Reconfiguration of Transcriptional Control of Lysine Biosynthesis in Candida albicans Involves a Central Role for the Gcn4 Transcriptional Activator

Microbes evolve rapidly so as to reconfigure their gene expression to adapt to the metabolic demands in diverse environmental niches. Here, we explored how conditions of nutrient deprivation regulate lysine biosynthesis in the human fungal pathogen Candida albicans. We show that although both Saccharomyces cerevisiae and C. albicans respond to lysine deprivation by transcriptional upregulation of lysine biosynthesis, the regulatory factors required for this control have been reconfigured in these species. We found that Gcn4 is an essential and direct transcriptional regulator of the expression of lysine biosynthetic genes under lysine starvation conditions in C. albicans. Our results therefore suggest that the regulation of the lysine biosynthetic pathway in Candida clade genomes involves gain of function by the master transcriptional regulator Gcn4, coincident with the neofunctionalization of the S. cerevisiae pathway-specific regulator Lys14.


IMPORTANCE
Microbes evolve rapidly so as to reconfigure their gene expression to adapt to the metabolic demands in diverse environmental niches. Here, we explored how conditions of nutrient deprivation regulate lysine biosynthesis in the human fungal pathogen Candida albicans. We show that although both Saccharomyces cerevisiae and C. albicans respond to lysine deprivation by transcriptional upregulation of lysine biosynthesis, the regulatory factors required for this control have been reconfigured in these species. We found that Gcn4 is an essential and direct transcriptional regulator of the expression of lysine biosynthetic genes under lysine starvation conditions in C. albicans. Our results therefore suggest that the regulation of the lysine biosynthetic pathway in Candida clade genomes involves gain of function by the master transcriptional regulator Gcn4, coincident with the neofunctionalization of the S. cerevisiae pathway-specific regulator Lys14. KEYWORDS: Candida albicans, lysine biosynthesis, transcriptional regulation, transcriptional activator, Gcn4, Lys14 H ow genome evolution contributes to the plasticity of gene regulation even in closely related genomes is critical for the survival of microbes in diverse environments. Saccharomyces cerevisiae has been the model for our understanding of microbial metabolism and its regulation. Several recent studies, however, highlighted the rewiring of transcriptional regulatory circuits in Candida albicans, a human fungal pathogen, and other fungal genomes (for reviews, see references 1 to 3). Such rewiring of the regulatory circuits in C. albicans included the replacement of the Tbf1 transcription factor, as well as the cognate promoter binding sites, in the ribosomal protein regulon (4,5), the regulation of the sexual cycle (6), the recent evolution of new binding motifs for Mcm1 (7), and the reconfiguration of the Gal4 binding site to be the Cph2 binding site in the GAL10 gene promoter (8).
Lysine is an essential amino acid for animals and is obtained from proteins in the diet. In lower eukaryotes, including fungi, lysine biosynthesis, outlined in Fig. 1, begins with condensation of ␣-ketoglutarate (2-oxoglutarate) and acetyl-coenzyme A (CoA) and has seven more enzymatic steps (9)(10)(11) 2-aminoadipate transaminase step have been identified in S. cerevisiae ( Fig. 1) (11)(12)(13)(14). The genes encoding 2-aminoadipate transaminase listed in Fig. 1 have been tentatively assigned as YER152c and ARO8, based on the Saccharomyces Genome Database (http://www.yeastgenome.org) and the KEGG database (http://www.genome.jp/kegg/), respectively. The regulation of lysine biosynthesis in S. cerevisiae occurs at the level of both gene expression and enzyme activity (15). Whereas the first enzyme in the pathway, homocitrate synthase (Lys20 and Lys21), is regulated by lysine feedback in S. cerevisiae, this may not be a prevalent mechanism in all fungi, since in Aspergillus fumigatus, the homocitrate synthase is insensitive to lysine inhibition (16). The sixth enzyme in the pathway, L-aminoadipate semialdehyde dehydrogenase (Lys2), is activated by Lys5mediated phosphopantetheinylation (17). The regulation of LYS pathway gene expression is achieved both by a pathway-specific regulator and by the general amino acid control mediated by Gcn4 (15). In S. cerevisiae, amino acid starvation and multiple other stress conditions lead to translational derepression of the expression of the bZIP protein Gcn4, a master regulator of the transcription of almost 73 genes belonging to every amino acid biosynthetic pathway (reviewed in reference 18). Lys14, a Gal4-like Zn(II) 2 Cys 6 binuclear cluster transcription factor, is the pathway-specific transcriptional regulator, which is activated by the pathway intermediate 2-aminoadipate semialdehyde (19,20). Genome-wide expression data (see supplemental Figure S1 at http:// www.jnu.ac.in/Faculty/natarajan/msphere_suppl_info.pdf) showed that almost all of the lysine biosynthetic pathway genes are induced upon histidine starvation (21), as well as by isoleucine-valine starvation (22). However, the direct regulation by Gcn4 and Lys14 at the LYS pathway promoters is only partially understood. MKS1 (LYS80), a negative regulator of the retrograde mitochondrion-to-nucleus signaling (23), was shown to downregulate lysine biosynthesis by restricting the availability of 2-oxoglutarate (24,25).
