Skip to main content
  • ASM Journals
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Research and News from ASM Journals
    • mSphere of Influence: Commentaries from Early Career Microbiologists
    • Archive
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Getting Started
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mSphere
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • ASM Journals
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
mSphere
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Research and News from ASM Journals
    • mSphere of Influence: Commentaries from Early Career Microbiologists
    • Archive
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Getting Started
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mSphere
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
Research Article | Host-Microbe Biology

Novel Immunomodulatory Flagellin-Like Protein FlaC in Campylobacter jejuni and Other Campylobacterales

Eugenia Faber, Eugenia Gripp, Sven Maurischat, Bernd Kaspers, Karsten Tedin, Sarah Menz, Aleksandra Zuraw, Olivia Kershaw, Ines Yang, Silke Rautenschlein, Christine Josenhans
Melanie Blokesch, Editor
Eugenia Faber
aInstitute for Medical Microbiology and Hospital Epidemiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
bGerman Center for Infection Research (DZIF), Hannover, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eugenia Gripp
aInstitute for Medical Microbiology and Hospital Epidemiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
bGerman Center for Infection Research (DZIF), Hannover, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sven Maurischat
cInstitute of Microbiology and Epizootics, Free University, Berlin, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bernd Kaspers
dInstitute of Animal Physiology, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Munich, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Karsten Tedin
cInstitute of Microbiology and Epizootics, Free University, Berlin, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sarah Menz
aInstitute for Medical Microbiology and Hospital Epidemiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
bGerman Center for Infection Research (DZIF), Hannover, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Aleksandra Zuraw
eInstitute of Veterinary Pathology, Free University Berlin, Berlin, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Olivia Kershaw
eInstitute of Veterinary Pathology, Free University Berlin, Berlin, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ines Yang
aInstitute for Medical Microbiology and Hospital Epidemiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
bGerman Center for Infection Research (DZIF), Hannover, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Silke Rautenschlein
fClinic for Poultry, Veterinary Medical School, Hannover, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christine Josenhans
aInstitute for Medical Microbiology and Hospital Epidemiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
bGerman Center for Infection Research (DZIF), Hannover, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Melanie Blokesch
Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne (EPFL)
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/mSphere.00028-15
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Supplemental Material
  • FIG 1
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 1

    ClustalOmega alignment of FlaC protein sequences. C. jejuni (Camje) FlaA (pink, a representative of non-TLR5-stimulatory flagellins), S. enterica (Salen) FliC (green, a paradigm for a TLR5-activating flagellin), and FlaC protein sequences of various Epsilonproteobacteria were aligned with ClustalOmega (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/clustalo ) and visualized in GeneDoc (https://www.psc.edu/index.php/user-resources/software/genedoc ). The locations of the D0 and D1 domains are indicated above the sequences. Residues of FliC involved in TLR5 binding and activation are shaded in gray (primary interface A) and in black (primary interface B) (according to reference 12). Residues of FlaC identical to those in C. jejuni FlaA or S. enterica FliC are colored accordingly in pink or green, respectively. A consensus score is shown underneath the alignment. Only flagellin sequence domains D0 and D1 present in FlaC are depicted; since the D2 and D3 domains are largely absent from FlaC orthologues, these domains have been omitted from the alignment.

  • FIG 2
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 2

    Characterization of C. jejuniflaC mutants and subcellular localization of FlaC. (A) Motility of the C. jejuni 11168 and 81-176 wild types (wt) and two corresponding flaC mutants (clone 1 and 2 [c1 and c2, respectively]) of each strain. A representative soft-agar motility plate from at least three independent assays shows the motility areas of all bacterial strains (swim diameter of ca. 10 mm) after 2 days of incubation at 37°C (scale bar, 10 mm). Corresponding motility-negative controls of C. jejuni (flgR mutant) always exhibited a swim halo diameter of <1 mm under the same conditions, while flaC-complemented bacteria reproducibly had a swim diameter similar to that of the wild type and flaC mutant (not shown). (B to D) Subcellular localization of FlaC in C. jejuni bacterial fractions. Comparative Western blot analyses of whole-cell lysates and different fractions of C. jejuni 11168 and 81-176 wild-type and flaC-mutants grown under microaerobic conditions were performed using polyclonal rabbit FlaC antiserum (dilution, 1:5,000). (B) S, soluble bacterial fraction; IS, insoluble bacterial fraction. (C) Surface/flagellar proteins. (D) Secreted proteins. Expression of FlaC was also investigated under anaerobic conditions. Western blot analyses of whole-cell lysates and different fractions of wild-type and flaC mutants grown under anaerobic conditions yielded comparable results (not shown). Our estimate from comparative Western blots was that approximately 2 µg of FlaC was secreted per 109 bacteria, and 100 to 200 ng of cell-bound FlaC was present in the same number of bacteria.

