidence (annotation, assembly, and binning), we conclude that the scaffold with ammonia oxidation genes belongs to the Nitrospira-like metagenome bin and thus suggests the presence of a comammox bacterium in the drinking water system of Ann Arbor, MI. The amoA gene of the newly reported Nitrospira-like metagenome bin clustered closely with the novel amoA gene of comammox Nitrospira bacteria. Phylogenetic analyses (15, 16) indicated that it branches from betaproteobacterial amoA but clusters closely with pmoA found in the metagenome of Crenothrix polyspora (Fig. 2C), a gammaproteobacterial methane oxidizer detected in a drinking water treatment plant in Germany (20), and “Ca. Nitrospira nitrificans” (6). It is interesting to note that one of the eight copies of 16S rRNA found in the Crenothrix polyspora metagenome on IMG belongs to a Nitrospira-like organism, suggesting that the gene annotated as pmoA might in fact be comammox amoA.

Figure S2

Coverage per base for scaffold 158 within the Nitrospira-like genome using all reads used for reassembly (A) and properly mapped reads (both pairs mapped with correct insert sizes) (B). Two regions with higher-than-average coverage using properly mapped reads and the portion of the scaffold with ammonia oxidation genes are indicated. Per-sample coverage for all scaffolds (C) and comparison of k-mer frequency distributions for scaffold 158 and the median for all scaffolds (D) in the Nitrospira-like metagenome bin indicate that scaffold 158 is not an outlier. Download Figure S2, JPG file, 2.5 MB.
Copyright © 2015 Pinto et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license .

FIG 2
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 2

(A) Tiled view of an ESOM map constructed using all 51 metagenome bins assembled from the samples collected in this study, with the white square encompassing the Nitrospira-like metagenome bin. Some metagenome bins expand over the edge of a single ESOM grid. Hence, a tiled view consisting of four copies of the ESOM grid is shown to allow for visualization of metagenome bins at the edge as contiguous clusters. This results in all metagenome bins included in the ESOM analyses appearing four times in the tiled view. (B) Enlarged view of panel A indicating three scaffold fragments that were outliers based on ESOM analyses. (C) Enlarged view of panel A showing fragments of scaffold 158 containing ammonia oxidation genes that were binned with the Nitrospira metagenome. The ESOM binning procedure and contents of the three outlier scaffolds/scaffold fragments are presented in Text S1 in the supplemental material. (D) RAxML-based maximum-likelihood tree constructed using amino acid sequences of the amoA gene in the Nitrospira metagenome bin and pmoA/amoA sequences from a range of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria/archaea and methane-oxidizing bacteria, including the Nitrospira comammox. The tree was built from a trimmed muscle alignment using the Dayhoff model for protein evolution, gamma distribution model, and 500 bootstraps using the archaeal amoA gene of Nitrosopumilus maritimus as the outgroup. Branches are colored according to phylogenetic affiliation, and node support of >70% is indicated. This placement of the amoA gene from the Nitrospira-like genome and overall tree topology were also confirmed by neighbor-joining analysis (500 bootstraps) and the unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA) (500 bootstraps) in Geneious and Bayesian phylogeny inference (20,000 generations) (Fig. S3).

Figure S3

Bayesian inference phylogeny (20,000 generation, standard deviation = 0.017) for amino acid sequences of the amoA gene in the Nitrospira metagenome bin and pmoA/amoA sequences from a range of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria/archaea and methane-oxidizing bacteria, including a Nitrospira comammox. The root was placed on the archaeal amoA gene of Nitrosopumilus maritimus. Branches are colored according to phylogenetic affiliation, and nodes with >70% bootstrap support are indicated. Download Figure S3, PDF file, 0.1 MB.
Copyright © 2015 Pinto et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license .

As part of this study, we also assembled a draft metagenome bin of Nitrosomonas-like AOB (GOLD identification number Ga0074132). However, due to the highly fragmented nature of this metagenome bin (598 scaffolds, N50 = 7.4 kbp), we were unable to recover all genes associated with nitrification. Nonetheless, its close affiliation with bacteria within the genus Nitrosomonas suggests that other canonical AOB were also present in these filters. To check for the presence of bacterial and archaeal amoA genes in the drinking water filter samples, we annotated the master assembly against a custom database of bacterial and archaeal amoA genes (Text S1). Only four significant amoA hits were detected in the master assembly, with two of these mapping to Betaproteobacteria-like amoA. The amoA gene within the Nitrospira metagenome bin was also detected in the master assembly, and we found an additional comammox-like amoA gene that was not present in any of the genomes assembled from this data set. Differences in coverage of the scaffolds on which these amoA genes were present across samples suggest that the four amoA genes (two comammox, two Betaproteobacteria) belong to four different organisms. The phylogenetic affiliations of all of these amoA genes and coverages per sample can be seen in Fig. S4.