In this study, we show that lysine deprivation elicits transcriptional upregulation of the LYS biosynthetic pathway in C. albicans. We then provide multiple lines of evidence supporting the view that the four LYS14-like genes, LYS141, LYS142, LYS143, and LYS144, have no role in the regulation of LYS gene expression in C. albicans. Cloning and expression of C. albicans LYS141 (ORF19.5548), LYS142 (ORF19.4778), LYS143 (ORF19.4776), and LYS144 (ORF19.5380) could not complement lysine auxotrophy of the S. cerevisiae lys14Δ mutant. Nor did the deletion of the four genes cause lysine auxotrophy in C. albicans, and none of the four were recruited to the promoters of LYS pathway genes under lysine deprivation conditions. Our results demonstrate that Gcn4 is essential for C. albicans growth under lysine deprivation conditions and, further, show that Gcn4 is a direct activator of multiple LYS biosynthetic pathway genes.
with lysine (SCϩLys medium) or without lysine (SCϪLys medium), as well as SCϪLys medium plus 0.1 mM 5-hydroxylysine (SCϪLysϩHyl medium), and quantified the mRNA levels of several LYS biosynthetic genes ( Fig. 1) by quantitative PCR (qPCR) analysis. The data showed that the LYS genes were significantly induced upon lysine deprivation. Whereas the expression of LYS1, LYS12, and LYS22 was highly induced (Ն4-fold), the expression of LYS2, LYS4, and LYS9 was induced~two-to threefold. However, the expression of LYS5, LYS21, and ORF19.1180 was unaffected by lysine deprivation (Fig. 2). It is interesting that of the two homocitrate synthase genes LYS21 and LYS22 in C. albicans, only LYS22 was induced upon lysine deprivation. The data also showed that the expression of LYS5, encoding phosphopantetheinyl transferase, required for activation of the LYS2 product, was not induced by lysine deprivation, although LYS2 expression was itself induced (Fig. 2). In contrast, both LYS2 and LYS5 mRNA levels in S. cerevisiae were increased upon amino acid starvation (21,22). The expression of ORF19.1180 was not altered upon lysine deprivation (Fig. 2), and therefore, the role of this putative ␣-aminoadipate aminotransferase in lysine biosynthesis is unclear. In S. cerevisiae, Aco2 was shown to catalyze the homocitrate-to-homoaconitate conversion (11). However, a proteomic study in C. albicans showed that, whereas Aco1 is upregulated, Aco2 is downregulated in a Gcn4-dependent manner upon amino acid starvation (33). Thus, there appear to be differences between S. cerevisiae and C. albicans as to which of the two aconitate hydratase genes carry out this step. Overall, our data showed that C. albicans responds to lysine deprivation by transcriptional upregulation of the bulk of the genes in the lysine biosynthetic pathway.