  • FIG 3
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 3

    Immune response in infected chickens to C. jejuni FlaC. (A) Adaptive immune response to recombinant C. jejuni FlaC in Campylobacter-infected chickens. Western blot analyses were performed to investigate and compare the reactivities of whole sera from Campylobacter-infected (lanes 1 to 19) and noninfected (lanes 20 to 22) chickens. Chicken sera were used at a dilution of 1:10,000 and detected with horseradish-peroxidase-coupled anti-chicken antibody. (B) In vivo expression of flaC in chicken cecal tissue. Transcript levels of flaC were determined by using quantitative RT-PCR of total RNA extracted from the ceca of five chickens which had been experimentally infected with C. jejuni strain RB922 (48). The amounts of specific flaC cDNA (in picograms) were normalized to C. jejuni 16S rRNA gene amounts determined in each animal.

  • FIG 4
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 4

    Effect of purified C. jejuni FlaC on human and chicken cell signal transduction. (A) p38 MAP kinase phosphorylation in human Lovo_Luc, THP-1_Luc, HEK293T, and chicken HD-11 cells was analyzed by Western immunoblotting after coincubation of the cell lines with ultrapure recombinant Salmonella FliC (100 ng) or ultrapure recombinant C. jejuni FlaC (200 ng) for 4 h (see Materials and Methods). Densitometry of P-p38 band intensities was performed, and results were normalized against those for the respective p38 signal and the actin loading control band in each lane. Normalized intensity values indicated that for all 3 cell lines, P-p38 was at least 5-fold enhanced by FlaC over levels in the mock-incubated control. (B) Analysis of the concentration-dependent response of Lovo cells, stably transfected with an NF-κB luciferase reporter gene, toward Salmonella FliC (positive control) or recombinant C. jejuni FlaC. (C) HD-11, THP-1, and Lovo cells stably transfected with an NF-κB luciferase reporter were coincubated with Salmonella FliC (25 ng) or recombinant C. jejuni FlaC (100 ng) for 3 h in 96-well plates and analyzed for NF-κB-driven luciferase expression using the SteadyGlo luciferase assay. The luciferase activities in panels B and C are given in luminescence values as photon counts per second (C/s). (D to I) Quantitative RT-PCR of cytokine mRNA induction by C. jejuni FlaC in human and chicken cells. Levels of induction of hIL-1β (D), hIL-8 (E), and hIL-10 (F) by C. jejuni FlaC and S. Typhimurium FliC in human macrophages (THP-1) and of chIL-1β (G), chIL-8 (H), and chK203 (I) in chicken macrophages (HD-11) are shown. Both cell types were stimulated for 2 h with recombinant ultrapure proteins FlaC (500 ng) and FliC (300 ng). Isolated RNA was analyzed by quantitative RT-PCR. Transcript values were normalized to human or chicken GAPDH values and are presented as fold increases of mRNA levels compared to the level in a mock-coincubated control. Mean values and standard deviations from triplicate measurements are shown. Significant P values are indicated by asterisks (Student’s t test, unpaired, one-sided) as follows: *, 0.01 ≤ P ≤ 0.05; **, 0.001 ≤ P ≤ 0.01; and ***, P ≤ 0.001.