Figure S4

(A) RAxML-based maximum-likelihood phylogenetic analyses of amoA genes (n = 4) recovered in the master assembly along with reference amoA/pmoA genes as detailed in Text S1. Branches are colored according to phylogenetic affiliation nodes, and >70% bootstrap support is indicated. (B) Coverage of amoA genes detected in the master assembly per biosample. The top and bottom panels provide coverage information for Nitrospira and Betaproteobacteria amoA genes. Download Figure S4, PDF file, 0.1 MB.
Copyright © 2015 Pinto et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license .

The presence of the complete ammonia oxidation capacity in Nitrospira organisms has significant implications for the nitrogen cycle, particularly if this organism is widespread. Using amoA sequence matches in the NCBI database and their associated environmental ontologies, we find support for previous detection of this Nitrospira-like organism in engineered systems (n = 8), soil ecosystems (n = 19), and groundwater (n = 10). This suggests that comammox Nitrospira organisms may be of importance for both engineered and natural systems. Interestingly, most of the matches in the NCBI database were attributed to methane-oxidizing bacteria, as also highlighted by Daims et al. (5). The recently published discovery of a comammox Nitrospira organism (5, 6) in combination with our finding strongly suggests that microbial contributions to the nitrogen cycle in engineered and natural environments will need to be reevaluated. The presence of a comammox is also congruent with previous observations of abundances of Nitrospira-like bacteria that were significantly higher than those of AOB/AOA based on 16S rRNA gene assays (21–23), indicating that comammox activity likely contributed substantially to nitrate formation in these environments. While direct evidence of the conversion of ammonia to nitrate by a Nitrospira organism was provided (5, 6), it will be critical to build on this initial work to understand the extent to which comammox organisms contribute to ammonia and nitrite oxidation in the wide range of environments where nitrogen cycling is important. This might be particularly critical for wastewater treatment systems that rely on partial nitrification followed by anammox processes (24) or short-cut nitrification-denitrification (25) for reducing energy costs of nitrogen removal. Similarly, nitrification in biofilms, a predicted ecological niche for comammox bacteria (4), is a considerable concern in drinking water distribution systems (26), and strategies devised to inhibit AOB/AOA may or may not yield optimal results if comammox activity primarily drives ammonia oxidation. On the other hand, the benefits of comammox bacteria can be exploited for ammonia removal from drinking water sources through promoting their activity in biofiltration systems, such as the system from which the currently described Nitrospira-like metagenome bin was obtained.

Raw reads and all draft genomes are available through NCBI BioProject PRJNA301005 . The draft genomes and annotation information can be accessed through IMG ER using JGI GOLD identification numbers Ga0074129-141 and Ga0077522-560. JGI GOLD, IMG-ID, and NCBI accession numbers for the Nitrospira metagenome bin discussed in this paper are Ga0074138, 2619618852, and LNDU00000000 , respectively.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This research was supported by NSF award 0613193, the University of Michigan, and EPSRC award no. EP/M016811/1.

A.J.P. performed the sampling. A.J.P., D.N.M., U.Z.I., and Q.M.B.D.L.S. analyzed the data. A.J.P., G.J.D., and L.R. wrote the paper.

We thank Brett Baker for kindly providing a reference database of 16 syntenic ribosomal proteins. We also thank anonymous reviewers for their valuable feedback.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received November 9, 2015.
    • Accepted December 8, 2015.
  • Copyright © 2015 Pinto et al.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license .