The four LYS14-like genes in C. albicans are not functional orthologs of the S. cerevisiae transcriptional activator LYS14. To investigate the mechanism of upregulation of the lysine biosynthetic pathway, we sought to identify the role of the C. albicans LYS14-like genes LYS141, LYS142, LYS143, and LYS144. Sequence analyses of the amino acid sequences encoded by the four LYS14-like genes showed~40% amino acid sequence identity of the 45-amino-acid region encompassing the Zn(II) 2 Cys 6 binuclear cluster DNA binding motif with that of S. cerevisiae Lys14 (ScLys14) (Fig. 3). The rest of the protein sequence had poor sequence identity (~20%) with that of ScLys14.
We employed a heterologous genetic complementation approach to identify the activity of the four LYS14-like genes in the regulation of the LYS gene pathway in S. cerevisiae. We cloned each of the four LYS14-like genes under the control of the GAL1 promoter in the vector pGAL-HA, introduced them individually into S. cerevisiae lys14Δ mutant strain 3973, and tested the mutants on SCϪLys or SCϩLys plates containing glucose, raffinose, or raffinose and galactose. As expected, with reference to the growth of control strain BY4741 (wild type [WT]), the parental strain 3973 (lys14Δ) showed retarded growth on SCϪLys plates compared to its growth on SCϩLys plates (see supplemental Figure S2 at http://www.jnu.ac.in/Faculty/natarajan/msphere_suppl_info.pdf). Interestingly, the introduction of each of the four LYS14-like genes could not restore this defect on plates with SCϪLys plus raffinose and galactose (see supplemental Figure S2 at the URL mentioned above). The four C. albicans LYS14-like coding sequences contained multiple CUG codons (see supplemental Table S3 at the URL mentioned above) that, instead of the altered Ser in C. albicans, would be decoded as Leu upon expression in S. cerevisiae. However, none of these CUG codons was found in the zinc cluster DNA-binding domain, and their positions were also not conserved between the four LYS14-like coding sequences. Moreover, Western blot analyses showed that all four genes were indeed expressed in medium containing galactose but not in medium with raffinose (data not shown). These data indicated that the C. albicans LYS14-like genes cannot complement the lysine auxotrophy of the S. cerevisiae lys14Δ strain.
To investigate the role of LYS14-like genes in C. albicans under lysine deprivation conditions, we constructed homozygous deletion mutants with deletions of each of the four LYS14-like genes. We employed pHAH1 (34) to delete both alleles, marked with HIS1 or ARG4, in the C. albicans parental strain SN152. The correct integration of the  deletion cassettes, as well as the absence of a wild-type copy of the candidate gene, was confirmed by PCR. The lys14-like deletion mutant strains and a control prototrophic strain, RPC206, an isogenic derivative of SN152, were grown in SCϩLys medium and spotted onto plates with SCϪLys medium, SCϪLysϩHyl medium, or the control SCϩLysϩHyl medium, and growth was monitored at 30°C. The results showed that none of the four lys14-like mutant strains was impaired for growth in lysine-deficient medium (see supplemental Figure S3 at http://www.jnu.ac.in/Faculty/natarajan/ msphere_suppl_info.pdf). The control C. albicans lys2Δ mutant strain, as expected, did not grow (see supplemental Figure S2 at the URL mentioned above). Although none of the single homozygous lys14-like genes is required for growth of C. albicans under lysine-deficient conditions in vitro, it was unknown whether any combination of the four lys14-like gene deletion mutations would confer a growth defect under lysinedeficient conditions. To further probe the role of the four LYS14-like genes in the regulation of lysine biosynthesis, we examined whether the expression of the four LYS14-like genes is regulated by lysine availability. The wild-type strain RPC206 was grown in lysine-replete (SCϩLys), lysine-deficient (SCϪLys), or lysine-starved (SCϪLysϩHyl) medium, total RNA was extracted, and LYS141, LYS142, LYS143, and LYS144 mRNA levels were quantified using quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR). The data showed that none of the four LYS14 mRNAs was upregulated upon lysine deprivation (see supplemental Figure S4 at http://www.jnu.ac.in/Faculty/natarajan/msphere_suppl_info.pdf). Next, we examined whether the activation of LYS2, LYS4, and LYS9 mRNA upon lysine deprivation was dependent on any of the four LYS14-like genes. The qRT-PCR data showed that the LYS2, LYS4, and LYS9 mRNAs were induced at or close to wild-type levels in the lys141Δ mutant (Fig. 4A). In the lys142Δ mutant, however, lysine deprivation led to a partial reduction of LYS2 and LYS9 mRNA induction and abrogation of LYS4 mRNA induction. In the lys143Δ and lys144Δ mutants, the induction of higher LYS2, LYS4, and LYS9 mRNA levels was greater than that in the wild type (Fig. 4A), indicating that LYS143 and LYS144 had a repressive effect on the three LYS biosynthetic genes examined here. Together, our results showed that although none of the four LYS14-like genes were obligate for LYS biosynthetic gene expression, they had differential effects on the expression of the three key LYS biosynthetic genes.