  • FIG 5
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 5

    Interaction of C. jejuni FlaC with TLR5 in vitro. Binding of C. jejuni FlaC to TLR5 was tested by pulldown assay. Cleared cell lysates from TLR5 plasmid-transfected (hTLR5, human; chTLR5, chicken; both expressed as a V5-tagged protein fusion) or empty-plasmid-transfected cells were generated and coincubated with purified C. jejuni 6×His-FlaC. Pulldown against the 6×His tag fused to FlaC was performed using Talon Co2+ resin. Protein detection on Western blots was performed using rabbit anti-6×His antiserum (diluted 1:1,000; Rockland) for FlaC, and anti-V5 antibody (mouse monoclonal, 1:5,000; Invitrogen) for the detection of hTLR5 and chTLR5 (V5 tagged). The input was cleared cell lysates of TLR5-V5 plasmid-transfected HEK293T cells that were used for the pulldown. IB, immunoblotting; P.D., pulldown.

  • FIG 6
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 6

    C. jejuni FlaC antagonizes the activating effect of the TLR4 ligand. Human (THP-1) (A) and chicken (HD-11) (B) macrophages stably transfected with the NF-κB luciferase reporter gene were coincubated with recombinant C. jejuni FlaC (100 ng), Salmonella FliC (50 ng), or E. coli LPS (25 ng) for 3 h, and NF-κB activation was measured in a SteadyGlo luciferase assay. Residual activation of the cells in all wells was determined by a luciferase measurement 19 h after the initial incubation. To analyze the reactivation potential, cells were preincubated with recombinant C. jejuni FlaC, Salmonella FliC, or E. coli LPS for 19 h and then coincubated with E. coli TLR4 ligand LPS (25 ng). The resulting reactivation potential of NF-κB was measured 3 h after the secondary coincubation step. As a control for TLR4-specific activity, control wells were preincubated with polymyxin B (10 µg/ml) 1 h before the initial activation, as indicated below the graph. For all measurements, relative luciferase activity is depicted as the percentage of maximal activation by LPS, which was defined as 100%. +, addition of substance on day 1; −, no addition of substance on day 1; *, addition of E. coli LPS on day 2. Significant P values are indicated by asterisks (Student’s t test, unpaired, two-sided), as follows: ***, P ≤ 0.001.

  • FIG 7
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 7

    C. jejuni flaC mutants induce increased cell activation in human and chicken cells. (A and B) Comparison of cell activation of live C. jejuni with the respective flaC mutants of two strains, 11168 and 81-176. (A) Human THP-1 NF-κB luciferase reporter cells were coincubated with live C. jejuni bacteria of strain 11168 or 81-176 (wt) and corresponding isogenic flaC mutants (flaC mut) at different multiplicities of infection (MOI) for 3 h. NF-κB activation was determined using SteadyGlo luciferase substrate. Means and standard deviations from technical quadruplicates are shown as luciferase activity in counts per second (C/s). (B) IL-8 secretion induced by the live C. jejuni wild type and flaC mutants was measured by IL-8 ELISA. The statistical significance of differences was determined using Student’s t test (unpaired, one-sided). ***, P ≤ 0.001; **, 0.001 ≤ P ≤ 0.01; *, 0.01 ≤ P ≤ 0.05. (C and D) Human (THP-1) (C) and chicken (HD-11) (D) NF-κB luciferase reporter cell lines were coincubated with cleared lysate fractions of wild-type bacteria (wt) and corresponding flaC mutants (flaC mut) (100 ng of cleared lysate) of two different C. jejuni strains (11168, 81-176) for 3 h. For comparison, cells which were preincubated for 1 h with purified FlaC (100 ng) were also incubated with soluble fractions of wild-type lysates (100 ng) for 3 h. Luciferase activities were measured in a SteadyGlo luciferase assay. Mean values and standard deviations of triplicate measurements are depicted as luciferase activities (counts per second [C/s]). n.s., not significant. (E and F) Complementation of flaC restores the cell activation level by C. jejuni. (E) Human (THP-1) and (F) chicken (HD-11) macrophages stably transfected for the NF-κB luciferase reporter gene were coincubated for 3 h with soluble lysate fractions (100 ng) of the C. jejuni parental strain (wt), corresponding flaC mutant (flaC mut), and two flaC complementation clones of strain 81-176 (flaC comp, c1, and c2). NF-κB activation was measured using SteadyGlo substrate. Means and standard deviations from technical quadruplicates are shown as luciferase activity in counts per second [C/s]. Statistical significance was determined using Student’s t test (unpaired, two-sided). Significant P values are indicated by asterisks, as follows: *, 0.01 ≤ P ≤ 0.05; **, 0.001 ≤ P ≤ 0.01; ***, P ≤ 0.001.