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Koops H-P,
    2. Purkhold U,
    3. Pommerening-Röser A,
    4. Timmermann G,
    5. Wagner M
    . 2006. The lithoautotrophic ammonia-oxidizing bacteria, p 778–811. In Dworkin M, Falkow S, Rosenberg E, Schleifer K-H, Stackebrandt E, (ed), The Prokaryotes. Springer, New York, NY. doi:10.1007/0-387-30745-1_36.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  2. 2.↵
    1. Stahl DA,
    2. de la Torre JR
    . 2012. Physiology and diversity of ammonia-oxidizing archaea. Annu Rev Microbiol66:83–101. doi:10.1146/annurev-micro-092611-150128.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    1. Teske A,
    2. Alm E,
    3. Regan JM,
    4. Toze S,
    5. Rittmann BE,
    6. Stahl DA
    . 1994. Evolutionary relationships among ammonia-oxidizing and nitrite-oxidizing bacteria. J Bacteriol176:6623–6630.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Costa E,
    2. Pérez J,
    3. Kreft J-U
    . 2006. Why is metabolic labour divided in nitrification?Trends Microbiol14:213–219. doi:10.1016/j.tim.2006.03.006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Daims H,
    2. Lebedeva EV,
    3. Pjevac P,
    4. Han P,
    5. Herbold C,
    6. Albertsen M,
    7. Jehmlich N,
    8. Palatinszky M,
    9. Vierheilig J,
    10. Bulaev A,
    11. Kirkegaard RH,
    12. von Bergen M,
    13. Rattei T,
    14. Bendinger B,
    15. Nielsen PH,
    16. Wagner M
    . 26November2015. Complete nitrification by Nitrospira bacteria. Nature doi:10.1038/nature16461.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  6. 6.↵
    1. van Kessel MAHJ,
    2. Speth DR,
    3. Albertsen M,
    4. Nielsen PH,
    5. Op den Camp HJM,
    6. Kartal B,
    7. Jetten MSM,
    8. Lücker S
    . 26 November2015. Complete nitrification by a single microorganism. Nature doi:10.1038/nature16459.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. 7.↵
    1. Peng Y,
    2. Leung HC,
    3. Yiu SM,
    4. Chin FY
    . 2012. IDBA-UD: a de novo assembler for single-cell and metagenomic sequencing data with highly uneven depth. Bioinformatics28:1420–1428. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bts174.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    1. Alneberg J,
    2. Bjarnason BS,
    3. de Bruijn I,
    4. Schirmer M,
    5. Quick J,
    6. Ijaz UZ,
    7. Lahti L,
    8. Loman NJ,
    9. Andersson AF,
    10. Quince C
    . 2014. Binning metagenomic contigs by coverage and composition. Nat Methods11:1144–1146. doi:10.1038/nmeth.3103.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    1. Parks DH,
    2. Imelfort M,
    3. Skennerton CT,
    4. Hugenholtz P,
    5. Tyson GW
    . 2015. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res25:1043–1055. doi:10.1101/gr.186072.114.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Markowitz VM,
    2. Chen I-A,
    3. Palaniappan K,
    4. Chu K,
    5. Szeto E,
    6. Grechkin Y,
    7. Ratner A,
    8. Jacob B,
    9. Huang J,
    10. Williams P,
    11. Huntemann M,
    12. Anderson I,
    13. Mavromatis K,
    14. Ivanova NN,
    15. Kyrpides NC
    . 2012. IMG: the integrated microbial genomes database and comparative analysis system. Nucleic Acids Res40:D115–D122. doi:10.1093/nar/gkr1044.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    1. Wu M,
    2. Scott AJ
    . 2012. Phylogenomic analysis of bacterial and archaeal sequences with AMPHORA2. Bioinformatics28:1033–1034. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bts079.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    1. Wang Q,
    2. Garrity GM,
    3. Tiedje JM,
    4. Cole JR
    . 2007. Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl Environ Microbiol73:5261–5267. doi:10.1128/AEM.00062-07.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Stamatakis A.
    2014. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics30:1312–1313. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    1. Castelle CJ,
    2. Hug LA,
    3. Wrighton KC,
    4. Thomas BC,
    5. Williams KH,
    6. Wu D,
    7. Tringe SG,
    8. Singer SW,
    9. Eisen JA,
    10. Banfield JF
    . 2013. Extraordinary phylogenetic diversity and metabolic versatility in aquifer sediment. Nat Commun4:2120. doi:10.1038/ncomms3120.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Ronquist F,
    2. Huelsenbeck JP
    . 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics19:1572–1574. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. 16.↵
    1. Koch H,
    2. Lücker S,
    3. Albertsen M,
    4. Kitzinger K,
    5. Herbold C,
    6. Spieck E,
    7. Nielsen PH,
    8. Wagner M,
    9. Daims H
    . 2015. Expanded metabolic versatility of ubiquitous nitrite-oxidizing bacteria from the genus Nitrospira. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A112:11371–11376. doi:10.1073/pnas.1506533112.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Palatinszky M,
    2. Herbold C,
    3. Jehmlich N,