S Y S RNGCRE CKRRK I RCP E E KP Y CS T CV RL GKQ CS Y P L AGE KV L R I S R AY S RGGCKE CKRRK I RCP E DKP S CAT CV RL GKV CS Y P L P GE RV P R ---I Y S K H GC K E C K R R K I K C D E GK P S CWQ C I R L R K D C S Y P K P GE K V L R ---K Y S RGGC A E C R R R K I K C D E L K P Y C H N C T R L N K L C V Y P T KP K F K F E ---K Y S R N GC S E C K R R RMK C D E T K P T CWQ C A R L N RQ C V Y V L NP K N K K R ---
Next, we wished to assess whether there was a direct role for LYS141, LYS142, LYS143, or LYS144 in the regulation of LYS biosynthetic genes under lysine deprivation conditions. We constructed C. albicans strains expressing TAP epitope-tagged LYS141, LYS142, LYS143, and LYS144 from genomic loci. Western blot analyses showed that Lys141-TAP, Lys142-TAP, Lys143-TAP, and Lys144-TAP were all expressed at levels very comparable to each other in C. albicans (see supplemental Figure S5 at http:// www.jnu.ac.in/Faculty/natarajan/msphere_suppl_info.pdf). Moreover, the data also showed that lysine deprivation did not alter the levels of any of the four Lys14-like proteins (see supplemental Figure S5 at the URL mentioned above), consistent with our mRNA analyses.
The TAP-tagged strains were used in chromatin immunoprecipitation assays to determine the promoter occupancy under lysine-replete and -deficient conditions. The strains were cultured, cross-linked with formaldehyde, chromatin sheared, and immunoprecipitated with IgG-Sepharose 4B to immunoprecipitate TAP-tagged proteins. The chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP)-qPCR data showed that none of the four regulators was bound to LYS2 or the LYS9 promoter regions above background levels under either lysine-replete or lysine-deficient conditions (Fig. 4B). These data are consistent with our finding that the C. albicans LYS2 and LYS9 gene promoters do not harbor the S. cerevisiae Lys14-binding sites (see supplemental Figures S6 and S7 at http:// www.jnu.ac.in/Faculty/natarajan/msphere_suppl_info.pdf). Thus, our data from multiple lines of investigation suggest that the four C. albicans LYS14-like genes do not play any role in the regulation of the lysine biosynthetic pathway even upon lysine deprivation.