  • FIG 8
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 8

    FlaC has a significant influence on the chicken cecal microbiota and cecal expression of chicken IL-1β. Microbiota analysis of chicken cecal tissue was performed using 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing. The microbiotas were compared between a chicken group (8 animals) of FlaC-treated animals and 8 animals that were mock (PBS) treated. Shown are comparative numbers of OTU (A), a comparison of the within-sample OTU diversity between the two groups (Shannon index) (B), and the comparative family assignments of OTU present in the cecal microbiotas of the two groups (C). (D) A principal-coordinates analysis (PC; based on Bray-Curtis distances [see Text S1 in the supplemental material]) of the microbiota data indicated that the chickens in the FlaC-treated group (neon-green dots) have a significantly different microbiota composition than the chickens in the mock-treated group (light-blue dots). Depicted in the graphs are the distances between the microbiota data in the first three dimensions (axes PC 1 to PC 3) of the Bray-Curtis principal-coordinates analysis (distances between PC 1 and PC 2 in the left panel; distances between PC 1 and PC 3 in the right panel), of which the first axis (PC 1) explains 30.2% of the total variance in the data set, the second axis (PC 2) 26.4%, and the third axis (PC 3) 15.0%. For specific differences in the OTU assignments between the groups, see Table 2. (E) Results of a quantitative RT-PCR of chIL-1β mRNA in cecal tissue of mock- and FlaC-treated chickens. Transcript values were normalized against those of the chicken GAPDH transcript and are presented as absolute specific transcript amounts in picograms (2 µl of cDNA was used for each sample). Mean values and standard deviations from quadruplicate measurements are shown. The significance of difference (Student’s t test, unpaired, one-sided) in cytokine expression between both groups is indicated by an asterisk (*, P ≤ 0.05).

Tables

  • Figures
  • Supplemental Material
  • TABLE 1

    C. jejuni FlaC orthologues in Campylobacter spp. and other Campylobacteralesa

    Species and strain name
    (for genomic information)
    Species host(s)/niche(s)% amino acid identity
    to C. jejuni FlaC
    C. coli RM2228Cattle, chicken/intestinal tract95
    Campylobacter upsaliensis JV21Cat, dog/intestinal tract84
    Campylobacter lari RM2100Cattle, chicken, wild birds/intestinal tract68
    Campylobacter showae CSUSNWCDDog, human/intestinal tract50
    Campylobacter rectus RM3267Dog/intestinal tract49
    C. fetus subsp. fetus 82.40Diverse/intestinal tract, urogenital tract49
    Campylobacter curvus 525.92Dog/intestinal tract48
    H. pullorum MIT 98-5489Chicken, human/intestinal tract47
    H. canadensis MIT 98-5491Wild birds, human/intestinal tract45
    H. winghamensis ATCC BAA 430Human/intestinal tract44
    W. succinogenes DSM 1740Cattle/intestinal tract43
    C. concisus 13826Cat, dog, human/intestinal tract39
    • ↵a None of the species had flagellar sheaths.