    4. Pogoda M,
    5. Han P,
    6. von Bergen M,
    7. Lagkouvardos I,
    8. Karst SM,
    9. Galushko A,
    10. Koch H,
    11. Berry D,
    12. Daims H,
    13. Wagner M
    . 2015. Cyanate as an energy source for nitrifiers. Nature524:105–108. doi:10.1038/nature14856.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Koch H,
    2. Galushko A,
    3. Albertsen M,
    4. Schintlmeister A,
    5. Gruber-Dorninger C,
    6. Lücker S,
    7. Pelletier E,
    8. Le Paslier D,
    9. Spieck E,
    10. Richter A,
    11. Nielsen PH,
    12. Wagner M,
    13. Daims H
    . 2014. Growth of nitrite-oxidizing bacteria by aerobic hydrogen oxidation. Science345:1052–1054. doi:10.1126/science.1256985.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Dick GJ,
    2. Andersson AF,
    3. Baker BJ,
    4. Simmons SL,
    5. Thomas BC,
    6. Yelton AP,
    7. Banfield JF
    . 2009. Community-wide analysis of microbial genome sequence signatures. Genome Biol10:R85. doi:10.1186/gb-2009-10-8-r85.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Stoecker K,
    2. Bendinger B,
    3. Schöning B,
    4. Nielsen PH,
    5. Nielsen JL,
    6. Baranyi C,
    7. Toenshoff ER,
    8. Daims H,
    9. Wagner M
    . 2006. Cohn’s Crenothrix is a filamentous methane oxidizer with an unusual methane monooxygenase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A103:2363–2367. doi:10.1073/pnas.0506361103.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. LaPara TM,
    2. Hope Wilkinson K,
    3. Strait JM,
    4. Hozalski RM,
    5. Sadowksy MJ,
    6. Hamilton MJ
    . 2015. The bacterial communities of full-scale, biologically active granular activated carbon biofilters are stable, diverse, and potentially contain novel ammonia-oxidizing microorganisms. Appl Environ Microbiol81:6864–6872 doi:10.1128/aem.01692-15.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Dionisi HM,
    2. Layton AC,
    3. Harms G,
    4. Gregory IR,
    5. Robinson KG,
    6. Sayler GS
    . 2002. Quantification of Nitrosomonas oligotropha-like ammonia-oxidizing bacteria and Nitrospira spp. from full-scale wastewater treatment plants by competitive PCR. Appl Environ Microbiol68:245–253. doi:10.1128/AEM.68.1.245-253.2002.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. White CP,
    2. DeBry RW,
    3. Lytle DA
    . 2012. Microbial survey of a full-scale, biologically active filter for treatment of drinking water. Appl Environ Microbiol78:6390–6394. doi:10.1128/AEM.00308-12.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    1. Kartal B,
    2. Kuenen JG,
    3. van Loosdrecht MCM
    . 2010. Sewage treatment with anammox. Science328:702–703. doi:10.1126/science.1185941.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Peng Y,
    2. Zhu G
    . 2006. Biological nitrogen removal with nitrification and denitrification via nitrite pathway. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol73:15–26. doi:10.1007/s00253-006-0534-z.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  26. 26.↵
    1. Zhang Y,
    2. Love N,
    3. Edwards M
    . 2009. Nitrification in drinking water systems. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol39:153–208. doi:10.1080/10643380701631739.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Metagenomic Evidence for the Presence of Comammox Nitrospira-Like Bacteria in a Drinking Water System
Ameet J. Pinto, Daniel N. Marcus, Umer Zeeshan Ijaz, Quyen Melina Bautista-de lose Santos, Gregory J. Dick, Lutgarde Raskin
mSphere Dec 2015, 1 (1) e00054-15; DOI: 10.1128/mSphere.00054-15

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print
Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this mSphere article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Metagenomic Evidence for the Presence of Comammox Nitrospira-Like Bacteria in a Drinking Water System
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from mSphere
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in mSphere.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Metagenomic Evidence for the Presence of Comammox Nitrospira-Like Bacteria in a Drinking Water System
Ameet J. Pinto, Daniel N. Marcus, Umer Zeeshan Ijaz, Quyen Melina Bautista-de lose Santos, Gregory J. Dick, Lutgarde Raskin
mSphere Dec 2015, 1 (1) e00054-15; DOI: 10.1128/mSphere.00054-15
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • OBSERVATION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Nitrospira
comammox
drinking water systems

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About mSphere
  • Board of Editors
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • Embargo Policy
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Warranty
  • Types of Articles
  • Getting Started
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #mSphereJ

@ASMicrobiology

       

 

Website feedback

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Online ISSN: 2379-5042