Other studies have also indicated that the LYS14 regulators may have roles outside lysine biosynthesis regulation. We examined a set of publicly available microarray data (35) and found that the expression of C. albicans LYS142 is upregulated during oxidative stress (data not shown). Another study employed green fluorescent protein (GFP)tagged Lys141 and Lys144, strongly overexpressed from the TDH3 promoter in yeast extract-peptone-dextrose (YPD) medium, and identified the genome-wide occupancy of the two regulators (36). Their data revealed that the two regulators bound to a small number of promoters, none of which were from the LYS biosynthetic gene pathway (36). Besides, Lys141 and Lys144 seem to make distinct contributions to C. albicans pathogenesis and commensalism (36). Moreover, Pérez et al. also showed that the four Lys14-like recombinant proteins have different DNA binding specificities as well (37). Thus, the studies described above, together with our results from studies carried out GCN4 is an essential regulator of the lysine biosynthetic pathway in C. albicans. Past studies have shown that lysine biosynthesis in S. cerevisiae is regulated not only by Lys14 but also by the master regulator Gcn4 under amino acid starvation conditions (15,21). To determine the contribution of GCN4 in the activation of the lysine biosynthetic pathway in C. albicans, we first constructed a gcn4Δ/Δ null mutant strain. A plate growth assay showed that the gcn4Δ/Δ mutant, as expected from studies in S. cerevisiae (Fig. 5A), was impaired for growth in medium containing sulfometuron methyl, an inhibitor of the ILV2 gene product (Fig. 5A). Remarkably, the C. albicans gcn4Δ/Δ mutant but not the S. cerevisiae gcn4Δ/Δ mutant displayed auxotrophy in lysine-deficient medium that was corrected by lysine supplementation (Fig. 5A). The integration of a cloned C. albicans GCN4 at the native locus completely rescued the growth defect of the gcn4Δ/Δ mutant in medium deficient in Lys or Ile-Val (Fig. 5A). The control transformant bearing the CIp10-LEU2 empty vector, however, failed to rescue the lysine auxotrophy (data not shown). Thus, GCN4 is an essential regulator of lysine biosynthesis in C. albicans.
To assess whether lysine biosynthetic pathway gene expression is dependent on Gcn4, we carried out qRT-PCR analysis to quantify the mRNA levels of LYS4, LYS2, and LYS9 in WT and gcn4Δ/Δ strains. We found statistically significant reductions in the upregulation of LYS2 and LYS9 expression in the gcn4Δ/Δ strain compared to their expression in the WT control both under Lys starvation and Ile-Val starvation conditions (Fig. 5B). The transcriptional activation of LYS4, however, was not impaired by the gcn4Δ/Δ mutation. Reintroduction of a cloned copy of GCN4 into the gcn4Δ/Δ strain also restored the induction of LYS2 mRNA (Fig. 5B). These data showed that Gcn4 is required for induction of the expression of at least two of the key LYS genes. A requirement of Gcn4 for the induction of LYS1 (and LYS2) mRNA under histidine starvation conditions was shown previously, and thus, additional LYS genes are under Gcn4 control (38). Interestingly, our data showing that LYS4 activation is independent of Gcn4 suggest that an additional regulator(s) responds to lysine deprivation to activate its transcription.
To examine the mechanism of LYS biosynthetic gene regulation, we assessed whether Gcn4 is indeed recruited to LYS gene promoters upon amino acid starvation. We constructed a homozygous TAP-tagged GCN4 strain and carried out chromatin immunoprecipitation-qPCR assays. Our data showed that Lys deprivation, as well as Ile-Val starvation, led to dramatic, statistically significant stimulation of Gcn4::TAP occupancy at both the LYS2 and the LYS9 promoter in vivo ( Fig. 6A and B). A ChIP assay carried out using the untagged control strain SN152 did not yield any enrichment, indicating the specificity of the assay. Together, these results established that Gcn4 is an activator of the LYS biosynthetic pathway in C. albicans.
In summary, we have shown that lysine biosynthesis is induced by Gcn4 upon Lys and other amino acid deprivation in C. albicans. Using a wide variety of assays, we have demonstrated that the four paralogous LYS14 gene family members do not directly regulate Lys biosynthesis in C. albicans. Importantly, we have shown that GCN4 is an essential activator of Lys biosynthesis in C. albicans. Because the four CaLYS14-like genes do not complement the Lys auxotrophy of the S. cerevisiae lys14Δ mutant, we hypothesize that the DNA binding regions of the four CaLys14 sequences have diverged far enough that they no longer recognize the S. cerevisiae Lys14 binding sites. Consistent with this view, recent work has demonstrated that, indeed, the four C. albicans Lys14 regulators bind to altered DNA sequences identified by genome-wide chromatin immunoprecipitation with microarray technology (ChIP-chip), as well as by electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs) (36,37). Moreover, the C. albicans LYS biosynthetic gene promoters do not harbor either the S. cerevisiae Lys14 binding sites (see supplemental Figures S6 and S7 at http://www.jnu.ac.in/Faculty/natarajan/ msphere_suppl_info.pdf) or the C. albicans Lys14-binding sites.