  • TABLE 2

    Designation of group-specific OTU significantly different between microbiotas of FlaC-treated and mock-treated chickens

    Specificity and OTUaClass or orderFamilyGenus (cluster)Most closely related sequence
    (% nucleotide identity)
    Mock-treated group
        OTU 63 Erysipelotrichales Erysipelotrichaceae Erysipelatoclostridium Clostridium innocuum (93)
        OTU 73 Lactobacillales Lactobacillaceae Lactobacillus Lactobacillus ingluviei (98)
        OTU 87 Clostridiales Clostridiaceae Clostridium (cluster IV) Clostridium sp. strain YIT12069 (100)
        OTU 134 Clostridiales Oscillospiraceae Oscillibacter ND
    FlaC-treated group
        OTU 50 Erysipelotrichales Erysipelotrichaceae Clostridium (cluster XVIII)ND
        OTU 52 Clostridiales Lachnospiraceae Blautia Blautia faecis (98)
        OTU 121 Clostridiales Lachnospiraceae Blautia Blautia hydrogenotrophica (97)
    • ↵a Designation of group-specific OTU at the genus or species level was verified by nucleotide BLAST search of 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequences using the NCBI nr database or SINA alignment with sequences listed in the Silva, Living Tree Project (LTP), or Ribosomal Database Project (RDP) database (http://www.arb-silva.de ). Noted identity scores (percentages) reflect similarities of OTU-specific consensus nucleotide sequences with the identified closest bacterial relatives. ND, not determined due to low similarity (<90%) of database hits.

  • TABLE 3

    Oligonucleotides used for gene amplification and cloning

    GenePrimersSequence (5′–3′)aTm (°C)Reference
    flaC (Cj0720c)CjflaC_F_BamHIAAAGGATCCCAAAGTGGCTTAATGATGACG55This study
    CjflaC_R_BamHIAAAGGATCCCGCTAGAGCTTGGACTTGAT55This study
    CjflaC_F3AAAGGATCCATCTCTGATGCAACTATGATG53This study
    CjflaC_R2AAACTCGAGTTGTAATAAATTAGCAATTTTGC51This study
    rdxA (Cjj81176_1083)CjrdxA_ClaI_R3AAAATCGATGTTGATTGTAACATAGGGTTG51This study
    CjrdxA_SpeI_F3AAAACTAGTCAAGTGCGAGTCATAATATC51This study
    CjrdxA_XbaI_F1AAATCTAGAGTGATTTTGTCGTAGATGAAG53This study
    CjrdxA_XbaI_R1AAATCTAGATATAAATTTCCAAGGTTCCA51This study
    SalTy LT2 fliCSalLT2FliCBamHI(F)CGGGATCCATGGCACAAGTCATTAATAC49This study
    SalT2FliCEcoRI(R)CGGAATTCCGCAGTAAAGAGAGGACG51This study
    chTLR5 chTLR5_F1AAAGGTACCGAGTCCGGATCCATGATGTTACAATCAA
    CGGCTAATAATTG
    65This study
    chTLR5_R1AAAAGCGGCCGCCGTGTGAGACTGTCGCTATAGTTTG69This study
    CAT cassettepCAT1AACAGCTATGACCATGATTAC57 81
    pCAT2_BamHIAGAGGATCCGATATCGCATGCCTGCAGAG57 81
    Gm cassette (aac)Gm1_ClaIAAAATCGATCGGGTGACTAACTAGGAGGAATAA65This study
    Gm2_SpeIAGAACTAGTCCGTGTCATTATTCCCTCCAGGTA67This study
    • ↵a Restriction sites in oligonucleotides are underlined. Tm, melting temperature.

  • TABLE 4

    Plasmids used in this study

    PlasmidVectorDescriptionResistanceaReference or source
    pEF6-hTLR5pEF6-V5Protein expression vector for human TLR5Ampr 86
    pEF6-V5Mammalian protein expression vector, originated from pEF6-TLR5-V5 by
    excision of the insert, EF-1α promoter, V5 tag
    Ampr 13
    pCJ801pEF6-V5Protein expression vector for chicken TLR5 (pEF6-chTLR5-V5)AmprE. Faber and C. Josenhans,
    unpublished data
    pET28aProtein expression vector, T7 lac promoter, 6×His tag, T7 tagKmrNovagen, Darmstadt,
    Germany
    pCJ375pET28a S. enterica serovar Typhimurium LT2 fliC cloned into pET28a via BamHI and XhoIKmrS. K. Lee and C. Josenhans,
    unpublished data
    pCJ1024pET28a flaC (C. jejuni, strain NCTC 11351) cloned into pET28a via BamHI and XhoIKmrThis study
    pCJ1025pUC18 flaC::Cm (C. jejuni strain 11168)Ampr CmrThis study
    pCJ1405pUC18 rdxA::Gm (C. jejuni strain 81-176) + flaC (C. jejuni strain 11168)Ampr GmrThis study
    • ↵a Ampr, ampicillin resistance; Kmr, kanamycin resistance; Cmr, chloramphenicol resistance; Gmr, gentamicin resistance.

Supplemental Material

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Figure S1

    flaC and its genetic neighborhood in different Campylobacter species. Gene order and annotation, which are schematically depicted, were extracted from available whole-genome sequences in databases. Download Figure S1, PDF file, 0.1 MB.

    Copyright © 2016 Faber et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license .

  • Figure S2

    (A) Unweighted pair group method using average linkages (UPGMA) tree of FlaC from different Campylobacter species, based on the protein sequence of FlaC, generated by MEGA 5.2; (B) maximum-likelihood tree (bootstrap method, 500 replicates) of FlaC proteins from different Campylobacter species, based on protein sequences of FlaC, generated by MEGA 5.2. *, P < 0.05. Download Figure S2, PDF file, 0.04 MB.

    Copyright © 2016 Faber et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license .

  • Figure S3

    Gene organization upstream of flaC and cotranscript detection in C. jejuni 11168. Cj0721, 0722, and 0723 are tandemly positioned directly upstream of flaC, likely forming a gene cluster. To predict whether these genes are cotranscribed with flaC, PCRs were performed on cDNA of C. jejuni strain 11168 grown in vitro. DNA of the same strain served as a control for the efficiency of the PCR. We used several primer combinations which span the regions within each of the four genes and regions between the genes (shown in the graph; the locations of primers are indicated by colored arrows and PCR products by numbered connection lines between arrows). Download Figure S3, PDF file, 0.3 MB.

    Copyright © 2016 Faber et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license .

  • Table S1

    Origin of sera from Campylobacter-positive and -negative chickens. Download Table S1, PDF file, 0.01 MB.

    Copyright © 2016 Faber et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license .

  • Figure S4

    IL-8 secretion of TLR5 plasmid-transfected HEK293T cells coincubated with FlaC and FliC. HEK293T cells were mock transfected or transiently transfected for human TLR5 (hTLR5) and 48 h after transfection coincubated with recombinant highly purified FlaC (200 ng) or S. Typhimurium FliC (100 ng, positive control) for 5 h. IL-8 secretion was determined using a human IL-8 ELISA (BD OptEIA). Mean values and standard deviations from duplicate biological experiments and triplicate measurements for each experiment are shown. FlaC led to a slight induction of IL-8 secretion in the TLR5 plasmid-transfected cells. Ultrapure E. coli LPS did not lead to induction of IL-8 secretion in this setting (data not shown). Significance of differences was calculated by Student’s t test (unpaired, one-sided), as follows: ***, ≤0.001; **, ≤0.01; *, ≤0.05; n.s., not significant. Download Figure S4, PDF file, 0.03 MB.

    Copyright © 2016 Faber et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license .

  • Figure S5

    Binding of C. jejuni FlaC to human and chicken cells. Human (HEK293T) (A) and chicken (HD-11) (B) cells were coincubated with 1 µg FlaC or 1 µg Salmonella FliC (positive control) for 1 h (both proteins as 6×His-tagged fusion proteins). After intensive washes, cell lysates were generated, fractionated, and analyzed on SDS gels. Bound FlaC was detected in the insoluble cell fractions using anti-FlaC polyclonal antiserum. Bound FliC was detected in the insoluble cell fractions using anti-6×His antibody. Enrichment of a low-molecular-mass band of ca. 35 kDa in the HD-11 chicken macrophage-like cell fraction (insoluble) coincubated with Salmonella FliC is noted. IB, immunoblot. Download Figure S5, PDF file, 0.3 MB.

    Copyright © 2016 Faber et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license .