The single Lys14 regulator found in Saccharomyces clade genomes has expanded in the Candida clade genomes to about two or three in the haploid Candida genomes and four or five in the diploid species, such as C. albicans (see Candida_Lys14_Orthologs at http: //www.broadinstitute.org/cgi-bin/regev/orthogroups/show_orthogroup.cgi?orfϭorf19 .5548 [24 September 2015, posting date]). Coincident with the expansion of this regulatory protein family, we found that the LYS gene promoters in Candida clade genomes lacked the ScLys14 binding sites (see supplemental Figure S7 at http://www .jnu.ac.in/Faculty/natarajan/msphere_suppl_info.pdf) but retained the binding site(s) for the master regulator Gcn4, indicating that Gcn4 is evolutionarily ubiquitous and a central hub for the transcriptional control of LYS gene transcription. Moreover, C . albicans genomic annotation lacked a sequence ortholog of MKS1 (LYS80), a negative regulator of Lys biosynthesis.
We examined the S. cerevisiae LYS gene promoters (up to Ϫ500 bp from the ATG codon) and found that 7 of the 10 LYS genes contain both ScLys14-and Gcn4-binding sites, whereas LYS12 and LYS5 contain only the Gcn4 site and the LYS9 promoter contains only the ScLys14 binding site (Fig. 7; see also supplemental Figures S6 and S7 at http://www.jnu.ac.in/Faculty/natarajan/msphere_suppl_info.pdf). In striking contrast, all 10 of the LYS genes in C. albicans contain only the Gcn4 site (Fig. 7). Indeed, our ChIP analysis showed the recruitment of Gcn4 but not Lys14 to LYS2 and LYS9 promoters in C. albicans. Together, our results suggest that the transcriptional reconfiguration of the Lys biosynthetic pathway in C. albicans, and likely other Candida clade genomes, has been brought about by multiple evolutionary events, including alteration of regulatorbinding sites in the LYS gene promoters, expansion and neofunctionalization of the LYS14 regulator, and strengthening of the regulatory control by the master regulator Gcn4.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Media and growth conditions. C. albicans and S. cerevisiae strains were cultured in synthetic complete (SC) medium containing 1.5 g/liter Bacto yeast nitrogen base with ammonium sulfate plus added amino acid supplements or in yeast extract-peptone-dextrose (YPD) medium. To impose Ile-Val starvation conditions, cells were cultured at 30°C in SC medium without Leu, Ile, or Val (SCϪLeuϪIleϪVal medium) (for S. cerevisiae) or in SCϪIleϪVal medium (for C. albicans) containing sulfometuron methyl (SM; Chem Service, PA). To impose Lys starvation conditions, cells were cultured in SC medium without lysine (SCϪLys medium) alone or in SCϪLys plus 5-hydroxylysine (DL-5-hydroxylysine hydrochloride, product number H0377; Sigma) (SCϪLysϩHyl medium). Strains, plasmids, and oligonucleotides. All strains, plasmids, and oligonucleotides used are listed in supplemental Tables S1 and S2 at http://www.jnu.ac.in/Faculty/natarajan/msphere_suppl_info.pdf.
Cloning of CaLYS14-like genes in pGAL-HA vector. The pGAL-HA vector was constructed by replacing the Myc epitope tag in pESC-LEU (Agilent) with a SalI-XhoI fragment encoding a triplehemagglutinin (HA) tag (HA 3 ). The coding sequence of each of the four CaLYS14-like ORFs was amplified by PCR from SC5314 genomic DNA using the primer pairs ONC350/ONC351 (LYS141), ONC352/ONC353 (LYS142), ONC354/ONC355 (LYS143), and ONC356/ONC357 (LYS144) and cloned between the SalI and SmaI sites in the pGAL-HA vector, and the inserts were sequenced using primers ONC364/ONC164 and ORF-specific primers ONC362 (CaLYS141), ONC363/ONC364 (CaLYS142), ONC365/ONC366/ONC367 (CaLYS143), and ONC368/ONC369/ONC370 (CaLYS144). DNA sequencing data showed that each of the four CaLYS14-like ORFs in the pGAL-HA constructs contained the correct sequence, bearing one of the two allelic sequences reported in assembly 22. The various C. albicans genome sequence assemblies, viz., assemblies 19, 20, and 22, revealed one or more nucleotide differences between the four LYS14-like ORFs, as well as between two alleles of each ORF. These allelic differences in the genome sequence and those of the cloned LYS14-like genes are shown in supplemental Table S3 at http://www.jnu.ac.in/Faculty/ natarajan/msphere_suppl_info.pdf.
Construction of C. albicans lys14⌬ and gcn4⌬ strains. The plasmid pHAH1 (34), a modified version of the single-transformation gene deletion cassette previously described (39), was used as a template to generate gene-specific disruption cassettes using a split-marker strategy (40). Primers with homology to the gene of interest were used for amplification of the cassette from the pHAH1 plasmid in two fragments, called up-split and down-split fragments, that have~1.0-kb overlapping regions within the ARG4 gene. The two fragments were transformed into C. albicans strain SN152, and Arg-positive (Arg ϩ ) transformants were selected. The correct integration was confirmed by PCR, and recombinants bearing second-allele replacements by the cassette were selected on SC plates without His or Arg, thereby obtaining homozygous deletion mutants with the deletion of each of the candidate CaLYS14 genes or the CaGCN4 gene. The deletions were confirmed by PCR using locus-specific primers, and ORF-specific primers were used as well, to rule out any additional ORF copies.
Cloning of C. albicans GCN4 and construction of CaGCN4 add-back strain. The GCN4 coding sequence, flanked by 760-bp and 400-bp upstream and downstream sequences, respectively, was amplified by PCR from C. albicans SC5314 genomic DNA using Phusion DNA polymerase and primers ONC1011 (bearing a SalI site) and ONC1012. The PCR amplicon was digested with SalI and cloned into the CIp10-LEU2 (41,42) vector that had been digested with ClaI, end filled with Klenow fragment polymerase, and again digested with SalI. The positive clones were verified by BglII digestion. Plasmid pYPC24 was linearized by digestion with PacI and integrated into the GCN4 promoter region in C. albicans strain PC234 (gcn4Δ/Δ) to generate C. albicans strain PC291, and the integration was confirmed by PCR.
Construction of C. albicans strains bearing a C-terminal TAP tag. We used a PCR-based one-step procedure to introduce the TAP epitope tag at the 3= end of each ORF. Amplicons were generated from plasmid Ip21 (42) as the template, using Phusion polymerase (Fermentas) and the following primer pairs: ONC565/ONC566 (LYS141), ONC561/ONC562 (LYS142), ONC563/ONC564 (LYS143), ONC567/ONC568 (LYS144), and ONC634/ONC635 (GCN4). The GCN4::TAP-LEU2 amplicon and each of the four LYS14::TAP-LEU2 amplicons were transformed into the wild-type parental strain SN152 or the heterozygous LYS14/ lys14Δ mutant strain, respectively, and selected for Leu-positive (Leu ϩ ) transformants. Correct integrations were confirmed by PCR using primer ONC109, a LEU2-TAP cassette-specific primer, and one of the following internal primers: ONC362 (LYS141), ONC363 (LYS142), ONC366 (LYS143), ONC369 (LYS141), or ONC47 (GCN4). To introduce the TAP tag at the second GCN4 allele, a HIS1-TAP cassette in Ip22 (41) was used as the template, and the amplicon was transformed into strain PC222 and selected on SDϩArg. The correct integration was verified by diagnostic PCR using primers ONC110 (HIS1-TAP cassette-specific primer) and ONC47. The absence of any untagged copies of the LYS14 ORFs or the GCN4 ORF in the strains was also verified.