  • Figure S6

    Molecular docking of modeled C. jejuni FlaC with TLR5. The FlaC structure was modeled according to the flagellin FliC of S. Typhimurium (1ucuA; complete atomic model of the bacterial flagellar filament by electron cryomicroscopy [K. Yonekura, S. Maki-Yonekura, and K. Namba, Nature 424:643–650, 2003]) using the Swiss model [N. Guex, M. C. Peitsch, and T. Schwede, Electrophoresis 30(S1):162–173, 2009]. Two FlaC molecules (blue) were docked to a dimer of the zebrafish TLR5 ectodomain (yellow; extracted from PDB accession number 3V47 [S. Yoon et al., Science 335:859–864, 2012]) using HexDock (HexServer, a Fourier transform [FFT]-based protein docking server powered by graphics processors [G. Macindoe, et al., Nucleic Acids Research 38:W445–W449, 2010]). The following default docking settings were used: docking_correlation 0, docking_refine 0, docking_grid_size 0.6, max_docking_solutions 3000, receptor_range_angle 180, docking_receptor_stepsize 7.5, ligand_range_angle 180, docking_ligand_stepsize 7.5, docking_r12_range 40, docking_r12_substeps 0, docking_main_scan 20, docking_main_search 25, docking_fft_device 1, and docking_fft_type 1. Download Figure S6, PDF file, 0.4 MB.

    Copyright © 2016 Faber et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license .

  • Text S1

    Microbiota analysis of chicken cecum tissue. Download Text S1, PDF file, 0.02 MB.

    Copyright © 2016 Faber et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license .

  • Figure S7

    Determination of protein amounts and purity of highly purified flagellins. Recombinantly expressed C. jejuni FlaC and S. Typhimurium FliC were purified by affinity chromatography on Ni-NTA agarose beads and additionally eluted from SDS gels. To analyze purity and determine final protein amounts, SDS gels using different amounts of highly purified flagellins and defined amounts of bovine serum albumin (BSA; 0.5 µg, 1 µg, 2 µg from left to right) as a protein standard were performed. (Left) Lane 1, 1 µg of FlaC; lane 2, empty; lane 3, 2 µg of FlaC; (right) lane 1, 1 µg FliC; lane 2, 2 µg of FliC. The gels were stained with Coomassie blue for the detection of protein and comparative quantitation of amounts. Download Figure S7, PDF file, 0.1 MB.

    Copyright © 2016 Faber et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license .

  • Table S2

    Oligonucleotides used for RT-PCR. Download Table S2, PDF file, 0.03 MB.

    Copyright © 2016 Faber et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license .

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Novel Immunomodulatory Flagellin-Like Protein FlaC in Campylobacter jejuni and Other Campylobacterales
Eugenia Faber, Eugenia Gripp, Sven Maurischat, Bernd Kaspers, Karsten Tedin, Sarah Menz, Aleksandra Zuraw, Olivia Kershaw, Ines Yang, Silke Rautenschlein, Christine Josenhans
mSphere Dec 2015, 1 (1) e00028-15; DOI: 10.1128/mSphere.00028-15

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print
Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this mSphere article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Novel Immunomodulatory Flagellin-Like Protein FlaC in Campylobacter jejuni and Other Campylobacterales
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from mSphere
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in mSphere.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Novel Immunomodulatory Flagellin-Like Protein FlaC in Campylobacter jejuni and Other Campylobacterales
Eugenia Faber, Eugenia Gripp, Sven Maurischat, Bernd Kaspers, Karsten Tedin, Sarah Menz, Aleksandra Zuraw, Olivia Kershaw, Ines Yang, Silke Rautenschlein, Christine Josenhans
mSphere Dec 2015, 1 (1) e00028-15; DOI: 10.1128/mSphere.00028-15
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Campylobacter
host-pathogen interaction
immune response
TLR5
flagellin

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About mSphere
  • Board of Editors
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • Embargo Policy
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Warranty
  • Types of Articles
  • Getting Started
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #mSphereJ

@ASMicrobiology

       

 

Website feedback

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Online ISSN: 2379-5042