RNA extraction and qRT-PCR analysis. C. albicans strain RPC206 or the various mutant strains were precultured overnight in SC medium and diluted into SC medium, SCϪLys medium, or SCϪLysϪHyl medium (0.1 mM Hyl) and grown to an optical density at 600 nm (OD 600 ) of~2.0 at 30°C. Alternately, the precultures in SCϪIleϪVal were diluted into fresh SCϪIleϪVal and grown to an OD 600 of~0.5, and then one half of each culture was treated for 2 h with 0.5 g/ml SM and the other left untreated. Cells equivalent to~10 OD were harvested rapidly by filtration and snap frozen in liquid nitrogen vapor. Total RNA was isolated using the hot phenol method (43) as described previously (41), and the concentration was determined using a NanoDrop spectrophotometer.
For all RT-PCR experiments, total RNA was treated with RNase-free DNase I (Invitrogen) and used for single-stranded cDNA synthesis using a high-capacity cDNA reverse transcription kit (Invitrogen). Realtime qRT-PCR was carried out in the Applied Biosystems 7500 real-time PCR system using SYBR green PCR master mix (Applied Biosystems). The comparative cycle threshold (C T ) method (2 ϪΔΔCT ) was used to determine the relative gene expression levels (44). SCR1 RNA, an RNA polymerase III transcript (45), was used as an endogenous control. Control reactions without reverse transcriptase were carried out for each cDNA preparation to ascertain that no amplification would occur, as judged by high C T values (Ͼ35) and gel analysis.
Chromatin immunoprecipitation. C. albicans strains PC205 (LYS141::TAP), PC206 (LYS142::TAP), PC209 (LYS143::TAP), and PC212 (LYS144::TAP) and the control untagged SN152 strain were grown in SCϩLys medium or SCϪLysϩHyl medium (0.1 mM Hyl) and cross-linked with formaldehyde, and sonicated chromatin extracts were prepared. C. albicans strain PC227 (CaGCN4::TAP) or the untagged control strain SN152 was cultured in SCϩLys medium, SCϪLys medium, or SCϪIleϪVal medium with or without SM and cross-linked with formaldehyde, and sonicated chromatin extracts were prepared. Formaldehyde (1%, vol/vol) was added to the cultures and cross-linked for 20 min at 30°C, and cells were treated to induce spheroplasts in a buffer containing 1 M sorbitol, 50 mM Tris-Cl (pH 7.4), 10 mM ␤-mercaptoethanol, and 0.03 mg/ml zymolyase (MP Biomedicals). Spheroplasts were resuspended in 50 mM HEPES-KOH (pH 7.5), 140 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100, 0.1% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS plus protease inhibitors (1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride [PMSF] and 1 mg/ml each of leupeptin, aprotinin, and pepstatin) and sheared by sonication using a Bioruptor (Diagenode model UCD 300) at high power for 30 cycles (30 s on and 30 s off). The average chromatin size obtained was~250 bp. About 25 l of preblocked IgG-Sepharose (GE Healthcare) was used for immunoprecipitation from sheared chromatin extract prepared from cells collected from~20 OD 600 culture, and the ChIP assay was carried out essentially as described previously (41,46). The cross-links in the whole-cell chromatin extracts (input) and the IP eluate were reversed and DNA purified, and enrichment determined by qPCR. ChIP-qPCR data analysis (44) and calculation of the enrichment were performed as described previously (41).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank K. Ganesan, Suzanne Noble, Alexander Johnson, and Joachim Morschhauser for plasmids and strains. We thank Sonal Sawhney for the pGAL-HA plasmid, Swaranlata for microarray data meta-analysis, and members of the Natarajan laboratory for helpful discussions and comments on the manuscript.
This work was partially supported by a grant from the Department of Biotechnology and through the DST-PURSE and UPOE programs. Y.P. was supported by junior and senior research fellowships from the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, New Delhi.

FUNDING INFORMATION
Jawaharlal Nehru University through the DST-PURSE and UPOE2 programs provided funding to Krishnamurthy Natarajan. Department of Biotechnology , Ministry of Science and Technology (DBT) provided funding to Krishnamurthy Natarajan.